Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 108 109 110 111 112 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V47!, The Orange Legion

views
     
yuhi
post Nov 8 2010, 09:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
194 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Koala-land!

QUOTE(destfull @ Nov 8 2010, 10:33 PM)
ieR : is that a real woman? Her face looks like a man tho =P
*
I agree, such an insult! shakehead.gif

p.s. noob question: I see a lot of people prefer to use 70-200mm to take portraiture, why is that? Why don't they use lenses shorter focal lengths like 24-70mm? Does standing closer to the model will make the model uneasy?
evilhomura89
post Nov 8 2010, 10:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,886 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BM


QUOTE(yuhi @ Nov 8 2010, 09:51 PM)
I agree, such an insult!  shakehead.gif

p.s. noob question: I see a lot of people prefer to use 70-200mm to take portraiture, why is that? Why don't they use lenses shorter focal lengths like 24-70mm? Does standing closer to the model will make the model uneasy?
*
i guess at longer focal range, the DOF appeared shallower without the need of wide aperture???

QUOTE
Note that I did not mention focal length as influencing depth of field.  Even though telephoto lenses appear to create a much shallower depth of field, this is mainly because they are often used to make the subject appear bigger when one is unable to get closer.  If the subject occupies the same fraction of the image (constant magnification) for both a telephoto and a wide angle lens, the total depth of field is virtually* constant with focal length!

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials...th-of-field.htm

This post has been edited by evilhomura89: Nov 8 2010, 10:05 PM
destfull
post Nov 8 2010, 10:07 PM

Brain for Creativity
******
Senior Member
1,063 posts

Joined: Jul 2005



QUOTE(yuhi @ Nov 8 2010, 09:51 PM)
I agree, such an insult!  shakehead.gif

p.s. noob question: I see a lot of people prefer to use 70-200mm to take portraiture, why is that? Why don't they use lenses shorter focal lengths like 24-70mm? Does standing closer to the model will make the model uneasy?
*
Sorry for those who have been hurt.. sweat.gif

Too many fake woman nowadays doh.gif
jerrylyh
post Nov 8 2010, 10:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
178 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(destfull @ Nov 8 2010, 10:07 PM)
Sorry for those who have been hurt..  sweat.gif

Too many fake woman nowadays  doh.gif
*

+1 doh.gif sweat.gif
evilhomura89
post Nov 8 2010, 10:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,886 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: BM


QUOTE(evilhomura89 @ Nov 8 2010, 10:03 PM)
i guess at longer focal range, the DOF appeared shallower without the need of wide aperture???
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials...th-of-field.htm
*
OK, the effect of focal length on shallower "DOF" has been confirmed - http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dof2.shtml
the DOF does not change but by using longer focal length, it will appear shallower with more bokeh in it
ieR
post Nov 8 2010, 11:27 PM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
destfull: hahaha no worries, i believe people see that too, because the lady, is not super leng like KL model ma... she is mix local sarawak ethnic.

why 70200, few thing i learned...

longer focal length affect the bokeh, its more softer with long zoom then short focal pushing F1.4 to bring out the bokeh.
longer focal length do not need extreme wide aperture to bring bokeh, due to, when zoomed, the BG is magnified vs subject, hence a small round bokeh actually appear bigger in 200mm F2.8 then in 50 F1.4.

and YES, longer focal makes DOF shallow. so will subject distance.
zstan
post Nov 9 2010, 12:07 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



pic spam. no money buy 70-200. so only got 55-200. biggrin.gif

1
user posted image

2
user posted image

3
user posted image

4
user posted image

5
user posted image

6
user posted image

7
user posted image




eddybeh
post Nov 9 2010, 12:13 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
830 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
ieR: agree agree.... i oso dreaming 70-200 if wanna get a tele. XP
clivengu
post Nov 9 2010, 04:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,850 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


QUOTE(shukrie @ Nov 8 2010, 03:51 PM)
nubie mo add photo too wink.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I love your macro photos thumbup.gif .. very clean background. i like i like!
yuhi
post Nov 9 2010, 08:47 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
194 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Koala-land!

QUOTE(ieR @ Nov 9 2010, 12:57 AM)
destfull: hahaha no worries, i believe people see that too, because the lady, is not super leng like KL model ma... she is mix local sarawak ethnic.

why 70200, few thing i learned...

longer focal length affect the bokeh, its more softer with long zoom then short focal pushing F1.4 to bring out the bokeh.
longer focal length do not need extreme wide aperture to bring bokeh, due to, when zoomed, the BG is magnified vs subject, hence a small round bokeh actually appear bigger in 200mm F2.8 then in 50 F1.4.

and YES, longer focal makes DOF shallow. so will subject distance.
*
Ohh, I understand now. Thanks for explaining nod.gif
applemango
post Nov 9 2010, 01:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: shah alam - subang jaya



QUOTE(fansoption @ Nov 8 2010, 09:41 PM)
Pic Spam :

Carbon Fiber

#1
user posted image

#2
user posted image
*
wow very sharp....
can borrow the lens hehehehe...


Added on November 9, 2010, 1:56 pm
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 12:07 AM)
pic spam. no money buy 70-200. so only got 55-200.  biggrin.gif

1
user posted image

2
user posted image

3
user posted image

4
user posted image

5
user posted image

6
user posted image

7
user posted image
*
like for picture 4 & 7....


This post has been edited by applemango: Nov 9 2010, 01:56 PM
fansoption
post Nov 9 2010, 01:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,065 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(applemango @ Nov 9 2010, 01:55 PM)
wow very sharp....
can borrow the lens hehehehe...


Added on November 9, 2010, 1:56 pm
like for picture 4 & 7....
*
boleh come!
applemango
post Nov 9 2010, 02:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: shah alam - subang jaya



QUOTE(fansoption @ Nov 9 2010, 01:58 PM)
boleh come!
*
what lens u use...
50 mm... huhuhu...
ahpingko
post Nov 9 2010, 02:07 PM

Live.Ride.Run
*******
Senior Member
2,816 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(applemango @ Nov 9 2010, 02:00 PM)
what lens u use...
50 mm... huhuhu...
*
wa...i oso use 50mm can get sharp nice pic..hehe... biggrin.gif

50mm F1.8 is cheap yet nice! drool.gif
applemango
post Nov 9 2010, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: shah alam - subang jaya



QUOTE(ahpingko @ Nov 9 2010, 02:07 PM)
wa...i oso use 50mm can get sharp nice pic..hehe... biggrin.gif

50mm F1.8 is cheap yet nice! drool.gif
*
just joke... but i like your picture...
seem like real...

zstan
post Nov 9 2010, 02:18 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(applemango @ Nov 9 2010, 01:55 PM)
wow very sharp....
can borrow the lens hehehehe...


Added on November 9, 2010, 1:56 pm
like for picture 4 & 7....
*
thanks. biggrin.gif try to spoiler the pics ya?
applemango
post Nov 9 2010, 02:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: shah alam - subang jaya



QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 9 2010, 02:18 PM)
thanks.  biggrin.gif  try to spoiler the pics ya?
*
nope la... just like it...
mabye one day i can capture picture like that...

perhaps.. hehehehe
Zicron
post Nov 9 2010, 02:27 PM

Come to the Dark Side
*****
Senior Member
899 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Klang


Hi people, please SPOILER the pics before reply.
applemango
post Nov 9 2010, 02:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: shah alam - subang jaya



want to ask... any bttery grip can mount with sony a230...
lwliam
post Nov 9 2010, 02:29 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(Zicron @ Nov 9 2010, 02:27 PM)
Hi people, please SPOILER the pics before reply.
*
+111

goshhh, its been quite some time.... MEGA busy.. @_@ can faint...

125 Pages « < 108 109 110 111 112 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0296sec    0.51    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 06:44 PM