Hi there guys,

You guys getting below 70C for stock cooler? Issit the same silver base cooler or those older copper bottom stock cooler?
Even at stock speed, my E8500 has 57~58 idling temp and full load temp at 82C. This is with stock intel cooler with silver bottom.
I went to buy those older Coolermaster cooler with copper bottom today. Installed already, idling temp still 52C and full load temp is 74C.
If I overclock it to 400FSB @ 3.8GHz, idling at 55~57C and full load @ 79C.

I wonder what did you guys do because your temp seem so far away from mine. Mine is E8500 C0.
Will try 4GHz later...

This is due to the faulty sensor of wolfdale C0 which is well known

Sure?
From what I search, only found some processor has stucked temp.
Where can I find more info on this?

erm whats the different of E0 and C0 stepping? i wanna hunt down C0 E8200 today -___-"

E0 overclock better as it runs cooler.
It doesnt matter for me as I dont overclock like crazy...

Any E8xxx should be able to reach 3.8GHz easily without changing Vcore. Mine does 3.8GHz with a flip of the FSB to 400. Just change the stock heatsink to those old type P4 cooler and full load at 79C.

i heard E0 is good for overclocking ability but in game performance, the C0 owning E0..i wanna buy 1333Mhz FSB for overclocking only -___-" but right now i got rm1000 for MSI P45 Neo2-FR and proc..proc i think i will find E8200 OEM/used because i bugdet rm350 only..then another rm150 wanna buy ram 2GB for my bro pc -___-" haih..cost matter now..

Then go for the OEM lar >.<

erm....not really, most e8600 E0 manyak hot

and some bad chip e8400 hardly does 3.4ghz stable with stock vcore......

no such thing bro...dont worry

This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Nov 30 2008, 05:57 PM

dont think any e8xxx can do 3.8ghz at stock vcore, especially e8200 and some bad batch e8400..

---

Added on November 30, 2008, 8:03 pmC0 and E0 is same in term of performance

This post has been edited by hengmy: Nov 30 2008, 08:03 PM

Hello,dumb ass
Where do you read such a difference and can you prove it?

Dont be surprised... some NBTD fella in ocforum did that.

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?p=5768454

BUT IF YOU LOOK HERE, totally opposite result...

http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=6
http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=7


Conclusion = did it even bother you for a second?

He means e8600@4.42GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable slower than e8500@4.02GHZ@1.36 Dual Prime95 Stable?

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Dec 1 2008, 08:52 AM

- Deleted -

This post has been edited by ericmaxman: Dec 1 2008, 09:32 AM

No... that fella lower the multiplier of 8600 to 9.5 to make both of it clock the same which is 9.5x. So the speed is same but result is different.

I can only say E8600 is made to run 10.0x

hi guy i dunno this is the right thread to ask o not

which 1 is better in gaming
P E5200 vs AMD 5600+ x2

Intel PDC E5200 would be a better choice.

just burn in this processor, 1st time play with quad
vtt more than 1.4 really will kill the processor?


Attached thumbnail(s)

Now seldom see people enthusiast to uplaod new o'c records
unlike last time all wanna get faster speed and post here haha.. miss those old days .

This post has been edited by yehlai: Dec 2 2008, 05:03 PM

maybe TS can update the results in the first page more frequently to encourage people to challenge and post more results