Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4, The journey continues...

views
     
andrekua
post Nov 29 2008, 06:07 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(LittleCordines @ Nov 23 2008, 05:11 PM)
idle 45 load never stress it, juz for gaming. 61 when gaming, reported by latest Everest. but from my review, they said E8400 10C cool from the reading show, mean idle should be 35?? not sure bout this. correct me if i'm wrong
*
QUOTE(hengmy @ Nov 27 2008, 04:19 PM)
quick oc on a retail e8400 E0 smile.gif
got a strange problem, the temp is very high even at low vcore, when ibt, core temp show below 70c, while the mobo cpu temp can goes up to 85c
anyone know what wrong with it? rclxub.gif

*
Hi there guys,

You guys getting below 70C for stock cooler? Issit the same silver base cooler or those older copper bottom stock cooler?
Even at stock speed, my E8500 has 57~58 idling temp and full load temp at 82C. This is with stock intel cooler with silver bottom.
I went to buy those older Coolermaster cooler with copper bottom today. Installed already, idling temp still 52C and full load temp is 74C.
If I overclock it to 400FSB @ 3.8GHz, idling at 55~57C and full load @ 79C.

I wonder what did you guys do because your temp seem so far away from mine. Mine is E8500 C0.
Will try 4GHz later...
andrekua
post Nov 30 2008, 08:55 AM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Nov 29 2008, 11:19 PM)
This is due to the faulty sensor of wolfdale C0 which is well known
*
Sure?
From what I search, only found some processor has stucked temp.
Where can I find more info on this?
andrekua
post Nov 30 2008, 10:50 AM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


E0 overclock better as it runs cooler.
It doesnt matter for me as I dont overclock like crazy...

Any E8xxx should be able to reach 3.8GHz easily without changing Vcore. Mine does 3.8GHz with a flip of the FSB to 400. Just change the stock heatsink to those old type P4 cooler and full load at 79C.
andrekua
post Dec 1 2008, 07:44 AM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Dec 1 2008, 12:00 AM)
Hello,dumb ass laugh.gif
Where do you read such a difference and can you prove it? tongue.gif
*
Dont be surprised... some NBTD fella in ocforum did that.

http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?p=5768454

BUT IF YOU LOOK HERE, totally opposite result...

http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=6
http://www.xcpus.com/GetDoc.aspx?doc=49&page=7


Conclusion = did it even bother you for a second?
andrekua
post Dec 3 2008, 10:23 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


I think most E0 will have an easier time to surpass 4GHz compared to C0.

My E8500 C0 will do 3.8GHz on stock Vcore stable but wouldnt even bother to post when I overclock to 4GHz. Set the Vcore to +5% then +10% and lastly to +15%, but all also cant boot. Nvm la... maybe thats the result of using cheap board (Biostar G31-M7 TE) and cheapo HSF (Cooler Master old fashion P4 cooler).
andrekua
post Dec 29 2008, 10:03 AM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Silverfire @ Dec 23 2008, 07:36 AM)
I don't think G31 motherboards allow OC?
*
Can. My E8500 runs at 400MHz FSB for a total 3.8GHz on stock Vcore. However, it seem like >400MHz is impossible. Wont boot at all regardless of the Vcore I set.
andrekua
post Jan 10 2009, 02:41 PM

NO!!! IT'S HIM!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,887 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


Check your heatsink. See if you got it seated properly. Pushpin design really is a nightmare.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0215sec    0.78    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 03:03 PM