Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
130 Pages « < 100 101 102 103 104 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool Football Club- The Kop Talks 2010, Do Your Part, Save The Club!

views
     
kenlimfornication
post Sep 20 2010, 04:51 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hm, I wouldn't rant about how RH positioned the team yesterday.

Started 4-2-3-1. Conceded 2 goals, no change, but there's still time. Luck was on our side for that few minutes and we converted both dead ball.

At 2-2, RH not only maintained the formation, removed lesser productive Maxi with Ngog and from there we were 4-4-2. He was definitely going for a win. Next, he replaced Meireles with Jovanovich which I believe was because of Jova's pace and strength to hit on the counter.

Anyone disagree with me he was going for the win? Very unfortunate, Berbatov converted another chance.

On another note, a change of manager means new players. Yesterday we had 4 new players(Cole, Meireles, Konchesky & Poulsen) on starting line-up. We've gone lesser than 10 competitive games if I'm not mistaken. Without Kuyt, I think we would need a little more time to gel and play as a unit. How much time? No one can tell.

We had the fighting spirit yesterday. We didn't just die. We attacked and gained the penalty and freekick. My opinion, defence was very unusual but we tried to fought back and got that 2 goals.
cheez
post Sep 20 2010, 05:04 PM

On my way to? -> Holland?
****
Senior Member
593 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Merseyside


QUOTE(kenlimfornication @ Sep 20 2010, 04:51 PM)
Hm, I wouldn't rant about how RH positioned the team yesterday.

Started 4-2-3-1. Conceded 2 goals, no change, but there's still time. Luck was on our side for that few minutes and we converted both dead ball.

At 2-2, RH not only maintained the formation, removed lesser productive Maxi with Ngog and from there we were 4-4-2. He was definitely going for a win. Next, he replaced Meireles with Jovanovich which I believe was because of Jova's pace and strength to hit on the counter.

Anyone disagree with me he was going for the win? Very unfortunate, Berbatov converted another chance.

On another note, a change of manager means new players. Yesterday we had 4 new players(Cole, Meireles, Konchesky & Poulsen) on starting line-up. We've gone lesser than 10 competitive games if I'm not mistaken. Without Kuyt, I think we would need a little more time to gel and play as a unit. How much time? No one can tell.

We had the fighting spirit yesterday. We didn't just die. We attacked and gained the penalty and freekick. My opinion, defence was very unusual but we tried to fought back and got that 2 goals.
*
It was AFTER NGOG that Liverpool leveled.
We scored with a formation of 4-4-2. nod.gif
cherroy
post Sep 20 2010, 05:38 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


The only player seem to be on form at the moment is Ngog.


ayanami_tard
post Sep 20 2010, 05:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
and cole,though he is nonexistent yesterday

and gerard

and pepe
TSsolstice818
post Sep 20 2010, 05:54 PM

You'll Never Walk Alone
*******
Senior Member
4,503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: The Far Away Venus Status: Being Insua-fied


LOL... now Hodgson vs Fergie?

http://www.teamtalk.com/liverpool/6388320/...strophe-Hodgson

Gotta salute Rafa for daring to go against that old uncle.
mamet
post Sep 20 2010, 05:54 PM

1/3 Sone
****
Senior Member
592 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Anson

liverpool shud play with 2 strikers from now on ...
play diamond on midfield ..
a pacheco really deserves a chance to play ..
bomberkenny
post Sep 20 2010, 06:16 PM

Gun Down your MOM!
******
Senior Member
1,617 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


pacheco should be given first team opportunities, especially when we need more flair in the attacking department.
air_mood
post Sep 20 2010, 06:21 PM

Randy Marsh, Guitar Queer-O
*******
Senior Member
4,150 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Sep 20 2010, 10:22 AM)
Good having you there buddy. As much as you think it's the organisers that make an event a success, the fans play a more important role. It's like I said last night, it's only half time. They still have to come to Anfield. I'm not sure if it's a good or bad thing but we're a different proposition at home.

I've got a sore jaw man. When we scored our 2nd, some over exhuberant bloke grabbed my face with his arm and darn well nearly dislocated my jaw smile.gif
You're like an energizer bunny dude smile.gif Keep your enthusiasm but it's like I said lah, we need to be realistic as well. Your prediction of a win over the mancs didn't come true unfortunately. In fact, we are getting worse. I don't remember playing this bad at Old Toilet is a long time. The only time Van Der Sar had anything to do was when he picked the ball from the back of the net. We only scored because the mancs gave away some silly fouls. Having said that, I don't know how O'Shea managed to stay on the pitch. Some 4 seasons ago, Hyypia was sent off in the 4th minute for a similar offence, and this was out wide. O'Shea's foul was clear and it was in a central, more threatening position. That aside, we offered nothing as an attacking force and I can now understand why Hodgson's Fulham were abysmal away.

In one of my moans last week, I brought up the issue of how fragile we look in the air and Berbatov exposed it like a sore thumb last night. It was as though our players were 5' nothing. Torres was too busy humping Berbatov and Carragher had lead in his boots.

Here's another moan. Maxi was invisible last night. Also, I think we should have brought on Babel when play opened up late in the game.

Que Sera Sera.
*
Hyppia's foul on Ruud was central and in the box Duke, it resulted in a peno. And it was not 4 seasons ago, it was 2003.

The only defense I can think of on why O'Shea wasn't sent off because it was probably not a clear goalscoring opportunity seeing that VDS would have gotten there first anyways??
Belphegor
post Sep 20 2010, 06:43 PM

Dreamer
*******
Senior Member
5,806 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: PJ | Tokyo


Just one fella should begone: Tom Hicks. Unsettle players, making them doubt their future in the club. Man I was hoping you guys can snatch some point from them. But meh. sad.gif
Mikeshashimi
post Sep 20 2010, 06:48 PM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Sep 20 2010, 05:52 PM)
and cole,though he is nonexistent yesterday

and gerard

and pepe
*
you sure about that?


i felt pepe did poorly for the man u game.. could have been better... he had no reaction to the 2nd and 3rd goal (yes i know that they were traveling at fast speed) but i felt he could have done abit better.

we should have started with 4-4-2... torres cant play alone up front...and we all know gerrard is better suited at cm/am/ss...maxi didnt help us either... it was only when Ngog came on that we became 4-4-2 and allowed torres to make more run-ins.
kenlimfornication
post Sep 20 2010, 06:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
729 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(cheez @ Sep 20 2010, 05:04 PM)
It was AFTER NGOG that Liverpool leveled.
We scored with a formation of 4-4-2. nod.gif
*
Sorry, my bad. So he did make a change to chase for a draw.
Duke Red
post Sep 20 2010, 07:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(air_mood @ Sep 20 2010, 06:21 PM)
Hyppia's foul on Ruud was central and in the box Duke, it resulted in a peno. And it was not 4 seasons ago, it was 2003.

The only defense I can think of on why O'Shea wasn't sent off because it was probably not a clear goalscoring opportunity seeing that VDS would have gotten there first anyways??
There you go. I stand corrected.

On the O'Shea incident, it was one of those which could have resulted in a sending off in another time, another place.
pyroboy1911
post Sep 20 2010, 07:13 PM

A Great Achievement
*****
Senior Member
950 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
I still can't really comprehend the red card appeal, Torres was nowhere near the ball and was only running towards it (not even with the ball towards the goal), so it is not a foul of preventing a goal scoring opportunity..or maybe i'm just not clear with the rule. It does seem like a last man foul, but the fact that he is not even targetting the goal makes the "goal-scoring opportunity" part invalid and thus not a red card? hmm.gif
tiSSue_paPer
post Sep 20 2010, 07:16 PM

milo ais KAW..!
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(pyroboy1911 @ Sep 20 2010, 07:13 PM)
I still can't really comprehend the red card appeal, Torres was nowhere near the ball and was only running towards it (not even with the ball towards the goal), so it is not a foul of preventing a goal scoring opportunity..or maybe i'm just not clear with the rule. It does seem like a last man foul, but the fact that he is not even targetting the goal makes the "goal-scoring opportunity" part invalid and thus not a red card?  hmm.gif
*
u are referering to the foul lead to a penalty...?

last man fouls is lead to free kick and yellow card.. biggrin.gif
whoopa
post Sep 20 2010, 07:22 PM

b~o~b~o
*******
Senior Member
7,126 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: in ur base killin your d00dz



QUOTE(pyroboy1911 @ Sep 20 2010, 07:13 PM)
I still can't really comprehend the red card appeal, Torres was nowhere near the ball and was only running towards it (not even with the ball towards the goal), so it is not a foul of preventing a goal scoring opportunity..or maybe i'm just not clear with the rule. It does seem like a last man foul, but the fact that he is not even targetting the goal makes the "goal-scoring opportunity" part invalid and thus not a red card?  hmm.gif
*
the rule is that last man tackling a player = red card. it appears that oshea is the last defender by using the same outside rule where oshea is in front of vidic or evans. oshea was given a yellow to my opinion was either he thought he is not the last man? or that no way torres could have gotten the ball. but whatever the ifs are gerrard scored the fk.
pyroboy1911
post Sep 20 2010, 07:24 PM

A Great Achievement
*****
Senior Member
950 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(tiSSue_paPer @ Sep 20 2010, 07:16 PM)
u are referering to the foul lead to a penalty...?

last man fouls is lead to free kick and yellow card..  biggrin.gif
*
no the one by Oshea on Torres. Evan's foul is a yellow card and penalty, no questions asked laugh.gif


Added on September 20, 2010, 7:30 pm
QUOTE(whoopa @ Sep 20 2010, 07:22 PM)
the rule is that last man tackling a player = red card. it appears that oshea is the last defender by using the same outside rule where oshea is in front of vidic or evans. oshea was given a yellow to my opinion was either he thought he is not the last man? or that no way torres could have gotten the ball. but whatever the ifs are gerrard scored the fk.
*
ah ok. i tot that rule have to come hand by hand, like the rule of handball and the term "intentional" etc.

This post has been edited by pyroboy1911: Sep 20 2010, 07:30 PM
all blacks
post Sep 20 2010, 07:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
565 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Damansara



QUOTE(pyroboy1911 @ Sep 20 2010, 07:24 PM)
no the one by Oshea on Torres. Evan's foul is a yellow card and penalty, no questions asked laugh.gif


Added on September 20, 2010, 7:30 pm

ah ok. i tot that rule have to come hand by hand, like the rule of handball and the term "intentional" etc.
*
It's a last man tackle, so usually u get a red especially when u bring down a man wic has a goal scoring opportunity (No matter with or without the ball)..

In my opinion the Ref got it right, it was last man tackle but the ball was too far and Van Der Sa would have got to the ball first.. So nothing to complaint about as we should be more happier because we managed to score through the free kick and I doubt Torres could has scored even if was given the chance as Van Der Sa would have been diving towards the ball and made it almost impossible for Torres to shoot...
digilife
post Sep 20 2010, 07:57 PM

The MNP guy, its me yeah.
*******
Senior Member
8,025 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Planet Boleland


lets move on......

we will surely find our footing in the next few games ahead

i guess, we should not hav played those players tat played in the Europa match as they are really tired, Konchesky and Miereles , Reina too looked tired and unfocus doh.gif

and Poulsen, he will surely match well wif our MF later on icon_idea.gif

RH, i still hav faith wif you thumbup.gif
sivapc
post Sep 20 2010, 08:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
Anyone read Agger's interview to some Danish press?


leaF
post Sep 20 2010, 08:34 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
517 posts

Joined: Jan 2008



QUOTE(Duke Red @ Sep 20 2010, 10:22 AM)
Good having you there buddy. As much as you think it's the organisers that make an event a success, the fans play a more important role. It's like I said last night, it's only half time. They still have to come to Anfield. I'm not sure if it's a good or bad thing but we're a different proposition at home.
*
nice see u there too , I guess you are the one wearing shankly shirt white colour? I saw u last time in Breakers and for sure I will keep following the next gathering if possible ,love the YNWA at the end =)


QUOTE(solstice818 @ Sep 20 2010, 02:54 PM)
Surprisingly, he can still lunge in on Konchesky...Thought, that would at least break his tissue-paper-made legs into pieces.
*
Agger should have smack him last night that c.ronaldo wannabe

QUOTE(sivapc @ Sep 20 2010, 08:26 PM)
Anyone read Agger's interview to some Danish press?
*
mind to share the link ? Nowadays less player from Liverpool come out and voice their opinion


130 Pages « < 100 101 102 103 104 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0313sec    1.26    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 07:30 AM