moo and sig how much selling ur f2.8 tele lens??

cant manage to open the link la, on FB mobile, it keeps linking me back to FB main page.

---

Added on August 5, 2010, 5:27 pmshootkk, hehe, i dun hv that lens, but used one before.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Aug 5 2010, 05:27 PM

ah-ha! but then the 200mm sounds like good enough for me, could save some bucks


hm lets juz set aside the factor of budget 1st, wanna know more on any pros n cons for that 2 options against each other.

ninja, see if u can send me an invitation to the event. Cant see it in my event list.

Chrisky : Truth is, there's not much difference between your 2 choices. One you need to swap lens. The other you don't need to.

If convenience is important to you then go for the all-in-one. One thing that you might want to consider is that people tend to use only the ends of a zoom lens rather than all the focal ranges. E.g. if you have an 18-200mm zoom, you will probably be using the 18mm to about 28mm and the 200mm focal lengths most of the time. Most other focal lenghts are seldom/rarely used. So the real question is 'Do you really NEED telephoto?'

im not sure la... but 55200 is a good lens IMO... i havent tried the 18250.. but people tend to favor the 16105 more over the 18250.. so my suggestion would be sell the 1855.. buy 16105... and buy beercan (70-210).. haha... nice set...

done sending the invitation to u bro...

what i know is, superzoom like 18-200, 18-250 or even 18-270, is categorise as all-in-one/travel lens
hence, the outcome not always the best, because optical degrade at tele-end, mean not sharp.. but it's convenient, as you no need to change the lens often. (but then, don't we buy slr because of the interchangeable lens? if your answer is no, then this type of lens i think suit you the most)

and i agree with shootkk that think, is NEED or WANT

good suggestion!

well i do travel and snap pic a lot on the road so there's many times i could use some extra zoom, which my 18-55 juz clearly doesnt cut it. so yeah i guess thats pretty much a 'need' for me.

n of coz the idea of juz bring along 1 lens and avoid the need of changing lens under some goddamn hot sun is really appealing to me.

a tele lens is said to be less good than a prime because the person who does the calculations, the designs and all need to consider the quality/performance of the lens at all focal length. also not to forget to consider the CA, distortions, coatings, and all. unlike the primes, the person who designs its optics only have to worry about one focal length. Thus to maximize the optics, minimize distortion and all is easier than tele lenses.

erm i read the description stated on this page but i dont understand...
care to explain http://shashinki.com/shop/samyang-mount-ad...pha-p-6040.html

---

Added on August 5, 2010, 6:25 pmif u need just buy lerr
sell me the sal1855 cheap2... (my friend cari 'kitties' , prefer the 1855, anyways pm me )

This post has been edited by mastering89: Aug 5 2010, 06:25 PM

man, i feel so regret not bringing my camera here

Off topic : I am staying at Marriott Hotel in Putrajaya
First time staying in 5 star hotel

lol can snap² ler.. why not bring..

u stay in 5-star hotel must bring one la...

guys, anyone kena "Your Product has been registered" message while trying to register your new product online?
i don't think this means my registration is successful, cos it didn't show up on my product list

this was the shot using D3s + 400mm f/2.8


bokeh + range + sharpness = GG

sorry post sini aa...

This post has been edited by mastering89: Aug 5 2010, 07:23 PM

eh, anyone here with the tammy 1750 experience some vignetting when shooting at 17mm?

yes.

on some occasions there were some wild vignetting.

what's that wild vignetting?

mastering, price for the lens is GGG.. can buy 2 cars for it d..