QUOTE(soulfly @ Jan 11 2006, 01:54 PM)

Thanks soulfly, problem solved using the latest CPU-Z(1.31). My S-754 Athlon64 using Venice core. Is 90nm = 0.09?
AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..
|
|
Jan 11 2006, 08:17 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
20 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
here i am again, now with 1:1 htt ratio
![]() |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 12:45 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(mansrx @ Jan 11 2006, 08:17 PM) Thanks soulfly, problem solved using the latest CPU-Z(1.31). My S-754 Athlon64 using Venice core. Is 90nm = 0.09? Yup...90nm = 0.09m 130nm = 0.13m |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 04:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 06:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 08:21 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
Not bad I should say, but it's a waste to run TCCD 3-4-4-8 at only 280mhz
maybe you could tighten up the timings, 280mhz 2.5-3-3-7 sounds better. TCCDs can do that quite easy I should say. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 09:33 PM
|
|
Elite
4,424 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 10:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jan 12 2006, 08:21 PM) Not bad I should say, but it's a waste to run TCCD 3-4-4-8 at only 280mhz yeah im agree.. jus wan to check the procs limitation up there.. here is what that tccd can do so far..maybe you could tighten up the timings, 280mhz 2.5-3-3-7 sounds better. TCCDs can do that quite easy I should say. ![]() |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 11:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 11:53 PM
|
|
Elite
4,424 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore |
oh, my assumptions failed me again
|
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 08:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,224 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: B.B.Bangi |
The metre may be used with some SI prefixes.
Multiple Name Symbol 10exp-1 decimetre dm 10exp-2 centimetre cm 10exp-3 millimetre mm 10exp-6 micrometre µm 10exp-9 nanometre nm 10exp-12 picometre pm 10exp-15 femtometre fm 10exp-18 attometre am Or wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SI_prefix New results are not that great considering that my winchester does 2.62 prime stable on air in which I believe if watercooled there is some more potential around the corner. Btw, hey, where are those opty results? newbieockids, your TCCD is doing great. Gskill? |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 10:50 AM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
micron should be µ actually ..... 90nµ or 0.09µ
|
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 10:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,672 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 11:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,544 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: United States of Cybertron |
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jan 13 2006, 10:50 AM) micron should be µ actually ..... 90nµ or 0.09µ µm = Micrometer = Microncorrect me if i'm wrong |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 12:21 PM
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
yes....i'm wrong
damn.... how come didn't realize that i type nµ... memalukan diri sendiri |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 04:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Jan 13 2006, 08:52 AM) New results are not that great considering that my winchester does 2.62 prime stable on air in which I believe if watercooled there is some more potential around the corner. Btw, hey, where are those opty results? yeah PCcrazy it is Gskill.. u got a very good instinct.. newbieockids, your TCCD is doing great. Gskill? |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 07:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
QUOTE(newbieockids @ Jan 13 2006, 04:46 PM) yeah PCcrazy it is Gskill.. u got a very good instinct.. lol wont one lacoz it use 90?m(dam dunno how to type) technology, temp wont be very high unless u raise the vcore goulat goulat |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 08:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
QUOTE(superpc @ Jan 13 2006, 07:39 PM) lol wont one la izzit the temp is low bcoz of dat 0.09µ tech?.. presscott using the same tech also.... how come their temperature so high?.. 1.7VCore not "goulat goulat" yet ar?.. coz it use 90?m(dam dunno how to type) technology, temp wont be very high unless u raise the vcore goulat goulat This post has been edited by newbieockids: Jan 14 2006, 03:24 AM |
|
|
Jan 14 2006, 04:05 PM
|
|
VIP
2,068 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Ipoh / Penang / PJ |
Just to share... this is much a 3000+ Venice performing slightly better than my 3500+ Winchester.
Just bought it 2 hours ago... 305HTT SP2004 stable for 17 mins and running... 9 x 305 = 2745Mhz RAM = UCCC 2GB @ 249MHz @ 2T @ 3-4-4-8 (I'm not proud of this RAM What do you guys think? Should I get some TCCD to play with? Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jan 15 2006, 12:50 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,224 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: B.B.Bangi |
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Jan 14 2006, 04:05 PM) Just to share... this is much a 3000+ Venice performing slightly better than my 3500+ Winchester. Yes, obviously you need a TCCD with 3000+. Multiplier 9, I just hate it the most. It's no go with BH5. I mean, typical BH5 will do 250 2-2-2-5. But 250 x 9 is only 2.25 GHz. A64 series as far as memory is concerned greatly benefited from proc clock speed.Just bought it 2 hours ago... 305HTT SP2004 stable for 17 mins and running... 9 x 305 = 2745Mhz RAM = UCCC 2GB @ 249MHz @ 2T @ 3-4-4-8 (I'm not proud of this RAM What do you guys think? Should I get some TCCD to play with? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0186sec
0.17
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 01:45 AM |