QUOTE(KilJim @ Dec 3 2005, 01:48 AM)
here's a 0522 i just got a few days ago
that impressive.. on cpu:ram --> 1:1 divider?
what is the ram u use?..
AMD 64/SEMPRON ---- OC DATABASE, Ocing results..OC problem?ask here..
|
|
 Dec 3 2005, 02:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005   
|
on cpu:ram --> 1:1 divider? what is the ram u use?.. |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 21 2005, 09:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
and the load temp too..
 |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
Hope im not too late for joining in..
 AMD64 3000+ Venice E6 @ stock heatsink + DFi Infinity + 512mb tccd everything on stock(280HTT @ stock Vcore)  benchable(306HTT @ 1.744 Vcore)  bootable(312HTT @ 1.712 VCore)  This post has been edited by newbieockids: Jan 12 2006, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Jan 12 2006, 10:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Jan 12 2006, 08:21 PM) Not bad I should say, but it's a waste to run TCCD 3-4-4-8 at only 280mhz yeah im agree.. jus wan to check the procs limitation up there.. here is what that tccd can do so far..maybe you could tighten up the timings, 280mhz 2.5-3-3-7 sounds better. TCCDs can do that quite easy I should say.  |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
QUOTE(PCcrazy @ Jan 13 2006, 08:52 AM) New results are not that great considering that my winchester does 2.62 prime stable on air in which I believe if watercooled there is some more potential around the corner. Btw, hey, where are those opty results? yeah PCcrazy it is Gskill.. u got a very good instinct.. newbieockids, your TCCD is doing great. Gskill? but the ram belong to dinster not mine.. borrow it frm him for a while.. neway guys, izzit all venice got such a nice temp?.. mine wouldnt surpass 55C in prime test for half an hour @ 1.712Vcore.. im afraid if the board probe not accurate, suddenly the procs blow im finish..  |
|
|
Jan 13 2006, 08:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
QUOTE(superpc @ Jan 13 2006, 07:39 PM) lol wont one la izzit the temp is low bcoz of dat 0.09µ tech?.. presscott using the same tech also.... how come their temperature so high?.. 1.7VCore not "goulat goulat" yet ar?.. coz it use 90?m(dam dunno how to type) technology, temp wont be very high unless u raise the vcore goulat goulat  This post has been edited by newbieockids: Jan 14 2006, 03:24 AM |
|
|
Jan 15 2006, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
1,405 posts Joined: Jun 2005
|
QUOTE(ah_khoo @ Jan 15 2006, 03:52 AM) Generally, 9x multi limits d alternatives of ram, while 10x or above multi give betta options... geez ya.. 9x sure need ram that capabale in higher speed.. to keep maintain in 1:1 divider.. most of the ram if higher mhz == loose timing.. not "kaww" ler.. Personally, 10x is d one i luv most... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0329sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:30 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.