QUOTE(HJebat @ Jun 11 2011, 09:18 PM)
Fuh, so rich ah you!
Conquered almost everthing you can get your hands on. Why not include gold or silver?

(strictly no pun intended

)
I used to have that
follow the leader mentality. But found out that it doesn't suit my style & strategy (what strategy?!). So, i prefer to invest directly in the market with the company that i feel i'm comfortable with.
I can understand (i think) the reason to invest in PFES, PRSEC & PFEPRF, but why PAGF & PSSF? If you have the knowledge & firepower to invest directly in the domestic stock market, what makes you put your money in those 2 funds? Aren't you paying more for UT because of the fees?

HJebat, i wish i am rich - perhaps richer than the church mouse but not by much

And no, i've NOT conquered almost everything i can get my hands on - conquered to me = able to teach and reason the stuff out to either my mum (70yrs old) or my girl (5 yrs old)

If they cant understand, that means theres still "something not quite right" yet with my methodologies & reasonings.
Yup yup, playing strictly lemming (follow the leader) is, IMHO, offloading the responsibility to others instead of stepping up for oneself. If no responsibility, then mana boleh "make it better" & grow?
Gold & SilverI was not early enough to learn the basics - interested in Gold & Silver, yes in 2008, learned enough during then no - thus, normal chicken-style, stayed out until i know more.
Now know a bit of basics, thus staying out

as investing in currency / money equivalent and/or commodities DIRECTLY is not my cuppa yet.
BTW, i am investing in commodities via my "agent investment" at NAV, i find it fits a niche and for such a small amount, it's just a hedge
PAGF & PSSF via EPF reasoning:PAGF
+ highly aggressive, thus a diversified approach better IMHO
+ smallcaps aint my forte in direct investments, thus leverage on PAGF
+ can hold up to 30% of foreign equities (PAGF was just "allowed" into the EPF scheme late last year or early this - i'm cant recall off-hand)
PSSF
+ sector rotation / sectoral , other than asset allocation, i've read somewhere (let me dig it up if U want to see see, like the value averaging thing), statistically makes a good return
+ again, this approach (sector rotation) is highly aggressive + i'm no expert in such an approach, thus diversified approach better IMHO
So far, my PER TRANSACTION gains from PSSF & PAGF outstrips PIX, thus i cut PIX and channeled the $ to PAGF
BTW, your mileage may vary - im using Value averaging (thus i want volatility) + im my own agent (kam sau to myself

) thus, my cost is lower + i have some stats that makes it personally attractive to me (due to my own donkey approach).
QUOTE(koinibler @ Jun 11 2011, 11:13 PM)
my agent told me that P Ittikal will be closed for investment on 16 June?
Ask me to do standing instruction to keep money going in?
Any comment?
Bro / sis - if U think PIttikal is your cuppa, go for it. If U "was-was", then dont.
U do know how much U are making / losing up to now in %pa for your investment into PIttikal right? If U dont, pls go poke yr agent for the info. Remember, get the net profit/loss %pa or CAGR, not the donkey GROSS profit/loss.
This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Jun 12 2011, 10:08 AM