QUOTE(gark @ Jul 4 2010, 11:51 PM)
You have not been reading right, that's why I said in my previous post, YOU must do the research, so that you know what fund you are investing in. You don't just go invest blindly into whatever fund that is recommended by agents, that is your mistake and no one can help you, and you are well deserve to get whatever gains or losses there is. Before I will even considering to buy a fund, I will do quite some research. Here are a sample of things you must read and understand.
1. General Stock Market & World Economy performance - I will not buy at peak, I buy at the bottom, DCA is rubbish.
1. Performance vs. benchmark 5 years minimum - I will not buy any fund which does not have min 5 years performance
2. Audited annual accounts - income, expenses, turnover, fund size, fund manager & policies
3. Fact Sheet - Monthly - Latest 6 months - Holding, percentage, regional risks, interest, equity vs. fixed income risks
4. Standard & Poors, Morningstar reviews - performance vs peers - I tend to buy funds which have dropped the least compared to peers during bad periods ie. 1997, 2001, 2008. Any fund will make money in a bull period, it takes skill to survive in bear.
5. Asset Allocation - You must have a proper asset allocation to diversify your risks.
You should not expect performance if you did not do your homework. It is your duty to choose, looks like you have bet on the wrong horse. In fact around 80% of the funds in the Malaysian market now is rubbish and most probably trailing the benchmarks (over 5, 10 year period). I will not buy those, will you?
Gark, I find the way you convey unfair to the investors. No offence. 1. General Stock Market & World Economy performance - I will not buy at peak, I buy at the bottom, DCA is rubbish.
1. Performance vs. benchmark 5 years minimum - I will not buy any fund which does not have min 5 years performance
2. Audited annual accounts - income, expenses, turnover, fund size, fund manager & policies
3. Fact Sheet - Monthly - Latest 6 months - Holding, percentage, regional risks, interest, equity vs. fixed income risks
4. Standard & Poors, Morningstar reviews - performance vs peers - I tend to buy funds which have dropped the least compared to peers during bad periods ie. 1997, 2001, 2008. Any fund will make money in a bull period, it takes skill to survive in bear.
5. Asset Allocation - You must have a proper asset allocation to diversify your risks.
You should not expect performance if you did not do your homework. It is your duty to choose, looks like you have bet on the wrong horse. In fact around 80% of the funds in the Malaysian market now is rubbish and most probably trailing the benchmarks (over 5, 10 year period). I will not buy those, will you?
If the investors are at young age like 20s or 30s, they of course can do research, ask around; but what about those who are low educated people and above 50s or 60s people? They might not have high education, they might not know how to calculate, they might not good in reading English.
What dannyme is trying to emphasize is that fund manager, who knows more than any one of us do, not taking care of clients' accounts, rather just let it stay over years despite they are in good performance or not, and receive 5.5% fees for every buy and sell, what's the point? We might as well go take exam and become our own agent.
p.s: sorry, I've been digging the old posts....
May 20 2011, 11:47 AM

Quote
0.0411sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled