QUOTE(DarkNite @ Sep 26 2010, 09:46 PM)
BTW Do take time to research first before you open your mouth and knock it. And for your info, many things in China has been lost...
Example.
There may be advance tech in China once upon a time, but we must not conflate it with everything that came out from that time.
Definately not the magical means of calculation and measurement known as FS... so in that sense I agree with Fifi.
In terms of seeking harmony... sure I agree, but not in the mythical sense FS was all about, even from the very beginning.
Added on September 27, 2010, 9:22 amQUOTE(nice.rider @ Sep 26 2010, 10:48 PM)
If you plan to get a house, do you check the location accessibility to work's place, hospital, school, restaurant? And whether it is built on a slope, having a dam nearby, draining facility is intact, etc.
You could call it a checklist before getting a house, or other names you see fit, some still stick to the conventional name FS. This is what harmonize with the surrounding actually means. I regards FS as all of the above and not about buying crystal ball, etc.
Unless you don't do the checklist above.
You know what, what you mentioned here make sense.
What is your opinion on the following scenario? You plan to get a house which is built on a hill slope. There are many houses on that slope. A friend of yours advised you this, the house is no good FS and he showed you a FS book that mentioned it. The reason is slope indanger kids when they walk out, bicycling and performing other activities. Also slope limits the car driver's vision as such indanger other cars and also the people staying there.
Using your example above, did your friend just justify a baseless conclusion? The chance that it is indeed bad to own a house on a slope would be coincidental?
Would you do a statistical study whether the chances of accidents are more likely happened on slopes before buying?
First of all, I'd like to say that I agree with you that all these needs to be put into consideration before purchasing, I've mentioned this in my earlier posts.
But the problem is, I think we are mixing what is logical, and attaching it to something which is mythical, and saying that it makes sense.
This is like calling all asians chinese.
If you'd notice, modern man is creating their own justification as to why FS is true, whereas that is not what it is about. FS is straight forward shown to be magical reasoning.
To make it a little bit clearer, which phrase in Iching states the above you mentioned? You'd probably say "Harmony", but that's vague. Anybody will know harmony is important, I'm more interested in the formula proposed by it to achieve this "Harmony".
Why don't we just say "ergonomics" instead of FS?
QUOTE(nice.rider @ Sep 26 2010, 10:48 PM)
I do not see any points in saying that, even FS's book is coincidentally logical in this case, it doesn't justify the correctness to its entity has anything to do with the decision in buying the house above.
I take it that you mean, that even if certain cases may be coincidental, doesn't mean that the whole lot (in FS) is wrong. That we should not use it to consider buying a house.
Well, as I mention above, we must differentiate our own reasoning with the formula and reasoning proposed by FS itself.
I think the most important thing to know whether something can be used or applied, is how it was derived.
Do you take a medicine, that was concocted through scientific research and testing, or something which someone dreamt up, has not been objectively tested, and has no real world logical reason to be true?
QUOTE
I Ching (Wikipedia)Traditionally it was believed that the principles of the I Ching originated with the mythical Fu Xi (伏羲 Fú Xī). In this respect he is seen as an early culture hero, one of the earliest legendary rulers of China (traditional dates 2800 BC-2737 BC), reputed to have had the 8 trigrams (八卦 bā guà) revealed to him supernaturally
Added on September 27, 2010, 9:40 amLet me break it down, so that we can address them seperately instead of FS as a whole entity.
QUOTE
(Wikipedia again)
During the Warring States period, the text was re-interpreted as a system of cosmology and philosophy that subsequently became intrinsic to Chinese culture. It centred on the ideas of the dynamic balance of opposites, the evolution of events as a process, and acceptance of the inevitability of change.
I believe this is where FS came from?
"acceptance of the inevitability of change" I agree.
"Dynamics of balance" in terms of the 5 elements etc. <---- this is Hogwash.
"Triagrams" having power or any significance <---- BS
Why does it have to end up with us been told we need to buy something for us to realise that it is not true? Why can't we see that the reason people can easily manipulate FS is because it is absent of proof? And the reason why it's absent of proof after thousands of years, may be because it's not true?
In the case of religion, or the existence of god, the conclusion/the promise, is beyond life, thus it can never be proved/disproved in this life.
But for FS which is suppose to work for us, in our daily lives, why do we not expect proof?
This post has been edited by TheDoer: Sep 27 2010, 09:40 AM