Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
184 Pages « < 152 153 154 155 156 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Buying Advice Wanna buy New Camera? Undecided which to choose?V3, ASK HERE! Dont create a thread elsewher

views
     
zstan
post Oct 22 2010, 10:17 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



@sniper
sorry but what's airfix plastic? hmm.gif plastic i know la. laugh.gif airfix....?

as for the EVF, the only cons i can think of is you might not get used to it or just personally don't like it for no reason. laugh.gif

with EVF, you can view your pictures directly in the view finder without taking your eye off, some may like it, some may think its a hassle(can be disabled).

if you change your WB, you can see how it actually looks like in the EVF. conventionally, you have to try your luck, or rely on experience, or use live view to check.

you can also get the real depth of field. in conventional DSLRs, you can only see the depth of field at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4 . of course if you are shooting at f3.5 and below then the depth of field is accurate.

and many more benefits you can go read yourself la. biggrin.gif



dennis5585
post Oct 22 2010, 10:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Johor Bahru / Singapore


what is the diff between a33 & a55, my wife is new to dslr, should i get her a33 or a55 ?
sniper on the roof
post Oct 22 2010, 10:45 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 10:17 AM)
@sniper
sorry but what's airfix plastic? hmm.gif plastic i know la. laugh.gif airfix....?

as for the EVF, the only cons i can think of is you might not get used to it or just personally don't like it for no reason. laugh.gif

with EVF, you can view your pictures directly in the view finder without taking your eye off, some may like it, some may think its a hassle(can be disabled).

if you change your WB, you can see how it actually looks like in the EVF. conventionally, you have to try your luck, or rely on experience, or use live view to check.

you can also get the real depth of field. in conventional DSLRs, you can only see the depth of field at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4 . of course if you are shooting at f3.5 and below then the depth of field is accurate.

and many more benefits you can go read yourself la. biggrin.gif
*
Aiyar I know lar brudder... Sony's EVF is already the best in the market.

The same rationale can be used for composing using LCD.
What you see is what you get.. all adjustments immediately reflected onto the the seen image etc.

In most practical and all logical sense, an electronic view finder is superior.

But........ electronic have no soul and viewing the real light/image through the lens has a certain ZEN.. this alone beats logic.. hahahhahaa tongue.gif
sevenor
post Oct 22 2010, 10:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
185 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Utama, PJ
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 09:49 AM)
i would suggest the sony a33. its small, light(although the cheap plastic build maybe a turn off). for 3k you can get the body and TWO kit lens if i am not mistaken. or you can get the sony a55 with ONE kit lens. sony bodies have built in stabilisation so every lens you attach to the body can have stabilising effect, unlike canon and nikon which relies on built-in lens stabilisation.

even acceptable images at iso 12800, let alone iso 6400.  biggrin.gif

currently has the best AF for video recording in a DSLR. very silent(even for normal lenses). very very quick and accurate compared to the 550D, 5DM2 and the likes.



*
Thanks a lot zstan. If not for you the A33/55 probably would have escaped my radar. sweat.gif Will definitely check them out. Hope I like how they look and feel. hmm.gif

Wow! even images at iso 12800 also boleh tahan! Then lower iso no need to say already loh hor. That's surely a strong point to me since I like existing light photography. rclxm9.gif

I didn't know that Sony has the best AF for vid recording. Good that you point it out to me.

I'm rather impressed with the autofocus speed shown in the videos. Are Canon/Nikon's much slower, anybody knows?

Wonder Sony's lenses are in the same league as Canon and Nikon already? hmm.gif

Thank you once again zstan. rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by sevenor: Oct 22 2010, 10:53 AM
zstan
post Oct 22 2010, 11:05 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(dennis5585 @ Oct 22 2010, 10:44 AM)
what is the diff between a33 & a55, my wife is new to dslr, should i get her a33 or a55 ?
*
a33 less megapixels, and no GPS tagging. otherwise its the same. smile.gif

QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 22 2010, 10:45 AM)
Aiyar I know lar brudder... Sony's EVF is already the best in the market.

The same rationale can be used for composing using LCD.
What you see is what you get.. all adjustments immediately reflected onto the the seen image etc.

In most practical and all logical sense, an electronic view finder is superior.

But........ electronic have no soul and viewing the real light/image through the lens has a certain ZEN.. this alone beats logic.. hahahhahaa tongue.gif
*
ehh..if you put vivid mode hor...everything in real life now will look more dull. tongue.gif

QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 10:52 AM)
Thanks a lot zstan. If not for you the A33/55 probably would have escaped my radar.  sweat.gif  Will definitely check them out. Hope I like how they look and feel. hmm.gif

Wow! even images at iso 12800 also boleh tahan! Then lower iso no need to say already loh hor. That's surely a strong point to me since I like existing light photography. 

I didn't know that Sony has the best AF for vid recording. Good that you point it out to me.

I'm rather impressed with the autofocus speed shown in the videos. Are Canon/Nikon's much slower, anybody knows?

Wonder Sony's lenses are in the same league as Canon and Nikon already?

Thank you once again zstan. rclxms.gif
*
look and feel.. its too small and light for me though, then again, it might just be the one for you wink.gif

as far as i know, only nikon d3100 has AF for video recording. 60D got AF or not a? and yes its definitely much slower than sony's. biggrin.gif

if you are refering to the G lenses and Sony Carl Zeiss lenses, of course they are the same league with the Canon's L and Nikon's Nikkor lenses, if not better.

its relatively cheaper as well considering you don't need to pay more for built in-lens stabilisation.

however i concede that canon and nikon has more lenses to choose from. then again, there's always 3rd party lenses, at a cheaper price with reasonably good optics too. wink.gif
sevenor
post Oct 22 2010, 11:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
185 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Utama, PJ
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 22 2010, 10:06 AM)
sevenor, what was your previous SLR setup and do you still have your lens with you?

On dslr's at your budget range:

Canon: Focal range x 1.6 crop factor to get 35mm equal.
Others: Focal range x 1.5

I don't really reckon the D3000 to be a good buy now since you mentioned HD movie, the D3000 has no Liveview let alone a movie mode as its quite an old model. The ISO capabilities can also prove to be a limiting factor if you're talking about available light.

I agree with Zstan though, the Sony A33 has one of the most longest spec list to price ratio. However, the viewfinder is electronic (essentially peeping into an LCD) and it felt like its built using airfix plastic tongue.gif
*
Actually I had dabbled with most of the big names except Minolta (strange, don't know why). Sony and Panasonic cameras were not out yet. Cameras I owned are now antiques already. I also malu to tell you guys. Anyway, they were Canon AE1, Canon A1, Olympus OM2N, Pentax MX and lastly the Nikon FM which I coupled it a 28-200mm/f3.5 Tamron lens besides the standard lens it came with, if I remember correctly.

The last 20 years or so I had switched to compact cameras after tired of dragging heavy and bulky slr around. That's why at first I thought of getting the Pana LX5 as my next camera istead of DSLR, but alas no DOF susah lah.

What's the pros and cons of EVF, anyone?

Thanks once again, Sniper. notworthy.gif


Added on October 22, 2010, 11:20 am
QUOTE(mint87 @ Oct 22 2010, 10:12 AM)
if u're leaning towards the HD video mode, sony's SLT camera's (a55/33) got the best AF so far

got to agree with sniper n zstan

just that with the sony SLT cameras,u might be losing abit of light..by 30%..not that big deal if u dont really mind tho smile.gif
*
Thanks mint87 for confirmming that Sony has the best AF so far. biggrin.gif

Will the loss of 30% of the light affect the IQ?

Cheers!



This post has been edited by sevenor: Oct 22 2010, 11:20 AM
zstan
post Oct 22 2010, 11:20 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 11:15 AM)
Actually I had dabbled with most of the big names except Minolta (strange, don't know why). Sony and Panasonic cameras were not out yet. Cameras I owned are now antiques already. I also malu to tell you guys. Anyway, they were Canon AE1, Canon A1, Olympus OM2N, Pentax MX and lastly the Nikon FM which I coupled it a 28-200mm/f3.5 Tamron lens besides the standard lens it came with, if I remember correctly.

The last 20 years or so I had switched to compact cameras after tired of dragging heavy and bulky slr around. That's why at first I thought of getting the Pana LX5 as my next camera istead of DSLR, but alas no DOF susah lah.

What's the pros and cons of EVF, anyone?

Thanks once again, Sniper.  notworthy.gif
*
this was my post above:

QUOTE
as for the EVF, the only cons i can think of is you might not get used to it or just personally don't like it for no reason.

with EVF, you can view your pictures directly in the view finder without taking your eye off, some may like it, some may think its a hassle(can be disabled).

if you change your WB, you can see how it actually looks like in the EVF. conventionally, you have to try your luck, or rely on experience, or use live view to check.

you can also get the real depth of field. in conventional DSLRs, you can only see the depth of field at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4 . of course if you are shooting at f3.5 and below then the depth of field is accurate.

and many more benefits you can go read yourself la.



Added on October 22, 2010, 11:21 am
QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 11:15 AM)

Will the loss of 30% of the light affect the IQ?

Cheers!
*
100% NO!

This post has been edited by zstan: Oct 22 2010, 11:21 AM
sevenor
post Oct 22 2010, 11:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
185 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Utama, PJ
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 10:17 AM)
@sniper
sorry but what's airfix plastic? hmm.gif plastic i know la. laugh.gif airfix....?

as for the EVF, the only cons i can think of is you might not get used to it or just personally don't like it for no reason. laugh.gif

with EVF, you can view your pictures directly in the view finder without taking your eye off, some may like it, some may think its a hassle(can be disabled).

if you change your WB, you can see how it actually looks like in the EVF. conventionally, you have to try your luck, or rely on experience, or use live view to check.

you can also get the real depth of field. in conventional DSLRs, you can only see the depth of field at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4 . of course if you are shooting at f3.5 and below then the depth of field is accurate.

and many more benefits you can go read yourself la. biggrin.gif
*
Judging from what you explained, this EVF thing seems to be a good idea. smile.gif

What do you mean by "conventional DSLR"? About the depth of field, why is it that with conventional DSLR you can only see DOF at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4? rclxub.gif

"...you can go read yourself la", I know but lazy ma that's why I asked you sifu's loh. Else have to spend 10's of hours browsing on the net, see liao. biggrin.gif

Arigato zstan! notworthy.gif
sniper on the roof
post Oct 22 2010, 11:31 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 11:05 AM)
as far as i know, only nikon d3100 has AF for video recording. 60D got AF or not a? and yes its definitely much slower than sony's.  biggrin.gif
*
I dunno why people so adverse to manual focusing in video mode. Even the best video AF also slower than manual wat.


QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 11:15 AM)
Actually I had dabbled with most of the big names except Minolta (strange, don't know why). Sony and Panasonic cameras were not out yet. Cameras I owned are now antiques already. I also malu to tell you guys. Anyway, they were Canon AE1, Canon A1, Olympus OM2N, Pentax MX and lastly the Nikon FM which I coupled it a 28-200mm/f3.5 Tamron lens besides the standard lens it came with, if I remember correctly.

What's the pros and cons of EVF, anyone?
*
Wow... those are classics. Always wanted to get an AE1

OVF (traditional mirror) vs EVF --> Its like looking at a beautiful scene while being there vs watching it on a TV (albeit a Full HD TV)


zstan
post Oct 22 2010, 11:39 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 11:30 AM)
Judging from what you explained, this EVF thing seems to be a good idea.  smile.gif

What do you mean by "conventional DSLR"? About the depth of field, why is it that with conventional DSLR you can only see DOF at f3.5 even if you are shooting at f1.4?   rclxub.gif

"...you can go read yourself la", I know but lazy ma that's why I asked you sifu's loh. Else have to spend 10's of hours browsing on the net, see liao. biggrin.gif

Arigato zstan!  notworthy.gif
*
conventional DSLR means those that are using the OVF lor.. this has gotta do with the glass used in the view finder...

QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 22 2010, 11:31 AM)
I dunno why people so adverse to manual focusing in video mode. Even the best video AF also slower than manual wat.
Wow... those are classics. Always wanted to get an AE1

OVF (traditional mirror) vs EVF --> Its like looking at a beautiful scene while being there vs watching it on a TV (albeit a Full HD TV)
*
nola..

sevenor stated 'video recording with AF is preferable' in his list ma. laugh.gif ..no doubt all serious videographers use manual focusing..

QUOTE
Any specific features u want? :  If can take HD video with zoom and autofocus functions while taking video that would be a big plus.



This post has been edited by zstan: Oct 22 2010, 11:40 AM
ic3rock
post Oct 22 2010, 12:00 PM

AkuNooB
*******
Senior Member
3,586 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Singapore / Kuching


If compare Canon S90 with Panasonic Lumix LX3, which 1 better?
General_Nic
post Oct 22 2010, 12:52 PM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 11:15 AM)
Actually I had dabbled with most of the big names except Minolta (strange, don't know why). Sony and Panasonic cameras were not out yet. Cameras I owned are now antiques already. I also malu to tell you guys. Anyway, they were Canon AE1, Canon A1, Olympus OM2N, Pentax MX and lastly the Nikon FM which I coupled it a 28-200mm/f3.5 Tamron lens besides the standard lens it came with, if I remember correctly.

The last 20 years or so I had switched to compact cameras after tired of dragging heavy and bulky slr around. That's why at first I thought of getting the Pana LX5 as my next camera istead of DSLR, but alas no DOF susah lah.

What's the pros and cons of EVF, anyone?

Thanks once again, Sniper.  notworthy.gif


Added on October 22, 2010, 11:20 am

Thanks mint87 for confirmming that Sony has the best AF so far.  biggrin.gif

Will the loss of 30% of the light affect the IQ?

Cheers!
*
if u still have old Nikon mount lenses, u still can use it on Nikon new Dslrs
Minolta A-mount lenses can use on Sony Dslr oso but since u nvr used Minolta...
Canon old mount lenses definitely cant use on their Dslrs

if u r accustomed to Manual focus, u can use 50 f/1.8 on D3100
mint87
post Oct 22 2010, 01:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
95 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(ic3rock @ Oct 22 2010, 12:00 PM)
If compare Canon S90 with Panasonic Lumix LX3, which 1 better?
*
this is a hard one actually..err

i have read alot of reviews about s95/lx5 so does the s90/lx3..some say s90,some say lx3..its a tie to tell u the truth..

for me,i prefer the lx3 colouring,and the s90's compactness.. smile.gif

i know its not helping..but i think its wut u want..if u want compactness,go for s90..if not go with the lx3..

This post has been edited by mint87: Oct 22 2010, 01:06 PM
Fizzy-Fiz
post Oct 22 2010, 02:17 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
696 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
guys, i have 700 to spend on a camera.


what do you suggest?
ic3rock
post Oct 22 2010, 02:40 PM

AkuNooB
*******
Senior Member
3,586 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Singapore / Kuching


QUOTE(mint87 @ Oct 22 2010, 01:05 PM)
this is a hard one actually..err

i have read alot of reviews about s95/lx5 so does the s90/lx3..some say s90,some say lx3..its a tie to tell u the truth..

for me,i prefer the lx3 colouring,and the s90's compactness.. smile.gif

i know its not helping..but i think its wut u want..if u want compactness,go for s90..if not go with the lx3..
*
Thanks for ur opinion, my friend plan selling off his lx3, Rm900 is a good steal? He say his lx3 come with 33 months warranty, he used for 1 year+, so still left 1 year+ warranty, condition is 95%, he always take good care of his stuff, so i will consider about it... hmm.gif
ceos
post Oct 22 2010, 02:56 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
[B]Type of camera/lens/accesories : Compact Digital camera
[B]Budget:RM600
[B]Your Location:Kuching
[B]Preferable brand :Canon, Sony
[B]Type of photography u want to do :Normal Shooting
[B]Any specific models in mind? : ?
[B]Any specific features u want? :autofocus, waterproof(optional), 12 mp and above, avoid handshake

sevenor
post Oct 22 2010, 03:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
185 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Utama, PJ
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 22 2010, 11:39 AM)
sevenor stated 'video recording with AF is preferable' in his list ma. laugh.gif ..no doubt all serious videographers use manual focusing..
*
Thanks for the explanation on conventional dslr thing. smile.gif

So need to ask you when they say a camera's video recording has AF do they mean that the camera will keep on refocusing whenever you point the camera on a different target/subject like when we video a person moving towards you? Sorry, I'm so behing time, guess I lau liao cry.gif And how do you go about refocusing it manually? Is it troublesome? hmm.gif

Thanks in advance everybody.


Added on October 22, 2010, 3:22 pm
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Oct 22 2010, 12:52 PM)
if u still have old Nikon mount lenses, u still can use it on Nikon new Dslrs
Minolta A-mount lenses can use on Sony Dslr oso but since u nvr used Minolta...
Canon old mount lenses definitely cant use on their Dslrs

if u r accustomed to Manual focus, u can use 50 f/1.8 on D3100
*
Unfortunately I sold every single one of them already when I switched to using compact cameras. Now regret. cry.gif Even had a handheld German bellow foldable camera with Carl Zeiss lens but was stolen. mad.gif

So now have to start from scratch. That's why have to decide which make carefully, don't want to keep switching make cos very costly. I only plan to have 3 lenses in totla - 24 (or 28)mm, 105 mm and a 28-135mm zoom (I'm talking about 35mm photography), as I'm no longer gila camera or photography (cos proven I don't have artistic talent even thought I have the technical knowhow cry.gif ). Will go for the brightest lens if at all possible and then build up my set from there. That's why I do not mind even used or cheap body if it means I can have better quality lenses.






This post has been edited by sevenor: Oct 22 2010, 03:22 PM
sniper on the roof
post Oct 22 2010, 03:23 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 03:02 PM)
Thanks for the explanation on conventional dslr thing.  smile.gif

So need to ask you when they say a camera's video recording has AF do they mean that the camera will keep on refocusing whenever you point the camera on a different target/subject like when we video a person moving towards you? Sorry, I'm so behing time, guess I lau liao  cry.gif And how do you go about refocusing it manually? Is it troublesome?  hmm.gif

Thanks in advance everybody.
*
Yeah but problem is that it's slow even on the fastest system.. you can check youtube for examples.

Refocussing it manually is just like turn turn focus ring on the lens like your old SLRs... only easier as the video is shown on the LCD (liveview).

Situations such as kid running around.. forget AF video.. it's not fast enough and when its HD resolution... its will show.


Added on October 22, 2010, 3:29 pm
QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 03:02 PM)
So now have to start from scratch. That's why have to decide which make carefully, don't want to keep switching make cos very costly. I only plan to have 3 lenses in totla - 24 (or 28)mm, 105 mm and a 28-135mm zoom (I'm talking about 35mm photography), as I'm no longer gila camera or photography (cos proven I don't have artistic talent even thought I have the technical knowhow cry.gif ). Will go for the brightest lens if at all possible and then build up my set from there. That's why I do not mind even used or cheap body if it means I can have better quality lenses.
*
That could be a bit of a problem.. I don't think any of the camp have wide angle prime for crop sensor.

My usual carry-everywhere setup is an entry 550D body + a Sigma 30mm f1.4 (= 48mm) + 55-250mm tele. Still looking for wide angle solution though.



This post has been edited by sniper on the roof: Oct 22 2010, 03:32 PM
sevenor
post Oct 22 2010, 03:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
185 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Bandar Utama, PJ
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 22 2010, 03:23 PM)
Yeah but problem is that it's slow even on the fastest system.. you can check youtube for examples.

Refocussing it manually is just like turn turn focus ring on the lens like your old SLRs... only easier as the video is shown on the LCD (liveview).

Situations such as kid running around.. forget AF video.. it's not fast enough and when its HD resolution... its will show.


Added on October 22, 2010, 3:29 pm

That could be a bit of a problem.. I don't think any of the camp have wide angle prime for crop sensor.

My usual carry-everywhere setup is an entry 550D body + a Sigma 30mm f1.4 (= 48mm) + 55-250mm tele. Still looking for wide angle solution though.
*
Since you said that for kid running around to forget about AF video, so switch to manual focusing? Then need to keep on focusing right? Not mah fun meh? hmm.gif

Wah, very bright Sigma lens you have there! drool.gif

This post has been edited by sevenor: Oct 22 2010, 03:56 PM
sniper on the roof
post Oct 22 2010, 04:14 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(sevenor @ Oct 22 2010, 03:54 PM)
Since you said that for kid running around to forget about AF video, so switch to manual focusing? Then need to keep on focusing right? Not mah fun meh? hmm.gif

Wah, very bright Sigma lens you have there!  drool.gif
*
It's more of control rather than mah fun... it's not like your gonna hold DSLR with one hand right?

184 Pages « < 152 153 154 155 156 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0188sec    0.74    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:52 PM