Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 11:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,187 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: sleepy melati |
Ahaks since my kind of poison is wierd one. Macro photography really bleeds out money
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 11:25 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
101 posts Joined: May 2005 |
thanks for the PP achew.... nice one indeed :-)
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,557 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Republic of Selayang |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:23 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
millenia3000: The Minolta 28-75mm F2.8, is mostly good but I've seen one bad copy at YL Camera. The Tamron has far more variance. It is the same size as your Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 if you're okay with that size (I find it a big largish.)
My Minolta 24-105mm F3.5-4.5(D) is so-so wide open (weak at the corners) but good at F8 onwards; hence it is a budget studio champion. I don't know how the 24-85mm/28-105mm/28-85mm/24-50mm fare since I haven't used them for group shots on FF. The (D) stands for Distance Integration meaning it has 8 pins and supports ADI flash. The earlier Minoltas without the (D) do not. All Sony lenses have (D) except the Sony 16mm F2.8 Fisheye, 20mm F2.8, 28mm F2.8, 135mm F2.8/T4.5 STF and 500mm F8 AF Reflex. |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,187 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: sleepy melati |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,580 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
guys ..
any1 owning tamron 70-200? .. thanks in advance .. |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There... |
QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Nov 24 2009, 01:36 PM) guys .. my dream 70200 lens too! also want to know the comment! hehehe... does it hunt in low light?any1 owning tamron 70-200? .. thanks in advance .. |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:52 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Seng Kiat: Both worth of your money..
Some sample taken with Tamron 70-200 2.8 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sample below is taken with Tamron TC 2x..noticed not much IQ drop even with TC ![]() This post has been edited by Ranceed: Nov 24 2009, 01:57 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 01:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There... |
oh my... love the bokeh! I'm hooked!
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:01 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Braynumb : Low light i can say, it can performed. Hardly it hunt. Maybe sometimes if with confusing light. Something about Sony and Tamron that can click together. The speed, if it zoom below 135mm, i can say it can match the Sony and sigma. Above 135mm, it still faster than my Sony 18-250mm.
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:10 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
101 posts Joined: May 2005 |
wah.... if tammy is sharper than sony then for the price of sony 70200 2.8 i can get 2 lens la if top up a bit. tammy 70200 2.8 and another one is UWA, maybe 10-24 or 11-18. nice!
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:12 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
Hallo... how are everyone on this rainy day again... hehehe.. been behind the scene for a while.. but now got something to ask to all masters... I know that we need a drybox to keep our photo gears in... by my problem is.. I dont want to get one.. reason.. SCARED to leave the gears at home in case theft pecah masuk my house then all gone
Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,409 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Somewhere Over There... |
uh... Buy a Safe and convert it to a drybox?
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
873 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
296 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Suchap69: The tamron is sharper then the Sony 70-300 4-5.6 G that is price of RM25xx.
mie_75 : i'm using Wonderful Electronic Moisture Absorber II. You can go to shashinki.com to see what it is.. |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:26 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
Seng_Kiat: The Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 is pretty fast on the A700 onwards. There is one at Leos Trading, Ampang Park.
Personally I say it is pretty darn sharp. It has excellent longitudinal chromatic aberration correction. http://www.glaringnotebook.com/zimages/bsst3big.jpg Left to right: 70mm, 135mm, 200mm. Top: Tamron 70-200mm F2.8; bottom: Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG HSM II. http://www.glaringnotebook.com/zimages/bsst4big.jpg Same thing; top is Sony 70-200mm F2.8G SSM; bottom is Minolta 80-200mm F2.8G HS APO. More details here: http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1243 |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:30 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
QUOTE(Ranceed @ Nov 24 2009, 02:19 PM) mie_75 : i'm using Wonderful Electronic Moisture Absorber II. You can go to shashinki.com to see what it is.. ahhh looks good... very handy indeed THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!! This post has been edited by mie_75: Nov 24 2009, 02:31 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,807 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Masking |
its gonna rain...
![]() |
|
|
Nov 24 2009, 02:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,187 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: sleepy melati |
Ahaks bokehmon also into water droplet ya
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0265sec
0.90
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 08:31 PM |