Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
125 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 13 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V34!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 24 2009, 11:12 AM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



Ahaks since my kind of poison is wierd one. Macro photography really bleeds out money laugh.gif If stick to shooting people a 50mm prime is already sufficient.
suchap69
post Nov 24 2009, 11:25 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2005


thanks for the PP achew.... nice one indeed :-)
signither
post Nov 24 2009, 01:13 PM

Certified Mutant
*******
Senior Member
3,557 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Republic of Selayang


QUOTE(Uzumaki NaruTo @ Nov 24 2009, 11:12 AM)
Ahaks since my kind of poison is wierd one. Macro photography really bleeds out money laugh.gif If stick to shooting people a 50mm prime is already sufficient.
*
sure or not uzu?? u have tried 135mm for portraiture or not?? brows.gif
albnok
post Nov 24 2009, 01:23 PM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


millenia3000: The Minolta 28-75mm F2.8, is mostly good but I've seen one bad copy at YL Camera. The Tamron has far more variance. It is the same size as your Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 if you're okay with that size (I find it a big largish.)

My Minolta 24-105mm F3.5-4.5(D) is so-so wide open (weak at the corners) but good at F8 onwards; hence it is a budget studio champion. I don't know how the 24-85mm/28-105mm/28-85mm/24-50mm fare since I haven't used them for group shots on FF.

The (D) stands for Distance Integration meaning it has 8 pins and supports ADI flash. The earlier Minoltas without the (D) do not. All Sony lenses have (D) except the Sony 16mm F2.8 Fisheye, 20mm F2.8, 28mm F2.8, 135mm F2.8/T4.5 STF and 500mm F8 AF Reflex.
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 24 2009, 01:26 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



QUOTE(signither @ Nov 24 2009, 01:13 PM)
sure or not uzu?? u have tried 135mm for portraiture or not?? brows.gif
*
Well if follow this thread 'NOT-YET' attitude sure can try first laugh.gif . Btw wheres your [WTS] a700 whistling.gif .
Braynumb
post Nov 24 2009, 01:33 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


QUOTE(millenia3000 @ Nov 24 2009, 09:24 AM)
hehe... thanks my friend... smile.gif might be joining the 850 clan today man.... excited...  rclxm9.gif
*
wahhhh... for real?!! dayum! congrats first! hahaha... waiting for macha poison from you now... hehehe...
Seng_Kiat
post Nov 24 2009, 01:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,580 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
guys ..

any1 owning tamron 70-200? .. smile.gif .. how is it if compared to sony 70-300G? I know, most of people will answer something like this, "depends on ur use. Indoor, outdoor, etc" .. I am asking about the color, sharpness, IQ for both of them .. which 1 is worth my money? .. smile.gif ..

thanks in advance ..
Braynumb
post Nov 24 2009, 01:51 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ Nov 24 2009, 01:36 PM)
guys ..

any1 owning tamron 70-200? .. smile.gif .. how is it if compared to sony 70-300G? I know, most of people will answer something like this, "depends on ur use. Indoor, outdoor, etc" .. I am asking about the color, sharpness, IQ for both of them .. which 1 is worth my money? .. smile.gif ..

thanks in advance ..
*
my dream 70200 lens too! also want to know the comment! hehehe... does it hunt in low light?
Ranceed
post Nov 24 2009, 01:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


Seng Kiat: Both worth of your money.. smile.gif However, if you like a bit light lens, then the G, if you want to go to 2.8 then Tamron. However, one of my friend who own the G has compared both on the spot, he said to me, the tamron is more sharp then the G.

Some sample taken with Tamron 70-200 2.8

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Sample below is taken with Tamron TC 2x..noticed not much IQ drop even with TC

user posted image



This post has been edited by Ranceed: Nov 24 2009, 01:57 PM
Braynumb
post Nov 24 2009, 01:56 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


oh my... love the bokeh! I'm hooked! tongue.gif
Ranceed
post Nov 24 2009, 02:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


Braynumb : Low light i can say, it can performed. Hardly it hunt. Maybe sometimes if with confusing light. Something about Sony and Tamron that can click together. The speed, if it zoom below 135mm, i can say it can match the Sony and sigma. Above 135mm, it still faster than my Sony 18-250mm.
suchap69
post Nov 24 2009, 02:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: May 2005


wah.... if tammy is sharper than sony then for the price of sony 70200 2.8 i can get 2 lens la if top up a bit. tammy 70200 2.8 and another one is UWA, maybe 10-24 or 11-18. nice!
mie_75
post Nov 24 2009, 02:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Hallo... how are everyone on this rainy day again... hehehe.. been behind the scene for a while.. but now got something to ask to all masters... I know that we need a drybox to keep our photo gears in... by my problem is.. I dont want to get one.. reason.. SCARED to leave the gears at home in case theft pecah masuk my house then all gone cry.gif habis i wor..... therefore I've been carrying it here n there in a good bag with lots of silica gel. Since its not a good method to keep it.. can anyone suggest me how to go about it tak???

Thanks in advance notworthy.gif
Braynumb
post Nov 24 2009, 02:17 PM

Yea, Still Broke
******
Senior Member
1,409 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Somewhere Over There...


uh... Buy a Safe and convert it to a drybox?
v1rtual
post Nov 24 2009, 02:18 PM

ALPHA
*****
Senior Member
873 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


achew: Of course we do!

user posted image
*

[/quote]

that is one hell of a strong poison mad.gif
drooling just by looking at those whiteys

why sigma and tammy doesnt come with white 70200 btw? i looks much better
Ranceed
post Nov 24 2009, 02:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


Suchap69: The tamron is sharper then the Sony 70-300 4-5.6 G that is price of RM25xx.

mie_75 : i'm using Wonderful Electronic Moisture Absorber II. You can go to shashinki.com to see what it is.. smile.gif
albnok
post Nov 24 2009, 02:26 PM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


Seng_Kiat: The Tamron 70-200mm F2.8 is pretty fast on the A700 onwards. There is one at Leos Trading, Ampang Park.

Personally I say it is pretty darn sharp. It has excellent longitudinal chromatic aberration correction.

http://www.glaringnotebook.com/zimages/bsst3big.jpg
Left to right: 70mm, 135mm, 200mm. Top: Tamron 70-200mm F2.8; bottom: Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG HSM II.

http://www.glaringnotebook.com/zimages/bsst4big.jpg
Same thing; top is Sony 70-200mm F2.8G SSM; bottom is Minolta 80-200mm F2.8G HS APO.

More details here:
http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1243
mie_75
post Nov 24 2009, 02:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Ranceed @ Nov 24 2009, 02:19 PM)
mie_75 : i'm using Wonderful Electronic Moisture Absorber II. You can go to shashinki.com to see what it is.. smile.gif
*
ahhh looks good... very handy indeed drool.gif so i just pun it in my bag la eh ... then when it turns pink... just recharge it.. how many of that u put in your bag??

THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!!



This post has been edited by mie_75: Nov 24 2009, 02:31 PM
achew
post Nov 24 2009, 02:32 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


its gonna rain...

user posted image
Uzumaki NaruTo
post Nov 24 2009, 02:33 PM

oro?
*******
Senior Member
4,187 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: sleepy melati



Ahaks bokehmon also into water droplet ya brows.gif.

125 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 13 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0265sec    0.90    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 08:31 PM