Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D5000 V6, Entry Level Digital SLR from Nikon.
|
General_Nic
|
 Sep 10 2009, 02:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Sep 10 2009, 09:03 AM) Anyone know where can get cheap lens cap? I lost my 52mm lens cap.... Found soem shop selling for RM90 =.= I don't need original Nikon lens cap, as long as it fits nicely into my lens and can protect my lens. Someone pm-ed me tarita in Lowyat plaza sells for RM39, i wonder is there any cheaper one =) u can buy original lens cap la, cos its not that expensive la Shashinki selling Nikon 52mm lens cap at rm28 only item HEREQUOTE(noobie1 @ Sep 10 2009, 10:06 AM) pns still use AA battery?? muz be quite old?? coz i thought nowaday pns no use AA bat already... now still got latest PnS cams using AA batteries, mostly superzooms |
|
|
|
|
|
tun
|
Sep 10 2009, 02:25 PM
|
|
|
update user list ! me D60 .
|
|
|
|
|
|
noobie1
|
Sep 10 2009, 06:02 PM
|
|
|
so envy you all...can get ur camera...i still keeping money for my camera...ikat perut period...LOLX...
|
|
|
|
|
|
pengiranijam
|
Sep 10 2009, 09:12 PM
|
|
|
It is already V6... congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
xcrue
|
Sep 10 2009, 11:31 PM
|
|
|
Congrats!!! It's version 6!!  Wanna share some f1.8 pics  This post has been edited by xcrue: Sep 10 2009, 11:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
heLL[tuRt]
|
Sep 10 2009, 11:40 PM
|
|
|
how come the pic blur-blur?
|
|
|
|
|
|
xcrue
|
Sep 10 2009, 11:43 PM
|
|
|
f1.8 50mm shot ehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
noobie1
|
Sep 10 2009, 11:59 PM
|
|
|
no tripod!!! haha.... 50mm 1.8 aso wont so blur 1 mah...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xcrue
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:04 AM
|
|
|
i was focusing front objects only and blurring rear background purposely. Higher Aperture, F1.8 will deriving better focusing in front object and blurring rear background. maybe handshake  or like dis?  |
|
|
|
|
|
TSshinjun
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:07 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(xcrue @ Sep 11 2009, 12:04 AM) i was focusing front objects only and blurring rear background purposely. Higher Aperture, F1.8 will deriving better focusing in front object and blurring rear background. maybe handshake or like dis? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « The previous photo, focus point on the car's front part is not sharp enuf, maybe need to adjust again due to manual focus. This post has been edited by shinjun: Sep 11 2009, 12:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
AlphaBeta
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:29 AM
|
|
|
50mm at f1.8 is soft...i have 1, i find it soft at 1.8..sharp at 2.5 onwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
illegaldragon87
|
Sep 11 2009, 08:32 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Sep 11 2009, 12:29 AM) 50mm at f1.8 is soft...i have 1, i find it soft at 1.8..sharp at 2.5 onwards. i seldom use it at f1.8... usually around f2.8.. |
|
|
|
|
|
xcrue
|
Sep 11 2009, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
icic.. Let me try f2.8 sooner |
|
|
|
|
|
ReasonsofThanatos
|
Sep 11 2009, 11:39 AM
|
Getting Started
|
actually wat's f1.8 n so??mind 2 teach teach =p noobie here..
|
|
|
|
|
|
project-o
|
Sep 11 2009, 12:54 PM
|
|
|
I agree.... which is why I find the 35 f1.8 much improved that you can see the sharpness wide open and at f3.5 (1 stop) you can really see how sharp it is. QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Sep 11 2009, 12:29 AM) 50mm at f1.8 is soft...i have 1, i find it soft at 1.8..sharp at 2.5 onwards.
Added on September 11, 2009, 12:55 pmThe f number is the aperture size. The larger the aperture the smaller the F-number. QUOTE(ReasonsofThanatos @ Sep 11 2009, 11:39 AM) actually wat's f1.8 n so??mind 2 teach teach =p noobie here.. |
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:28 PM
|
|
|
@General Nic
Thanks for the link! But including shipping it's RM 38, just one ringgit difference than the shop i found... The shop also selling original. Cuz i am living in hostel now, shipping is not convenient for me =)
BTW im saving for 35mm f1.8 now T_T
|
|
|
|
|
|
illegaldragon87
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:40 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Sep 11 2009, 01:28 PM) @General Nic Thanks for the link! But including shipping it's RM 38, just one ringgit difference than the shop i found... The shop also selling original. Cuz i am living in hostel now, shipping is not convenient for me =) BTW im saving for 35mm f1.8 now T_T buy more stuff so itz free shipping...  u r planning to use 35mm for portrait?? if yes, i feel itz too wide... 50mm would be better... jus my 2 cent...  |
|
|
|
|
|
zellleonhart
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:51 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(illegaldragon87 @ Sep 11 2009, 01:40 PM) buy more stuff so itz free shipping... u r planning to use 35mm for portrait?? if yes, i feel itz too wide... 50mm would be better... jus my 2 cent... Most probably portrait. I have no choice =x D40 can't AF with 50mm F1.8, the AF-S ones are too expensive... |
|
|
|
|
|
ReasonsofThanatos
|
Sep 11 2009, 01:55 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(project-o @ Sep 11 2009, 12:54 PM) The f number is the aperture size. The larger the aperture the smaller the F-number. i see...and what's its effect?when aperture size is bigger n smaller? |
|
|
|
|
|
illegaldragon87
|
Sep 11 2009, 02:01 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Sep 11 2009, 01:51 PM) Most probably portrait. I have no choice =x D40 can't AF with 50mm F1.8, the AF-S ones are too expensive... okok... i think u should try the 35mm be4 decide... coz initially GeneralNic wanna get 35mm too, but afte he tried 35mm and 50mm,den he kno the difference n aim for 50mm now... |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0277sec
0.54
6 queries
GZIP Disabled