Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

70 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LYN Official TRANSFORMERS Movie Thread: V2, Next: Transformers 3 - July 1st, 2011

views
     
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 09:54 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 08:12 PM)
...well, a movie can have more than one MacGuffin.  tongue.gif  But perhaps MacGuffin isn't the right term to describe them. How about... they're plot devices.

Not characters.
*
whoever said they couldn't be characters?
Davidtcf
post Jun 28 2009, 09:58 PM

To the moon!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 09:54 PM)
whoever said they couldn't be characters?
*
lack of character development for this movie...
n00b13
post Jun 28 2009, 09:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 09:54 PM)
whoever said they couldn't be characters?
*
I didn't say they couldn't be characters. They certainly could, and probably should. I say they're not characters, because Michael Bay doesn't treat them like characters. smile.gif
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 10:02 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 09:59 PM)
I didn't say they couldn't be characters. They certainly could, and probably should. I say they're not characters, because Michael Bay doesn't treat them like characters.  smile.gif
*
Then what does he treat them (if by them, you mean Autobots) like?
n00b13
post Jun 28 2009, 10:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 10:02 PM)
Then what does he treat them (if by them, you mean Autobots) like?
*
For the significant ones, plot devices. All the rest, special effects.



This post has been edited by n00b13: Jun 28 2009, 10:10 PM
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 10:17 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 10:09 PM)
For the significant ones, plot devices. All the rest, special effects.
*
Mind explaining how are the Autobots plot devices? I thought the Allspark fragment and Harvester were plot devices?
n00b13
post Jun 28 2009, 10:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 10:17 PM)
Mind explaining how are the Autobots plot devices? I thought the Allspark fragment and Harvester were plot devices?
*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Again, they have no personality, nor are they capable of expressing any emotion. They are not characters. What else could they be?




kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 10:32 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 10:28 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Again, they have no personality, nor are they capable of expressing any emotion. They are not characters. What else could they be?
*
Bumblebee and Prime are characters. They have personality. Their lack of it doesn't make them plot devices. The lack of personality among the characters in TF2 is just down to bad writing.


Added on June 28, 2009, 10:33 pmIf it doesn't advance the story, I find it hard to believe it can be a plot device.

This post has been edited by kobe8byrant: Jun 28 2009, 10:35 PM
Davidtcf
post Jun 28 2009, 10:35 PM

To the moon!!
*******
Senior Member
3,520 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 10:28 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Again, they have no personality, nor are they capable of expressing any emotion. They are not characters. What else could they be?
*
i disagree, even toy story, "they" being the toy they still do function as characters...

if u'd say gundams are not characters then yes, as the pilots are the characters and it depends on them on how the gundam fights and moves...

as for transformers, they are living robot tissue... how could something living not be a character? michael could have done better in the 2nd movie but he kind of failed to... yet it is still somewhat a good movie

imo, transformers 1 will still leave a strong memory compared to its sequel

This post has been edited by Davidtcf: Jun 28 2009, 10:36 PM
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 10:42 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


Will you say Buster Keaton isn't a character but a plot device? NONE of the characters he play show any emotion.

The fact that Autobots personify certain values such as justice and compassion make them characters. Though they do not undergo any change in expression, they stand for values which make them flat characters.

This post has been edited by kobe8byrant: Jun 28 2009, 10:45 PM
n00b13
post Jun 28 2009, 10:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 10:32 PM)
Bumblebee and Prime are characters. They have personality. Their lack of it doesn't make them plot devices. The lack of personality among the characters in TF2 is just down to bad writing.


Added on June 28, 2009, 10:33 pmIf it doesn't advance the story, I find it hard to believe it can be a plot device.
*
But that's literally the only thing they do - advance the plot.

There's certainly plenty of bad writing in the movie, but I don't think that's why the robots have no personality. Even that annoying Leo and the Tyrese Gibson character have more personality than the robots.

I think it's because Michael Bay deliberately made them that way. It's the basis for his entire approach to the franchise. He's purposely making Transformers movies in which the Transformers are not characters.

Everything about how the movies portray them fits this interpretation.


QuickFire
post Jun 28 2009, 10:55 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


thats because the robots only appear when they do battle with one another. You cant expect much characterization from Random Transformer no. 14 when he is getting his butt kicked by Random Transformer no. 42.

I see noob13 is criticizing the movie more than praising it despite the 3 stars. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by QuickFire: Jun 28 2009, 10:57 PM
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 10:56 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 10:51 PM)
But that's literally the only thing they do - advance the plot.

There's certainly plenty of bad writing in the movie, but I don't think that's why the robots have no personality. Even that annoying Leo and the Tyrese Gibson character have more personality than the robots.

I think it's because Michael Bay deliberately made them that way. It's the basis for his entire approach to the franchise. He's purposely making Transformers movies in which the Transformers are not characters.

Everything about how the movies portray them fits this interpretation.
*
No it doesn't.

Just because human characters are more expressive doesn't mean they have more personality. All the characters in Transformers are one dimensional. He doesn't purposely make Transformers movies in which Transformers AREN'T characters because they are characters. If they aren't, you won't see that many Bumblebee-Sam scenes and the 'development' of their relationship.

The core of the story is 'a story about a boy and his car' so the car is a character. And as mentioned, they do stand for certain values and have showed emotion making them characters.
QuickFire
post Jun 28 2009, 10:59 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


hey you two should combine instead and let the fanboys (there are more than enough) to defend the movie tongue.gif
kobe8byrant
post Jun 28 2009, 11:00 PM

I'm too old for this stuff
********
All Stars
12,275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: KL


What about you? whistling.gif Don't try and blend in now tongue.gif
nimrod323
post Jun 28 2009, 11:02 PM

Macster/Gunner\Autobot /Alphaman\
*******
Senior Member
2,664 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Here and There


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 28 2009, 10:55 PM)
thats because the robots only appear when they do battle with one another. You cant expect much characterization from Random Transformer no. 14 when he is getting his butt kicked by Random Transformer no. 42.

I see noob13 is criticizing the movie more than praising it despite the 3 stars. biggrin.gif
*
lol he even made it sound convincing that Buster Witwicky is just a minor character and has no significant value in the old cartoon series,despite me proving him otherwise.

QuickFire
post Jun 28 2009, 11:02 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


every second I spend discussing this movie, my hate grows
BelowAverage
post Jun 28 2009, 11:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,274 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 10:51 PM)
But that's literally the only thing they do - advance the plot.

There's certainly plenty of bad writing in the movie, but I don't think that's why the robots have no personality. Even that annoying Leo and the Tyrese Gibson character have more personality than the robots.

I think it's because Michael Bay deliberately made them that way. It's the basis for his entire approach to the franchise. He's purposely making Transformers movies in which the Transformers are not characters.

Everything about how the movies portray them fits this interpretation.
*
I AGree with u.

But i guess they cant make a movie where the majority of the time is showing the robots, guess its takes too much time and too much work and budget.
But SRSLY, reduce all the human dramas, im more interested in the robots than making them look like some gundams who can talk.
n00b13
post Jun 28 2009, 11:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
364 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kobe8byrant @ Jun 28 2009, 10:56 PM)
The core of the story is 'a story about a boy and his car' so the car is a character.
*
That's just what they say in the press junkets. smile.gif Do you honestly think that came across in both movies?

QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jun 28 2009, 10:55 PM)
I see noob13 is criticizing the movie more than praising it despite the 3 stars. biggrin.gif
*
I enjoyed the movie despite itself. I recognize the fact that most of what it aimed for simply didn't work.




QuickFire
post Jun 28 2009, 11:05 PM

The more you sin the more you win
*******
Senior Member
2,867 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(n00b13 @ Jun 28 2009, 11:03 PM)

I enjoyed the movie
*
dont worry with time you will change your mind.

70 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0347sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:46 PM