Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 IPTA VS IPTS, which one has higher oppurtunity to work

views
     
TSadix4
post Mar 30 2009, 02:03 PM, updated 17y ago

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

so i ask some advisor
some of them said that IPTS hv higher oppurtunity to work and some said that IPTA hv higher oppurtunity to work.

so what about you?what did u think about it?in your opinion which one has higher oppurtunity?
spitfire111
post Mar 30 2009, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
295 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
the one who can actually "do" the work and extra if come form a recommendable ipta/ipts....
if that ipta/ipts produce more reliable worker for their company, then that ipta/ipts will have a higher opportunity in their eye...
in the end, the manager don't want a worker that complain a lot, do less work and asked for a huge sum of paycheck...


just my 2cent.... smile.gif

This post has been edited by spitfire111: Mar 30 2009, 02:17 PM
WingKalimdor
post Mar 30 2009, 02:50 PM

Mirai-Chan
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Shibuya, Japan

Studying in either IPTS or IPTA won't compromised you a high pay even you are from top university/college. This is the matter how you promote yourself during the interview and how well your job performance during the work. Did you expect to get high salary without working on it??
liangtucky
post Mar 30 2009, 03:07 PM

TOSHIBA QOSMIO!
*****
Senior Member
795 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: PJ,SS2,TTDI,Kepong



The same question that i wanted to know. Somehow from what i see,every college offers different scholarship and offers to many overseas college...Practically IPTS can be obtained by most of the ppl compared to IPTA
WingKalimdor
post Mar 30 2009, 04:30 PM

Mirai-Chan
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Shibuya, Japan

QUOTE(liangtucky @ Mar 30 2009, 03:07 PM)
The same question that i wanted to know. Somehow from what i see,every college offers different scholarship and offers to many overseas college...Practically IPTS can be obtained by most of the ppl compared to IPTA
*
To be honest, I dislike the subject conducted by IPTA because most of the subject were conducted in Malay Language and cause most of the student not ready to prepare themselves facing the actual business social. My friend were a top student in UPM, no doubt her CGPA 3.8xx but she can't even speak well in English during our private conversation. Sometime, doesn't involve ourselves in IPTA is not a bad thing. smile.gif
ron4
post Mar 30 2009, 05:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,123 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL



I heard before about the statistic for unemployed graduate in Malaysia, most of them are from IPTA, only small amount from IPTS. But our media try to cover up by not letting the details statistic

This post has been edited by ron4: Mar 30 2009, 05:41 PM
hyxer
post Mar 30 2009, 06:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: UNMC
IPTA sux. sorry but thats the truth. They make you join useless programs during the weekends that brings no help at all when applying for work. I've talked with some job interviewers and they approved that most of the graduates from IPTA's cant converse in english well(From various ppl including a talk from JPA job interviewer), thus rejected from the job. this is with the exception of UIAM(this is from Petronas human resource) because they require good english from student.

The key is english. I did not say that if you enter ipta u cant get a job, its that the chance is slimmer.

Peace
xavi5567
post Mar 30 2009, 07:22 PM

\(●'Å'●)/
*******
Senior Member
3,348 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: The Matrix

well it is quite wrong for u guy to blame the IPTA if ur english sucks right.. after all it is a language tat is up to u to pick up.. so wat if ur lecture is conducted in malay? how long do u stay in a lecture? 1-3 hour the most.. then u go bac to ur geng speaking chinese la.. hokien la.. cantonese la.. malay la... so who can u blame.. ? it is u urself.. even if the class is conducted in english.. how many of them will come out and speak english straight.. it is still require some self learning ma.. we r human not computer.. language is learn by practice not by instalation .. wat say u? in an interview.. u cant speak english.. tat is becos u hav no confident in urself.. if u r confident even though with a bit a grammar mistake i dont think the interviewer will screw u ..

u say IPTA offering crappy course? but down right these r course which r "cold" but when u come out u dont need to compete the whole m'sia.. u hav ur own niches market for ur study..
u go IPTS study wat every other people is studying hence more to compete with when u graduated in order to get a job..
plus u also pay more in IPTA let jus say u pay rm75000 for a study in ipts come out u work in a company as admin executive earning rm2300.. is it worth?
u study in IPTA cost u rm21000 come out earn the same as those of iPTS also.. so wat the diff... ? it all bout ourself la.. take the road not taken and u will find a path full of chances to explore..
TSadix4
post Mar 30 2009, 08:16 PM

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

QUOTE(hyxer @ Mar 30 2009, 06:01 PM)
IPTA sux. sorry but thats the truth. They make you join useless programs during the weekends that brings no help at all when applying for work. I've talked with some job interviewers and they approved that most of the graduates from IPTA's cant converse in english well(From various ppl including a talk from JPA job interviewer), thus rejected from the job. this is with the exception of UIAM(this is from Petronas human resource) because they require good english from student.

The key is english. I did not say that if you enter ipta u cant get a job, its that the chance is slimmer.

Peace
*
as far as i know IPTA like UIA is fully english lol

i also ask some job interviewers and he said that IPTS students sometimes they dont approve because from the "college" where they're from
PuttyKitties
post Mar 30 2009, 08:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE
well it is quite wrong for u guy to blame the IPTA if ur english sucks right.. after all it is a language tat is up to u to pick up.. so wat if ur lecture is conducted in malay? how long do u stay in a lecture? 1-3 hour the most.. then u go bac to ur geng speaking chinese la.. hokien la.. cantonese la.. malay la... so who can u blame.. ? it is u urself.. even if the class is conducted in english.. how many of them will come out and speak english straight.. it is still require some self learning ma.. we r human not computer.. language is learn by practice not by instalation .. wat say u? in an interview.. u cant speak english.. tat is becos u hav no confident in urself.. if u r confident even though with a bit a grammar mistake i dont think the interviewer will screw u ..

u say IPTA offering crappy course? but down right these r course which r "cold" but when u come out u dont need to compete the whole m'sia.. u hav ur own niches market for ur study..
u go IPTS study wat every other people is studying hence more to compete with when u graduated in order to get a job..
plus u also pay more in IPTA let jus say u pay rm75000 for a study in ipts come out u work in a company as admin executive earning rm2300.. is it worth?
u study in IPTA cost u rm21000 come out earn the same as those of iPTS also.. so wat the diff... ? it all bout ourself la.. take the road not taken and u will find a path full of chances to explore..


U can't compare both IPTA & IPTS generally. IPTA has it's own good, as IPTS has its as well. But overall, IPTS has some bonus in getting a career, rather than a job.

IPTA was once good, but as time passes by, the lack of proper monitoring and good lecturers have gone away has driven IPTA to the darker corner.

IPTS can be great, but it really depends whether did you do a proper background check on the institution and the course it offers before attempting studies. There are a significant number of IPTS which are bullshit and not registered as well. Doesn't mean they advertise aggressively means that they are recognized.

QUOTE
i also ask some job interviewers and he said that IPTS students sometimes they dont approve because from the "college" where they're from


Before going for IPTS, go to Ministry of Higher Education's website to check whether the courses you are interested are listed and registered in their system. The system is constantly updated. If it's not there, don't bother even going.

QUOTE
well it is quite wrong for u guy to blame the IPTA if ur english sucks right..

And your English isn't that proper as well. Perhaps ease out on the comment.

This post has been edited by PuttyKitties: Mar 30 2009, 08:33 PM
azarimy
post Mar 30 2009, 10:11 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


most IPTA courses are already conducted in english since 5 years ago. all this bullshit spawns from years before. google it, u'll find the same old story about graduates cannot speak english since before 2004.

i teach in IPTA and everything is now in english, mainly bcoz now we have quite a number of foreign students who dont speak BM at all.

and btw, dont be confused with IPTS marketing themselves as having less number of jobless graduates. just compare the numbers. IPTAs produce larger number of graduates compared to IPTS. ofcourse the number of jobless graduates would be bigger.
Xero
post Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Mar 30 2009, 04:30 PM)
To be honest, I dislike the subject conducted by IPTA because most of the subject were conducted in Malay Language and cause most of the student not ready to prepare themselves facing the actual business social. My friend were a top student in UPM, no doubt her CGPA 3.8xx but she can't even speak well in English during our private conversation. Sometime, doesn't involve ourselves in IPTA is not a bad thing.  smile.gif
*
IPTA uses malay because it is our national language dude, if we use english then this country would become a pirated mat saleh country filled with asians that think they're white ppl, those westerners would laugh at us that we don't have our own language and using theirs. this is not a pirated mat saleh country to be using english, and don't be proud to use english either because ...

Here's the truth. IPTA or IPTS. Malaysian people's english sux. Broken and can't even pronounce words properly. "Haiya, dunno lar, have u tried this ar?" Sometimes I wonder who started all these broken english gibberish. Probably from ppl who can't speak english properly. and most malaysians don't speak english properly. To speak english properly you need to also speak it in either the american or british accent, then only the correct pronounciation will come out. Good grammar doesnt equal to good english, imagine some mat saleh speaking malay with very good grammar but still sound like mat saleh accent, that's not proper malay. and also, here's something that most malaysians do, they mix american and british english accent together. hello you can't mix indonesian language with malay language even tho they sound similar. You wanna talk about the real business social, your english better be good like those mat salehs, because america owns the big companies, many american products in malaysia as well, hard to escape from them.


QUOTE(ron4 @ Mar 30 2009, 05:41 PM)
I heard before about the statistic for unemployed graduate in Malaysia, most of them are from IPTA, only small amount from IPTS. But our media try to cover up by not letting the details statistic
*
That's only what you heard, it doesn't mean that its true, if not where's the proof? I realize that most of these rumours about bad things going on in IPTA comes from mostly the non-malays. Probably cause they don't get much space to get in. I'm a mix, so I see things from both sides most of the time. And don't try to argue about equal rights and all because one thing if you wanna argue about it, I say go read Malaysian History and read American History first, then you talk. Also, You have to know, most IPTS are not credible at all, they don't produce their own degree, that's the thing the difference between IPTA and IPTS. IPTS just borrows degree from overseas universities that are mostly not the top ones and make it under a twinning programme crap. I emailed Hong Kong University, which is one of the top university in the world, number 26 in the world ranking, and I asked them if they recognize my IPTS college, they say they don't, what they recognize from Malaysia are only IPTAs like UiTM and those polytechnic institutes. what a bummer. Only few IPTS are good, and they are the international unis that setup a branch in msia, like monash, nottingham and swinburne, at least they produce their own degree like IPTAs. All those other IPTS are mostly not recognized by overseas unis also except the crappy overseas unis. Taylors is good, because its the oldest IPTS and you know what, universities are good based on how old they are.

You wanna compare IPTA with Malaysian IPTS, you can never, because IPTA unis are in the world ranking like UM, UKM, USM, UPM, sure you might say number 200+ is not good, but check again which universities they beaten. There are more than 2100 colleges and universities in the US alone, and our IPTA being number 200-300, means the IPTA already beaten out like 1800-1900 american unis and colleges in the US ALONE. There are also japanese unis that IPTA beaten. and all those other unis in the WORLD that IPTA had beaten. I can't believe many malaysians are so ignorant to see this fact.

In IPTA you can get courses like nuclear science, aerospace engineering, forestry and they do research there too. Most IPTS just functions as a teaching centre, not a research centre, and they teach what courses? mostly just Mass comm, business, Hotel&tourism and Pre-U, and they keep going back to that. IPTA has ALL THOSE COURSES + MORE. You wanna talk about globalization, you need a uni with research capabilities.

The prestigious ivy league unis are one of the oldest universities in america. IPTAs like UM, UKM, UPM and all are way older than any IPTS in the country. UM and UPM dates back to before independence and it used to be british colleges and universities. Older means more experience.

The one possible reason why companies in malaysia would take IPTS students are because the majority of the economy are hold by the chinese community, so most of the company holders are chinese and chinese people not many can get into the IPTA because of the quota, so they pick IPTS students because its their own geng. IPTA students would find work with the government.






QUOTE(hyxer @ Mar 30 2009, 06:01 PM)
IPTA sux. sorry but thats the truth. They make you join useless programs during the weekends that brings no help at all when applying for work. I've talked with some job interviewers and they approved that most of the graduates from IPTA's cant converse in english well(From various ppl including a talk from JPA job interviewer), thus rejected from the job. this is with the exception of UIAM(this is from Petronas human resource) because they require good english from student.

The key is english. I did not say that if you enter ipta u cant get a job, its that the chance is slimmer.

Peace
*
The other true reason why IPTA uses malay language is that IPTA produces student for the local job market and not overseas market man. The government want us to study and work here so the public unis aim to do whats right to do. Why in the world would any government would build a university for their people to ciao overseas and never come back? that would be dumb right? If you wanna go overseas then find a way yourself la, learn english yourself, the IPTAs are already cheap enough to give you big campuses that IPTS cannot beat ever, why ask so much.

Even in American Universities people do useless programs like joining fraternities and worshipping nonsense (not to mention the naked run). The thing about the IPTA is that it doesn't matter if you can speak english well or not. The use of malay language there is to preserve the malay language and to be proud of malay language as our national language. and for you to work in Malaysia. If you look at advanced countries like the US and UK, do you see many of their citizens go study 'overseas' ? No, so they get more manpower for their country, taught by their country and work for their country. Why would they want to use japanese language for all their university courses just because japan is advancing a lot.



Also, why do I have to explain all these? if Malaysian people are advanced enough to be GLOBALIZED i think many of them would have figured this out by themselves right.

This post has been edited by Xero: Apr 1 2009, 03:43 AM
SUSkalauandaceria
post Apr 1 2009, 03:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
its depends on ur own fate kid
RainJR
post Apr 1 2009, 01:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
342 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KL


tumpang thread~ UTAR consider as IPTA or IPTS ?
blurskyblue
post Apr 1 2009, 01:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
56 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(RainJR @ Apr 1 2009, 01:00 PM)
tumpang thread~ UTAR consider as IPTA or IPTS ?
*
ipts
LoveMeNot
post Apr 1 2009, 01:50 PM

Live . Laugh . Love
******
Senior Member
1,710 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


blame it on IPTA for not being able to speak proper english?you guys are a bunch of jokers... It all goes back to yourself, whether you use the language or not in your daily conversation. From what I've observed, 95% of chinese students in local U all converse in Mandarin or Cantonese. Now what?

IPTAs in BM?Well, some may try to explain with a mixture of english and BM but most of the time, its in english IMHO.

Back to the Q, its how you carry yourself, present yourself during the interview session. Having bombastic results, coming from IPTA is nothing. Same goes with IPTS.

And i find it funny when people keep complaining about the irrelevant, nonsense courses offered at IPTAs, but yet people are still flocking and applying for it..

Ive nothing against both IPTA and IPTS because I have the opportunity to be educated in these both and each of it has its own set of pro and cons..
lycan01
post Apr 1 2009, 02:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
73 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
*
if you were a female, i'd proposed for a marriage.
NUR_VER.3
post Apr 1 2009, 03:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(adix4 @ Mar 30 2009, 02:03 PM)
so i ask some advisor
some of them said that IPTS hv higher oppurtunity to work and some said that IPTA hv higher oppurtunity to work.

so what about you?what did u think about it?in your opinion which one has higher oppurtunity?
*
Up to you, IPTA is harder to get into, IPTS is easier... wanna talk about job opportunity, proper english is a must, whether it is a local company or an international company, why? cause huge companies nowadays are becoming more globalized...we deal with foreigners...

Whatever people say, good english cant be attained by picking either one, good english can only be attained when U URSELF WANT TO LEARN...
im studying in INTI, honestly, most of the students here cant even pronounce correctly, let alone communicating in english...

as for the course conducted, IPTA programmes have higher credibility, and IPTA lectures are mostly PHD and masters holders....IPTS? some of the lecturers dont even have a master qualification, then how to teach??

but when getting into IPTS, you can approach your lectures easier, since IPTS colleges have lesser students, so each student have their fair share of the lecture's time, so use it....

in the end it all depends on the type of course you want to take, if you want the business side, take the IPTS
(down to earth no frills teaching, u dont even need a text book) they will focus more into practical topics, rather than add on subjects that are not related...

but if you want more specialized course like Engineering, Medic,Architectural,Science and technology, take the IPTA, as they have more capable experts and facilities...IPTA are known to teach outdated subjects,or including add on subjects that are not even related to your course, but they have long history of providing strong tertiary educations, so some of these subjects might come in handy.. tongue.gif

QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
IPTA uses malay because it is our national language dude, if we use english then this country would become a pirated mat saleh country filled with asians that think they're white ppl, those westerners would laugh at us that we don't have our own language and using theirs. this is not a pirated mat saleh country to be using english, and don't be proud to use english either because ...

Here's the truth. IPTA or IPTS. Malaysian people's english sux. Broken and can't even pronounce words properly. "Haiya, dunno lar, have u tried this ar?" Sometimes I wonder who started all these broken english gibberish. Probably from ppl who can't speak english properly. and most malaysians don't speak english properly. To speak english properly you need to also speak it in either the american or british accent, then only the correct pronounciation will come out. Good grammar doesnt equal to good english, imagine some mat saleh speaking malay with very good grammar but still sound like mat saleh accent, that's not proper malay. and also, here's something that most malaysians do, they mix american and british english accent together. hello you can't mix indonesian language with malay language even tho they sound similar. You wanna talk about the real business social, your english better be good like those mat salehs, because america owns the big companies, many american products in malaysia as well, hard to escape from them.
That's only what you heard, it doesn't mean that its true, if not where's the proof? I realize that most of these rumours about bad things going on in IPTA comes from mostly the non-malays. Probably cause they don't get much space to get in. I'm a mix, so I see things from both sides most of the time. And don't try to argue about equal rights and all because one thing if you wanna argue about it, I say go read Malaysian History and read American History first, then you talk. Also, You have to know, most IPTS are not credible at all, they don't produce their own degree, that's the thing the difference between IPTA and IPTS. IPTS just borrows degree from overseas universities that are mostly not the top ones and make it under a twinning programme crap. I emailed Hong Kong University, which is one of the top university in the world, number 26 in the world ranking, and I asked them if they recognize my IPTS college, they say they don't, what they recognize from Malaysia are only IPTAs like UiTM and those polytechnic institutes. what a bummer. Only few IPTS are good, and they are the international unis that setup a branch in msia, like monash, nottingham and swinburne, at least they produce their own degree like IPTAs. All those other IPTS are mostly not recognized by overseas unis also except the crappy overseas unis. Taylors is good, because its the oldest IPTS and you know what, universities are good based on how old they are.

You wanna compare IPTA with Malaysian IPTS, you can never, because IPTA unis are in the world ranking like UM, UKM, USM, UPM, sure you might say number 200+ is not good, but check again which universities they beaten. There are more than 2100 colleges and universities in the US alone, and our IPTA being number 200-300, means the IPTA already beaten out like 1800-1900 american unis and colleges in the US ALONE. There are also japanese unis that IPTA beaten. and all those other unis in the WORLD that IPTA had beaten. I can't believe many malaysians are so ignorant to see this fact.

In IPTA you can get courses like nuclear science, aerospace engineering, forestry and they do research there too. Most IPTS just functions as a teaching centre, not a research centre, and they teach what courses? mostly just Mass comm, business, Hotel&tourism and Pre-U, and they keep going back to that. IPTA has ALL THOSE COURSES + MORE. You wanna talk about globalization, you need a uni with research capabilities.

The prestigious ivy league unis are one of the oldest universities in america. IPTAs like UM, UKM, UPM and all are way older than any IPTS in the country. UM and UPM dates back to before independence and it used to be british colleges and universities. Older means more experience.

The one possible reason why companies in malaysia would take IPTS students are because the majority of the economy are hold by the chinese community, so most of the company holders are chinese and chinese people not many can get into the IPTA because of the quota, so they pick IPTS students because its their own geng. IPTA students would find work with the government.
The other true reason why IPTA uses malay language is that IPTA produces student for the local job market and not overseas market man. The government want us to study and work here so the public unis aim to do whats right to do. Why in the world would any government would build a university for their people to ciao overseas and never come back? that would be dumb right? If you wanna go overseas then find a way yourself la, learn english yourself, the IPTAs are already cheap enough to give you big campuses that IPTS cannot beat ever, why ask so much.

Even in American Universities people do useless programs like joining fraternities and worshipping nonsense (not to mention the naked run). The thing about the IPTA is that it doesn't matter if you can speak english well or not. The use of malay language there is to preserve the malay language and to be proud of malay language as our national language. and for you to work in Malaysia. If you look at advanced countries like the US and UK, do you see many of their citizens go study 'overseas' ? No, so they get more manpower for their country, taught by their country and work for their country. Why would they want to use japanese language for all their university courses just because japan is advancing a lot.
Also, why do I have to explain all these? if Malaysian people are advanced enough to be GLOBALIZED i think many of them would have figured this out by themselves right.
*
i agree on your certain points BUT:

you have to understand, people do not employ because of their race origin, BIG COMPANIES wont waste their time to employ certain candidates just because of their race or anything like that, so please dont simply blame on lame stuff like "its their geng.." whatever....its a lame excuse...

Im a malay, my father are those people who interview people, he work in LOCAL company OWNED by BUMIS, but still he complained or refuse to take people who dont have the capability to speak properly in english, and dont get me wrong either, HE DONT CARE WHETHER THEY COME FROM IPTS OR IPTA, in the end all that matters is first impression and the candidate's result...

whatever people say, in reality, ENGLISH IS A MUST, if you want my opinion no offense intended here, based on my experience malays have the capability to speak well in english, but they are too afraid or ashamed to speak english with their friends.

Trust me, IPTA students have good grammar and vocab, on the paper they write really well, but unfortunately their lack experience on speaking made them look dumb..so whatever people say, IPTA students are good in english but they just need to speak more...

as for others, their english grammar and vocab sux to the max, but they tend to speak english between themselves frequently, and this is how IPTS students attain their speaking skills icon_idea.gif

It is time for us to look at the bigger picture here, i know most of us(malays) want to preserve our language, or whatever because of our long history but take a step back and properly analyze the situation. Face the fact, even in the local company, WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH FOREIGNERS, even in the big company WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH FOREIGNERS, even in the government sector, WE ARE GOING TO DEAL WITH FOREIGNERS. So please, preserve our language as you want but keep it to yourself, in reality more company are becoming GLOBALIZED, and at the same time the more demands are required for people who can converse in english...

regardless on how you view the local education system, education ministry are focusing its people to becoming more versatile,thats why the ministry are focusing on using english on certain subjects. We learn english because we need to deal with foreigners(arabs, europeans, japs,) and not only with white people, we learn english not because we want to worship the language, no, far from that..

THE ONLY REASON IS THAT ENGLISH IS THE ONLY GLOBAL LANGUAGE (or:lingua franca) used by people around the world...thats why we need it..so assuming that learning english will cause the downfall of the local language is utter nonsense and paranoia, because in the end we only use it to deal with foreign people, and not to converse with people on daily bases..

Take note: this will give you the COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE in the fresh grad groups....

Finally, back to the topic, the factor for choosing IPTA or IPTS cannot be decided just because people say IPTS is better on english or IPTA is better on facilities and what not,

its far from that..all you need to do is identify which educational areas you are interested, and decide which universities gives a better advantage according to your preferred courses...

Don't be fooled by advertisements, and do your own research about certain colleges and universities before deciding...do this and you will never regret your decision. good luck... thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Apr 1 2009, 03:44 PM
slvn
post Apr 1 2009, 03:58 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Shah Alam/Petaling Jaya/Damansara


IPTA of cos..full stop..
in IPTS the fees ar ridiculously high..the syllabus are extremely simple(comparing UNISEL's exam paper with UKM's, i've seen them)..
one interviewer once said to my friend that they dont hire IPTS graduates..
i still have no idea why people still go to IPTS(except for ppl than not qualified to enter IPTA)
NUR_VER.3
post Apr 1 2009, 04:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(slvn @ Apr 1 2009, 03:58 PM)
IPTA of cos..full stop..
in IPTS the fees ar ridiculously high..the syllabus are extremely simple(comparing UNISEL's exam paper with UKM's, i've seen them)..
one interviewer once said to my friend that they dont hire IPTS graduates..
i still have no idea why people still go to IPTS(except for ppl than not qualified to enter IPTA)
*
bro, even JPA scholars go to IPTS, these people are top scorers so please do your research before posting tq...
and i dont think that 1 interviewer can resemble all the interviewer in the job market, so it varies bro...

IPTS fees are high because they didnt get support from govt. but sometimes if you give peanuts you get monkeys bro...
slvn
post Apr 2 2009, 09:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Shah Alam/Petaling Jaya/Damansara


QUOTE(NUR_VER.3 @ Apr 1 2009, 04:06 PM)
bro, even JPA scholars go to IPTS, these people are top scorers so please do your research before posting tq...
and i dont think that 1 interviewer can resemble all the interviewer in the job market, so it varies bro...

IPTS fees are high because they didnt get support from govt. but sometimes if you give peanuts you get monkeys bro...
*
you haven't see the world boy..
i assume you're an IPTS student or ex-student..
i wanna see u study in IPTA and let see if u could handle the tight schedule and the
hard syllabus..i have friends who are lecturers, research assistand and even master students in IPTS
and the only nice thing i heard from them about the students is they drive nice cars..

i know there are good students in IPTS.. but in malaysia's situation u cant really
compare them..

This post has been edited by slvn: Apr 2 2009, 09:43 AM
NUR_VER.3
post Apr 2 2009, 06:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(slvn @ Apr 2 2009, 09:40 AM)
you haven't see the world boy..
i assume you're an IPTS student or ex-student..
i wanna see u study in IPTA and let see if u could handle the tight schedule and the
hard syllabus..i have friends who are lecturers, research assistand and even master students in IPTS
and the only nice thing i heard from them about the students  is they drive nice cars..

i know there are good students in IPTS.. but in malaysia's situation u cant really
compare them..
*
dude, eventhough im an IPTS student, i have lots of friends studying in IPTA right now, and my cousins are IPTA grads, my uncle is a lecturer in UTM,my sister is a graduate from UITM, i know all about IPTA,their facilities, their lectures, and u wanna talk about tight schedule?? oh please...u think only IPTA have tight schedules???do you have friends taking A-level before? or AUP programme?

U urself dont have strong point to bring up here, please stop posting stuffs that are irrelevant, saying things like "they just drive nice cars" "in malaysia u cant really compare them" are baseless, what type of situation makes these people un-comparable?

calling me boy dosent make you wiser than me, well enough arguing here, sorry for the off topic TS
TSadix4
post Apr 2 2009, 07:19 PM

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

QUOTE(NUR_VER.3 @ Apr 1 2009, 04:06 PM)
bro, even JPA scholars go to IPTS, these people are top scorers so please do your research before posting tq...
and i dont think that 1 interviewer can resemble all the interviewer in the job market, so it varies bro...

IPTS fees are high because they didnt get support from govt. but sometimes if you give peanuts you get monkeys bro...
*
IPTA tak sediakan A Levels,SAM and stuff
thats why they send em to the IPTS

azarimy
post Apr 2 2009, 07:30 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(NUR_VER.3 @ Apr 2 2009, 10:57 AM)
dude, eventhough im an IPTS student, i have lots of friends studying in IPTA right now, and my cousins are IPTA grads, my uncle is a lecturer in UTM,my sister is a graduate from UITM, i know all about IPTA,their facilities, their lectures, and u wanna talk about tight schedule?? oh please...u think only IPTA have tight schedules???do you have friends taking A-level before? or AUP programme?

U urself dont have strong point to bring up here, please stop posting stuffs that are irrelevant, saying things like "they just drive nice cars" "in malaysia u cant really compare them" are baseless, what type of situation makes these people un-comparable?

calling me boy dosent make you wiser than me, well enough arguing here, sorry for the off topic TS
*
so u're basing ur argument from what they said, and u havent actually been to an IPTA itself?

well hello there black kettle!

i've taught in both IPTA and IPTS. lets argue against me instead wink.gif.
TSadix4
post Apr 2 2009, 07:38 PM

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

QUOTE(NUR_VER.3 @ Apr 1 2009, 03:41 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
for your information
IPTA standard is rising
go google any universities(IPTA) in world rank
and yes
theres a lot of black people,arab and white people who stody in Ipta and they dont understand english
and thats why IPTA use english now
azarimy
post Apr 2 2009, 07:44 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(adix4 @ Apr 2 2009, 11:38 AM)
for your information
IPTA standard is rising
go google any universities(IPTA) in world rank
and yes
theres a lot of black people,arab and white people who stody in Ipta and they dont understand english
and thats why IPTA use english now
*
u mean they dont understand BM? that's why IPTAs use english now? correct?




anyway, it is to my understanding that although english helps in communication, it doesnt mean bad english = stupid. u can learn engineering perfectly in BM bcoz being based in math, a universal language. u could learn architecture totally in BM, bcoz being based in drawings, another universal language. whatever language u use, it doesnt really matter if u wanna learn. the japanese learned entirely in japanese, chinese (mainland) in mandarin.

nowadays we use english bcoz of internationalization (i18n). we want to diversify and accelerate our students. but dont confuse it with english=better.
WingKalimdor
post Apr 2 2009, 07:47 PM

Mirai-Chan
******
Senior Member
1,801 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Shibuya, Japan

QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 2 2009, 07:30 PM)
so u're basing ur argument from what they said, and u havent actually been to an IPTA itself?

well hello there black kettle!

i've taught in both IPTA and IPTS. lets argue against me instead wink.gif.
*
I have a question, let's make an assumption that I'm graduate from IPTS could I proceed to IPTA to continue the MSc??
wleong
post Apr 2 2009, 09:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
762 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


IPTA IS GOV WORK
IPTS IS PRIVATE WORK
azarimy
post Apr 3 2009, 12:27 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Apr 2 2009, 11:47 AM)
I have a question, let's make an assumption that I'm graduate from IPTS could I proceed to IPTA to continue the MSc??
*
yes.

QUOTE(wleong @ Apr 2 2009, 01:15 PM)
IPTA IS GOV WORK
IPTS IS PRIVATE WORK
*
not really. for example, in my field, everybody will end up in private sector. the government sector could only accommodate about 5-10% of the graduates.
empirekhoo
post Apr 3 2009, 01:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: 1001010100010011101
QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
IPTA uses malay because it is our national language dude, if we use english then this country would become a pirated mat saleh country filled with asians that think they're white ppl, those westerners would laugh at us that we don't have our own language and using theirs. this is not a pirated mat saleh country to be using english, and don't be proud to use english either because ...
*
i have to admit you have certain degree of accuracy in ur point of view. however, do realise that english is MUCH important and appropriate to be teaching language (at least in sci and tech). All first handed article in science & tech are wrote in english papers. and how could you translate certain jargon to malay? (note i'm not proposing we throw malay language inside the dustbin, but to emphasise the importance of english in teaching. this make our graduates much more competitive). I still disagree that using english is making our country 'pirated mat saleh' country. are you refering US, UK, aus to be the same country? they do still have their own distinction dispite the same language they use.

QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
Here's the truth. IPTA or IPTS. Malaysian people's english sux. Broken and can't even pronounce words properly. "Haiya, dunno lar, have u tried this ar?" Sometimes I wonder who started all these broken english gibberish. Probably from ppl who can't speak english properly. and most malaysians don't speak english properly. To speak english properly you need to also speak it in either the american or british accent, then only the correct pronounciation will come out. Good grammar doesnt equal to good english, imagine some mat saleh speaking malay with very good grammar but still sound like mat saleh accent, that's not proper malay. and also, here's something that most malaysians do, they mix american and british english accent together. hello you can't mix indonesian language with malay language even tho they sound similar. You wanna talk about the real business social, your english better be good like those mat salehs, because america owns the big companies, many american products in malaysia as well, hard to escape from them.
*
Language is beauty for some, but it's generally regarded as a means of communication. the key is to get your point straight to the opposite side as far as people understand and not misleading (i'm not promoting grammatical error. anyway there's nothing like perfect grammar) so it's not the accent. it's the language skill one owns. perhaps malaysian student never take an initiative to work on their english. Though i would still insist using english for education will at least improve the problem that "most graduate cannot speak fluent english".

QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
That's only what you heard, it doesn't mean that its true, if not where's the proof? I realize that most of these rumours about bad things going on in IPTA comes from mostly the non-malays. Probably cause they don't get much space to get in. I'm a mix, so I see things from both sides most of the time. And don't try to argue about equal rights and all because one thing if you wanna argue about it, I say go read Malaysian History and read American History first, then you talk. Also, You have to know, most IPTS are not credible at all, they don't produce their own degree, that's the thing the difference between IPTA and IPTS. IPTS just borrows degree from overseas universities that are mostly not the top ones and make it under a twinning programme crap. I emailed Hong Kong University, which is one of the top university in the world, number 26 in the world ranking, and I asked them if they recognize my IPTS college, they say they don't, what they recognize from Malaysia are only IPTAs like UiTM and those polytechnic institutes. what a bummer. Only few IPTS are good, and they are the international unis that setup a branch in msia, like monash, nottingham and swinburne, at least they produce their own degree like IPTAs. All those other IPTS are mostly not recognized by overseas unis also except the crappy overseas unis. Taylors is good, because its the oldest IPTS and you know what, universities are good based on how old they are.
*
wow. that's clearly stereotype! okay let me just clarify a little. whether who able to get into IPTA or not, it's not up to us to say. but to say 'non-malays' make up rumours about how bad IPTA was, it's clearly wrong. I don't see why would someone NOT being in IPTA giving bad comment about IPTA. it's more to students in IPTA which are not satisfied with their position. things can include from bad lecturers to language to segregation and so on.


QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
You wanna compare IPTA with Malaysian IPTS, you can never, because IPTA unis are in the world ranking like UM, UKM, USM, UPM, sure you might say number 200+ is not good, but check again which universities they beaten. There are more than 2100 colleges and universities in the US alone, and our IPTA being number 200-300, means the IPTA already beaten out like 1800-1900 american unis and colleges in the US ALONE. There are also japanese unis that IPTA beaten. and all those other unis in the WORLD that IPTA had beaten. I can't believe many malaysians are so ignorant to see this fact.

In IPTA you can get courses like nuclear science, aerospace engineering, forestry and they do research there too. Most IPTS just functions as a teaching centre, not a research centre, and they teach what courses? mostly just Mass comm, business, Hotel&tourism and Pre-U, and they keep going back to that. IPTA has ALL THOSE COURSES + MORE. You wanna talk about globalization, you need a uni with research capabilities.

The prestigious ivy league unis are one of the oldest universities in america. IPTAs like UM, UKM, UPM and all are way older than any IPTS in the country. UM and UPM dates back to before independence and it used to be british colleges and universities. Older means more experience.

The one possible reason why companies in malaysia would take IPTS students are because the majority of the economy are hold by the chinese community, so most of the company holders are chinese and chinese people not many can get into the IPTA because of the quota, so they pick IPTS students because its their own geng. IPTA students would find work with the government.
The other true reason why IPTA uses malay language is that IPTA produces student for the local job market and not overseas market man. The government want us to study and work here so the public unis aim to do whats right to do. Why in the world would any government would build a university for their people to ciao overseas and never come back? that would be dumb right? If you wanna go overseas then find a way yourself la, learn english yourself, the IPTAs are already cheap enough to give you big campuses that IPTS cannot beat ever, why ask so much.

Even in American Universities people do useless programs like joining fraternities and worshipping nonsense (not to mention the naked run). The thing about the IPTA is that it doesn't matter if you can speak english well or not. The use of malay language there is to preserve the malay language and to be proud of malay language as our national language. and for you to work in Malaysia. If you look at advanced countries like the US and UK, do you see many of their citizens go study 'overseas' ? No, so they get more manpower for their country, taught by their country and work for their country. Why would they want to use japanese language for all their university courses just because japan is advancing a lot.
Also, why do I have to explain all these? if Malaysian people are advanced enough to be GLOBALIZED i think many of them would have figured this out by themselves right.
*
first. do not use weird statistic which i don't even know if you did have the reference cited properly. second. I would not use "how many college in US". Rather i'll say. why UM fall out of 200? though this is off topic. anyway, again i don't like stereotype posts. is chinese holding the economy? i saw the statistic of equity for malay ethnics went way up (well...statistic..everyone can lie with it)

also, if the government is so brilliant, they'd use english to teach us because this make us much more competitive. bringing the name 'MALAYSIA' everywhere. at least by then we feel proud because there're malaysian which really done something that's impresive. 'oh! that what MNC company's CEO is a malaysian' or so on so on. why make people of less competitive and lock them in malaysia, take them into gov agency and sit there, while not even picking up my call? (i've js called jpa today. 8 times till someone pick up) If IPTA cannot produce competitive grads internationally, it's a failure (at least for me). Malaysian don't pay tax (which goes into i don't care who's pocket, and into the uni) just for them to produce degree holder which only capable of local market. that's a shame to malaysia. lol. we are the one SHOULD complain because despite the cheap price we pay for IPTA, it's our money. we paid TAX every year (this reminds me of my EA form ==)

back to topic. i wouldn't say ipta or ipts is better. i'd criticize the malaysia education at whole.
wornbook
post Apr 3 2009, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
370 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(Xero @ Apr 1 2009, 03:07 AM)
Probably from ppl who can't speak english properly. and most malaysians don't speak english properly. To speak english properly you need to also speak it in either the american or british accent, then only the correct pronounciation will come out.
*
Oh come on, that's just a ridiculous statement. I have never understood some people's obsession with speaking in "Western" accents.

First of all, can you tell me exactly what an American or British accent is? With the range of accents that it's impossible to say exactly what an American or British accent is.

Secondly, what about other native English speakers like Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, South Africans? Are you suggesting they don't speak proper English because they don't speak with American or British accents?

English is the most widely-spoken language in the world. When a language is so widespread, it is only natural that regional dialects will develop. Malaysian English (not Manglish) is as valid a dialect of English as American English is. In fact, the many accents in England are the product of many dialects of English spoken throughout the land.

There is no need to speak with an American or British accent, whatever that means, in order to speak proper English.

Thirdly, I suggest you take a look at your own English before saying most Malaysians don't speak English properly.
yanniieee
post Apr 3 2009, 05:23 PM

Starsss!
****
Senior Member
564 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


i don't think it related to which college/university you graduate from. it's all depends on your ability
NUR_VER.3
post Apr 3 2009, 06:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 2 2009, 07:30 PM)
so u're basing ur argument from what they said, and u havent actually been to an IPTA itself?

well hello there black kettle!

i've taught in both IPTA and IPTS. lets argue against me instead wink.gif.
*
is there a problem using comments from IPTA students and lectures as base for my arguments?

i dont need to argue, if you read my previous comments you'll know that im not picking any sides, i only brought forward pros and consbetween IPTA and IPTS...

what ticks me off is that certain people here are ignorant towards IPTS credibility in providing good tertiary education and keeps on saying IPTA is the best or whatever, they need to know university rankings has no meaning when it comes to the real world, in the end all that matters is your performance and the ability to adapt...


QUOTE(adix4 @ Apr 2 2009, 07:38 PM)
for your information
IPTA standard is rising
go google any universities(IPTA) in world rank
and yes
theres a lot of black people,arab and white people who stody in Ipta and they dont understand english
and thats why IPTA use english now
*
and your point is? did i say anything about IPTA standard declining? i know IPTA using english as basis, especially UITM..and thats a good thing..

QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 2 2009, 07:44 PM)
u mean they dont understand BM? that's why IPTAs use english now? correct?
anyway, it is to my understanding that although english helps in communication, it doesnt mean bad english = stupid. u can learn engineering perfectly in BM bcoz being based in math, a universal language. u could learn architecture totally in BM, bcoz being based in drawings, another universal language. whatever language u use, it doesnt really matter if u wanna learn. the japanese learned entirely in japanese, chinese (mainland) in mandarin.

nowadays we use english bcoz of internationalization (i18n). we want to diversify and accelerate our students. but dont confuse it with english=better.
*
thats the thing, we can learn anything by using our language alone, but that also causes us to fail learning from experts from overseas, since both are using different technical jargons.. it is not impossible, it is just time consuming.. and in the business world, it means incurring more costs in training..

Using english dosent mean you are better, but it really helps when u want to get yourself into the business world...since communication in business is really important.
xavi5567
post Apr 4 2009, 12:58 PM

\(●'Å'●)/
*******
Senior Member
3,348 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: The Matrix

be it english, malay, chinenese, japanese, korean.. it is all bout understanding and how broad the language is.. i admit malay borrow alot of word from other languages, even the indonesian language is broader than malay. there r some term which non existent in malay hence need to be borrowed. so if u understand the term, the formula, the ways of doing things, there is no limitation toward wat language is being use.. jus take the japanese as an example.. alot of english term being directly translated to japs as well.. bac to the mastering of english to converse it without any hesitation, it is all bout confident and the well to learn. y a boy who speak no language can learn so many language once he grow up.. becos without it they fail to communicate their need. so learning english is solely up to the one who r wanting to learn.. even though ur teacher teach bad english .. u still got a lot of source, radio, magazine, tv, internet, cd.. u name it.. so when it come to ipta, ipts.. i c no diffirence jus tat one is supported by government and mean to serve to people and the other is mean to serve the people as wee but with a price.. no standard of teaching is almost the same but depending on the uni, college and those college community. some r really set up jus to make money while giving peanut to the student..
bigboy
post Apr 4 2009, 01:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
265 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



first choice of course IPTA lorrr...

in terms of oppurtunity, both is same, its all depends on your result,your comm skil,your abilities ..
empirekhoo
post Apr 4 2009, 10:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: 1001010100010011101
QUOTE(bigboy @ Apr 4 2009, 01:31 PM)
first choice of course IPTA lorrr...

in terms of oppurtunity, both is same, its all depends on your result,your comm skil,your abilities ..
*
Yes i agree with your view to certain extend. however, do realise education shape a person's ability/personality/whatever. shame to say malaysia education failed to shape student to meet market needs as well to ultilise students to their full potential. (you may substitute it with "not success" if you found "failed" offensive)

Edited: hence, yes IPTA & IPTS do make a differecne. however we have to be specific which to compare. and the methods to compare is crucial to avoid bias

This post has been edited by empirekhoo: Apr 4 2009, 10:27 PM
azarimy
post Apr 4 2009, 10:33 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(empirekhoo @ Apr 4 2009, 02:24 PM)
Yes i agree with your view to certain extend. however, do realise education shape a person's ability/personality/whatever. shame to say malaysia education failed to shape student to meet market needs as well to ultilise students to their full potential. (you may substitute it with "not success" if you found "failed" offensive)

Edited: hence, yes IPTA & IPTS do make a differecne. however we have to be specific which to compare. and the methods to compare is crucial to avoid bias
*
there's a flaw in that argument, although i do recognize its validity.

what is to say "what the market needs" is the right way to go? take for example in my field of architecture. the market demands architects that can do what the client often wants - renovate a terrace house into a romanesque villa. sure, that's what the market wants, and the ability to fulfill that requirement puts food on the table.

but that's not exactly healthy for the society as a whole. romanesque villa is unsuitable for our climate, not to mention the bizzare out-of-context existence. so in IPTAs we teach them NOT to do romanesque designs, but go for tropical. then the industry complained to the schools that the graduates cant do what they want them to do.

so how?
NUR_VER.3
post Apr 6 2009, 09:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
308 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Dun ya



QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 4 2009, 10:33 PM)
there's a flaw in that argument, although i do recognize its validity.

what is to say "what the market needs" is the right way to go? take for example in my field of architecture. the market demands architects that can do what the client often wants - renovate a terrace house into a romanesque villa. sure, that's what the market wants, and the ability to fulfill that requirement puts food on the table.

but that's not exactly healthy for the society as a whole. romanesque villa is unsuitable for our climate, not to mention the bizzare out-of-context existence. so in IPTAs we teach them NOT to do romanesque designs, but go for tropical. then the industry complained to the schools that the graduates cant do what they want them to do.

so how?
*
Thats why not all can follow what market wants, especially in ur area of expertise shows that certain designs are not suitable for our climate and its true. But in this case we are talking what are the skills needed in the JOB market, and since most organizations requires at least english and malay language in their job requirement,we cant say it is not suitable for the situation in malaysia.

Because who decide the "market" needs in the job market usually decided by experts that know what their company need, so they will demand certain skills that proves beneficial for their companies.. so we cant really compare it with ur example, which based on clients needs and not from experts needs like in the job market..

regardless of what people say, when certain expertise is demanded, it means whoever have that expertise..they will have the advantage in the market, but that dosent mean the market demand will not change, it just give you a little opportunity at that specific time...

and take note, we cant put hope solely on what others can offer, in this case we cant really say IPTA or IPTS gives more job opportunity, what matters the most is whether you yourself have the capability to do the job, and ur knowledge about the job and the company itself. Since most companies(especially the private ones) seeks people based on their capabilities...
empirekhoo
post Apr 11 2009, 12:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
218 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: 1001010100010011101
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 4 2009, 10:33 PM)
there's a flaw in that argument, although i do recognize its validity.

what is to say "what the market needs" is the right way to go? take for example in my field of architecture. the market demands architects that can do what the client often wants - renovate a terrace house into a romanesque villa. sure, that's what the market wants, and the ability to fulfill that requirement puts food on the table.

but that's not exactly healthy for the society as a whole. romanesque villa is unsuitable for our climate, not to mention the bizzare out-of-context existence. so in IPTAs we teach them NOT to do romanesque designs, but go for tropical. then the industry complained to the schools that the graduates cant do what they want them to do.

so how?
*
hm. you are somewhat correct. However, do realise that what i mean by "what the market needs", generally refering to the market as whole. It's like lets say 80% company which hires architects require a certain knowledge. Then it should be taught in universities.

Most universities does teach the major subjects needed for a certain degree. But some does better in emphasising towards market needs. For example, UTP (petronas) does invite professionals from working field to rewise their curricular structure few year once. (I read this somewhere. Of course i'm not sure about the truth, nor i'm promoting UTP) Anyway, it's quite a good move if you ask me.

I wouldn't say it's healthy for the society as a whole but we still need to agree that the industry are absorbing most of graduates. To make graduates "market-able" is to provide graudates with the adeque knowledge that industry needs.

Again, this argument is partly off topic. IPTS and IPTA both have their difference. we should specify a certain course & university to be able to compare it properly. =)
joe_89
post Apr 16 2009, 04:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Here


Hey everyone, is it really true that, if we have a degree from a private university, we have more opportunities to go international, compared to if we own a degree from a public university?
Bepeon
post Apr 16 2009, 04:15 PM

Tennis Lover
*******
Senior Member
3,768 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Tennis heaven


Well, i would assume people who study in private university get degree cert issued by oversea university (those 3+0 programs in private uni such as Monash University, Sheffield University, University of South Australia), while people who study in public universities in Malaysia are awarded with certs issued by UM, UTM, USM blah blah blah.

So maybe people outside of this country will actually recognize certs issued by oversea universities rather than names like UM, UTM, USM, UTAR... lolz

This post has been edited by Bepeon: Apr 16 2009, 04:15 PM
lordblood
post Apr 16 2009, 04:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(joe_89 @ Apr 16 2009, 04:10 PM)
Hey everyone, is it really true that, if we have a degree from a private university, we have more opportunities to go international, compared to if we own a degree from a public university?
*
I disagree with that. When the first unis came up in Malaysia, somewhere in 1970, everyone was fighting to enter in correct? As it was the only uni back then.. Slowly more and more unis come up, be it IPTA or IPTS.. There's no guarantee having a IPTS degree will guarantee u a place in overseas, heck it doesn't even guarantee u a job here in Malaysia.. And I know so many people who are local graduates and are now in overseas, either working for big international companies or migrated there.. To me it comes down to what u study and how u perform in your working life. You maybe a graduate from a top prestigious uni but if you can't even work to save yourself, what good is the degree? No difference whether u come out from IPTA or IPTS.


Added on April 16, 2009, 4:57 pm
QUOTE(Bepeon @ Apr 16 2009, 04:15 PM)
Well, i would assume people who study in private university get degree cert issued by oversea university (those 3+0 programs in private uni such as Monash University, Sheffield University, University of South Australia), while people who study in public universities in Malaysia are awarded with certs issued by UM, UTM, USM blah blah blah.

So maybe people outside of this country will actually recognize certs issued by oversea universities rather than names like UM, UTM, USM, UTAR... lolz
*
True. People who do the 3+0 program get degrees issued from overseas uni. However job interviewers of a major company do not care where u come from, may it be Malaysia, UK, US, Indonesia.. Most importantly is your personality, your work ethics.. Brings back to my point above, you can come from the best but it doesn't guarantee you to be the best in the working field..


Added on April 16, 2009, 4:58 pm
QUOTE(eriko9 @ Apr 16 2009, 04:36 PM)
it depends on ur interview dudes
*
agreed.. interview plays an important role when you're applying for a job. the first impression is always important no matter where u go

This post has been edited by lordblood: Apr 16 2009, 04:58 PM
joe_89
post Apr 16 2009, 08:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Here


I mean local private university degree versus local public uni to be exact.
destroyer
post Apr 16 2009, 08:40 PM

Gila Makan!
******
Senior Member
1,624 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Between Ground And Sky


QUOTE(NUR_VER.3 @ Apr 1 2009, 04:06 PM)
bro, even JPA scholars go to IPTS, these people are top scorers so please do your research before posting tq...
and i dont think that 1 interviewer can resemble all the interviewer in the job market, so it varies bro...

IPTS fees are high because they didnt get support from govt. but sometimes if you give peanuts you get monkeys bro...
*
because there is contract with gov to send student to prepare there. this can also help the IPTS financially.

but some IPTS are good like KYUEM, UTP.


________________________________________________________________

people always said IPTA student no quality thus many grads are jobless when compare to IPTS.

but mind this fact. for example, 1st year mechanical engineering student in UTM(i use this as example) are around 400. and after graduation, 200 got employed and 200 not employed.

but in another ipts have 150 1st year student in mechanical engineering. out of 150, 40 got employed after graduate. another 110 not employed.

when compared, it will look like that IPTS are better since less people jobless. but when we look at the number of students. actually IPTS got more jobless in term of student ratio.

but I also accept the fact that there are also some not so good IPTA. for example UiTM. keep opening new branches. macam cendawan tumbuh selepas hujan. quality also not very good.

don't be biased. I would like to say that our IPTA is actually among the best in terms of facilities, lecturer, study... but the prob is that our IPTA is politically influenced and the younger generation behaviour.

let me tell you a story. one of my fren use to study in university(IPTA) before he enter my place of study. he always skip class. lecturer notice that he is missing and go to his room to wake him up and ask him to go to class. then the lecturer also make tuition class for a few weak performance student. the lecturer do the best. but the student make prob and make whole university get bad name.

do you get this kind of lecturer in IPTS? in IPTS, there are lecturer who good in teaching. but never think of student. they are more glad to fail students bacause when they repeat, more money will come.
joe_89
post Apr 16 2009, 09:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Here


Okay. My concern is, if I get a degree by a local private university (which doesn't twin with any other oversea degree), will it possibly hinder me from getting opportunities of venturing into other countries because let's say, they don't recognize my degree?
Bepeon
post Apr 16 2009, 09:39 PM

Tennis Lover
*******
Senior Member
3,768 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Tennis heaven


QUOTE(joe_89 @ Apr 16 2009, 09:22 PM)
Okay. My concern is, if I get a degree by a local private university (which doesn't twin with any other oversea degree), will it possibly hinder me from getting opportunities of venturing into other countries because let's say, they don't recognize my degree?
*
It depends which university you would be studying in... Well, Monash University in Sunway is also considered as a local private uni isn't it? tongue.gif tongue.gif No offense to those who study in the local Monash, but there are distinct differences in terms of qualities between the real Monash and the local Monash. tongue.gif tongue.gif
destroyer
post Apr 16 2009, 09:42 PM

Gila Makan!
******
Senior Member
1,624 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Between Ground And Sky


QUOTE(joe_89 @ Apr 16 2009, 09:22 PM)
Okay. My concern is, if I get a degree by a local private university (which doesn't twin with any other oversea degree), will it possibly hinder me from getting opportunities of venturing into other countries because let's say, they don't recognize my degree?
*
not many people who graduate from 100% local university(ipta n ipts) get to work str8 abroad. most of them either work 1st to gain experience before working abroad, or work in malaysian based companies, then get transferred to foreign branch, or just apply for job oversea when continuing study to master or phd oversea.

mostly those who work str8 oversea they get the job when study there. other common method is by working in MNC in malaysia then get transferred oversea.

This post has been edited by destroyer: Apr 16 2009, 09:43 PM
joe_89
post Apr 16 2009, 09:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
288 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Here


QUOTE(Bepeon @ Apr 16 2009, 09:39 PM)
It depends which university you would be studying in... Well, Monash University in Sunway is also considered as a local private uni isn't it?  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  No offense to those who study in the local Monash, but there are distinct differences in terms of qualities between the real Monash and the local Monash.  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
*
erm... i mean local degree. say, uniten, utar....

QUOTE(destroyer @ Apr 16 2009, 09:42 PM)
not many people who graduate from 100% local university(ipta n ipts) get to work str8 abroad. most of them either work 1st to gain experience before working abroad, or work in malaysian based companies, then get transferred to foreign branch, or just apply for job oversea when continuing study to master or phd oversea.

mostly those who work str8 oversea they get the job when study there. other common method is by working in MNC in malaysia then get transferred oversea.
*
not necessarily have to straight go oversea. i mean a few years of working after graduation.
lordblood
post Apr 16 2009, 10:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(joe_89 @ Apr 16 2009, 09:59 PM)
erm... i mean local degree. say, uniten, utar....
not necessarily have to straight go oversea. i mean a few years of working after graduation.
*
like i said, getting degree from IPTA or IPTS doesn't really matter.. and also depends on which overseas country ur looking at.. for example, EU countries don't recognise any MBBS degree outside the EU.. And if u were to go to UK or australia to practise, either with IPTA or IPTS medicine degree, u still have to sit for their professional exam, cause every country thinks their standard is better than others..

and yes, u must work first.. u can't say i got IPTS degree i can go overseas work.. nobody will employ u.. u see all the top post or post require u go overseas, all have minimum working exp, so to me, get a degree, don't care from where as long it suits the job market and it's something u like.. then work and gain experience, be good in your field and the world will be yours.. biggrin.gif
Hyperalle
post Apr 17 2009, 01:18 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Hi, I wanna ask: Programs such as degree that is issued by college itself, how to know if it is recognised? Wats the Malaysia degree verification agency that approve the degree that is issued by college itself? A foreign-degree or a local degree more job-promising?

This post has been edited by Hyperalle: Apr 17 2009, 09:48 AM
TSadix4
post Apr 20 2009, 09:15 PM

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

kita nk masuk U sekarang kena fikir short and long term brah..sekarang ni , macam kat satu company KL ni , dia nak graduan dari UTM,UTP and UM je , yang lain dia reject.sekarang camni cara diorang pilih orang berkualiti...

most likely kalau U yang suka tendang orang adalah U yang berkualiti LOL.
azarimy
post Apr 20 2009, 09:53 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(adix4 @ Apr 20 2009, 01:15 PM)
kita nk masuk U sekarang kena fikir short and long term brah..sekarang ni , macam kat satu company KL ni , dia nak graduan dari UTM,UTP and UM je , yang lain dia reject.sekarang camni cara diorang pilih orang berkualiti...

most likely kalau U yang suka tendang orang adalah U yang berkualiti LOL.
*
maka pilihlah UTM, kerana ia adalah

Universiti
Tendang
Menendang

thumbup.gif
TSadix4
post Apr 20 2009, 11:23 PM

ich bin eine Katze :3
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Berlin

QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 20 2009, 09:53 PM)
maka pilihlah UTM, kerana ia adalah

Universiti
Tendang
Menendang

thumbup.gif
*
masuk ramai2 jom , tapi tu selalunya apa yang aku dengar la , and based on true story haha
bigboy
post May 6 2009, 08:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
265 posts

Joined: Mar 2008



QUOTE(Hyperalle @ Apr 17 2009, 01:18 AM)
Hi, I wanna ask: Programs such as degree that is issued by college itself, how to know if it is recognised? Wats the Malaysia degree verification agency that approve the degree that is issued by college itself? A foreign-degree or a local degree more job-promising?
*
i think LAN (LEMBAGA AKREDITASI NEGARA) and also can check at JPA (if not mistaken)


HW-12
post May 10 2009, 05:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kulim, Kedah - near Penang
Haiz, it seems like this topic has turn to a place for arguing using English and BM as teaching language....lol.

So i have a question.
I want to study in computer science (bachelor degree) or network engineering (bachelor degree)...

Some people said local uni programs r outdated.

Is our country private uni program outdated?
Is our country gov uni program outdated?

Private uni computer science or gov uni program better?

I hardly find a uni that offer network engineering?
Recommendations?


One more. Wat is the teaching language of our gov local uni (USM) offer computer science course (degree)?

This post has been edited by HW-12: May 19 2009, 10:14 PM
Sarbath
post May 13 2009, 06:47 PM

.:The Power Of Love:.
******
Senior Member
1,241 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Im going to UNISEL this 23rd May.. Got offered Pengajian Tahun Asas Pengurusan Maklumat.. So, UNISEL IPTS rite?? good or bad?? in term of quality.. help me decide it
epalbee3
post Dec 12 2009, 09:08 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
In conclusion, if you don't have much money and you get IPTA, go for it.

If you cannot get IPTA but you can get some loan/sponsorship, go for IPTS.

If you have a lot of money and have very good results, go for top IPTA or top IPTS, up to you.

Not all IPTS are good, some good IPTS are MMU, UTAR, IMU, Nottingham, Swineburg, Monash (all are backed by reputable organisations). These IPTS are definitely having good system like IPTA. The graduates from these IPTS sometimes get better comments from industry during their practical training. In IPTS, mostly they are trained to be independent, instead of just have to follow the IPTA strict rules.

I guess for communication skills/teaching skill wise, IPTS won IPTA a lot.
IPTA won't in term of facility and cost of enrolment.

Up to you to decide, but I always see students from IPTS are happier.
If you don't believe, go visit one IPTA and one IPTS and you will realize that.
OMG!
post Dec 12 2009, 10:45 AM

Raymond
******
Senior Member
1,397 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
From: Peaceful Island



As far as i am concerned, IPTA students are more concerned about their study while those from IPTS, they just like to flaunt around and always extravagant in their spending.See their clothing and hairstylesand u will know.

No offence to IPTS students, but i just feel like most of them are not deserve the place in IPTS just because they have the ' don't care' attitudes.
resit and resit in order to barely pass their exam and gain a certs,satisfy their parents' expectations and that is all for them.

of course i am speaking of my own observations. it may have just applied to some of them.
mrfarhatadib89
post Dec 12 2009, 11:02 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,414 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: the beginning



to me,it's all about the course that u r taking
if u tke critical courses,the chnce of getting hired is much more high.regardless whthr u studied in ipts or ipta.
if u taking less critical course,it means less job.
thken
post Dec 12 2009, 11:02 AM

keep walking
*****
Senior Member
938 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: where I belong to....


few years ago, employer will pick IPTA grad because they survived in stpm.

somehow, things had changed during the past decade, many top student in spm do not sit for stpm anymore, especially chinese
epalbee3
post Dec 12 2009, 01:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(OMG! @ Dec 12 2009, 10:45 AM)
As far as i am concerned, IPTA students are more concerned about their study while those from IPTS, they just like to flaunt around and always extravagant in their spending.See their clothing and hairstylesand u will know.

No offence to IPTS students, but i just feel like most of them are not deserve the place in IPTS just because they have the ' don't care' attitudes.
resit and resit in order to barely pass their exam and gain a certs,satisfy their parents' expectations and  that is all for them.

of course i am speaking of my own observations. it may have just applied to some of them.
*
By the way, I'm a product of IPTA. I am not helping IPTS, but just want to make the thing clear.

On the other hand, i think the concept of students must dress humblely, cover until knee, and must hold their own status is just some people's opinion.
The code of behavior is being misleaded in the outer behavior.

How about internally? By dressing smartly, do you treat your friends sincerely? do you talk nicely at the front and talk bad at lecturer's back?

If you been to singpore NUS and NTU, you will know that non of them are blamed for wearing casual like shorts. Ok, their lecturer are wearing jeans and T-shirt.

Did not been US? The stanford university does not have any border of university, do you still think that the university students should be fenced and not mixed with the society?

well, you should broaden your mind. Do you think when you join the company, they will look at how you dress, what you eat? They will see whether you can work, whether you can communicate, whether you are able to complete the tasks, responsible...

Living luxuriously is just less then 5% of the populations, it is not because they are in IPTS. It is because they are rich... and they are pampered by their rich family. Do you still think everyone can live luxuriously? How many percent of the people are rich?

In taiwan university, they are allowed to make up in their classes, the stars can come into their university. Can you say they are bad people? Of course no, their graduates are the fundamental of the country.

Even if you go to Indonesia university, they called their lecturers "pak" which means someone respected and treat them as friends.. DO you still think that formality is a must?

You believe in your own standards (dress properly etc) but other places insist friendliness, free thinking, etc.. Do you still think what you think is absolutely correct?

Everything got good and bad, doesn't it? If given a chance, which of about types of university would you choose? answer to yourself..




SUSOptiplex330
post Dec 12 2009, 01:34 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(OMG! @ Dec 12 2009, 10:45 AM)
As far as i am concerned, IPTA students are more concerned about their study while those from IPTS, they just like to flaunt around and always extravagant in their spending.See their clothing and hairstylesand u will know.

No offence to IPTS students, but i just feel like most of them are not deserve the place in IPTS just because they have the ' don't care' attitudes.
resit and resit in order to barely pass their exam and gain a certs,satisfy their parents' expectations and  that is all for them.

of course i am speaking of my own observations. it may have just applied to some of them.
*
I read in Malaysiakini newspaper there were lecturers in IPTA who MUST pass certain students regardless of their result. No need to resit. How can that be good?


epalbee3
post Dec 12 2009, 01:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
yupe..

this is 50 steps laughing at the 100 steps..


Added on December 12, 2009, 3:51 pmEntering IPTS is very helpful and unavoidable in the following cases:

1) student is not accepted to IPTA. (private school students, some other reasons ++)
2) student does not get the course their like. ( they want to be engineer but they get offer for socialist)
3) student is assigned to a very far university. (like east/west Malaysia, vice vesa)
4) student want the chance for going overseas. (Twinning program)

I see many penang people prefer to stay in Penang. If they are not accepted to USM, they will opt for KDU or INTI. Some KL people are assigned to Sabah, and they finally choose to stay with MMU/UTAR.

For IPTA, you have very least option to what you can study.

But your choice is unlimited for IPTS.

See.. not everyone is so lucky to get to the right university and the right course they want. With a few tens of extra money, they have the right to choose. (u can become engineer, doctor, marketer.)

It is not always the quality issue. And PTPTN does provide a financial assitance for those who are in need.

The people who get the right uni and right course when they apply for IPTA is rare (<20%). 30-40k worth for a whole life career type at your own hand. smile.gif Think about it...

Not like last time, no IPTS, you get what you must go, no PTPTN also. If you don't get IPTA, no future at all. Here is the use of IPTS.. wink.gif



This post has been edited by epalbee3: Dec 12 2009, 03:51 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Dec 12 2009, 08:57 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(epalbee3 @ Dec 12 2009, 01:52 PM)
Entering IPTS is very helpful and unavoidable in the following cases:

1) student is not accepted to IPTA. (private school students, some other reasons ++)
This is very true for student siting for the Chinese UEC certificate that other countries recognized but not by our government. In fact some countries so love UEC certificate that they are more than willing to grab them aka Singapore. If they don't go overseas, then they ended up at IPTS.


Dennos
post Dec 12 2009, 09:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



all certs are just a toilet paper.

Its no value if it is without shit on it

working experience more important
SUSOptiplex330
post Dec 12 2009, 10:14 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Dennos @ Dec 12 2009, 09:28 PM)
all certs are just a toilet paper.

Its no value if it is without shit on it

working experience more important
*
Degree with working experience vs no degree with working experience. Which do you go for as an employer?

alsree786
post Dec 13 2009, 12:50 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
937 posts

Joined: Jun 2007


QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Dec 12 2009, 10:14 PM)
Degree with working experience vs no degree with working experience. Which do you go for as an employer?
*
depends on the position applied for. for professions, you will need the certs...
epalbee3
post Dec 13 2009, 01:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,345 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
an employee don't want to see your cert after your interview.

they just want to see you have the capability to complete the required job.

for an example, you can see that some news reporter like ong ching yee, she has a degree, but she never need to show it anymore.

or credit card promoters, they just need to use their communication skill to grab enough customers; this knowledge cannot be grabbed from book.

boosting your cert after joining the workforce is sometimes a mistake that the new graduate makes.

For example, do you need a plumber that know how to fix the pipe leakage or a plumber that has a lot of certs but only good in theory?
abc2005
post Dec 13 2009, 10:11 PM

UNIVERSE is my CATALOGUE
*******
Senior Member
2,079 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



whatever it is, whether it's the degree or whatever certs, they are just a ticket to get u to the interview (It's different story if u hv got ivy league or oxbridge degrees). Once you get onboard, you must know how to steer your course in order to get to your destination or goal.
ShadoW_ChaseR
post Dec 14 2009, 03:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
107 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(abc2005 @ Dec 13 2009, 10:11 PM)
whatever it is, whether it's the degree or whatever certs, they are just a ticket to get u to the interview (It's different story if u hv got ivy league or oxbridge degrees). Once you get onboard, you must know how to steer your course in order to get to your destination or goal.
*
Well said, degree is just a ticket for us to get a proper job at current market. other than that by having a degree you can demand for your pay increase because even if having 8 years and more experience in the related job field but it does guarantee you to have similar pay just as your fellow colleague who have the same experience as you but with a degree on hand.
defectivelasagna
post Dec 23 2009, 01:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


here's a cool story about IPTA,

my cousin studied in UiTM and got DL for every semester for her diploma, with that she applied to many UK unis and got accepted by good ones such as UCL and Manchester, and with that she got scholarship to study at UCL, i believe chances to go overseas are great if you work hard enough as my cousin who's from the dubbed "crappy" Uni UiTM got through to UCL by her diploma alone.


diversity
post Dec 23 2009, 03:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,184 posts

Joined: Sep 2009



SOME private universities like Monash,Nottingham are very good, easily employable blabla ayda yada etc
SOME public universities like UM, UTAR( wait it's half IPTA half IPTS ) are very good,
easily employable nlanla yada yada etc


Actually it depends individually
SUSOptiplex330
post Dec 23 2009, 05:17 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(defectivelasagna @ Dec 23 2009, 01:31 PM)
here's a cool story about IPTA,

my cousin studied in UiTM and got DL for every semester for her diploma, with that she applied to many UK unis and got accepted by good ones such as UCL and Manchester, and with that she got scholarship to study at UCL, i believe chances to go overseas are great if you work hard enough as my cousin who's from the dubbed "crappy" Uni UiTM got through to UCL by her diploma alone.
*
Is your cousin a Bumi or Non-bumi when applying for the scholarship? And who gave this scholarship?


defectivelasagna
post Dec 23 2009, 08:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Dec 23 2009, 05:17 PM)
Is your cousin a Bumi or Non-bumi when applying for the scholarship? And who gave this scholarship?
*
My cousin is a Bumi, her sponsor is JPA i believe.
SUSOptiplex330
post Dec 23 2009, 09:47 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(defectivelasagna @ Dec 23 2009, 08:22 PM)
My cousin is a Bumi, her sponsor is JPA i believe.
*
What is available to Bumi are often not available to non-Bumi so your example may not be possible for others when it comes to scholarship.


This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Dec 23 2009, 09:47 PM
defectivelasagna
post Dec 23 2009, 10:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Dec 23 2009, 09:47 PM)
What is available to Bumi are often not available to non-Bumi so your example may not be possible for others when it comes to scholarship.
*
Well yes i suppose i should've stated that it was for bumis, but it could also give an idea to bumis who are on the fence wether IPTA or IPTS.
laksaUTARA
post Dec 23 2009, 10:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Dec 12 2009, 01:34 PM)
I read in Malaysiakini newspaper there were lecturers in IPTA who MUST pass certain students regardless of their result. No need to resit. How can that be good?
*
in my class Sem 2 i think 80% of my classmate failed that course including me. so i guess that statement is not 100% true..
through out my years, i also have to repeat couple of papers.....


Added on December 23, 2009, 10:26 pmUiTM i guess their student are equip by communication skills, most of other IPTA just focusing on papers only including my U.
But in the end actually, how we presented ourselves is important , doesn't matter where are u graduating from... it wouldn't matter


Added on December 23, 2009, 10:32 pmactually in my U (ipta) after semester 3, all courses conducted in English.. but depends on the lecturer... but if u know u cannot converse in english .. y not learn it by yourself.. y all things have to be spoon feed?

This post has been edited by laksaUTARA: Dec 23 2009, 10:32 PM
xpole
post Dec 23 2009, 11:39 PM

Rain on me baby
******
Senior Member
1,410 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
From: Everywhere



IPTA kinda sux.... I prefer IPTS... But my family cannot afford me to study at IPTS..
blacktortoise
post Dec 24 2009, 12:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
134 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
English must be good, if english is not good, then during the interview, most probably they will say bye before you could say hi. so it doesn't matter if it is IPTA or IPTS, just be a person who loves knowledge and be independent and confident, then no one can bring you down. Just feel grateful that you are able to further your studies and make use of the chance well.

after all we should not wait for opportunity, rather we should make oppurtunity come flying to us by upgrading our self.
cozeyzero
post Apr 19 2010, 06:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
160 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: bangi & hang tuah town!



act ipts n ipta almost same le..some lecture ipts also concern like ipta..some lecture for both also suck..dfrent mybe rule in ipta more ketat..dats y public see ipta upper~
159
post Apr 19 2010, 07:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


Get a jpa loan. Then repay the loan by working with the government for 10 years.

There. You got a job.
azarimy
post Apr 19 2010, 08:02 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(159 @ Apr 18 2010, 11:49 PM)
Get a jpa loan. Then repay the loan by working with the government for 10 years.

There. You got a job.
*
u still need to repay the loan even if u work for the government.

i think what u mean is JPA scholarship.
faezfahmi618
post May 5 2010, 03:48 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
435 posts

Joined: Apr 2010


tumpang thread~ Uniten consider as IPTA or IPTS ?
cdrw87
post May 5 2010, 03:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Melaka || Wangsa Maju



QUOTE(faezfahmi618 @ May 5 2010, 03:48 AM)
tumpang thread~ Uniten consider as IPTA or IPTS ?
*
IPTS
freedom2912
post May 5 2010, 09:18 AM

Cool Like Fire
*****
Senior Member
802 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Amsterdam
IPTA or IPTS is just the same
the curriculum is not much different

but u need to set target for your future career
if let say you wanna involve in IT career, get yourself to institution which is well known in IT so that u get extra points
Hikari0307
post May 5 2010, 03:39 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(faezfahmi618 @ May 5 2010, 03:48 AM)
tumpang thread~ Uniten consider as IPTA or IPTS ?
*
definitely an IPTS

This post has been edited by Hikari0307: May 5 2010, 04:08 PM
Gh-x
post Nov 15 2010, 04:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
475 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(freedom2912 @ May 5 2010, 09:18 AM)
IPTA or IPTS is just the same
the curriculum is not much different

but u need to set target for your future career
if let say you wanna involve in IT career, get yourself to institution which is well known in IT so that u get extra points
*
and a well known IT institution is?
MMU?

i am thinking to further my studies in IT.
lonely_dream
post Nov 15 2010, 04:34 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
533 posts

Joined: Jun 2010


QUOTE(159 @ Apr 19 2010, 07:49 AM)
Get a jpa loan. Then repay the loan by working with the government for 10 years.

There. You got a job.
*
And we will become slave for 10 years.
azarimy
post Nov 15 2010, 04:53 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


10 years ka?

even my PhD contract is only 7 years...
Hikari0307
post Nov 15 2010, 10:11 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(lonely_dream @ Nov 15 2010, 04:34 PM)
And we will become slave for 10 years.
*
It's not slave, it's paying back, it's your moral duty to serve after getting sponsored for so long and the government spending so much of the people's money on you. Giving back the same amount of money doesn't cover.

QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 15 2010, 04:53 PM)
10 years ka?

even my PhD contract is only 7 years...
*
10 years contract is only for Medicine,Dentistry and Pharmacy students if I'm not mistaken. It depends on the course. My sister is under JPA scholarship for Engineering and her bond is 7 years.
entryman
post Nov 15 2010, 10:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Eralus @ Nov 15 2010, 06:21 PM)
dont call it slave..its something u need to contribute after u get something for free..
the benefit not only for government but also for you..
at least after u graduate immediately u got job unlike other graduate out there that still searching for a job
*
QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Nov 15 2010, 10:11 PM)
It's not slave, it's paying back, it's your moral duty to serve after getting sponsored for so long and the government spending so much of the people's money on you. Giving back the same amount of money doesn't cover.
10 years contract is only for Medicine,Dentistry and Pharmacy students if I'm not mistaken. It depends on the course. My sister is under JPA scholarship for Engineering and her bond is 7 years.
*
You guys don't even need to start going to the extent of morality.

It's a contractual obligation. If you don't want to honour the contract in the first place why did you accept the offer. It's just stealing on purpose! hmm.gif

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 19 2010, 12:12 AM
cyberheross
post Nov 24 2010, 02:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(adix4 @ Mar 30 2009, 02:03 PM)
so i ask some advisor
some of them said that IPTS hv higher oppurtunity to work and some said that IPTA hv higher oppurtunity to work.

so what about you?what did u think about it?in your opinion which one has higher oppurtunity?
*
Ofcoz IPTS having a higher chance to get hired. smile.gif
hirano
post Nov 25 2010, 03:53 AM

凸(`△´#)
*******
Senior Member
3,334 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Pluto


QUOTE(cyberheross @ Nov 24 2010, 02:11 AM)
Ofcoz IPTS having a higher chance to get hired. smile.gif
*
And your basis for that is...?
violet05
post Nov 25 2010, 09:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(adix4 @ Mar 30 2009, 02:03 PM)
so i ask some advisor
some of them said that IPTS hv higher oppurtunity to work and some said that IPTA hv higher oppurtunity to work.

so what about you?what did u think about it?in your opinion which one has higher oppurtunity?
*
I would say depends....
the graduates from good IPTA like UM are in demand....
but same goes with good IPTS grads like UTP, MMU, Monash, Nottingham...
but most important the employer seek for workers from the uni that takes only bright students to study there...

mostly IPTS with 3 credit oso can enter like SEGi, HELP, Cosmopoint....etc...
are not preferrable..
the education quality that the lecturers gave...sucks! shakehead.gif
even the lecturers said that sometimes they falsify the students' result to survive... they advise to study elsewhere..
only good about facilities....education wise....haih... doh.gif

This post has been edited by violet05: Nov 25 2010, 09:48 AM
cyberheross
post Nov 25 2010, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
143 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Johor Bahru


QUOTE(hirano @ Nov 25 2010, 03:53 AM)
And your basis for that is...?
*
IPTS education quality are better than IPTA.
I mean some IPTS, but overall, yes.
I got some friends studying in famous IPTA such as UM, USM, UUM and UTM.
They keep complained that lecturers teach using 65% malay, 35% english.
Most of the IPTA students can't present themselves well enough in english too.
Me myself studying in MMU, although the status of MMU getting lower now to Top 200 only.
But most of us can speak english well enough compare to IPTA students.

And i saw the syllabus in IPTA, their coverage in courses are not so wide as IPTS.
So, private companies preferred IPTS students in most cases.
violet05
post Nov 25 2010, 10:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
some of the IPTS' lecturers taught the students in Mandarin too...
does that means that the quality that the lecturers' teaching are not good?

it's not the languange that matters..the INPUT is what matters most.
regardless of what language they use...
there are too many IPTs in msia..outnumbered IPTA far enough...
hundreds emerged rapidly nowadays...

most of the students who are rejected from IPTA have no choice but to join IPTS....
but those who study in IPTS only merely can join IPTA...
so basic thinking, which is better?? brows.gif

yes of course there are some really bright students who prefer to join well known IPTs like
Monash, Nottingham, MMU...

but for the majority of the IPTS...no quality!!!
emerging rapidly not for the motive of educating ppl.....

but as i said, it depends....
some of IPTA are good, some IPTS better than IPTA...
MMU is one of a good IPTs in M'sia
but most of the IPTS doh.gif

This post has been edited by violet05: Jan 30 2011, 11:17 AM
azarimy
post Nov 25 2010, 11:03 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(cyberheross @ Nov 25 2010, 02:11 AM)
IPTS education quality are better than IPTA.
I mean some IPTS, but overall, yes.
I got some friends studying in famous IPTA such as UM, USM, UUM and UTM.
They keep complained that lecturers teach using 65% malay, 35% english.
Most of the IPTA students can't present themselves well enough in english too.
Me myself studying in MMU, although the status of MMU getting lower now to Top 200 only.
But most of us can speak english well enough compare to IPTA students.

And i saw the syllabus in IPTA, their coverage in courses are not so wide as IPTS.
So, private companies preferred IPTS students in most cases.
*
what a load of bull. u based all that on what your friends said?

which ranking is MMU in?

This post has been edited by azarimy: Nov 25 2010, 11:03 AM
violet05
post Nov 25 2010, 11:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
just to share.... biggrin.gif
if you ppl judge on the ranking side...
MOST of the UK and Aussie Degrees that the IPTS are offering
like degree from Uni of Greenwich, Uni of East London, Uni of West England, Uni of Curtin, Uni of Victoria,
Uni of Wollonggong, RMIT, Uni of Hertfordshire, Uni of Stafforshire, Uni of Abertay dundee, Uni of Oxford Brookes, Anglia Ruskin, Shieffield Hallam, Uni of Teeside, etc...(too many to name)


these unis ranking are lower than UM,
and most of them below USM, UKM and UPM as well.
don't understand why students of IPTs from these programmes are too proud of saying they are UK uni grad
what's come to worst, some of the syllibus are not the same with parent's uni s well.

they dun do research???

note:MOST of the prgramme not ALL...
eg: UOL, Lancaster, Brimingham are top uni in the world., abv UM. notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by violet05: Jan 30 2011, 11:19 AM
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 04:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
i think apart from reputation wise, the language they use to teach is fairly important especially for fields like business.. being taught in english will have an added advantage as this will brush up the student's command of the language in order to prepare for their work life..

furthermore, it is generally known that IPTS like Monash, Sunway, Taylors are more in tune to the industry where their syllabus content are decided with consultation and input from the industry leaders...Sad to say the public uni are not so where politics interfere with the efficient running of the uni...

this is why so many top firms have standing arrangement to recruit on campus from IPTS
azarimy
post Nov 26 2010, 07:52 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 25 2010, 08:54 PM)
i think apart from reputation wise, the language they use to teach is fairly important especially for fields like business.. being taught in english will have an added advantage as this will brush up the student's command of the language in order to prepare for their work life..

furthermore, it is generally known that IPTS like Monash, Sunway, Taylors are more in tune to the industry where their syllabus content are decided with consultation and input from the industry leaders...Sad to say the public uni are not so where politics interfere with the efficient running of the uni...

this is why so many top firms have standing arrangement to recruit on campus from IPTS
*
IPTS are run by business people who have little interest in academic prowess. what they do at the top level is sign an agreement with top firms so that those firms will recruit their graduates upon graduation. all they need to do is comply with what the top firms want.

this is called industry grip on academia, something a university should avoid. if the industry is doing something wrong, the academia have the responsibility to counter the balance. if the industry have a strong grip on the kind of graduates the university is producing, then they're just producing slaves and have no control over the world of knowledge.

which is why IPTAs are now opting for more international staff and students, with emphasis on post graduate studies.
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 12:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 26 2010, 07:52 AM)
IPTS are run by business people who have little interest in academic prowess. what they do at the top level is sign an agreement with top firms so that those firms will recruit their graduates upon graduation. all they need to do is comply with what the top firms want.

this is called industry grip on academia, something a university should avoid. if the industry is doing something wrong, the academia have the responsibility to counter the balance. if the industry have a strong grip on the kind of graduates the university is producing, then they're just producing slaves and have no control over the world of knowledge.

which is why IPTAs are now opting for more international staff and students, with emphasis on post graduate studies.
*
what you say are true to a certain extent.. But somehow I believe the intention of majority of the people who go for tertiary education is to find a job.. What is the opint if what you learn is not the content demanded by employer? we're not talking about reseacrh here... sorry to say that business graduate without the skills demanded by the industry itself are not the workforce required by the industry and at best can only be described as those with knowledge on paper but are not equiped for the real world.

the education sector serves to underpin the training and development of the nation's workforce in order to drive effeciency and growth in the industry sectors.. if it does not do so, then what is the point of the universities? just to let the youngsters have 4 years of fun?

Furthermore, it is this kind of shielded mentality that our public uni has that the public uni refuse to acknowledge international univerisites ranking and refused to improve.. each time the rankings are published, they will said they did not wnat to be included and quoting reasons such as biasness...they refused to openly admit that the public uni do have some weaknesses and continue to indulge in their pride whilst refusing to take concrite steps to improve their international standing? without uni with international standings (even if the quality is just a perception), how are we to attract multinationals to invest substantially in Malaysia as these multinationals would not want to invets in a country that does not have a skilled and sophiticated workfoce.. is it no wonder that Taiwan and Korea has overtake our country ?



entryman
post Nov 26 2010, 12:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE
But somehow I believe the intention of majority of the people who go for tertiary education is to find a job.. What is the opint if what you learn is not the content demanded by employer?


What you've written is one of the key reasons that adds weight to azarimy's comment about industry having a grip on academics.

Majority just want to get a degree so that they can find a good job. Whatever good job that is, majority of the students won't even know.

It's a mindset that is pretty linear: Get good SPM grade, go into College/Uni, get good job.

Not much further research is conducted into what's happening in the world, trends, issues, the types of companies, what these companies do and how they contribute to society in a bigger picture, how different expertise play a role in the company to form a coherent goal, etc.

Being in a linear model, most get into jobs or companies that only require linear thinking from the workers.


QUOTE
Furthermore, it is this kind of shielded mentality that our public uni has that the public uni refuse to acknowledge international univerisites ranking and refused to improve.. each time the rankings are published, they will said they did not wnat to be included and quoting reasons such as biasness...they refused to openly admit that the public uni do have some weaknesses and continue to indulge in their pride whilst refusing to take concrite steps to improve their international standing? without uni with international standings (even if the quality is just a perception), how are we to attract multinationals to invest substantially in Malaysia as these multinationals would not want to invets in a country that does not have a skilled and sophiticated workfoce.. is it no wonder that Taiwan and Korea has overtake our country ?


Do you see any of the locally bred IPTS in Malaysia having a place in any ranking? At least UM and UKM do.

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 26 2010, 12:51 PM
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 08:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE
Do you see any of the locally bred IPTS in Malaysia having a place in any ranking? At least UM and UKM do.


This is because there is not yet a full fledged local private uni..Nevertheless, IPTS are quite good at certain specialist field..

take for example Sunway University College; its professional accountancy arm is one of the best ACCA tuition providers in the world where there are many students who got World and Malaysian prize very semester... Quite a few of the top affiliates( candidates who achieved overall highest marks) are from Sunway Uni' College.. In addition, for their A-Levels programme, they produce many of the students with the highest marks in the world..

Kemayan ATC and Brickfields Asia College excels in law... They are recognised as one of the institutions that produce the most 1st class honours graduates for their LLB (external system) awarded by university of London.. Quite a few of their students are granted a scholarship to pursue their law education in King's College London..Mind you, only 2 are awarded each year..

Isn't all these testaments to the strength and competitiveness of our IPTS?

However, I agree that there are many IPTS that are of low quality.. But to say that IPTS are lousier than IPTA is unwarranted.. In fact, in my opinion the above IPTS are even better than the IPTA in the fields mentioned..
Hikari0307
post Nov 26 2010, 09:04 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 26 2010, 08:14 PM)
This is because there is not yet a full fledged local private uni..Nevertheless, IPTS are quite good at certain specialist field..

*

Come again? There's a lot of local private universities in Malaysia. Though they aren't seen in world rankings. The only one I've seen are MMU in QS Asia rankings while our 5 research unis are there in the top 500 for the world even though not in the top 200.
I am not saying what is better than what since it's highly subjective to say which is "better" but just to state some stuff.

This post has been edited by Hikari0307: Nov 26 2010, 09:08 PM
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 09:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE
Come again? There's a lot of local private universities in Malaysia.


my bad..i meant the uni that I said are not full fledged uni..sunway, bac, atc

those full-fledged private uni like Nottingham and Monash are definitely in the world ranking, and as such i did not use it in making my point.. i'm just pointing out that certain although IPTS without ranking, have international standing
CANONPIXMA
post Nov 26 2010, 09:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
712 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



usually IPTS will be priority, most of the time it depends on your interview though
zeeyang
post Nov 26 2010, 11:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
128 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


Hi guys, SPM student tumpang thread tanya smile.gif

Here is my question. If you have good grades(extremely good one), and your parents can afford, which would be better, IPTA or IPTS? (For IPTS I mean Nottingham and Monash)

The course I am opting for is either mechanical/civil engineering. Of course, if I go to IPTA, good ones like UM, UPM are preferable. However, from what I heard/ observed, you can't get into those reputable IPTAs easily, not even if you have high CGPA in Form 6. Maybe the case would be different for engineering courses or matriculation students. Anyone can clarify this?

Or would it be better if I go straight to Nottingham or Monash, where the quality of education of engineering is ensured and quicker enrollment? (1 year of January intake Pre-u, next year start course)

With the results of >7A+ and straight As in trials my best bet should be overseas scholarships. But we can't guarantee that. Some say I could have done well in Form 6/matriculation and hope for good IPTAs but also we can't be sure. Heaven knows if I will stray off course in my Form 6 and did really bad sweat.gif And I don't really like my future to be decided by someone else..

So.... feeling undecided about the future, therefore need extra views and opinions from seniors to clear my doubts tongue.gif Thanks in advance for your help notworthy.gif
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 11:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(zeeyang @ Nov 26 2010, 11:45 PM)
Hi guys, SPM student tumpang thread tanya  smile.gif

Here is my question. If you have good grades(extremely good one), and your parents can afford, which would be better, IPTA or IPTS? (For IPTS I mean Nottingham and Monash)

The course I am opting for is either mechanical/civil engineering. Of course, if I go to IPTA, good ones like UM, UPM are preferable. However, from what I heard/ observed, you can't get into those reputable IPTAs easily, not even if you have high CGPA in Form 6. Maybe the case would be different for engineering courses or matriculation students. Anyone can clarify this?

Or would it be better if I go straight to Nottingham or Monash, where the quality of education of engineering is ensured and quicker enrollment? (1 year of January intake Pre-u, next year start course)

With the results of >7A+ and straight As in trials my best bet should be overseas scholarships. But we can't guarantee that. Some say I could have done well in Form 6/matriculation and hope for good IPTAs but also we can't be sure. Heaven knows if I will stray off course in my Form 6 and did really bad sweat.gif  And I don't really like my future to be decided by someone else..

So.... feeling undecided about the future, therefore need extra views and opinions from seniors to clear my doubts  tongue.gif Thanks in advance for your help  notworthy.gif
*
if you are willing to spend the money in Monash, why not u try going for NUS?
DJFoo000
post Nov 27 2010, 01:31 AM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



lol first time hear private university colleges have an 'advantage' in being hired. For one I know the fact that high competition to get a place in IPTA is already a plus point for the highly regarded IPTAs' students.

They are on par at best, but never more sought after locally.

@zeeyang, settle your Pre-U first. If engineering, I recommend A Levels, with Further Maths a must.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Nov 27 2010, 01:32 AM
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 03:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Nov 27 2010, 01:31 AM)
lol first time hear private university colleges have an 'advantage' in being hired. For one I know the fact that high competition to get a place in IPTA is already a plus point for the highly regarded IPTAs' students.

They are on par at best, but never more sought after locally.

@zeeyang, settle your Pre-U first. If engineering, I recommend A Levels, with Further Maths a must.
*
you will be suprised, i have a fren who graduate from USM with bachelor of finance yet even he acknowledge that he is being passed over for promotions..at age of 28, his pay is still 3.5k only whereas my fren who graduate from Sunway (ACCA) are paid about 4.5k at age of 24...
azarimy
post Nov 27 2010, 08:47 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 26 2010, 07:14 PM)
you will be suprised, i have a fren who graduate from USM with bachelor of finance yet even he acknowledge that he is being passed over for promotions..at age of 28, his pay is still 3.5k only whereas my fren who graduate from Sunway (ACCA) are paid about 4.5k at age of 24...
*
again, u're using examples of ur friends. are those two friends working at the same firm, the same position and under the exact same conditions?

wouldnt u agree that ur friends' situations might not be related to where they graduate from at all?
violet05
post Nov 27 2010, 08:52 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 03:14 AM)
you will be suprised, i have a fren who graduate from USM with bachelor of finance yet even he acknowledge that he is being passed over for promotions..at age of 28, his pay is still 3.5k only whereas my fren who graduate from Sunway (ACCA) are paid about 4.5k at age of 24...
*
yes...there are cases like that...
it depends...

well taking what you said as an argument...
what about those who excel in business without even furthering their study?
most of the richest biz man in the world dun even hold degrees....or myb even a cert.

however, what u mentioned is not really a comparable situations...
ACCA and Degree...those are two different qualifications...
same like an engineer holding IR and another which holds degree...

most of the newspapers will point that the students from this IPTS excel, got scholarship to go Uk...
that IPTS tighten its partnership with a reputable Aussie Uni...
whatever....
most of these news will come out in the newspaper weekly in the same section on some newspapers...
it is paid by the colleges to advertised such articles...
it is usually referred as campus section or whatever...

The IPTA dun even have to do it so.
of course they also have very strong partnership with well known foreign unis..
each year many students sent to foreign unis, excelled in many fields...
but the newspapers dun really need to highlight that...
like IPTS did...

IPTA dun have to advertise...the students queued to go there...
but if IPTS dun advertise...what will happen to them?

This post has been edited by violet05: Jan 30 2011, 11:26 AM
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 07:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 27 2010, 08:47 AM)
again, u're using examples of ur friends. are those two friends working at the same firm, the same position and under the exact same conditions?

wouldnt u agree that ur friends' situations might not be related to where they graduate from at all?
*
i think it's quite fair comparison considering one the USM guy in BP, and Sunway guy in one of the big 4 firm... and both ahve the same years of experience as the USM guy graduate later..


Added on November 27, 2010, 7:33 pm
QUOTE(violet05 @ Nov 27 2010, 08:52 AM)
yes...there are cases like that...
it depends...

well taking what you said as an argument...
what about those who excel in business without even furthering their study?
most of the richest biz man in the world dun even hold degrees....or myb even a cert.

however, what u mentioned is not really a comparable situations...
ACCA and Degree...those are two different qualifications...
same like an engineer holding IR and another which holds degree...

most of the newspapers will point that the students from this IPTS excel, got scholarship to go Uk...
that IPTS tighten its partnership with an reputable Aussie Uni...
whatever....
most of these news will come out in the newspaper weekly in the same section on some newspapers...
it is paid by the colleges to advertised such articles...
it is usually referred as campus section or whatever...

The IPTA dun even have to do it so.
of course they also have very strong partnership with well known foreign unis..
each year many students sent to foreign unis, excelled in many fields...
but the newspapers dun really need to highlight that...
like IPTS did...

IPTA dun have to advertise...the students queued to go there...
but if IPTS dun advertise...what will happen to them?
*
but still the having a degree with 5 years working experience and still stuck at 3.5k pay is below par even with degree holders from IPTS, don't you agree? maybe there are other factors such as lack of soft skills...

and btw, i think most people queue for IPTA is because it cost less to study..a whole degree at less than 10k..i dunno about others but none of my friend who can afford went to IPTA especially those studying business and commerce as the tuition fees in IPTS for these course are affordable..oen of my frens' parents even said that they have never considered IPTA..

furthermore, have u seen statistics of unemployment in our country? 60k graduates from IPTA without jobs...most of those from IPTS get a job within 6 months whilst many of parents even securing jobs before the went for their finals.. IPTA are merely churning out graduates without considering the input from the industry on their skills requirements..if the graduates do not have the skills required by industry, then they can really be incorporated into the workforce unless further training is given which is an additional cost for them..

in my opinion, the syllabus of IPTA is too politically influenced where many of the subjects are unrelated to the fields the graduates are gonna work in..


This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Nov 27 2010, 07:33 PM
azarimy
post Nov 27 2010, 07:45 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 11:23 AM)
i think it's quite fair comparison considering one the USM guy in BP, and Sunway guy in one of the big 4 firm... and both ahve the same years of experience as the USM guy graduate later..


okay, if u prefer to have that way... here's from my perspective.

in architecture business, none of the IPTS are even remotely accredited to offer a professional degree in malaysia. and i'm not talking about what i heard or what people said, it's about actual facts. u are welcomed to check if u want.

in this industry, people avoid taking IPTS students because of the predicaments about practice licenses, capabilities and the actual quality of the graduates. they can talk, sure. but most of them struggle in practice because when push comes to shove, it's about what u can deliver rather than what u said u could.

architectural graduates from IPTAs are top priority in malaysia. and since my sample is bigger than yours, i win tongue.gif.

QUOTE

Added on November 27, 2010, 7:33 pm

but still the having a degree with 5 years working experience and still stuck at 3.5k pay is below par even with degree holders from IPTS, don't you agree? maybe there are other factors such as lack of soft skills...

and btw, i think most people queue for IPTA is because it cost less to study..a whole degree at less than 10k..i dunno about others but none of my friend who can afford went to IPTA especially those studying business and commerce as the tuition fees in IPTS for these course are affordable..oen of my frens' parents even said that they have never considered IPTA..

furthermore, have u seen statistics of unemployment in our country? 60k graduates from IPTA without jobs...most of those from IPTS get a job within 6 months whilst many of parents even securing jobs before the went for their finals.. IPTA are merely churning out graduates without considering the input from the industry on their skills requirements..if the graduates do not have the skills required by industry, then they can really be incorporated into the workforce unless further training is given which is an additional cost for them..

in my opinion, the syllabus of IPTA is too politically influenced where many of the subjects are unrelated to the fields the graduates are gonna work in..
*
dude, come on? politically influenced? is patriotism and general knowledge politically motivated? would u prefer graduates that knows nothing about the general happenings in the country? i think u're extremely biased against IPTAs with no real grounds. stop listening to ur friends and go walk into one.
Agent 45
post Nov 27 2010, 08:04 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
934 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 27 2010, 07:45 PM)
dude, come on? politically influenced? is patriotism and general knowledge politically motivated? would u prefer graduates that knows nothing about the general happenings in the country? i think u're extremely biased against IPTAs with no real grounds. stop listening to ur friends and go walk into one.
*
+1
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 08:10 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 27 2010, 07:45 PM)
okay, if u prefer to have that way... here's from my perspective.

in architecture business, none of the IPTS are even remotely accredited to offer a professional degree in malaysia. and i'm not talking about what i heard or what people said, it's about actual facts. u are welcomed to check if u want.

in this industry, people avoid taking IPTS students because of the predicaments about practice licenses, capabilities and the actual quality of the graduates. they can talk, sure. but most of them struggle in practice because when push comes to shove, it's about what u can deliver rather than what u said u could.

architectural graduates from IPTAs are top priority in malaysia. and since my sample is bigger than yours, i win tongue.gif.
dude, come on? politically influenced? is patriotism and general knowledge politically motivated? would u prefer graduates that knows nothing about the general happenings in the country? i think u're extremely biased against IPTAs with no real grounds. stop listening to ur friends and go walk into one.
*
lol...i'm not really that anti-IPTA..it's just that i like to play the role of devil advocate..since so many ppl are bashing IPTS here, therefore i spoke in defense of IPTS..then we can have a balance discussion..both have good and bad actually...

returning to my role, smile.gif

the subject of accreditation are fundamentally political..look at accountancy profession..to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, one have to be a member of MIA...there are two routes to achieve that; one is to be a member of professional accountancy bodies like ACCA,CPA,ICAEW..second is to be a graduate from public universities like UM,USM...

this is considered a joke in our profession in that a degree holder is considered to be on par with the same technical knowledge and skills as a member of professional body... as such, even if government allow a public uni graduate to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, Big 4 accountancy firms would require these graduates to purse foreign professional accountancy programmes..this will tell u whether the industry truly recognised these graduates or not...in paper they may, but deep inside they do not..

and one of most ironic thing is, the graduates from Oxford and Cambridge are not allow to directly registered as member of MIA without professional accountacy bodies membership whereas graduates from UM does..what a joke...does the government think UM is better than Oxford?

as for my opinion on the architecture industry, the government is merely raising barrier of entry by only recognising the public uni graduates..this does not mean the IPTA are better..try go otehr country and see if they recognised UM more than the degree awarded by private uni.. let's put this in perspective, is Proton really better than foreign car? not only their quality are just so so, they are actually more expensive..a honda city if without import duty will cost less than 50k...a korean car will be even cheaper where they are selling for 10,000 USD only..that is 30k ringgit..

and i quote from George Benard Shaw, one of teh founder of London School of Economics.. "Patriotism is, fundamentally, a conviction that a particular country is the best in the world because you were born in it… "


DJFoo000
post Nov 27 2010, 08:54 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



AFAIK the government has nothing to do with accreditation. It's the professional bodies that have a say. Just a matter of policies, like the BEM issue.
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 08:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Nov 27 2010, 08:54 PM)
AFAIK the government has nothing to do with accreditation. It's the professional bodies that have a say. Just a matter of policies, like the BEM issue.
*
this professional association are related to government..ar eusaying securities commission and bursa malaysia are government related?? they are established by the government

these professional bodies are established by the government to prescribe regulations for the profession...so that the government need to enact an ACT establishing these professional association and the subsequent changes to regulation governing these profession will not need to go through parliment. these are called subsidiary legislation..


Added on November 27, 2010, 9:04 pm"MIA is a statutory body established under the Accountants Act, 1967 to regulate and develop the accountancy profession in Malaysia. To date, MIA has 27285 members."
http://www.mia.org.my/new/about.asp

"The Board of Architects Malaysia is a statutory authority responsible for the enforcement of the Architects Act 1967."
http://www.lam.gov.my/aboutus.html



This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Nov 27 2010, 09:04 PM
azarimy
post Nov 27 2010, 09:19 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 12:10 PM)
lol...i'm not really that anti-IPTA..it's just that i like to play the role of devil advocate..since so many ppl are bashing IPTS here, therefore i spoke in defense of IPTS..then we can have a balance discussion..both have good and bad actually...

returning to my role, smile.gif

the subject of accreditation are fundamentally political..look at accountancy profession..to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, one have to be a member of MIA...there are two routes to achieve that; one is to be a member of professional accountancy bodies like ACCA,CPA,ICAEW..second is to be a graduate from public universities like UM,USM...

this is considered a joke in our profession in that a degree holder is considered to be on par with the same technical knowledge and skills as a member of professional body... as such, even if government allow a public uni graduate to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, Big 4 accountancy firms would require these graduates to purse foreign professional accountancy programmes..this will tell u whether the industry truly recognised these graduates or not...in paper they may, but deep inside they do not..

and one of most ironic thing is, the graduates from Oxford and Cambridge are not allow to directly registered as member of MIA without professional accountacy bodies membership whereas graduates from UM does..what a joke...does the government think UM is better than Oxford?

as for my opinion on the architecture industry, the government is merely raising barrier of entry by only recognising the public uni graduates..this does not mean the IPTA are better..try go otehr country and see if they recognised UM more than the degree awarded by private uni.. let's put this in perspective, is Proton really better than foreign car? not only their quality are just so so, they are actually more expensive..a honda city if without import duty will cost less than 50k...a korean car will be even cheaper where they are selling for 10,000 USD only..that is 30k ringgit..

and i quote from George Benard Shaw, one of teh founder of London School of Economics..  "Patriotism is, fundamentally, a conviction that a particular country is the best in the world because you were born in it… "
*
focusing on the bolded part,

here's where i suggest u stop putting the noose around ur neck. i've been involved in the accreditation process twice. i can assure u that none of the IPTS have reached the minimum standard required by the profession. just like most professions out there, one can opt to take local professional cert or international.

in malaysia, local architectural practice is governed by LAM. and internationally, there's RIBA/ARB (UK), RAIA (australia) and so on, where they are equally recognized. none of the IPTS hold accreditation from these bodies either, but UM and UiTM (the so called lousy bumiputera only university) holds RIBA/ARB accreditation, while USM and UTM are following suite.

i dont mind u talking about other professions, but dont even begin to act like u know mine.

believe it what u like, we in IPTAs are quite independent-minded from the government.
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 09:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 27 2010, 09:19 PM)
focusing on the bolded part,

here's where i suggest u stop putting the noose around ur neck. i've been involved in the accreditation process twice. i can assure u that none of the IPTS have reached the minimum standard required by the profession. just like most professions out there, one can opt to take local professional cert or international.

in malaysia, local architectural practice is governed by LAM. and internationally, there's RIBA/ARB (UK), RAIA (australia) and so on, where they are equally recognized. none of the IPTS hold accreditation from these bodies either, but UM and UiTM (the so called lousy bumiputera only university) holds RIBA/ARB accreditation, while USM and UTM are following suite.

i dont mind u talking about other professions, but dont even begin to act like u know mine.

believe it what u like, we in IPTAs are quite independent-minded from the government.
*
okay, then it's my bad smile.gif

btw..the IPTS does not qualify, is it because they are not awarding their own degree but due to their twinning nature?

anyway, isn't IPTS like Taylor Uni also accredited?? http://www.taylors.edu.my/courses/arc/arc_...ing2.php?id=267
Hikari0307
post Nov 27 2010, 11:26 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 09:31 PM)
okay, then it's my bad smile.gif

btw..the IPTS does not qualify, is it because they are not awarding their own degree but due to their twinning nature?

anyway, isn't IPTS like Taylor Uni also accredited?? http://www.taylors.edu.my/courses/arc/arc_...ing2.php?id=267
*
Even IPTS that offers their own degrees are not yet accredited. Believe me don't fight with Azarimy on the education side of Architecture in Malaysia. I'd believe him if he says IPTS doesn't meet the minimum requirements for accreditation yet since he knows what are these requirements and are in the field. He's one of the most informed guy about education in the field around these parts.
No TU's architecture programme is not accredited by LAM and also why their graduates always go to continue to architecture schools overseas which are recognized for their second degree.
Knight_2008
post Nov 27 2010, 11:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Nov 27 2010, 11:26 PM)
Even IPTS that offers their own degrees are not yet accredited. Believe me don't fight with Azarimy on the education side of Architecture in Malaysia. I'd believe him if he says IPTS doesn't meet the minimum requirements for accreditation yet since he knows what are these requirements and are in the field. He's one of the most informed guy about education in the field around these parts.
No TU's architecture programme is not accredited by LAM and also why their graduates always go to continue to architecture schools overseas which are recognized for their second degree.
*
icic...haha..my bad then
violet05
post Nov 28 2010, 01:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 08:10 PM)
lol...i'm not really that anti-IPTA..it's just that i like to play the role of devil advocate..since so many ppl are bashing IPTS here, therefore i spoke in defense of IPTS..then we can have a balance discussion..both have good and bad actually...

returning to my role, smile.gif

the subject of accreditation are fundamentally political..look at accountancy profession..to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, one have to be a member of MIA...there are two routes to achieve that; one is to be a member of professional accountancy bodies like ACCA,CPA,ICAEW..second is to be a graduate from public universities like UM,USM...

this is considered a joke in our profession in that a degree holder is considered to be on par with the same technical knowledge and skills as a member of professional body... as such, even if government allow a public uni graduate to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, Big 4 accountancy firms would require these graduates to purse foreign professional accountancy programmes..this will tell u whether the industry truly recognised these graduates or not...in paper they may, but deep inside they do not..

and one of most ironic thing is, the graduates from Oxford and Cambridge are not allow to directly registered as member of MIA without professional accountacy bodies membership whereas graduates from UM does..what a joke...does the government think UM is better than Oxford?

as for my opinion on the architecture industry, the government is merely raising barrier of entry by only recognising the public uni graduates..this does not mean the IPTA are better..try go otehr country and see if they recognised UM more than the degree awarded by private uni.. let's put this in perspective, is Proton really better than foreign car? not only their quality are just so so, they are actually more expensive..a honda city if without import duty will cost less than 50k...a korean car will be even cheaper where they are selling for 10,000 USD only..that is 30k ringgit..


and i quote from George Benard Shaw, one of teh founder of London School of Economics..  "Patriotism is, fundamentally, a conviction that a particular country is the best in the world because you were born in it… "
*
hello there...you are totally going off sense.
let's put it this way...
let me give you scenarios...

your family is operating a restaurant biz...
i want to get food from your family's restaurant and you
straight away tell me that
"you should buy elsewhere..our food is not s tasty and as good as other restaurants out there!"
well you act potrays the example that i gave.

and when your family want to compete with outsider and expand the biz, you tell your mom..
'what a joke,do you think you are as good as the others??? who are you to compete with them??
your words potrays that. what do you think will happen to any country or organization which has all its members like you?
i'm sure any organization won't go anywhere if they have person like this within.

do you know that in Korea, when their national car was launch...
it's not as good as now of course...
but even then, for korean's locals who bought outsider's cars are consider betrayer by their own ppl.....
it's written on the newpapers..it's fact!

MIA stands for MALAYSIAN institute of accountants
not UK institutes of accountants...
of course it must be design to meet the local syllibus and the vice versa
if you study UK syllibus..of course you will be qualified for UK bodies!

and yes the overseas universities do accept UM degrees!
check the entry requirements for foreign universities....do survey...do research...
they prefer public uni's qualifications first and then...they will state......the qualifications of some of the private unis which bla3X

entryman
post Nov 28 2010, 01:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 08:10 PM)
the subject of accreditation are fundamentally political..look at accountancy profession..to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, one have to be a member of MIA...there are two routes to achieve that; one is to be a member of professional accountancy bodies like ACCA,CPA,ICAEW..second is to be a graduate from public universities like UM,USM...

this is considered a joke in our profession in that a degree holder is considered to be on par with the same technical knowledge and skills as a member of professional body... as such, even if government allow a public uni graduate to be a chartered accountant in Malaysia, Big 4 accountancy firms would require these graduates to purse foreign professional accountancy programmes..this will tell u whether the industry truly recognised these graduates or not...in paper they may, but deep inside they do not..

and one of most ironic thing is, the graduates from Oxford and Cambridge are not allow to directly registered as member of MIA without professional accountacy bodies membership whereas graduates from UM does..what a joke...does the government think UM is better than Oxford?

*
I can't seem to find on Oxbridge's websites stating that they deliver undergraduate or graduate programmes in Accountancy.
Knight_2008
post Nov 28 2010, 01:35 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(violet05 @ Nov 28 2010, 01:16 AM)
hello there...you are totally going off sense.
let's put it this way...
let me give you scenarios...

your family is operating a restaurant biz...
i want to get food from your family's restaurant and you
straight away tell me that
"you should buy elsewhere..our food is not s tasty and as good as other restaurants out there!"
well you act potrays the example that i gave.

and when your family want to compete with outsider and expand the biz, you tell your mom..
'what a joke,do you think you are as good as the others??? who are you to compete with them??
your words potrays that. what do you think will happen to any country or organization which has all its members like you?
i'm sure any organization won't go anywhere if they have person like this within.

do you know that in Korea, when their national car was launch...
it's not as good as now of course...
but even then, for korean's locals who bought outsider's cars are consider betrayer by their own ppl.....
it's written on the newpapers..it's fact!

MIA stands for MALAYSIAN institute of accountants
not UK institutes of accountants...
of course it must be design to meet the local syllibus and the vice versa
if you study UK syllibus..of course you will be qualified for UK bodies!

and yes the overseas universities do accept UM degrees!
check the entry requirements for foreign universities....do survey...do research...
they prefer public uni's qualifications first and then...they will state......the qualifications of some of the private unis which bla3X
*
i understand your arguments, but do not expect me to share your viewpoint..

i do believe that criticizing the public university does not of itself make me any more of a betrayer to my own people...if it is true, then why a country needs an opposition? put it in this context, as parent you're supposed to support your child in their life, but does this means that you're not to criticize them whilst continue to sing praises of them even when they're wrong.. this mentality is what dragging our country down..party members of both divide blindly supporting their leaders regardless of the policies that are being discussed..(sorry, out of topic..lol)

Our Nation's public university were once the envy of the region..The university which we now called NUS was once UM... However, the intolerence to criticism and refusal to admit their mistake and improve is the reason why our public university starts to deteriorates.. each time they fall in ranking and people start to criticize them, they say the ranking are not fair...

violet05
post Nov 28 2010, 01:36 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(entryman @ Nov 28 2010, 01:28 AM)
I can't seem to find on Oxbridge's websites stating that they deliver undergraduate or graduate programmes in Accountancy.
*
hahaha, correct rclxms.gif
i am an accounting and finance student...
i've googled and still wonder around if Oxford and Cambridge offer accountancy programmes?? hmm.gif
Knight_2008
post Nov 28 2010, 01:37 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(entryman @ Nov 28 2010, 01:28 AM)
I can't seem to find on Oxbridge's websites stating that they deliver undergraduate or graduate programmes in Accountancy.
*
tongue.gif my bad... esjudem generis; i meant those uni that are of the same league which have accountancy or programme like LSE..


Added on November 28, 2010, 1:39 am
QUOTE
MIA stands for MALAYSIAN institute of accountants
not UK institutes of accountants...
of course it must be design to meet the local syllibus and the vice versa
if you study UK syllibus..of course you will be qualified for UK bodies!


btw.. do u know, there is starting to be harmonisation of accounting standards where by 2012, malaysia will fully comply with IFRS; which mean studying degree in UK will be almost the same technical knowledge as here..the difference will be very minimal..

This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Nov 28 2010, 01:39 AM
zstan
post Nov 28 2010, 01:42 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 28 2010, 01:37 AM)
tongue.gif my bad... esjudem generis; i meant those uni that are of the same league which have accountancy or programme like LSE..


Added on November 28, 2010, 1:39 am

btw.. do u know, there is starting to be harmonisation of accounting standards where by 2012, malaysia will fully comply with IFRS; which mean studying degree in UK will be almost the same technical knowledge as here..the difference will be very minimal..
*
technical knowledge might be the same. but the experiences shared by those top professors lecturing there, could never be gotten here.
Knight_2008
post Nov 28 2010, 01:51 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 28 2010, 01:42 AM)
technical knowledge might be the same. but the experiences shared by those top professors lecturing there, could never be gotten here.
*
agreed! but Violet imply that MIA should not recognised uni such as LSE as they ahve different syllabus which are imcompatible with local accounting standards.. i'm merely just pointing out that why MIA should also recognised foreign uni such as LSE as how they recognised UM..

nevertheless, I've heard that government is planning to take away public university's special privilege in that their graduates have to either sit for MIA qualifying exams or take professional accountancy bodies exam to gain entry into MIA in the future.. Government have remarked that they plan to make Malaysia a global accountancy service hub in that we export our services to foreign market.. (such as by attracting foreign investments by luring MNC to set up their accountancy function here)


azarimy
post Nov 28 2010, 08:05 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 27 2010, 01:31 PM)
okay, then it's my bad smile.gif

btw..the IPTS does not qualify, is it because they are not awarding their own degree but due to their twinning nature?

anyway, isn't IPTS like Taylor Uni also accredited?? http://www.taylors.edu.my/courses/arc/arc_...ing2.php?id=267
*
there are two forms of accreditation: one by MQA, the other by the professional body.

MQA basically accredits that the degree offered complies to the international standard of awarding a degree. so u would know that cert u're holding is an actual degree, not a diploma or something lower. the professional accreditation, in this case by LAM, certifies that the degree complies to the professional standard of practice in the relevant industry. being accredited means u dont have to take any extra examinations and automatically qualifies u to become a professional right upon graduation.

IPTS always market themselves as being fully recognized. now, recognition and accreditation itself are two very different things. it's like driving a car. u may be able to drive, but u dont have a license. that translates to "the course is recognized, but not accredited".

these play of words are rampant in the marketing of IPTS. taylor's are one of those who practice a good standard, they dont try to play around with words. they would explain themselves clearly to prospective students, hence the diagram u posted in ur link.

but from that diagram, u would be able to deduce that they're not yet accredited. scroll down to the bottom four cells, right after graduation of masters, there's a professional examination. now, this is solid proof that they're not accredited. IPTA students can graduate and jump straight into practice without the need to go through the exam. IPTS students would have to take those exams first.

unfortunately, most IPTS graduates just jump straight into practice, illegally, despite being paid lower as there are risks involved.
firdzee
post Nov 28 2010, 09:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
there is too many different aspect from IPTA and IPTS .

zstan
post Nov 28 2010, 12:48 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



....and its a bit unfair to just compare accounting and architecture alone... laugh.gif
Knight_2008
post Nov 28 2010, 01:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 28 2010, 08:05 AM)
there are two forms of accreditation: one by MQA, the other by the professional body.

MQA basically accredits that the degree offered complies to the international standard of awarding a degree. so u would know that cert u're holding is an actual degree, not a diploma or something lower. the professional accreditation, in this case by LAM, certifies that the degree complies to the professional standard of practice in the relevant industry. being accredited means u dont have to take any extra examinations and automatically qualifies u to become a professional right upon graduation.

IPTS always market themselves as being fully recognized. now, recognition and accreditation itself are two very different things. it's like driving a car. u may be able to drive, but u dont have a license. that translates to "the course is recognized, but not accredited".

these play of words are rampant in the marketing of IPTS. taylor's are one of those who practice a good standard, they dont try to play around with words. they would explain themselves clearly to prospective students, hence the diagram u posted in ur link.

but from that diagram, u would be able to deduce that they're not yet accredited. scroll down to the bottom four cells, right after graduation of masters, there's a professional examination. now, this is solid proof that they're not accredited. IPTA students can graduate and jump straight into practice without the need to go through the exam. IPTS students would have to take those exams first.

unfortunately, most IPTS graduates just jump straight into practice, illegally, despite being paid lower as there are risks involved.
*
icic..thanks for the info smile.gif
violet05
post Nov 28 2010, 02:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(firdzee @ Nov 28 2010, 09:30 AM)
there is too many different aspect from IPTA  and IPTS .
*
yes..agree...
that's what i am trying to say, it depends...
here is no firm answer for this..
there too many aspects to consider...
but there are ppl who just look at one party and compare blindly.

there are enormous numbers of IPTS in this country...
simply firmly said that IPTS is better by only taking a small number of good IPTs for example is shallow.

i am an IPTS student btw...
but i'm seing things on both sides...

p/s: condemning and critisizing are two different things....
Knight_2008
post Nov 28 2010, 05:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(violet05 @ Nov 28 2010, 02:48 PM)
yes..agree...
that's what i am trying to say, it depends...
here is no firm answer for this..
there too many aspects to consider...
but there are ppl who just look at one party and compare blindly.

there are enormous numbers of IPTS in this country...
simply firmly said that IPTS is better by only taking a small number of good IPTs for example is shallow.

i am an IPTS student btw...
but i'm seing things on both sides...

p/s: condemning and critisizing are two different things....
*
agreed..just to clarify; i was not comparing IPTS and IPTA in general..merely between top tier IPTA and top tier IPTS (as defined by the SETARA)
DJFoo000
post Nov 28 2010, 06:45 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



To add something, I dun think it's fair to put foreign branch universities in the same category as locally bred private universities.
skinnydude
post Nov 28 2010, 11:51 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
522 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


should create a poll.. let everyone to vote. rclxms.gif
azarimy
post Nov 29 2010, 09:47 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(skinnydude @ Nov 28 2010, 03:51 PM)
should create a poll.. let everyone to vote.  rclxms.gif
*
since most members of LYN are from IPTS, i'm pretty sure the poll results will be lopsided wink.gif.
biggie
post Nov 29 2010, 10:38 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,291 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
IMHO
I come from IPTA and have been involved in accreditation business in my case for engineering as opposed to Azrimy for Architecture.

The difference between IPTA and IPTS is in the environmental setting of the institutions. The IPTA mainly have ppl who cannot afford to go to IPTS. Therefore the socioeconomic environment is different.

IPTS due to business reasons do not invest in education and facilities as much as IPTA. Therefore most facilities and infra of IPTS is inferior to IPTA, as also education syllabus and ppl.

However due to socioeconomic status of students in IPTS there is easier to make connections in business etc. Thus the student who in this line in IPTS will have better connections etc and will be more successful in this line of work as opposed the technical oriented architecture/engineering where due to their limited exposure (in IPTS) will make them fail or have to work harder then IPTA counterpart.
azarimy
post Nov 29 2010, 10:45 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(biggie @ Nov 29 2010, 02:38 AM)
IMHO
I come from IPTA and have been involved in accreditation business in my case for engineering as opposed to Azrimy for Architecture.

The difference between IPTA and IPTS is in the environmental setting of the institutions. The IPTA mainly have ppl who cannot afford to go to IPTS. Therefore the socioeconomic environment is different.

IPTS due to business reasons do not invest in education and facilities as much as IPTA. Therefore most facilities and infra of IPTS is inferior to IPTA, as also education syllabus and ppl.

However due to socioeconomic status of students in IPTS there is easier to make connections in business etc. Thus the student who in this line in IPTS will have better connections etc and will be more successful in this line of work as opposed the technical oriented architecture/engineering where due to their limited exposure (in IPTS) will make them fail or have to work harder then IPTA counterpart.
*
i agree.
violet05
post Nov 29 2010, 02:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(biggie @ Nov 29 2010, 10:38 AM)
IMHO
I come from IPTA and have been involved in accreditation business in my case for engineering as opposed to Azrimy for Architecture.

The difference between IPTA and IPTS is in the environmental setting of the institutions. The IPTA mainly have ppl who cannot afford to go to IPTS. Therefore the socioeconomic environment is different.

IPTS due to business reasons do not invest in education and facilities as much as IPTA. Therefore most facilities and infra of IPTS is inferior to IPTA, as also education syllabus and ppl.

However due to socioeconomic status of students in IPTS there is easier to make connections in business etc. Thus the student who in this line in IPTS will have better connections etc and will be more successful in this line of work as opposed the technical oriented architecture/engineering where due to their limited exposure (in IPTS) will make them fail or have to work harder then IPTA counterpart.
*
i agree with u... rclxms.gif

entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 03:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(biggie @ Nov 29 2010, 10:38 AM)
IMHO
I come from IPTA and have been involved in accreditation business in my case for engineering as opposed to Azrimy for Architecture.

The difference between IPTA and IPTS is in the environmental setting of the institutions. The IPTA mainly have ppl who cannot afford to go to IPTS. Therefore the socioeconomic environment is different.

IPTS due to business reasons do not invest in education and facilities as much as IPTA. Therefore most facilities and infra of IPTS is inferior to IPTA, as also education syllabus and ppl.

However due to socioeconomic status of students in IPTS there is easier to make connections in business etc. Thus the student who in this line in IPTS will have better connections etc and will be more successful in this line of work as opposed the technical oriented architecture/engineering where due to their limited exposure (in IPTS) will make them fail or have to work harder then IPTA counterpart.
*
So to sum up your final statement,

To fully maximize utility...

For business related degrees, you will need to go overseas (worthwhile only if within world 200), the foreign university branches in M'sia, or the IPTS in Tier 5 Setara.

For technical degrees, it's either in the branches of foreign universities, or the IPTAs in Tier 5 Setara, or other IPTS in Tier 5 Setara that provides 1+3 or 2+2 etc but NOT 3+0. The choice between the three is dependent on personal career aspirations/planning (e.g. one might choose IPTA instead of Nottingham for Engineering degree as he wants to be accredited) or financial constraints.

Sums it up properly?

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 29 2010, 03:10 PM
azarimy
post Nov 29 2010, 03:10 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(entryman @ Nov 29 2010, 07:06 AM)
So to sum that up.

To fully maximize utility...

For business related degrees, you will need to go overseas (worthwhile only if within world 200), the foreign university branches in M'sia, or the IPTS in Tier 5 Setara.

For technical degrees, it's either in the branches of foreign universities, or the IPTAs in Tier 5 Setara, or other IPTS in Tier 5 Setara that provides 1+3 or 2+2 etc but NOT 3+0. The choice between the three is dependent on personal career aspirations/planning (e.g. one might choose IPTA instead of Nottingham for Engineering degree as he wants to be accredited) or financial constraints.

Sums it up properly?
*
well, there's a danger here as not all courses for tier 5 IPTAs are equally advanced.

for example, if an IPTA just opened a particular course and not yet accredited, u cant put it equal to another that have established it for 10-15 years. in such cases, i'd say opt for the non-tier 5 IPTA which have been accredited. it's all about the course u want to choose, not just the general university.
entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 03:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(azarimy @ Nov 29 2010, 03:10 PM)
well, there's a danger here as not all courses for tier 5 IPTAs are equally advanced.

for example, if an IPTA just opened a particular course and not yet accredited, u cant put it equal to another that have established it for 10-15 years. in such cases, i'd say opt for the non-tier 5 IPTA which have been accredited. it's all about the course u want to choose, not just the general university.
*
Ah yes...

My catch-all didn't work out too well blush.gif
riou666
post Nov 30 2010, 12:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
85 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


anyone know which ipts got accredited for electrical engineering degree?
Hikari0307
post Nov 30 2010, 12:08 AM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(riou666 @ Nov 30 2010, 12:00 AM)
anyone know which ipts got accredited for electrical engineering degree?
*
accredited by who? BEM?
Press on the Universities/Colleges to see which of their programmes have been accredited.
http://www.bem.org.my/v3/listofaccreditedprogrammes.html
riou666
post Nov 30 2010, 12:33 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
85 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Nov 30 2010, 12:08 AM)
accredited by who? BEM?
Press on the Universities/Colleges to see which of their programmes have been accredited.
http://www.bem.org.my/v3/listofaccreditedprogrammes.html
*
Sorry I dont understand this chart

http://www.eac.org.my/web/document/list%20....2010%29%20.pdf

Does it mean only electronic majoring in optical engineering recognize?
Hikari0307
post Nov 30 2010, 01:38 AM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(riou666 @ Nov 30 2010, 12:33 AM)
Sorry I dont understand this chart

http://www.eac.org.my/web/document/list%20....2010%29%20.pdf

Does it mean only electronic majoring in optical engineering recognize?
*
All the Degrees listed there are accredited. The chart shows the graduates of which years hold degrees that have received accreditation.
riou666
post Nov 30 2010, 01:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
85 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Nov 30 2010, 01:38 AM)
All the Degrees listed there are accredited. The chart shows the graduates of which years hold degrees that have received accreditation.
*
Ok, Thanks for the info smile.gif
gizmoduck
post Dec 16 2010, 01:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
323 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Kota Damansara


I have taught both at IPTAs and IPTSs.

Both have its merits but in terms of teaching experience, and higher learning, you have to go with IPTAs. To put it bluntly, do look at the business model for both types of universities and you could see the difference.

IPTSs main goal is to make money (despite the slogans blahblah) and profit margin is sought after before academic excellence. You only have to see the influx of foreign students who barely qualify as high school students in IPTS degree courses across the country. We have also seen the emergence of 'instant' vocational diplomas such as nursing in a lot of Colleges as these courses provide instant profit.

I am not saying that this drive for profit gain has caused quality to reduce, but it certainly makes it harder for these University colleges to grow. As an example, a lot of UCs today are gearing up for Full Uni status by encouraging their lecturers to do research. However, most of the funds have already been allocated to the shareholders, marketing and student services that the best these researchers can do is go beyond the College for grants. IPTAs on the other receive a steady (maybe not in the last couple of years) injection of funds by the government specifically meant for research.

Most students who are applying for their diplomas and degrees may not have to worry about the amount of research produced at their universities because it is irrelevant to their studies. However, Research universities do attract the best minds and though they might not be the best 'teachers' in the classroom, they are some of the best thinkers/ writers/ policy makers in the country.

As for this debate whether IPTAs or IPTSs students speak better Engrrish, I think they are equally good and equally atrocious. I was just marking some exam papers this afternoon and OMG the level of English..is..horrible.. can't read..anymore..must poke eyes with red pen!!!!
rooney723
post Dec 21 2010, 03:39 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
596 posts

Joined: Dec 2010

here i will list out all the cons of a local u based on my personal experience,

for IPTA, you will not get the EXPOSURE , you will be like a katak di bawah tempurung , you will not be exposed to real university life, western education styles, western thinking .....bla bla........, in local u's , its more like schooling than uni, wif strict rules and stuff,such as gals hav to wear long jeans to classes and even around the campus, same applies to guys, and the environment and atmosphere around the campus is just so dull and boring. it sounds more like you are in an islamic university.

and IPTA do hav long credit hours, at more than 20 hours a week, and you hav to learn stupid subjects that are not related to the course at all....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a student from an IPTS will possesses high social and PR skill ,sporting, open mindedness, pro-activeness, high exposure, western style thinking, outgoing, high self esteem, extrovert..............

a student from an IPTA will be close minded, conservative, shy, lack the social and PR skill, getting virtually no exposure at all, malaysian and 'islamic' style thinking, low self esteem,introvert................

academically and skill-wise, both will be almost the same altho IPTA will have a slight advantage on this....

IPTS will be 10x the price of IPTA.............

so which wan do you choose? or more specifically, which type of person do you choose to be?



azarimy
post Dec 21 2010, 08:47 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(rooney723 @ Dec 20 2010, 07:39 PM)
here i will list out all the cons of a local u based on my personal experience,

for IPTA, you will not get the EXPOSURE , you will be like a katak di bawah tempurung , you will not be exposed to real university life, western education styles, western thinking .....bla bla........, in local u's , its more like schooling than uni, wif strict rules and stuff,such as gals hav to wear long jeans to classes and even around the campus, same applies to guys, and the environment and atmosphere around the campus is just so dull and boring. it sounds more like you are in an islamic university.

and IPTA do hav long credit hours, at more than 20 hours a week, and you hav to learn stupid subjects that are not related to the course at all....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

a student from an IPTS will possesses high social and PR skill ,sporting, open mindedness, pro-activeness, high exposure, western style thinking, outgoing, high self esteem, extrovert..............

a student from an IPTA will be close minded, conservative, shy, lack the social and PR skill, getting virtually no exposure at all, malaysian and 'islamic' style thinking, low self esteem,introvert................

academically and skill-wise, both will be almost the same altho IPTA will have a slight advantage on this....

IPTS will be 10x the price of IPTA.............

so which wan do you choose? or more specifically, which type of person do you choose to be?
*
that's an extreme generalization.

is that what IPTA did to u? that u become so... skewed?
entryman
post Dec 21 2010, 11:06 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(azarimy @ Dec 21 2010, 08:47 AM)
that's an extreme generalization.

is that what IPTA did to u? that u become so... skewed?
*
Well azarimy I believe that it the perception of many people, I'm not sure if it's the majority or not, but it's a huge chunk, i.e. if you've got the financing, you better stay clear from the IPTAs, due to the reasons given by rooney.

Well I'm in the middle of the fence, since I've never been exposed to IPTAs nor met a student. But I guess you know about the "network effect". When you've heard nothing but negative stuff (okay perhaps didn't hear much negative stuff, but the strong perception about having money and staying clear remains), it naturally spreads throughout communities.

One of the major reasons that I believe fuels this issue, comes from how the government might be managing the talent. Some stories here, they're true, no reason for me to make them up.

1970s, a person I know was working in the bank. One day, mr. old and senior engineering lecturer (bank customer) mentioned that he was quitting his job. This person I that I knew asked: why? you've got such a good job why quit? The answer was something in the lines of portraying the skewed marking system and having to pass those who fail. And the concluding sentence was something like:"It is against my conscience and my profession. Can you imagine, these people are the ones who are going to build your bridges and buildings."

Fast forward to very recently. Things that portray racial discrimination.

I remember reading a news clipping in some forumer's blog here, mentioning a patriotic Malaysian Chinese coming back from Canada and felt neglected by the racial policies, and went to NUS instead, and he's now head of the Faculty of Medicine, leading a team of international scientists to conduct cutting edge research. Well this is not recently, but it also happened in the 70s and 80s.

Anyway back to stuff that I personally know.

Scenario 1.

- Science related
- Secured a PhD post at Harvard.
- PTPTN not only blocked the person from going, some more charge with a court case, wanted full settlement.
- Personally obtained Fullbright Scholarship. Vowed to say bye bye to M'sia.
- Pulled strings and got the case settled. On top of the Fullbright scholarship, got another scholarship from Malaysia.
- Now this person says doesn't mind coming back to Malaysia. However, had it not been for the scholarship and the settled case, you imagine lah, M'sia would have lost a top scientist to another country.

*I know the actual facts above are abit vague. Because this is third person account. But you should get the idea of what I mean.*

Scenario 2.

- Bright young student, straight As in everything
- Secured a place at Cambridge
- Secured PTPTN loan (note that it's loan, not even scholarship).
- Started at Cambridge U, however, while studying there, loan didn't arrive! Stuck there with no money to pay uni fees doh.gif
- Appealed to Cambridge U, obtained full scholarship.
- You can imagine, contrary to the above scenario, this one confirmed say bye bye to M'sia. The education was fully funded by the M'sian government, till a bright young student was nurtured, and picked up with a few cents by the British. shocking.gif

* And you guessed it right, the above two were not Malays.

Scenario 3.

Foreign scientist who did his PhD at one of the IPTAs told me that his research results were blocked from being published, and were destroyed by the U (they said it went lost). His research was on the agricultural soil composition of Cameron highlands, and of course, the results were bad. My best guess is that these results would bring on negative implications to the industry.


----


So with all these spreading around, and me being only a student, all these were passed on to me by the older generation, it doesn't help but to fuel the negative perception (and perhaps more of the minority races) towards a public education in M'sia.

However, I personally know and respect some people who are really hard-working and do not have the funds to go to IPTS. They make the most out of their time in IPTA.

Reiterating that I'm in the middle of the fence. Perhaps you can give comments, both towards what I've written above, and also some points contradictory to rooney's statements. Because, I would also also be compelled to think in that way, though not as extreme (compare the environment, not the people).

This post has been edited by entryman: Dec 21 2010, 11:15 AM
Hikari0307
post Dec 21 2010, 11:19 AM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(entryman @ Dec 21 2010, 11:06 AM)
Scenario 1.

- Science related
- Secured a PhD post at Harvard.
- PTPTN not only blocked the person from going, some more charge with a court case, wanted full settlement.
- Personally obtained Fullbright Scholarship. Vowed to say bye bye to M'sia.
- Pulled strings and got the case settled. On top of the Fullbright scholarship, got another scholarship from Malaysia.
- Now this person says doesn't mind coming back to Malaysia. However, had it not been for the scholarship and the settled case, you imagine lah, M'sia would have lost a top scientist to another country.

*I know the actual facts above are abit vague. Because this is third person account. But you should get the idea of what I mean.*

Scenario 2.

- Bright young student, straight As in everything
- Secured a place at Cambridge
- Secured PTPTN loan (note that it's loan, not even scholarship).
- Started at Cambridge U, however, while studying there, loan didn't arrive! Stuck there with no money to pay uni fees  doh.gif
- Appealed to Cambridge U, obtained full scholarship.
- You can imagine, contrary to the above scenario, this one confirmed say bye bye to M'sia. The education was fully funded by the M'sian government, till a bright young student was nurtured, and picked up with a few cents by the British.  shocking.gif

* And you guessed it right, the above two were not Malays.
*
For scenario 1. Wouldn't it be the person's fault for not paying PTPTN in the first place ^^" He doesn't pay or ask to defer paying for a while, so it's kinda his fault for getting blacklisted from going abroad right.

For scenario 2 I'm just curious, as far as I know PTPTN only provide loans for courses done in Malaysia hmm.gif they never provide any financial aids at all for those going overseas.

This post has been edited by Hikari0307: Dec 21 2010, 11:30 AM
azarimy
post Dec 21 2010, 11:22 AM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(entryman @ Dec 21 2010, 03:06 AM)
Well azarimy I believe that it the perception of many people, I'm not sure if it's the majority or not, but it's a huge chunk, i.e. if you've got the financing, you better stay clear from the IPTAs, due to the reasons given by rooney.

Well I'm in the middle of the fence, since I've never been exposed to IPTAs nor met a student. But I guess you know about the "network effect". When you've heard nothing but negative stuff (okay perhaps didn't hear much negative stuff, but the strong perception about having money and staying clear remains), it naturally spreads throughout communities.

One of the major reasons that I believe fuels this issue, comes from how the government might be managing the talent. Some stories here, they're true, no reason for me to make them up.

1970s, a person I know was working in the bank. One day, mr. old and senior engineering lecturer (bank customer) mentioned that he was quitting his job. This person I that I knew asked: why? you've got such a good job why quit? The answer was something in the lines of portraying the skewed marking system and having to pass those who fail. And the concluding sentence was something like:"It is against my conscience and my profession. Can you imagine, these people are the ones who are going to build your bridges and buildings."

Fast forward to very recently. Things that portray racial discrimination.

I remember reading a news clipping in some forumer's blog here, mentioning a patriotic Malaysian Chinese coming back from Canada and felt neglected by the racial policies, and went to NUS instead, and he's now head of the Faculty of Medicine, leading a team of international scientists to conduct cutting edge research. Well this is not recently, but it also happened in the 70s and 80s.


are u saying majority perception > truth?

QUOTE
Anyway back to stuff that I personally know.

Scenario 1.

- Science related
- Secured a PhD post at Harvard.
- PTPTN not only blocked the person from going, some more charge with a court case, wanted full settlement.
- Personally obtained Fullbright Scholarship. Vowed to say bye bye to M'sia.
- Pulled strings and got the case settled. On top of the Fullbright scholarship, got another scholarship from Malaysia.
- Now this person says doesn't mind coming back to Malaysia. However, had it not been for the scholarship and the settled case, you imagine lah, M'sia would have lost a top scientist to another country.

*I know the actual facts above are abit vague. Because this is third person account. But you should get the idea of what I mean.*


my wife took PTPTN. she didnt finish paying before she continued for her 2nd degree in the UK. PTPTN didnt stop her from leaving, because she applied to PTPTN for a postponement, and she got it.

it's simple: if u borrow, pay it back. if u have to postpone, ask for it. it's not a big deal!

but if u dont pay and got black listed (barred from going abroad), it's ur own fault. now this is from our own experience, not some third person account.

QUOTE
Scenario 2.

- Bright young student, straight As in everything
- Secured a place at Cambridge
- Secured PTPTN loan (note that it's loan, not even scholarship).
- Started at Cambridge U, however, while studying there, loan didn't arrive! Stuck there with no money to pay uni fees  doh.gif
- Appealed to Cambridge U, obtained full scholarship.
- You can imagine, contrary to the above scenario, this one confirmed say bye bye to M'sia. The education was fully funded by the M'sian government, till a bright young student was nurtured, and picked up with a few cents by the British.  shocking.gif

* And you guessed it right, the above two were not Malays.


PTPTN doesnt give overseas loans.

QUOTE
Scenario 3.

Foreign scientist who did his PhD at one of the IPTAs told me that his research results were blocked from being published, and were destroyed by the U (they said it went lost). His research was on the agricultural soil composition of Cameron highlands, and of course, the results were bad. My best guess is that these results would bring on negative implications to the industry.
----


source? there would be an academic record for the studies being done. any studies will have a budget allocation, and the university audit will want to know the outcome/result of each ringgit spent. so if there's money being spent but not producing results, the audit unit will rain havoc over them.

QUOTE
So with all these spreading around, and me being only a student, all these were passed on to me by the older generation, it doesn't help but to fuel the negative perception of (and perhaps the minority races) towards a public education in M'sia.

However, I personally know and respect some people who are really hard-working and do not have the funds to go to IPTS. They make the most out of their time in IPTA.

Reiterating that I'm in the middle of the fence. Perhaps you can give comments, both towards what I've written above, and also some points contradictory to rooney's statements. Because, I would also also be compelled to think in that way, though not as extreme. However I compare the environment, not the people.
*
my advice is get the truth, son. no point keep feeding off the same fuel. if u have a chance to make things better, why not take it? u can start by not fueling others.

entryman
post Dec 21 2010, 11:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:19 AM)
For scenario 1. Wouldn't it be the person's fault for not paying PTPTN in the first place ^^"

For scenario 2 I'm just curious, doesn't PTPTN only provide loans for courses done in Malaysia hmm.gif
*
Scenario 1.

As I said, the actual facts are abit vague (coz I forgot).

Focus on the general story instead.

Btw, the person's very poor, fought all the way till current qualifications!


Scenario 2.

Again clause as above (forgot facts).

Focus on general story again please.

If it's not PTPTN then think of it as some other government fund lah. whistling.gif


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:27 am
QUOTE(azarimy @ Dec 21 2010, 11:22 AM)
are u saying majority perception > truth?
my wife took PTPTN. she didnt finish paying before she continued for her 2nd degree in the UK. PTPTN didnt stop her from leaving, because she applied to PTPTN for a postponement, and she got it.

it's simple: if u borrow, pay it back. if u have to postpone, ask for it. it's not a big deal!

but if u dont pay and got black listed (barred from going abroad), it's ur own fault. now this is from our own experience, not some third person account.
PTPTN doesnt give overseas loans.
source? there would be an academic record for the studies being done. any studies will have a budget allocation, and the university audit will want to know the outcome/result of each ringgit spent. so if there's money being spent but not producing results, the audit unit will rain havoc over them.
my advice is get the truth, son. no point keep feeding off the same fuel. if u have a chance to make things better, why not take it? u can start by not fueling others.
*
Of course majority perception doesn't mean it's the truth.

I'm trying to get some truth here with the little time I have, so I can start dispersing those perception with the truth.

Again, all these were from real accounts.

Third person meaning, someone very close to me informed me of his accounts with specific people facing such issues.

It's the same as you telling me the issues faced by your loved ones.

So, what I was asking was about the.. environment.

Although rooney's statement was very much to the extreme, but I suppose there's still some basis as to why that comment was made. What's the basis? Or is that complete bollocks. I've never been to IPTA so I'm asking.


Added on December 21, 2010, 11:31 amNah, of course there's no "credible source".

It would be a futile attempt to obtain them.

Though you see, these "you can call them stories if you want", are being conveyed, and they are unique in each of their cases.

Imagine if it reached me, a young student, just 1 separation away from the source, how many others did it reach?

So that's ONE OF the factors fuelling the negative perception.



*Out of topic:* By the way, was there a recent change of the PTPTN CEO/Chairman? This year.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by entryman: Dec 21 2010, 11:58 AM
azarimy
post Dec 21 2010, 01:13 PM

mister architect: the arrogant pr*ck
Group Icon
Elite
10,672 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam


QUOTE(entryman @ Dec 21 2010, 03:22 AM)
Scenario 1.

As I said, the actual facts are abit vague (coz I forgot).

Focus on the general story instead.

Btw, the person's very poor, fought all the way till current qualifications!
Scenario 2.

Again clause as above (forgot facts).

Focus on general story again please.

If it's not PTPTN then think of it as some other government fund lah.  whistling.gif
well, the facts speak for themselves. as in scenario 1, regardless whether one is poor or rich, they can request to postpone payment by a simple letter. in this case, going for their studies is a very good reason, one PTPTN often give the green light to.

in scenario 2, different funds got different requirements and procedure. JPA is one of the most popular, but will be awarded before departure, not after. others are awarded upon admission, the rest with their own system. so depending on which, the story can be very different. it's easy to listen to individual accounts, but u cant ignore the system.

for example, if u're a driver, a single accident shouldnt prove that u're a bad one. and the person causing the accident doesnt mean he's a bad one either.

rooney723
post Dec 21 2010, 02:32 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
596 posts

Joined: Dec 2010

well, i noe dat my views are a little extreme and unfair, but dat is what i had experienced at local u's. I am currently a first year student at UM and i am commenting from wat i had xperienced. in local u's , there are many strict rules and regulation that makes the whole study environment dull and boring. There are also the type of 'islamisation' and 'political agendas' that you hav to go thru in a local u. For example they hav subjects glorifies a religion and the 'one race', that they force every student to take and its a must pass subject.

not to mention the bias-ness and unfairness of lecturers marking papers, for example, i hav a paper, which i got A for mid term, and B+ for 'quizzes', and in the end , i got a C for my total marks, how on earth can i get a C if i get A and B+? and i hav some of my frens, who got AA , but for the total marks, they are given a B, ironic isnt it? while for the 'other' students, most of them got F, but they are given a D!!. this is the kind of biasness and unfairness you hav to go thru in IPTA.

and not to mention the way courses are taught, its more like schooling than uni, the lecturer will oni teach and the students will only copy and students are only required to memorize to get good results.....there is no communication between lecturers and students and students are not equipped with the thinking skills taught in IPTS.

definitely i am comparing my IPTA wif renowned IPTS like taylors, sunway, monash , notingham.......etc, and not wif some lesser known IPTS like kdu, kbu, segi, inti etc, and there is also lesser known IPTA's like UUM, UNIMAP, UMK and etc that are 10x worst than the well known IPTA's. so you cant compare a uni like segi wif lets say um or usm. good IPTA's and good IPTS's produce academically good students, while poor IPTA's and poor IPTS's produce academically poor students.....

its more like comparing the kind of social and thinking skills you get from those uni's than comparing academical performance.

conclusionally, academically, IPTA students wins by a slight margin over IPTS.
but socially, IPTA students will fail horribly...........

so if you r an outgoing dynamic and sporting person, u r better off to IPTS, but if you are a quiet , introvert ,laid back, IPTA will suits you better......
and its definitely worth the large sum of money spent to go to IPTS's, the experience and exposure you get from an ipts will be vital for your future career....
biggie
post Dec 21 2010, 03:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,291 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
You can rechecke your final exams question right? So do it

Back to the 1st post where bright minds are attracted to the uni due to better research environment. This bright minds are not good teachers but will give you better facts as they are more current then their peers who teach 30-40 hrs a week. Teaching style is different from lect. to lect; they are one way communicators in UM, USM, UKM and UPM as also from Nottingham, Monash etc.

It you are a dynamic and sporting person you will excel anywhere that you go (if you study). If you're quiet and introvert, you can also excel.

but as I mentioned earlier if you do not have the right equipment (technical field) then the graduates produced are 'tong kosong'; can talk only the moment work need to be done all shy away.

This post has been edited by biggie: Dec 21 2010, 03:03 PM
xtrasher_kingx
post Dec 21 2010, 03:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: May 2010
i've read from page 1 to 8 (well up until 7 actually), too many out of topic posts. haahaha!

here's my 2cents, to experience real university life, living in a dorm/hostel/college and such, u have to go to ipta. but don't complain about all the strict rules, coz it is there for a reason.

so for TS, i'm coming from IIUM/UIAM myself, studied Computer Science. after 6 months of graduation, 90% of my batch are employed. the remaining 10% are either ladies who are getting married soon rclxms.gif or those who have family business to run.

so i don't experience the rejection by the work industry.. icon_rolleyes.gif
zeilouz
post Dec 21 2010, 04:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Atas Pokok


This is based on my own experience.

In 2008, I've enrolled to a foundation course from UITM, asasi kejuteraan and to be honest, I really love the life in IPTA. I met a lot of friends, (since im staying in the dorm), played different types of sports, (they have a significant amount of sport facilities) and the lecturers are very professional indeed. I still remembered that there was this lecturer who graduated from US was really good..I always love being in her lectures.

Studying for a month before going to a college (scholarship) at UITM surely have given me a lot of sweet memories and technical points.

So, In 2010, I've finished my college studies and was enrolled to UniKL Micet, (an IPTS which I have to study a year in my scholarship agreement) and I was seriously disappointed by the fact that its totally different from what I've experienced in UiTM.

The sporting facilities are very bad and the lecturers were not up to my expectations..they were some lecturers who were holding PHD's..but most of my lecturers were around the age of 24-28; in which I've found the lectures were something that I tried to "avoid" and rather study on my own and make a group/case study with my friends.

Studying in IPTA does bring workmanship, togetherness and to some point, leadership that most IPTS lacks from. I've been in both universities and experienced it and I would rather not spend and put myself in the burden of debt just because I want to study in IPTS (unless I have no other choice).

Okay, so regarding job opportunities, in my most humble opinion, I would say being in IPTA has a higher job opportunity because most of the time in IPTA you've gotta sort and discipline yourself and most of the lecturers are very, very, very good. I'm not saying that IPTS don't have any good quality lecturers, its just that, being in IPTA it makes you more confident, disciplined and credible if you have the right friends, the right mindset and the willing to succeed.

Heck, I think the person itself after graduating from IPTA/IPTS would determine whether he/she obtain the career or the job of his/her choice.

Its like saying,

If you're from a rich or poor family,

Which has the highest opportunity to succeed in the future?

The debate will never ends.


Benjamin911
post Dec 22 2010, 12:55 AM

~`~artisan`~
*****
Senior Member
777 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Firstly, I personally do not see anything wrong regarding the terms "introvert" or "extrovert". Both are just what they are; individual "characteristics" of a person that's all; and there's absolutely nothing wrong with either one. Success/being good is based on a whole lot of other factors; definitely not based on being "introvert" or "extrovert". In universities, there are "introverts" who will be doing great, and "extroverts" who will be doing badly; and the other way round. (Introverts & extroverts will be found in both IPTS & IPTAs.)

Secondly, an individual can never solely be judged as "good" simply because he/she is highly sociable, full of high self-esteem, full of confidence, have high PR skills, and (or) is particularly pro-active, sporting, outgoing, open-minded, and (or) good in talking.. Because you'll never know the person right beside, the one who tend to be more quiet, reserved, shy, conservative, and (or) introverted; is actually the one who is having the right "tenacity", capabilities, mindset, thinking, skill, & talent for the job/role/position; far better than the talkative over-confident guy right beside. (A saying goes: "Being over confident is as good as having no confidence at all.") ("An empty vessel makes the most noise.")

P.S., having a "good" moral (or good moral values) in general is far more important & desirable than having so-called "Western Style Thinking" or "Eastern Style Thinking" and so on..

Thirdly, there is absolutely nothing wrong in studying/learning about Islamic history, culture, & civilization. (I personally find Islamic architecture, culture, & civilization to be very interesting.)

Finally, there is absolutely nothing wrong with "Classroom Style Teaching" or lectures. (We have it all the time too in IPTS.) There is always "Tutorials" for you to further demonstrate your enthusiasm, keenness, & participation. (You are free to even make appointments with your lecturers, or form your own study groups & tutorials.. The options are there; there is freedom of learning in tertiary level education.)

Regarding rules & regulation, there are also general "on campus rules" concerning behavior, appearance, & the code of conduct of individuals at private institutions. At Taylors for example, there is a very particularly strict rule for smokers, where a hefty penalty of RM10K will be imposed on anyone who is caught smoking on campus ground/premises.

In the end, at university/tertiary level, a good student will always be a good student; regardless of IPTS or IPTA. (The institution can never make you good or bad; at this level, you are on your own; it is for you to "carve" out your own path to make yourself good.) Regardless of "introvert" or "extrovert", you must find your own individual way to succeed.

Regards.

This post has been edited by Benjamin911: Dec 22 2010, 01:00 AM
zstan
post Dec 22 2010, 09:36 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(zeilouz @ Dec 21 2010, 04:39 PM)
This is based on my own experience.

In 2008, I've enrolled to a foundation course from UITM, asasi kejuteraan and to be honest, I really love the life in IPTA. I met a lot of friends, (since im staying in the dorm), played different types of sports, (they have a significant amount of sport facilities) and the lecturers are very professional indeed. I still remembered that there was this lecturer who graduated from US was really good..I always love being in her lectures.

Studying for a month before going to a college (scholarship) at UITM surely have given me a lot of sweet memories and technical points.

So, In 2010, I've finished my college studies and was enrolled to UniKL Micet, (an IPTS which I have to study a year in my scholarship agreement) and I was seriously disappointed by the fact that its totally different from what I've experienced in UiTM.

The sporting facilities are very bad and the lecturers were not up to my expectations..they were some lecturers who were holding PHD's..but most of my lecturers were around the age of 24-28; in which I've found the lectures were something that I tried to "avoid" and rather study on my own and make a group/case study with my friends.

Studying in IPTA does bring workmanship, togetherness and to some point, leadership that most IPTS lacks from. I've been in both universities and experienced it and I would rather not spend and put myself in the burden of debt just because I want to study in IPTS (unless I have no other choice).

Okay, so regarding job opportunities, in my most humble opinion, I would say being in IPTA has a higher job opportunity because most of the time in IPTA you've gotta sort and discipline yourself and most of the lecturers are very, very, very good. I'm not saying that IPTS don't have any good quality lecturers, its just that, being in IPTA it makes you more confident, disciplined and credible if you have the right friends, the right mindset and the willing to succeed.

Heck, I think the person itself after graduating from IPTA/IPTS would determine whether he/she obtain the career or the job of his/her choice.

Its like saying,

If you're from a rich or poor family,

Which has the highest opportunity to succeed in the future?

The debate will never ends.
*
to be fair, you shouldn't even be comparing one of the most exclusive IPTA in Malaysia with a mediocre IPTS like UniKL.........
Knight_2008
post Dec 22 2010, 11:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(zstan @ Dec 22 2010, 09:36 AM)
to be fair, you shouldn't even be comparing one of the most exclusive IPTA in Malaysia with a mediocre IPTS like UniKL.........
*
agreed..maybe he should compare with nottingham and monash or even sunway
Bonetoad
post Dec 22 2010, 01:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
158 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
Here's my thoughts. You are welcome to edit any of this.

Admission
IPTS - You have $$$, you're in. Ada wang ada education.
IPTA - You have to compete with the whole Malaysia including those who already have contacts in the school which 99% they will be selected regardless of their results/CGPA

Fees
IPTS - 10x higher than IPTA

Facilities
IPTA - Offers more lecture halls, classes, equipments and fields for sports.

Lecture
Both depends on the lecturers, facilities, notes n etc

Strictness
IPTS - Less strict compared to IPTA (clothing, discipline, class attendance, curfew n etc)

Social
IPTS - Most are non-Malays and foreign students. More likely to talk about iPhones, Alienware, overseas vacation, LV, Prada.. u know what i mean.
IPTA - Most IPTA requires u to stay in campus during 1st year. Due to that reason, u'll be studying, lepaking, eating, shitting, showering, gaming, sharing porns, gossiping, going to class with your roomates/hostel block friends/group members.

Of course there's more to this, i'm just generalizing.

Time
It seems that IPTS has slightly more time to spent since they are not forced to join after class activities and the credit hours i believed are less. Correct me if i'm wrong.

Food
Most IPTS does not have their own cafe/food court. Even if they do, usually will be pricey.

Job opportunities and life after University/College
In my opinion this totally depends on the person itself. How u fully utilized your school's facilities, classes given and notes hand out to you. A smart person are those who can adapt to whatever situation given and knows how to make the right decision and choices with all the resources available.


violet05
post Jan 30 2011, 12:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(Hikari0307 @ Dec 21 2010, 11:19 AM)
For scenario 1. Wouldn't it be the person's fault for not paying PTPTN in the first place ^^" He doesn't pay or ask to defer paying for a while, so it's kinda his fault for getting blacklisted from going abroad right.

For scenario 2 I'm just curious, as far as I know PTPTN only provide loans for courses done in Malaysia hmm.gif they never provide any financial aids at all for those going overseas.
*
QUOTE(azarimy @ Dec 21 2010, 11:22 AM)
are u saying majority perception > truth?
my wife took PTPTN. she didnt finish paying before she continued for her 2nd degree in the UK. PTPTN didnt stop her from leaving, because she applied to PTPTN for a postponement, and she got it.

it's simple: if u borrow, pay it back. if u have to postpone, ask for it. it's not a big deal!

but if u dont pay and got black listed (barred from going abroad), it's ur own fault. now this is from our own experience, not some third person account.
PTPTN doesnt give overseas loans.
source? there would be an academic record for the studies being done. any studies will have a budget allocation, and the university audit will want to know the outcome/result of each ringgit spent. so if there's money being spent but not producing results, the audit unit will rain havoc over them.
my advice is get the truth, son. no point keep feeding off the same fuel. if u have a chance to make things better, why not take it? u can start by not fueling others.
*
yes,
PTPTN never gave loan for overseas programmes.
for the students who want to postponed their payment to PTPTN in the cases of furthering study, they need to write a letter and inform PTPTN.

this is the problem of malaysians...........

they are not aware of their own country's news, development...
i'm pretty sure that most of the non-bumi's dun know that they can apply for JPA scholarship....
the possibilities to get JPA scholarship is the same between bumi and non-bumi.
which the gov had anounce and discussed in the parliament.
that they can get an aid in any contigency difficulties...
and most importantly they dun know their eligibility to that.

even the bumi's also dun know abt that.



This post has been edited by violet05: Feb 15 2011, 03:32 PM
cmy1612
post Feb 9 2011, 12:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


I am studying in a private university. Personally, I prefer a private university. Who says private university doesn't have sport facilities and etc? We have basketball courts, olympic size swimming pool, squash cours and etc.

The food in the cafeteria is not too pricey also, it range between RM3-RM5 for a plate of economic rice (3-4 dishes). Now, who say it's pricey? Oh btw, not all private universities students' talk about Prada, LV, latest gadgets and etc. There are more down-to-earth students that you can ever imagine.

No offence, not being a racist here. My friends who are non-bumiputras are mistreated in local universities. How is that so? I don't know.

p/s: No offence to anyone, really. If I've offended you. My apologies. Just stating the fact.

This post has been edited by cmy1612: Feb 9 2011, 12:10 PM
s|dE
post Apr 24 2011, 05:44 PM

Out Of My Mind
*****
Senior Member
715 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Jupiter



its depend on how you present yourself...ipta/ipts both can provide good study environment.

but...if you want to choose IPTS...please choose highly recognise ipts and you will get the benefir smile.gif
isamuxakira
post Apr 29 2011, 11:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
325 posts

Joined: Apr 2011


QUOTE(Bonetoad @ Dec 22 2010, 01:12 PM)
Here's my thoughts. You are welcome to edit any of this.

Admission
IPTS - You have $$$, you're in. Ada wang ada education.
IPTA - You have to compete with the whole Malaysia including those who already have contacts in the school which 99% they will be selected regardless of their results/CGPA

Fees
IPTS - 10x higher than IPTA

Facilities
IPTA - Offers more lecture halls, classes, equipments and fields for sports.

Lecture
Both depends on the lecturers, facilities, notes n etc

Strictness
IPTS - Less strict compared to IPTA (clothing, discipline, class attendance, curfew n etc)

Social
IPTS - Most are non-Malays and foreign students. More likely to talk about iPhones, Alienware, overseas vacation, LV, Prada.. u know what i mean.
IPTA - Most IPTA requires u to stay in campus during 1st year. Due to that reason, u'll be studying, lepaking, eating, shitting, showering, gaming, sharing porns, gossiping, going to class with your roomates/hostel block friends/group members.

Of course there's more to this, i'm just generalizing.

Time
It seems that IPTS has slightly more time to spent since they are not forced to join after class activities and the credit hours i believed are less. Correct me if i'm wrong.

Food
Most IPTS does not have their own cafe/food court. Even if they do, usually will be pricey.

Job opportunities and life after University/College
In my opinion this totally depends on the person itself. How u fully utilized your school's facilities, classes given and notes hand out to you. A smart person are those who can adapt to whatever situation given and knows how to make the right decision and choices with all the resources available.
*
strongly agree with you.

This post has been edited by isamuxakira: Apr 29 2011, 11:08 PM
kempetai
post Jul 27 2011, 05:19 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jul 2011


QUOTE(slvn @ Apr 1 2009, 03:58 PM)
IPTA of cos..full stop..
in IPTS the fees ar ridiculously high..the syllabus are extremely simple(comparing UNISEL's exam paper with UKM's, i've seen them)..
one interviewer once said to my friend that they dont hire IPTS graduates..
i still have no idea why people still go to IPTS(except for ppl than not qualified to enter IPTA)
*
This is all bullshit. ipta and ipts in malaysia suck. The best solution is go to universities overseas. I guarantee you that it will be easy for you to get a job with a good pay in the future
Hikari0307
post Jul 27 2011, 05:22 PM

平成の光
*******
Senior Member
4,541 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(kempetai @ Jul 27 2011, 05:19 PM)
This is all bullshit. ipta and ipts in malaysia suck. The best solution is go to universities overseas. I guarantee you that  it will be easy for you to get a job with a good pay in the future
*
Those are also bullshit.
Knight_2008
post Jul 27 2011, 05:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kempetai @ Jul 27 2011, 05:19 PM)
This is all bullshit. ipta and ipts in malaysia suck. The best solution is go to universities overseas. I guarantee you that  it will be easy for you to get a job with a good pay in the future
*
if u talk about top 200 uni, then i might agree with u that the grads will have better job prospect. if u say some chaplang uni overseas in countries like romania etc etc, then sorry, what you say i total b/s

This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Jul 27 2011, 05:26 PM
figuremeout
post Jul 27 2011, 07:52 PM

~In another life, I would make u stay~
*****
Senior Member
890 posts

Joined: May 2010
From: where i was then,to where i am now


QUOTE(slvn @ Apr 1 2009, 03:58 PM)
IPTA of cos..full stop..
in IPTS the fees ar ridiculously high..the syllabus are extremely simple(comparing UNISEL's exam paper with UKM's, i've seen them)..
one interviewer once said to my friend that they dont hire IPTS graduates..
i still have no idea why people still go to IPTS(except for ppl than not qualified to enter IPTA)
*
so...one interviewer represents the whole population of interviewers eh? doh.gif
i had both experience of IPTA&IPTS. One thing in common,the determination to be successful regardless of which uni/college one is from.
H4XF4XTOR
post Jul 30 2011, 01:24 PM

【ツ】PANDAMON 【ツ】
*******
Senior Member
3,081 posts

Joined: May 2011
From: ▁ ▂ ▃ ▄ ▅ ▆ █ 100 %



QUOTE(xtrasher_kingx @ Dec 21 2010, 03:09 PM)
i've read from page 1 to 8 (well up until 7 actually), too many out of topic posts. haahaha!

here's my 2cents, to experience real university life, living in a dorm/hostel/college and such, u have to go to ipta. but don't complain about all the strict rules, coz it is there for a reason.

so for TS, i'm coming from IIUM/UIAM myself, studied Computer Science. after 6 months of graduation, 90% of my batch are employed. the remaining 10% are either ladies who are getting married soon  rclxms.gif  or those who have family business to run.

so i don't experience the rejection by the work industry..  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
same universities aren't we...


i think like many said.

IPTS : $$$ + not to strict
IPTA: $$ + certain ethics or low that is quite restricting
OVERSEAS : $$$$$$$$$$$ + having either one of IPTA or IPTS law
mia22
post Aug 31 2011, 03:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


For me it depends on your skills.....once you have a skills you will get jobs
seanwc101
post Sep 1 2011, 09:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
I saw from a report that there's more students from IPTA who are unemployed compared to IPTS students. Like some forummers already said, IPTA produces more graduates compared to IPTS and it is not surprised that the report showed more IPTA students unemployed. The report only showed the results of the study but didn't bother to show how the study was conducted. We don't know how valid is the report without knowing the methodology of the study.
arsenwagon
post Sep 1 2011, 10:20 PM

all ur bass are belong to usa
*******
Senior Member
2,227 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: cheras



one of the reasons could be IPTS only focusses on marketable jobs.

ever seen any IPTS offering Bachelor of Forestry - Orchidology? tongue.gif
ainafoon
post Aug 3 2012, 12:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
516 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


IPTA is better since the graduates able to work in both public and private sector as well as overseas such as Singapore. For IPTS, the chances are slimmer to work in the public sector. Furthermore, IPTA is cost effective and many smart and hardworking students at there since the competition is tough and they been though STPM which is far more difficult than a degree. Nevertheless, for IPTS, many students think that their standard is better than IPTA but actually many tips are given to them for their final exam. But frankly speaking, if you are employer, would you choose UM or Taylor graduates? Btw, I am student from UTAR and I found out that the lecturer from IPTA is better than IPTS as their knowledge of the subject is far more comprehensive whereas the lecturer from IPTS just know the surface of the meaning. Many students depend on the tips that given by the lecturer as the lecturer wants the uni to acknowledge that he able to teach students well.

This post has been edited by ainafoon: Aug 3 2012, 12:52 AM
SUSJohnDoe93
post Aug 3 2012, 02:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
58 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
From: Klang mang!


QUOTE(ainafoon @ Aug 3 2012, 12:49 AM)
IPTA is better since the graduates able to work in both public and private sector as well as overseas such as Singapore. For IPTS, the chances are slimmer to work in the public sector. Furthermore, IPTA is cost effective and many smart and hardworking students at there since the competition is tough and they been though STPM which is far more difficult than a degree. Nevertheless, for IPTS, many students think that their standard is better than IPTA but actually many tips are given to them for their final exam. But frankly speaking, if you are employer, would you choose UM or Taylor graduates?  Btw, I am student from UTAR and I found out that the lecturer from IPTA is better than IPTS as their knowledge of the subject is far more comprehensive whereas the lecturer from IPTS just know the surface of the meaning. Many students depend on the tips that given by the lecturer as the lecturer wants the uni to acknowledge that he able to teach students well.
*
UM top student > Taylors top student.

Any f***ing day.
IvanWong1989
post Aug 18 2012, 04:06 PM

!StringTheory!
*******
Senior Member
4,297 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



... just chipping in my 2 cents opinion..

Originally Educational Institutions do NOT exists for JOB market demands.

But now, the perception is, JOB market demands etc etc knows something about etc etc, they dun need to know bout etc etc.
So EDUCATION must provide that.
If the institution does not teach that requirement, that institution is crap.

come on. The purpose of studying is to learn, and gain knowledge. If education is being influenced by market demand, whats to stop them dropping important but less in demand subjects off?
MyNameIs...
post May 13 2013, 01:28 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Mar 2013
QUOTE(WingKalimdor @ Mar 30 2009, 05:30 PM)
To be honest, I dislike the subject conducted by IPTA because most of the subject were conducted in Malay Language and cause most of the student not ready to prepare themselves facing the actual business social. My friend were a top student in UPM, no doubt her CGPA 3.8xx but she can't even speak well in English during our private conversation. Sometime, doesn't involve ourselves in IPTA is not a bad thing.  smile.gif
*
Well, we can't blame her for her excellent achievement. It depends on the course actually. Some of the courses are conducted in English and some are in Malay language. biggrin.gif It is the process of learning, some people can speak Malay very well and vice versa. IPTA or IPTS doesn't matter. What you've learnt is the real deal. Give yourself round of applause.

This post has been edited by MyNameIs...: May 13 2013, 01:29 AM
listening93
post Jun 13 2013, 04:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


im facing the same problem now.
i got the full scholarship to study in nottingham malaysia campus , but im waiting for the result of IPTA too.

which school i should choose if the course offered are both the same?
marczeman2
post Jun 13 2013, 06:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
177 posts

Joined: Nov 2012


QUOTE(listening93 @ Jun 13 2013, 04:24 PM)
im facing the same problem now.
i got the full scholarship to study in nottingham malaysia campus , but im waiting for the result of IPTA too.

which school i should choose if the course offered are both the same?
*
nottingham la

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0679sec    0.80    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:57 PM