okok, i try it later
now at workplace

ahaha. that might be a possibility as well

so u see your games with its technical side or visually? dont tell me you are special species

bro rather than giving a blanket statement like u did, it's better to clarify or elaborate what u said. otherwise u will cause flaming in the thread or ppl will think that ur just ignorant. just my word of advice la
but yes, u r right. when it comes to visual, there is well... hardly any difference

---

Added on March 13, 2009, 12:28 pmbro u got the ori version?

This post has been edited by metsatsu: Mar 13 2009, 12:28 PM

hahha. nope. was planning to get an ori one for warhead, cuz i really wanna play the multiplayer. but my pc is down now.so i put it on hold first.

sorry if i offended anyone.. but anyway thanks for supporting

ok. so u sure u managed to install the patch for crysis? hope u can remember how u did it. I'm having problem with the warhead at the moment. same error 1642 message.

btw, i'm sure i got the warhead patch, not crysis war patch.

For crysis I remember patching it successfully. For warhead, I uninstalled it right after i finished it, which was before the patch came out. sorry D:

jz use crysis 1.1 ,not much improvements from the patch.jz patch if u wan to join multiplayer games

NO Game Discussion on this Thread

ok ok, sorry

Humm, iv tried both DX10.1 and PhysX.

My opinion on (based on experience)
i) PhysX
Pros
- The added cosmetic on game really is cool, makes the game runs beautifully (tested on Mirror's Edge)
Cons
- PhysX tends to crash randomly on single gpu (and FPS inconsistency) . You need one dedicated card (dedicated PhysX's rendering) to make the crashes gone.


i) DirectX 10.1
Pros
- Better IQ and runs >20% faster than DX10 when Anti-Aliasing is on (tested on Assassin Creed, Stalker Clear Sky, Tom Clancy's HAWX demo)
Cons
- DX10.1 performance isn't enough to takeover DX9 legacy.

This post has been edited by pikacu: Mar 13 2009, 05:00 PM

bro u can use a higher card for PhysX. and why talk about legacy? the fact is that dx10 smoothen and make the graphic more realistic compared to dx9 isnt it?

This post has been edited by law1777: Mar 13 2009, 05:40 PM

erm... bro... I think pikacu mean that he had used nvidia GC before... ATI will run phyx but at a very very low FPS, coz the calculation will be all done in CPU if it is turned on.

i edited my post lo. lolz

lol split second change eh. hehe

I would personally describe the change of DX in such way...

DX9 to DX10 = Good improvement
DX8 to DX9 = Revolutionary

Just my 2Cents

dude? I use 8800GT to test it

And ..a well-optimized DX9 have almost the same image quality and performs faster compared to DX10/DX10.1

yeah, unlike Havok (Havok is property of Intel), PhysX isn't well optimized on CPU.

Strange...I never encountered tat when playing my Mirror Edge with my GTX260+.....

do you play about 1~3 hours non-stop, and do you monitor your FPS during gameplay?

This post has been edited by pikacu: Mar 13 2009, 07:33 PM

bcoz gtx260+ is a decent/dedicated card