Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

36 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [FAQ] Which Distro?, Fedora, Mandrake, Gentoo, SUSE, etc.

views
     
yuchankit
post May 1 2007, 12:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kons @ May 1 2007, 04:56 AM)
you can't get rid of dependencies absolutely.

some packages would have dependencies that's outside normal repository scope.

using package manager might be able to solve some, but not all.

however, when installing a distro, installing everything would help a bit in that.
*
What you mean by everything?
But at least the bigger stuff included like pyhton(all type) and many more because my installation take about 8GB.

And for Debian,what is the function of the other 10+ cds?

This post has been edited by yuchankit: May 1 2007, 12:34 PM
chilskater
post May 3 2007, 11:29 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,124 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
i tried RH,Fedora,Suse,Mandrake...all gud for beginner but i think it eats some memory...a bit lagg
yuchankit
post May 3 2007, 10:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
I agree.
But can someone please answer me why Debian have as 14 cds?
ryurhrt
post May 7 2007, 11:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: JB


Arch Linux, speed is comparable with Gentoo Linux, simple and easy... but it sound like Malaysia less use this distro ... it is worth a Try.
MadCentury
post May 26 2007, 01:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
231 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(kons @ May 1 2007, 04:56 AM)
you can't get rid of dependencies absolutely.

some packages would have dependencies that's outside normal repository scope.

using package manager might be able to solve some, but not all.

however, when installing a distro, installing everything would help a bit in that.
*
install everything is stupid. you support to install the package that needed.
kons
post May 31 2007, 06:18 PM

Конс
Group Icon
Moderator
6,181 posts

Joined: Oct 2004



QUOTE(MadCentury @ May 26 2007, 01:41 AM)
install everything is stupid. you support to install the package that needed.
*
If we want to have minimal dependencies trouble, installing everything would help a bit.

And I've never thought that installing everything is stupid if I have the hard disk space for that.
UbuntuClient
post Jul 6 2007, 03:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,417 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: /puchong/cyberjaya/klang



Yes..Agreed

This post has been edited by UbuntuClient: Jul 6 2007, 03:36 PM
kons
post Jul 6 2007, 08:23 PM

Конс
Group Icon
Moderator
6,181 posts

Joined: Oct 2004



QUOTE(UbuntuClient @ Jul 6 2007, 03:35 PM)
Kons, which distro that using less resource? Can suggest for me..
*
Since you're an Ubuntu "client", can try the Xubuntu or Ubuntu "Alternate CD" installation.
They are using significant less resource than the original Ubuntu.

UbuntuClient
post Jul 7 2007, 11:38 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,417 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: /puchong/cyberjaya/klang



The Alternate is for what?
kons
post Jul 7 2007, 12:25 PM

Конс
Group Icon
Moderator
6,181 posts

Joined: Oct 2004



QUOTE(UbuntuClient @ Jul 7 2007, 11:38 AM)
The Alternate is for what?
*
QUOTE
The Ubuntu Alternate CD uses the text installer instead of the new GUI installer. It needs less system memory and permits advanced installs with preseeded options as well as LVM or RAID disk configurations.


Can run with minimal system specs. smile.gif
UbuntuClient
post Jul 7 2007, 01:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,417 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: /puchong/cyberjaya/klang



But no GUI? Pretty hard for new guy like me..Using text only..
kons
post Jul 7 2007, 10:45 PM

Конс
Group Icon
Moderator
6,181 posts

Joined: Oct 2004



QUOTE(UbuntuClient @ Jul 7 2007, 01:21 PM)
But no GUI? Pretty hard for new guy like me..Using text only..
*
It's only for the installer. smile.gif
Or else, you can try Xubuntu.
tengkurex
post Jul 9 2007, 05:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
253 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: PRAY 4 SABAH



QUOTE(yuchankit @ May 3 2007, 10:01 PM)
I agree.
But can someone please answer me why Debian have as 14 cds?
*
Actually for installation,you need only 1 cd.I think the rest are softwares or applications for pc without internet connection.All I need is to download using the application that I need.Here some guidance for ubuntu
http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Feisty

UbuntuClient
post Jul 10 2007, 03:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,417 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: /puchong/cyberjaya/klang



Agreed with tengkurex. All CD not necessary. You need install base system only. Other application you can use apt-get.


Added on July 10, 2007, 3:11 pm
QUOTE(chilskater @ May 3 2007, 11:29 AM)
i tried RH,Fedora,Suse,Mandrake...all gud for beginner but i think it eats some memory...a bit lagg
*
Have you tried slackware or BSD? BSD using less memory but if you dont know the basic of BSD you will get headache. rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by UbuntuClient: Jul 10 2007, 03:11 PM
cherasbabe
post Jul 21 2007, 01:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Cheras LRT
QUOTE(IwAp @ Sep 15 2004, 12:40 PM)
Great list but do you have the list of PXE bootable OS?
dopodplaya
post Jul 21 2007, 03:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(cherasbabe @ Jul 21 2007, 01:39 PM)
Great list but do you have the list of PXE bootable OS?
*
One that well-prepared, ready to use PXE environment is Edubuntu. The other? Hum, you need to prepare it manually.
datto
post Jul 28 2007, 11:53 PM

a.k.a. datsun turbo
******
Senior Member
1,079 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: s'ban | KL
I have a IDT WinChip 225MHz, 32MB ram (28MB system + 4MB graphic) and 2.1GB hard disk. Which distro shall i go for? I want to install it to the hard disk instead of using live cd & prefer GUI. I read about Damn Small Linux & it sounds ok to me. what do you guys think?
ngjx
post Aug 15 2007, 12:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
282 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Penang


After i reading through all the topics regarding linux, i feel like trying to install 1.. so i have a few question about linux...
I have 2 partition on my HDD, 1 partition i installed vista home premium.. the other 1 i plan to install linux..

1. can i just download the whole linux file n install it? or it need to be burned into a cd n make it bootable??
2. whats the difference among all those distro since they all r base from linux?? y some say is more simple, user friendly... etc?? is it different distro have different add-on?? how about the visual style??
3. after i installed linux, i need to install linux, i need to install another software for visual style?? cos i heard of gnome n KDE but i'm not really sure what it is actually....
4. The motherboard that i'm using now doesn't has the driver for linux.. so how??

thx for your advise... i'm really noob in linux as i haven't used nor do any of my friend is using it... so i can be quite new for me
thx!! notworthy.gif notworthy.gif
Melchsedec
post Aug 23 2007, 09:43 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(ngjx @ Aug 15 2007, 12:15 AM)
After i reading through all the topics regarding linux, i feel like trying to install 1.. so i have a few question about linux...
I have 2 partition on my HDD, 1 partition i installed vista home premium.. the other 1 i plan to install linux..

1. can i just download the whole linux file n install it? or it need to be burned into a cd n make it bootable??
2. whats the difference among all those distro since they all r base from linux?? y some say is more simple, user friendly... etc?? is it different distro have different add-on?? how about the visual style??
3. after i installed linux, i need to install linux, i need to install another software for visual style?? cos i heard of gnome n KDE but i'm not really sure what it is actually....
4. The motherboard that i'm using now doesn't has the driver for linux.. so how??

thx for your advise... i'm really noob in linux as i haven't used nor do any of my friend is using it... so i can be quite new for me
thx!! notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
Well, I can't say that I know a lot about linux but I'll try to help out as much as I can.
1. A rule of thumb is that Windows does not recognize linux file types and partitions. Meaning after your installation you can see part of your HD 'disappear'.
2. You answered your own question rclxms.gif The visual style is generally divided into KDE and GNOME. The visual style comes with the distribution that you install so do some research and look for the interface which you would be more comfortable with.
3. Linux drivers a basically easy to find. If you're not particularly fussy, and generic driver would work just as well.

For me I use my linux for programming purposes so it's mostly LiveCD or Red Hat Enterprise. I seldom use UBUNTU coz of the strange VI Editor (this includes PcOSLinux as well). tongue.gif

Hope this helps
uchiha_shasuke
post Aug 30 2007, 10:00 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
9 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
ubuntu is the best distro out there..check www.distrowatch.com and you will see ubuntu is at the top of the list..smile.gif

36 Pages « < 8 9 10 11 12 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0245sec    0.67    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 02:56 AM