QUOTE(surehit @ Nov 6 2008, 11:15 PM)
There will always be people who come in, read a bit then throw general statement like the above. I'm guilty of it too sometimes...
So to correct you, please read below:
My comparison:CHERY EASTAR
Engine: Mitsubishi 2.4L SOHC 16V
Max Power: 95kw@5500rpm
Max Torque: 198Nm@3000rpm (the best compare to others!!) 
Min Turning Radius: 6m
TOYOTA AVANZA
Engine: Toyota 1.5 DOHC 16V
Max Power: 80kw@6000rpm
Max Torque: 141Nm@4400rpm
Min Turning Radius: 4.7m
TOYOTA RUSH
Engine: Toyota 1.5 DOHC 16V
Max Power: 80kw@6000rpm
Max Torque: 141Nm@4400rpm
Min Turning Radius: 5.2m
NISSAN GRAND LIVINA
Engine: Nissan 1.8L DOHC 16V
Max Power: 93kw@5200rpm
Max Torque: 174Nm@4800rpm
Min Turning Radius: 5.2m
For what I'm paying, I'm getting:

1. Nice elegant look, esp the beautiful LED rear lights.
2. Good features you can only find in higher price MPV: Dual Airbags, ABS, EBD, Steptronic (auto & manual transmission), Mitsubishi 2.4L engine, 16" alloy wheel, CD + MP3 player with USB, Dual Tone Horn.
3. Good petrol consumption from the feedbacks here, RM100 for 450km.
4. Sleeker than Avanza/Innova/Serena but roomier than Avanza/Grand Livina/Rush/Citra/Rondo. Sits 7 people comfortably.
5. Auto thermostatic adjust air-con with blowers on last 2 rows.
6. 3 years warranty and 1 year free service. Use Mitsubishi spare parts.
7. NCAP Safety Rating of 4.RM80k only now, mana boleh dapat from other brands?
i quote from paultan.org
According to Naza Kia, the new Rondo is built on the D-segment new Kia Optima platform and also shares the Optima’s sweet new GEMA-based 2.0 liter DOHC CVVT engine producing 145 horsepower and 189Nm of torque, mated to a 4-speed automatic transmission with sequential manual shifting. The GEMA engine is a joint project between DaimlerChrysler, Hyundai and Mitsubishi. The 4B11 in the Mitsubishi Lancer is also based on the GEMA family.
http://paultan.org/archives/2008/09/15/naz...ed-in-malaysia/which ncap are u referring to? all ncaps are different, the ancap and euro ncap are totally different things, different test basis.
if u base on horsepower basis, no doubt the low tech 4g64 has better torque, but by how much, a negligible, close to 9nm of torque. your fuel consumption would be higher since its not a fuel efficient engine. 2.4 vs 2.0 is not a fair fight. if u want to compare proper engines, think of the toyota estima 2.4 or toyota alphard 2.4.
i have nothing against china made cars, but their tech is still much away from any major manufacturers. the kia is using a mitsubishi based engine which has more parts and tuning parts, which can easily swallow the 4g64 underdeveloped engine.
kia rondo has 4 star ancap test (http://www.mynrma.com.au/cps/rde/xchg/mynrma/hs.xsl/ancap_kia_rondo_lhd_08.htm)
sohc vehicles lack top speed, mind you, i owned a 1.8 litre sohc mitsubishi lancer . good pickup, but lack the top speed!
wait till the proton mpv comes out, i bet most owners of the chery mpv would be in tears.