QUOTE(KeV @ Nov 7 2008, 12:00 AM)
if u base on horsepower basis, no doubt the low tech 4g64 has better torque, but by how much, a negligible, close to 9nm of torque. your fuel consumption would be higher since its not a fuel efficient engine. 2.4 vs 2.0 is not a fair fight. if u want to compare proper engines, think of the toyota estima 2.4 or toyota alphard 2.4.
wait till the proton mpv comes out, i bet most owners of the chery mpv would be in tears.
So glad to see u wrote the above. For all those considering Chery MPV @ RM80k now (RM86k soon), we have an experience user here Mr KeV asking us to compare it only with Toyota Estima or Alphard. Walau man, thank you for the endorsement of value for money! wait till the proton mpv comes out, i bet most owners of the chery mpv would be in tears.
As for FC, it was already mentioned by existing users, RM100 for 450km, damn good. Well again, you need to read this whole thread lor...
Same with Chery MPV vs Proton MPV, also addressed earlier in this thread, and in the Proton MPV thread. Main point is where can you find similar specs for only RM80k? I've sat in Citra/Rondo and I tell you the Chery is definitely more roomy, with better looks. Citra/Rondo last row cannot fit 2 full-size adults. Try them yourself.
So for performance/looks/size/features @ RM80k, cannot find anything else lar. And dun try to take different cars to compare different areas, unless u can manufacture a Toyota/Nissan/Honda/Kia rojak. I tested all those below RM90k brands since Feb this year. I know coz I'm a careful buyer with a big family.
PS. I read Paul Tan blog too, but it's different when u actually see and test drive the real thing. Lucky I didn't buy the Livina, very sempit.
Nov 7 2008, 12:28 AM
Quote

0.0193sec
0.38
6 queries
GZIP Disabled