Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
INTEL P4/PM 478/479 THREAD, >>V7<<,, The Journey Continues Here!
|
bai1101
|
Nov 18 2008, 08:31 PM
|
|
my ram back from RMA
From double side become single side .........
______________________________________________
Just finish test only able to run at single channel tat suk now i got 2 find another double side ram =.= Piss Off
This post has been edited by bai1101: Nov 18 2008, 09:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
fylon
|
Nov 18 2008, 10:48 PM
|
|
What a pity news bai1101.. Haha! Time to move on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Nov 19 2008, 08:32 AM
|
|
lol why wan poison him to go to the dark side ?  RMA should return u at least same item right ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
ac_N1
|
Nov 19 2008, 11:45 AM
|
|
QUOTE(bai1101 @ Nov 18 2008, 08:31 PM) my ram back from RMA From double side become single side ......... ______________________________________________ Just finish test only able to run at single channel tat suk now i got 2 find another double side ram =.= Piss Off In term of OC, single sided is better right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
edministrator
|
Nov 19 2008, 01:40 PM
|
|
hi guys, i have a evaluated enough current Vista OS on our rigs. End result, revert back to good old XP. Reasons? Less bloatware. Files transfer speed is faster. Games run faster in XP. Less resources taxed. And X-fi sounds much better in XP.
Vista is meant for newer hardware. Nuff' said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ac_N1
|
Nov 19 2008, 03:46 PM
|
|
Just stick to XP for the time being.... Unless u change to Dx10 GC Wondering if windows 7 will be lighter than vista
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 19 2008, 04:19 PM
|
|
It should be lighter....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Nov 19 2008, 04:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(edministrator @ Nov 19 2008, 01:40 PM) hi guys, i have a evaluated enough current Vista OS on our rigs. End result, revert back to good old XP. Reasons? Less bloatware. Files transfer speed is faster. Games run faster in XP. Less resources taxed. And X-fi sounds much better in XP. Vista is meant for newer hardware. Nuff' said. on a socket 478 rig or a dual core / quad core rig ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
edministrator
|
Nov 19 2008, 04:29 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Nov 19 2008, 04:23 PM) on a socket 478 rig or a dual core / quad core rig ? s478, HT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 19 2008, 04:29 PM
|
|
of course a S478 rig  better just stick with XP SP2 or SP3 for now and wait for Windows 7 This post has been edited by shinjite: Nov 19 2008, 04:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Nov 19 2008, 05:55 PM
|
|
yup, sticking to XP for now for my 478 HT vista is a definite no-go , even on higher end procs and etc never was a windows thinner than its previous version always got fatter and fatter
|
|
|
|
|
|
dlwl
|
Nov 19 2008, 05:59 PM
|
|
i used vista dual boot with xp too, that time just wanna see how vista looks and how it performs. tested some apps and games, then deleted it already. reverted back to xp sp3. as edmin said, lot of bloatware, takes up resources, and the UAC annoys me...xp sp2/sp3 still serves me well
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 19 2008, 06:51 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jcsy @ Nov 19 2008, 05:55 PM) yup, sticking to XP for now for my 478 HT vista is a definite no-go , even on higher end procs and etc never was a windows thinner than its previous version always got fatter and fatter  that is why we users make it thinner and thinner by uninstalling unnecessary stuffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
ravewar
|
Nov 20 2008, 11:56 PM
|
|
what do u guys mean by "bloatware"? sorry...too lazy to google....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jcsy
|
Nov 21 2008, 01:13 AM
|
|
things we dont NORMALLY use... alot of vista services and xp services are actually turned ON but we dont use them actually in fact nearly 20-30 things are turned ON without us ever using them  i assume this is general but not specific meaning 2 bloatware
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSraymond5105
|
Nov 21 2008, 09:10 AM
|
|
Hi guys,is Prescott's SSE3 instruction helping much on daily program usage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
edministrator
|
Nov 21 2008, 12:11 PM
|
|
QUOTE(raymond5105 @ Nov 21 2008, 09:10 AM) Hi guys,is Prescott's SSE3 instruction helping much on daily program usage? No
|
|
|
|
|
|
astria
|
Nov 21 2008, 01:13 PM
|
|
anyone playing undercover on their P4???
|
|
|
|
|
|
edministrator
|
Nov 21 2008, 01:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(astria @ Nov 21 2008, 01:13 PM) anyone playing undercover on their P4??? be patient, i will feedback 2nite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dlwl
|
Nov 21 2008, 01:37 PM
|
|
wanted to try on my P4, my lil bro scared lag, dare not try.. will experiment with it if got a chance..
|
|
|
|
|