Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

58 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!

views
     
OC4/3
post Sep 5 2008, 08:12 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Sep 5 2008, 06:38 PM)
oh.. forgot -.-... so its +5C for all temps... and im not uncle u grandfather..  biggrin.gif
*
Quad Core really hot sweat.gif
34 C idle where are E2160 no matter what vcore idle at 31 C tongue.gif
-pWs-
post Sep 6 2008, 03:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


Guys,

May I know the max vCore for 45nm Quad?? (The max vCore before vDrop & vDroop) notworthy.gifnotworthy.gif

-pWs-
TSCyclone87
post Sep 6 2008, 11:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




Hmm guys, can somebody enlighten me what is this 2 option in my bios?

Robust Graphic Booster : Auto ; Fast ; Turbo
Performance Enchance : Standard ; Turbo ; Extreme

When i put performance enchance to extreme, i need addition of 0.5-0.7v to get my processor stable on the same clock speed. But the superPI score did improve a little by 1Sec.
zer0hour
post Sep 7 2008, 06:40 AM

Unlike Any Other
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Cyclone - that setting auto overclocks your GPU under heavy load.
http://www.gigabyte.us/FileList/NewTech/ol...1125_PX_RGB.htm
http://xtreview.com/addcomment.php?id=617&...-Booster-review

Pws - Intel max safe vcore for Yorkfield is rated at 1.3625V.
http://www.intel.com/design/core2quad/documentation.htm
-pWs-
post Sep 7 2008, 09:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


Which PDF you referring to??
Yesterday I found out that the absolute vCore and vTT are below 1.45v.

Thanks notworthy.gif

-pWs-
xchoit
post Sep 7 2008, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Edinburgh and Kelantan



im going to join this very2 soon with my X3320 xD but still confusing which mobo to take =.=;

1st opt is max form 2 RM840
2nd opt is DFI P45 DK RM600+
3rd opt is DFI X48 DK RM800+ T_T!! RAWR still cant decide xD
kmarc
post Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 6 2008, 03:27 PM)
Guys,

May I know the max vCore for 45nm Quad?? (The max vCore before vDrop & vDroop) notworthy.gifnotworthy.gif

-pWs-
*
I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE#

However, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows.... hmm.gif
OC4/3
post Sep 7 2008, 06:22 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(xchoit @ Sep 7 2008, 04:51 PM)
im going to join this very2 soon with my X3320 xD but still confusing which mobo to take =.=;

1st opt is max form 2 RM840
2nd opt is DFI P45 DK RM600+
3rd opt is DFI X48 DK RM800+ T_T!! RAWR still cant decide xD
*
DFI P45 DK will be my choice
-pWs-
post Sep 7 2008, 07:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


QUOTE(kmarc @ Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM)
I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE#

However, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows....  hmm.gif
*
Thanks bro kmarc.

-pWs-
zer0hour
post Sep 8 2008, 04:41 AM

Unlike Any Other
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(kmarc @ Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM)
I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE#

However, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows....  hmm.gif
*
Yep, I posted the wrong link sorry. Kmarc's statement is right - we can deduce from Intel VID specs that max safe voltage is 1.3625V. 1.45V is the absolute max given in the documents, and I'd be very hesitant to run my proc near that =p
xpresside
post Sep 8 2008, 04:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 7 2008, 06:40 AM)
Cyclone - that setting auto overclocks your GPU under heavy load.
http://www.gigabyte.us/FileList/NewTech/ol...1125_PX_RGB.htm
http://xtreview.com/addcomment.php?id=617&...-Booster-review

Pws - Intel max safe vcore for Yorkfield is rated at 1.3625V.
http://www.intel.com/design/core2quad/documentation.htm
*
user posted image
http://download.intel.com/design/processor...shts/318726.pdf

This post has been edited by xpresside: Sep 8 2008, 04:26 PM
-pWs-
post Sep 8 2008, 04:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


Yea..this is what I saw in that PDF.
Still struggling whether want to go more or not?? hmm.gif

-pWs-
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 8 2008, 05:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


1 question guys, what is CPU PLL?
mine is default at 1.5v
xpresside
post Sep 8 2008, 05:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(manutd #1 fan @ Sep 8 2008, 05:21 PM)
1 question guys, what is CPU PLL?
mine is default at 1.5v
*
http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/12926-post19.html

CPU Clock Skew Control - - AKA As CPU PLL on other Motherboards
(G)MCH Clock Skew Control - AKS NB PLL on other Motherboards
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 8 2008, 06:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


^
thanks dude!
reading time. brows.gif
zer0hour
post Sep 8 2008, 06:52 PM

Unlike Any Other
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 8 2008, 04:59 PM)
Yea..this is what I saw in that PDF.
Still struggling whether want to go more or not?? hmm.gif

-pWs-
*
Haha if you're going for benchmarking then do it lor. 24/7 use, no point =p
xpresside
post Sep 8 2008, 07:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,982 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: TTDI


QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 8 2008, 06:52 PM)
Haha if you're going for benchmarking then do it lor. 24/7 use, no point =p
*
sometime unlucky, get bad batch on mobo/proc need high vcore..what to do cry.gif
zer0hour
post Sep 8 2008, 07:51 PM

Unlike Any Other
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Well thing is the extra 100-200Mhz isn't really needed la for daily use. So keep a low vcore and a conservative overclock lor =p
shawn-mode
post Sep 8 2008, 08:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


Which one is better OC?
Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66gh or Q6600?
Thanks.
tkh_1001
post Sep 8 2008, 09:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(shawn-mode @ Sep 8 2008, 08:01 PM)
Which one is better OC?
Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66gh or Q6600?
Thanks.
*
both are not from the same family and specs so u cant really compare that way IMHO...

q6600 have a higher multiplier of 9 which makes it easier to reach higher clock n capable of taking more voltage due to 65nm while q9450 is a proc with lower multiplier of 8 thus making it not really that easy to reach a high clock... but as far i as know, running the same clock speed n other settings together, q9450 will beat q6600....



58 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0207sec    0.85    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:19 PM