QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Sep 5 2008, 06:38 PM)
Quad Core really hot 34 C idle where are E2160 no matter what vcore idle at 31 C
Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 08:12 PM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6 2008, 03:27 PM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
Guys,
May I know the max vCore for 45nm Quad?? (The max vCore before vDrop & vDroop) -pWs- |
|
|
Sep 6 2008, 11:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,254 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
Hmm guys, can somebody enlighten me what is this 2 option in my bios?
Robust Graphic Booster : Auto ; Fast ; Turbo Performance Enchance : Standard ; Turbo ; Extreme When i put performance enchance to extreme, i need addition of 0.5-0.7v to get my processor stable on the same clock speed. But the superPI score did improve a little by 1Sec. |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 06:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,864 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Cyclone - that setting auto overclocks your GPU under heavy load.
http://www.gigabyte.us/FileList/NewTech/ol...1125_PX_RGB.htm http://xtreview.com/addcomment.php?id=617&...-Booster-review Pws - Intel max safe vcore for Yorkfield is rated at 1.3625V. http://www.intel.com/design/core2quad/documentation.htm |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 09:56 AM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
Which PDF you referring to??
Yesterday I found out that the absolute vCore and vTT are below 1.45v. Thanks -pWs- |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 04:51 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Nov 2006 From: Edinburgh and Kelantan |
im going to join this very2 soon with my X3320 xD but still confusing which mobo to take =.=;
1st opt is max form 2 RM840 2nd opt is DFI P45 DK RM600+ 3rd opt is DFI X48 DK RM800+ T_T!! RAWR still cant decide xD |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM
|
|
Elite
14,576 posts Joined: May 2006 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 6 2008, 03:27 PM) I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE#However, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows.... |
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 06:22 PM
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 07:53 PM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM) I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE# Thanks bro kmarc. However, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows.... -pWs- |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 04:41 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,864 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Sep 7 2008, 06:19 PM) I usually base it on Intel's own specs.... for example, the Q9300 is here (VID voltage range): http://processorfinder.intel.com/Details.aspx?sSpec=SLAWE# Yep, I posted the wrong link sorry. Kmarc's statement is right - we can deduce from Intel VID specs that max safe voltage is 1.3625V. 1.45V is the absolute max given in the documents, and I'd be very hesitant to run my proc near that =pHowever, it never mention whether that is for bios setting or the average vcore in windows.... |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 04:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: TTDI |
QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 7 2008, 06:40 AM) Cyclone - that setting auto overclocks your GPU under heavy load. http://www.gigabyte.us/FileList/NewTech/ol...1125_PX_RGB.htm http://xtreview.com/addcomment.php?id=617&...-Booster-review Pws - Intel max safe vcore for Yorkfield is rated at 1.3625V. http://www.intel.com/design/core2quad/documentation.htm ![]() http://download.intel.com/design/processor...shts/318726.pdf This post has been edited by xpresside: Sep 8 2008, 04:26 PM |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 04:59 PM
|
|
Elite
8,545 posts Joined: Aug 2006 From: 224.0.0.6 |
Yea..this is what I saw in that PDF.
Still struggling whether want to go more or not?? -pWs- |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 05:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
124 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
1 question guys, what is CPU PLL?
mine is default at 1.5v |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 05:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: TTDI |
QUOTE(manutd #1 fan @ Sep 8 2008, 05:21 PM) http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/12926-post19.htmlCPU Clock Skew Control - - AKA As CPU PLL on other Motherboards (G)MCH Clock Skew Control - AKS NB PLL on other Motherboards |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 06:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
124 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
^
thanks dude! reading time. |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 06:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,864 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 07:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,982 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: TTDI |
|
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 07:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,864 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
Well thing is the extra 100-200Mhz isn't really needed la for daily use. So keep a low vcore and a conservative overclock lor =p
|
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 08:01 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
152 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Which one is better OC?
Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66gh or Q6600? Thanks. |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 09:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
QUOTE(shawn-mode @ Sep 8 2008, 08:01 PM) both are not from the same family and specs so u cant really compare that way IMHO...q6600 have a higher multiplier of 9 which makes it easier to reach higher clock n capable of taking more voltage due to 65nm while q9450 is a proc with lower multiplier of 8 thus making it not really that easy to reach a high clock... but as far i as know, running the same clock speed n other settings together, q9450 will beat q6600.... |
| Change to: | 0.0207sec
0.85
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:19 PM |