Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!
|
manutd #1 fan
|
Sep 2 2008, 02:32 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 2 2008, 12:38 PM) Read below:- http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/374005...discussion.htmlIt says proc will not spoil due to vCore but vTT. -pWs-thanks for the link. currently waiting for fm123 to replace stock xigmatek hsf. hopefully will reduce core temp at a decent level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC4/3
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:37 PM
|
.
|
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 2 2008, 01:55 PM) Ermm...you guys can go Folding@Home  -pWs-GPU is faster
|
|
|
|
|
|
IcEMoCHa
|
Sep 3 2008, 11:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Sep 2 2008, 08:37 PM) GPU is faster  EDIT:ALOT faster ... its better to use gpu than cpu...  im getting about 2.5 times faster than cpu with GPU...
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pWs-
|
Sep 3 2008, 12:05 PM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
But we can do Dual SMP + GPU2 ma. -pWs-
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSCyclone87
|
Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM
|
|
I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall* This post has been edited by Cyclone87: Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
tech_frix
|
Sep 3 2008, 12:50 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM) I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall*  on what vcore dude??
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSCyclone87
|
Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tech_frix @ Sep 3 2008, 12:50 PM) on what vcore dude??  On default. Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tech_frix
|
Sep 3 2008, 04:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM) On default. Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon.  haha... me 2... i just open up cpu-z and he just like WTF??? xeon can use on normal desktop meh??
|
|
|
|
|
|
manutd #1 fan
|
Sep 3 2008, 04:16 PM
|
Getting Started

|
^ try to imagine xeon proc on cosmos 1000 case.  almost as real as a server, baby!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
zer0hour
|
Sep 3 2008, 05:04 PM
|
|
Haha yeah, a lot of ppl impressed by Xeon name. My cousin came to my place, I asked him which he think is faster - my QX9650 or the X3320. He thought X3320 =p
Cyclone - X3320 is ~5-10% faster than Q6600 at the same clock rate, due to Yorkfield core optimizations. That translates to 200-360Mhz (around there la) at our current overclocking So there's no point going back to Q6600 when X3320s can reach 3.5-3.6Ghz lor..
|
|
|
|
|
|
tkh_1001
|
Sep 3 2008, 06:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM) I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall*  wa...for a q6600 to hit 3.2ghz on stock vcore is consider very good edi wor
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSCyclone87
|
Sep 3 2008, 06:46 PM
|
|
QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 3 2008, 05:04 PM) Haha yeah, a lot of ppl impressed by Xeon name. My cousin came to my place, I asked him which he think is faster - my QX9650 or the X3320. He thought X3320 =p Cyclone - X3320 is ~5-10% faster than Q6600 at the same clock rate, due to Yorkfield core optimizations. That translates to 200-360Mhz (around there la) at our current overclocking So there's no point going back to Q6600 when X3320s can reach 3.5-3.6Ghz lor.. Yea i going back to my X3320 and run it at 450FSB daily. Gotta learn how to satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC4/3
|
Sep 3 2008, 07:55 PM
|
.
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM) On default. Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon.  Q6600 of your quality should hit 3.6ghz 24/7
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSCyclone87
|
Sep 3 2008, 08:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Sep 3 2008, 07:55 PM) Q6600 of your quality should hit 3.6ghz 24/7  Too bad , when open CPUz, core 2 quad. Not enough to impress my friend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
owikh84
|
Sep 3 2008, 08:23 PM
|
i7 Clan
|
Yalor, woah it's Xeon cant believe it running on my desk
|
|
|
|
|
|
manutd #1 fan
|
Sep 3 2008, 10:49 PM
|
Getting Started

|
3.5GHz daily now. vcore 1.35 vfsb 1.4 vdimm 2.08 NB 1.2 How do you guys think? Is it ok for me to run it daily like that? full load temp max 70-75 idle temp 50-55.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pWs-
|
Sep 4 2008, 01:22 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
How about GTL setting? You can try lower vTT and pump GTL.
A bit to high for 24/7 on vTT.
Let say, 1.3 x 0.61 = 0.793 = 1.26 x 0.63
It is just a reference. I might be wrong.
-pWs-
|
|
|
|
|
|
manutd #1 fan
|
Sep 4 2008, 09:50 AM
|
Getting Started

|
i can't find any GTL setting in my bios. or is it CPU Reference? if it is, i already put 0.9 if im not mistaken. The default is 0.5.
anyway, what i the most trusted core temp reader program that can be used to measure cpu & system temp?
coz my easy tune app read max 50-55 C during load but core temp & real temp read 70-73 C max during load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-pWs-
|
Sep 4 2008, 09:54 AM
|
Look at all my stars!!
|
Core Temp & Real Temp. -pWs-
|
|
|
|
|