Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

58 Pages « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!

views
     
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 2 2008, 02:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 2 2008, 12:38 PM)
Read below:-

http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/374005...discussion.html

It says proc will not spoil due to vCore but vTT. unsure.gif

-pWs-
*
thanks for the link.
currently waiting for fm123 to replace stock xigmatek hsf. hopefully will reduce core temp at a decent level.
rolleyes.gif
OC4/3
post Sep 2 2008, 08:37 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(-pWs- @ Sep 2 2008, 01:55 PM)
Ermm...you guys can go Folding@Home laugh.giflaugh.gif

-pWs-
*
GPU is faster flex.gif
IcEMoCHa
post Sep 3 2008, 11:54 AM

~本田~
******
Senior Member
1,988 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Sep 2 2008, 08:37 PM)
GPU is faster flex.gif
*
EDIT:ALOT faster ... its better to use gpu than cpu... tongue.gif im getting about 2.5 times faster than cpu with GPU...
-pWs-
post Sep 3 2008, 12:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


But we can do Dual SMP + GPU2 ma. tongue.gif

-pWs-
TSCyclone87
post Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall* doh.gif

This post has been edited by Cyclone87: Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM
tech_frix
post Sep 3 2008, 12:50 PM

Boo Yah!
*******
Senior Member
5,656 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: wheres d oil price is higher than condoms..

QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM)
I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall*  doh.gif
*
on what vcore dude?? hmm.gif
TSCyclone87
post Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(tech_frix @ Sep 3 2008, 12:50 PM)
on what vcore dude?? hmm.gif
*
On default. laugh.gif
Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon. laugh.gif
tech_frix
post Sep 3 2008, 04:00 PM

Boo Yah!
*******
Senior Member
5,656 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: wheres d oil price is higher than condoms..

QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM)
On default.  laugh.gif
Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon.  laugh.gif
*
haha...
me 2...
i just open up cpu-z and he just like WTF???
xeon can use on normal desktop meh?? laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 3 2008, 04:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


^
try to imagine xeon proc on cosmos 1000 case.
brows.gif
almost as real as a server, baby!! rclxm9.gif
zer0hour
post Sep 3 2008, 05:04 PM

Unlike Any Other
******
Senior Member
1,864 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Haha yeah, a lot of ppl impressed by Xeon name. My cousin came to my place, I asked him which he think is faster - my QX9650 or the X3320. He thought X3320 =p

Cyclone - X3320 is ~5-10% faster than Q6600 at the same clock rate, due to Yorkfield core optimizations. That translates to 200-360Mhz (around there la) at our current overclocking So there's no point going back to Q6600 when X3320s can reach 3.5-3.6Ghz lor..
tkh_1001
post Sep 3 2008, 06:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 12:49 PM)
I just boat to 6600 G0. But stuck at 3.2ghz. Bang my head on wall*  doh.gif
*
wa...for a q6600 to hit 3.2ghz on stock vcore is consider very good edi wor drool.gif
TSCyclone87
post Sep 3 2008, 06:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 3 2008, 05:04 PM)
Haha yeah, a lot of ppl impressed by Xeon name. My cousin came to my place, I asked him which he think is faster - my QX9650 or the X3320. He thought X3320 =p

Cyclone - X3320 is ~5-10% faster than Q6600 at the same clock rate, due to Yorkfield core optimizations. That translates to 200-360Mhz (around there la) at our current overclocking So there's no point going back to Q6600 when X3320s can reach 3.5-3.6Ghz lor..
*
Yea i going back to my X3320 and run it at 450FSB daily. Gotta learn how to satisfied. laugh.gif
OC4/3
post Sep 3 2008, 07:55 PM

.
Group Icon
Elite
4,746 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Speed rule


QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Sep 3 2008, 03:49 PM)
On default.  laugh.gif
Anyway i think i back to X3320 because 6600 not that impressive. Cant go too far from X3320. Futhermore X3320 got nice name . My friend was like Woah, when i tell them my desktop is power by Intel Xeon.  laugh.gif
*
Q6600 of your quality should hit 3.6ghz 24/7 laugh.gif
TSCyclone87
post Sep 3 2008, 08:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,254 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang




QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Sep 3 2008, 07:55 PM)
Q6600 of your quality should hit 3.6ghz 24/7 laugh.gif
*
Too bad , when open CPUz, core 2 quad. Not enough to impress my friend. laugh.gif

owikh84
post Sep 3 2008, 08:23 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Yalor, woah it's Xeon cant believe it running on my desk
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 3 2008, 10:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


3.5GHz daily now.
vcore 1.35
vfsb 1.4
vdimm 2.08
NB 1.2
How do you guys think? Is it ok for me to run it daily like that?
full load temp max 70-75 idle temp 50-55.
-pWs-
post Sep 4 2008, 01:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


How about GTL setting?
You can try lower vTT and pump GTL.

A bit to high for 24/7 on vTT.

Let say,
1.3 x 0.61 = 0.793 = 1.26 x 0.63

It is just a reference. I might be wrong.

-pWs-
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 4 2008, 09:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


i can't find any GTL setting in my bios.
or is it CPU Reference?
if it is, i already put 0.9 if im not mistaken. The default is 0.5.

anyway, what i the most trusted core temp reader program that can be used to measure cpu & system temp?

coz my easy tune app read max 50-55 C during load but core temp & real temp read 70-73 C max during load.
-pWs-
post Sep 4 2008, 09:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


Core Temp & Real Temp. smile.gif

-pWs-
manutd #1 fan
post Sep 4 2008, 10:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
124 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


so it's very hot then... cry.gif

58 Pages « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0282sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 11:55 PM