Getting Started

|
Alamak, this topic is finally over and will not see the light in the end of the tunnel.
Everyone is reading from his own exposure and interpretation, never care to think more outside the box, from being subjective and selective readings.
Everyone misunderstood everyone, hence can only see face value.
things got worst when some just jump in to make accusation without really going through the details.
I ask everyone, primarily Ah Cheng & Ah Pai, When u read Backkom's post, dosent it reflect on you?
Some accusation from Xui Cheng arose from her misunderstings on Pai; Similarily, Pai's allegations also arose from his confronting mode.
Same thing happen when Backkom referred it to Ah Cheng alone, when the whole things were contributed by all of us. When Bacckom said "stop digging", arent this is what Ah cheng, AH Pai and I have been doing? And even Backkom himself, where he asked "find me a single words...." If u dont like that, why do u repeat?
It is just a forum to share, not a debate, coz here got no winner and prize.
No need to ask for justification, coz we all have our brain to analyse, to make an informed judgment. It is always the liberty of him/her to choose how far and how much to justify.
Ah Cheng did justify, whether it is sufficient and abundant depends on each individuals. Apparently, Zavier is happy enough with that
If they is no one start to make some nobel/bold statement, how a good brainstorming process can be initiated?
If i cant force Tom to take whatever i advice, how can Tom force me to say what he/she wants to hear? Vice versa, fair and square. Hence, I do Agree Ah Pai has the right to ask for more justification, but Ah Cheng also has equivalent right not to do so. Liberty, freedom, tolerance, mutual understanding & respect, are lacking.
I can just jump in to give a lead/clue, w/t justification. If everyone has the same view, facts and privileged news, than the genuine investor can never make a lot of money. We always need some secondary people to offer higher price, in property and in capital market.
And if we are to be a caring forumer, we can rebut something even if the maker has yet to justify.
And please have this in our mind, what can be corrected/disputed is only facts. There is nothing to be corrected when come to our "prediction" or "speculation", coz it is something yet to happen.
only time will tell.
And every link DOES consist of a lot of gabage, including this one. But isnt it contributed collectively by all of us?
And when anyone is willing to share his view for free(right or wrong) in this forum, can we demand more?
If you were impressed by her and buy solely on her view, and you make, will you thank her? No, u say u are clever
If you were depressed by her hence not buying, and the price goes up, will you blame her?No, u say u are stupid
Bottomline is, money is in my pocket, i choose to buy or not.
Why dont we all stop and revisit this link in 2012, only when it is completed.
Added on September 23, 2009, 4:20 pm
If we still refuse to listen in substance to each other, i would rather to see this..
Copied, Mr Cannot Tahan.
See u again in 2012
This post has been edited by Cannot Tahan: Sep 23 2009, 04:26 PM
|