QUOTE(halcyon27 @ Oct 9 2014, 12:37 PM)
Well utilized yes. If you work in O&G, ya it justifies that kind of usage esp 4 ppl on shifts so the machine will work 4 times a day. I'm referring back to your posting. It dawned to me why so frequent. Even if not fully loaded, the point is even springs and other things are rated for how many millions or hundred thousands compression and decompression. I mentioned here that the standard tests used to measure how efficient the wm are is based on a 220 wash cycle/year.
4 washes per day for 365 days = 1460 washes per year.
This exceeds the standard by = 1460 /220 =6.64 times.
Ie, the WM in the villa is doing a 6 and half year wash cycle vs the standard's 220 wash cycle in one year. In 2 years it's done 13 years worth of washing already vs the standard's wash cycle. Talk about accelerated wear. So I have to take that statement with a pinch of salt in light of how it's being used.
Chemical suits are wash by company, we only wash our normal T-shirts and underwear. So is quite hard to have full load, most of the time about 30% load.4 washes per day for 365 days = 1460 washes per year.
This exceeds the standard by = 1460 /220 =6.64 times.
Ie, the WM in the villa is doing a 6 and half year wash cycle vs the standard's 220 wash cycle in one year. In 2 years it's done 13 years worth of washing already vs the standard's wash cycle. Talk about accelerated wear. So I have to take that statement with a pinch of salt in light of how it's being used.
I assuming that 220 cycles are based on full load, if run on 30% load, it is only 2 times a day. Still failed on reliability
By your calculations, then my Hitachi already completed 4380 cycles and that's 19.9 times with most of the time running on full 10KG load.
Oct 9 2014, 12:46 PM

Quote
0.1066sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled