Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

36 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Best manager of our time?, Best manager

views
     
matyrze
post Jan 9 2009, 08:04 PM

Historical tears
****
Senior Member
678 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(yngwie @ Jan 9 2009, 02:55 PM)
club: SAF - his records speak for itself. arsene wenger will always be a 2nd fiddle; till he can win the euro holy grail.
rafa was good in euro. remember he has a very good record in la liga. and they're topping the table in bpl at the moment. could be the kopites time.  whistling.gif

country; bora milutinovic !! a fine example of how a good coach should be; the only person to have coached 5 different team to wc. including china!

to be honest, a manager that can win the world cup for malaysia will be automatically considered the best ever  tongue.gif
*
Both Club and Country: MARCELO LIPPI rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif
zamarano
post Jan 10 2009, 02:37 AM

Above Us Only Sky
****
Senior Member
665 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: right here


i dunno who is the best manager
but i know who is the best player manager
who else if not Kenny Dalglish rclxms.gif

MamulaMoon
post Jun 12 2009, 01:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
Sir Alex Ferguson is the best manager of all time... no doubt about that..

Sometimes I really feel sorry for him, he doesnt have much money to spend like what Chelsea and Real Madrid did and yet he has to sell the best players from time to time... Beckham, van Nistelrooy and now Ronaldo.

If you look at Real Madrid, they can spend €73.5 million on Zidane, £56million on Kaka, £80million on Ronaldo....then you will know what i mean...

Life is never fair.... i guess sad.gif


Duke Red
post Jun 12 2009, 10:09 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(MamulaMoon @ Jun 12 2009, 01:10 AM)
Sir Alex Ferguson is the best manager of all time... no doubt about that..

Sometimes I really feel sorry for him, he doesnt have much money to spend like what Chelsea and Real Madrid did and yet he has to sell the best players from time to time... Beckham,  van Nistelrooy and now Ronaldo.

If you look at Real Madrid, they can spend €73.5 million on Zidane, £56million on Kaka, £80million on Ronaldo....then you will know what i mean...

Life is never fair.... i guess sad.gif
*
To put a little perspective into your statement, Man Utd is one of the richest clubs in the world thanks to well thought out marketing initiatives and success on the pitch of course. You compare your spending power to clubs like Chelsea and Real Madrid but fail to take into consideration the vast number of clubs that don't have the kind of money you do. How many Chelseas and Read Madrids are there in the world? I'm wondering if Rafa has hung himself yet.

Ferguson did not "have" to sell the players you mentioned incidentally. He chose to.

"Life is never fair"? I really think you've lost touch with reality here. Sorry but it gives me the impression you don't keep yourself updated with the rest of the footballing world. It's almost comical you think you're in dire straights.

This post has been edited by Duke Red: Jun 12 2009, 10:13 AM
EyraYus
post Jun 12 2009, 10:29 AM

sTRe3tHunt3R
*******
Senior Member
2,152 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Gombak Setia



QUOTE(MamulaMoon @ Jun 12 2009, 01:10 AM)
Sometimes I really feel sorry for him, he doesnt have much money to spend like what Chelsea and Real Madrid did and yet he has to sell the best players from time to time... Beckham,  van Nistelrooy and now Ronaldo.
*
yes Duke is true,

Fergie neve "forced" to sell star player like Becks, Ruud, Keane, Stam, and now Ronaldo,he is the one who want to let them go, eerr maybe in the exception of Ronaldo when he himself already says that he want to move...
jiidaineko
post Jun 12 2009, 10:47 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
579 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


this poll is kinda meaningless as most if not all people will vote for the manager of their supported club. facepalm.jpg @ SAF
Tak3shi
post Jun 14 2009, 01:42 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
SAF could have done a better job managing Arsenal than AW could nuff said.
Shin1022
post Jun 14 2009, 02:11 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Mars



QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jun 12 2009, 10:09 AM)
To put a little perspective into your statement, Man Utd is one of the richest clubs in the world thanks to well thought out marketing initiatives and success on the pitch of course. You compare your spending power to clubs like Chelsea and Real Madrid but fail to take into consideration the vast number of clubs that don't have the kind of money you do. How many Chelseas and Read Madrids are there in the world? I'm wondering if Rafa has hung himself yet.

Ferguson did not "have" to sell the players you mentioned incidentally. He chose to.

"Life is never fair"? I really think you've lost touch with reality here. Sorry but it gives me the impression you don't keep yourself updated with the rest of the footballing world. It's almost comical you think you're in dire straights.
*
if you really know more about man utd's history, they were never a rich club b4 SAF took over. They were almost relegated at times, but when SAF came, it changes everything....from a normal club to a pretigious club with wide fan base and getting rich until glazer took over and put them into debt..
the whole man utd history, part of it, is actually SAF...so, i still think he's the best manager in d world..
Tak3shi
post Jun 14 2009, 02:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jun 12 2009, 10:09 AM)
To put a little perspective into your statement, Man Utd is one of the richest clubs in the world thanks to well thought out marketing initiatives and success on the pitch of course. You compare your spending power to clubs like Chelsea and Real Madrid but fail to take into consideration the vast number of clubs that don't have the kind of money you do. How many Chelseas and Read Madrids are there in the world? I'm wondering if Rafa has hung himself yet.

Ferguson did not "have" to sell the players you mentioned incidentally. He chose to.

"Life is never fair"? I really think you've lost touch with reality here. Sorry but it gives me the impression you don't keep yourself updated with the rest of the footballing world. It's almost comical you think you're in dire straights.
*
Dude stop being emo just because your team hasn't won the league in more than a decade, it doesn't give you the right to ram your bias criticisms at every chance you have on rival supporter's opinions.

MU were nowhere near the richest club when SAF took over. In 1986 they were edging towards the relegation before Atkinson was sacked. SAF almost had the boot himself, when he took over.

Since 1986, SAF and team have turned MU into one of the best teams in the world and the best team in the EPL for the past decade.

I think there's a statistic somewhere that confirms that since the inception of the EPL, Liverpool have spent the most on transfer fees, so enough with the bull of not having enough funds.

You can check it here too (http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120864)

Leeds, and other teams in the EPL Have spent big and failed, it has been the people behind the spending sprees that have changed the fortunes of the clubs involved, at the end of the day people make or break clubs, so kudos to those who have succeeded where others have failed.
Duke Red
post Jun 14 2009, 08:36 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(Shin1022 @ Jun 14 2009, 02:11 AM)
if you really know more about man utd's history, they were never a rich club b4 SAF took over.  They were almost relegated at times, but when SAF came, it changes everything....from a normal club to a pretigious club with wide fan base and getting rich until glazer took over and put them into debt..
the whole man utd history, part of it, is actually SAF...so, i still think he's the best manager in d world..
*
I do know a fair bit about your history thank you. You weren't just almost relegated, you were relegated curtousy of a goal from Dennis Law, your former player. He was close to tears after scoring that goal. I've been following your club since I started supporting Liverpool back in 1988. If you've been following this post, you'll notice that I did agree with several posters stating that Fergie is one of the best managers during our time. However I was responding to a poster that spoke as though you were a debt ridden club fighting relegation. I did say that success on the pitch and good marketing brought you the income you have now. I did also defend you on many times when supporters from Chelsea, etc claim that you bought success as well. I have been quoted many times saying that you "earned" your success. Please feel free to verify this with seasoned posters here. Don't be so presumptious mate. Having said all this the financial disparity between clubs back then wasn't as wide as it is today. Today, billionaires looking for a hobby are a dime a dozen. When was the last time Everton, Spurs, Newcastle, Blackburn or West Ham challenged for the league? The smaller clubs are falling behind the bigger ones. These days promoted clubs hope to stave of relegation, nothing more. Back then newly promoted sides like Newcastle and Blackburn could fight for the Prem the very next season after promotion. There was a discussion to do with this and I agree that it's harder these days without substantial financial backing.

QUOTE(Tak3shi @ Jun 14 2009, 02:12 AM)
Dude stop being emo just because your team hasn't won the league in more than a decade, it doesn't give you the right to ram your bias criticisms at every chance you have on rival supporter's opinions.

MU were nowhere near the richest club when SAF took over. In 1986 they were edging towards the relegation before Atkinson was sacked. SAF almost had the boot himself, when he took over.

Since 1986, SAF and team have turned MU into one of the best teams in the world and the best team in the EPL for the past decade.

I think there's a statistic somewhere that confirms that since the inception of the EPL, Liverpool have spent the most on transfer fees, so enough with the bull of not having enough funds.

You can check it here too (http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120864)

Leeds, and other teams in the EPL Have spent big and failed, it  has been the people behind the spending sprees that have changed the fortunes of the clubs involved, at the end of the day people make or break clubs, so kudos to those who have succeeded where others have failed.
*
Ditto to you. How was my post biased again? Please do point out what I said wrong. Take into consideration the post I was responding to. Isn't your allegation a little biased given you never took into consideration what I've previously said about your club? The point of my post was to put things into perspective. You may have earned your wealth while Chelsea inherited theirs as I quite rightly pointed out but to say that the world is unfair and life is an uphill battle for you, is an insult to the other 18 teams in the league, no?

If you weren't a little biased, you'd see how overly dramatic his post is. Poor you for not having the wealth of Chelsea and Real Madrid? Well same goes for 95% of clubs round the world. "Ferguson had to sell players"? He chose to sell them. Am I wrong?

We have spent a fair bit on transfers, where did I say otherwise? Again, you're making an assumption. I brought up the issue of marketing because Rick Parry did a piss poor job in this department or we'd have been the huge commercial success you are back in the 80's. It's why we're in debt because we aren't generating enough income to pay for players via cash. If you look at statstics of the world's richest clubs you'd see this. WTF does bringing us into the picture have to do with the post I was responding too anyway. If I accuse someone of being a prick, should he justify his actions or point out that there are other pricks around?

I hope that instead of accusing me of being biased, you can put up an argument. Feel free to counter my points if you think I'm wrong. It's what a discussion thread is all about.

This post has been edited by Duke Red: Jun 14 2009, 08:48 AM
torreto
post Jun 14 2009, 10:32 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
659 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Russia with Love


Best Manager : Sir Alex Ferguson
Most Successful Manager : Jose Mourinho ( Portugal - checked )( England - checked )( Italy - checked )( UEFA Cup - checked )(UEFA Champions League - checked)

This post has been edited by torreto: Jun 14 2009, 10:34 AM
Makakeke
post Jun 14 2009, 12:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Alex Ferguson is by far the best manager ever, period.
oucheev
post Jun 14 2009, 12:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I vote for all the previous and current M'sian National Football team manager. How many manager can achieve what they do? Spend awful lots of money and still make the team lose all the time. Its a achievement no manager can do. MALAYSIA BOLEH!!!! rclxm9.gif
torreto
post Jun 14 2009, 12:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
659 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Russia with Love


QUOTE(oucheev @ Jun 14 2009, 12:49 PM)
I vote for all the previous and current M'sian National Football team manager. How many manager can achieve what they do? Spend awful lots of money and still make the team lose all the time. Its a achievement no manager can do. MALAYSIA BOLEH!!!! rclxm9.gif
*
Well spoken rclxms.gif
account_manager
post Jun 16 2009, 12:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Kuala Lumpur


Kedah head coach, azrai khor. he led Kedah for triple championship 2 years in a row. check if there's anybody near him on that record. even SAF couldnt do it.

hehe...
Duke Red
post Jun 16 2009, 09:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(Makakeke @ Jun 14 2009, 12:23 PM)
Alex Ferguson is by far the best manager ever, period.
*
I'd agree if you said "our time" but "ever"? I can't help but think of names like Shankley (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Shankly), Busby (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Matt_Busby) and Jock Stein (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jock_Stein). Outside of England, have a look at the legendary Rinus Michels(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rinus_Michels) What do you reckon makes Ferguson better than those two? Even if we were to focus on the present, someone like Guus Hiddink while not having achieved the same level of success at club level, has brought unfancied sides like Australia and South Korea to the World Cup Finals. How many expected the Koreans to reach the semis albeit amidst some contraversy? He has also brought PSV to the Champions League semi's twice, and where really unlucky to lose to AC Milan on one occasion.

That all being said I did vote for Ferguson as well and I stated my reasons sometime back between pages 14 - 18. Would you like to share yours? I'd repeat myself but it's tiring and I feel that if someone were to enter an ongoing conversation, they should do their best to listen and catch up before interjecting because wrong assumptions are often formed. Most of the time people post for the sake of posting something.

This post has been edited by Duke Red: Jun 16 2009, 10:10 AM
cellfreezer
post Jun 16 2009, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
65 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jun 16 2009, 09:43 AM)
I'd agree if you said "our time" but "ever"? I can't help but think of names like Shankley and Busby. What do you reckon makes Ferguson better than those two? Even if we were to focus on the present, someone like Guus Hiddink while not having achieved the same level of success at club level, has brought unfancied sides like Australia and South Korea to the World Cup Finals. How many expected the Koreans to reach the semis albeit amidst some contraversy? He has also brought PSV to the Champions League semi's twice, and where really unlucky to lose to AC Milan on one occasion.

That all being said I did vote for Ferguson as well and I stated my reasons sometime back. Would you like to share yours?
*
Well, to be fair SAF has spent most of his career at OT. But, don't forget that he brought a bottom tier division two club (St. Mirren) to promotion and become the First Division champ. He also broke Celtic and Rangers dominance by winning the Scottish league with Aberdeen. Last, don't forget that he brought Man Utd back to its feet from when the last league winner from Manchester is Man City.
Duke Red
post Jun 16 2009, 10:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(cellfreezer @ Jun 16 2009, 10:09 AM)
Well, to be fair SAF has spent most of his career at OT. But, don't forget that he brought a bottom tier division two club (St. Mirren) to promotion and become the First Division champ. He also broke Celtic and Rangers dominance by winning the Scottish league with Aberdeen. Last, don't forget that he brought Man Utd back to its feet from when the last league winner from Manchester is Man City.
*
I'm aware of Ferguson's achievements. I actually took the liberty of reading up a little on other managers before I posted my nomination. I myself agree that he's the best manager of my time but I'm questioning claims that he's the "best manager ever", especially when there is no justification. If it were purely down to medals and trophies, we won't even hear names like Shankly or Busby being whispered.
Makakeke
post Jun 16 2009, 10:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Jun 16 2009, 09:43 AM)
I'd agree if you said "our time" but "ever"? I can't help but think of names like Shankley and Busby. What do you reckon makes Ferguson better than those two? Even if we were to focus on the present, someone like Guus Hiddink while not having achieved the same level of success at club level, has brought unfancied sides like Australia and South Korea to the World Cup Finals. How many expected the Koreans to reach the semis albeit amidst some contraversy? He has also brought PSV to the Champions League semi's twice, and where really unlucky to lose to AC Milan on one occasion.

That all being said I did vote for Ferguson as well and I stated my reasons sometime back. Would you like to share yours?
*
Let's see, if we're taking number of trophies into consideration, Fergie has won United 11 domestic titles and 2 european cups. That might not rival some other managers like Barnebau who had more european glory but i think he shares the same podium as Ancelotti, Del Bosque with 2 UCL title under their belt. Domestic glory is pretty much justified. That alone is something to be glorified.

Loyalty comes into the picture. No doubt, managers like Guus, Scolari, Mourinho, Keegan are great managers but neither had the steel to last that long with a single club. Arsene Wenger is another example I could bring into the picture, look at how he stayed and transformed Arsenal. He stayed for more than 10 years now? How many managers can actually do that?

I believe the main factor that separates a great manager to a great coach is management itself. Fergie has shown us in the past and perhaps recently? (with the offload of Ronaldo) that no one is bigger than the club and no one is indispensable. He's not afraid of making choices, even hard ones that might affect the club's reputation and chances. He'd sold some of the best players in the world i.e Stam, Becks, RVN and still United is one of the best clubs in the world. That's a great manager. The game is not based on strategy alone, that can only bring you to a certain level, mentality and team spirit brings you further and Fergie inculcates it in the team. The club, fans, players all respect him, how many clubs can say that with their manager?

And not many managers develop homegrown players. Fergie probably is the virtuoso in this area. The bunch on kids that won us the title in 95/96, and even the current United youth squad, they're all perfect examples. That's already a problem that when Fergie retires, there ain't another manager that could fill that void, except for Wenger but we know where his loyalty stands.

I'd say why Fergie is the best manager of all time is because of his undying passion to the game, his willingness to evolve with time, and his policies that is not self-centred but universally loved.
Duke Red
post Jun 16 2009, 10:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,112 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Earth


QUOTE(cellfreezer @ Jun 16 2009, 10:09 AM)
Well, to be fair SAF has spent most of his career at OT. But, don't forget that he brought a bottom tier division two club (St. Mirren) to promotion and become the First Division champ. He also broke Celtic and Rangers dominance by winning the Scottish league with Aberdeen. Last, don't forget that he brought Man Utd back to its feet from when the last league winner from Manchester is Man City.
*
I'm aware of Ferguson's achievements. I actually took the liberty of reading up a little on other managers before I posted my nomination. I myself agree that he's the best manager of my time but I'm questioning claims that he's the "best manager ever", especially when there is no justification. If it were purely down to medals and trophies, we won't even hear names like Shankly or Busby being whispered.


Added on June 16, 2009, 10:36 am
QUOTE(Makakeke @ Jun 16 2009, 10:20 AM)
Let's see, if we're taking number of trophies into consideration, Fergie has won United 11 domestic titles and 2 european cups. That might not rival some other managers like Barnebau who had more european glory but i think he shares the same podium as Ancelotti, Del Bosque with 2 UCL title under their belt. Domestic glory is pretty much justified. That alone is something to be glorified.

Loyalty comes into the picture. No doubt, managers like Guus, Scolari, Mourinho, Keegan are great managers but neither had the steel to last that long with a single club. Arsene Wenger is another example I could bring into the picture, look at how he stayed and transformed Arsenal. He stayed for more than 10 years now? How many managers can actually do that?

I believe the main factor that separates a great manager to a great coach is management itself. Fergie has shown us in the past and perhaps recently? (with the offload of Ronaldo) that no one is bigger than the club and no one is indispensable. He's not afraid of making choices, even hard ones that might affect the club's reputation and chances. He'd sold some of the best players in the world i.e Stam, Becks, RVN and still United is one of the best clubs in the world. That's a great manager. The game is not based on strategy alone, that can only bring you to a certain level, mentality and team spirit brings you further and Fergie inculcates it in the team. The club, fans, players all respect him, how many clubs can say that with their manager?

And not many managers develop homegrown players. Fergie probably is the virtuoso in this area. The bunch on kids that won us the title in 95/96, and even the current United youth squad, they're all perfect examples. That's already a problem that when Fergie retires, there ain't another manager that could fill that void, except for Wenger but we know where his loyalty stands.

I'd say why Fergie is the best manager of all time is because of his undying passion to the game, his willingness to evolve with time, and his policies that is not self-centred but universally loved.
*
It was always going to be subjective when you remove silverware and rightly so I believe.

My vote for "best manager of all time" would be Bill Shankly. I suppose a lot of it is down to sentiment but his contributions not only to the club but the city of Liverpool speaks for itself. Liverpool were in shambles at the time he took over. A second division side with facilities that resembled the slums of Brazil. He not only transformed us into one of the most feared sides in Europe, he changed the hearts and minds of the people. He made Liverpool "the people's club" and his connection with them was unrivaled. He was behind the all red kit, the bootroom, almost everything that the club stands for today. He had a really dry sense of humour and some mistook his confidence of arrogance. Was he arrogant? Well he would talk to anyone off the street about football. He would let strangers into his house. He would stop by for a kickabout with local kids on the way home. The stories go on and on. Even after he left the club, he bought a ticket and stood at the kop because it was were he said "he belonged". I've done some research and not many managers have as many stories as the Shanks. Not many have as many testimonials from journalists and common folk.

I can see why non-Liverpool fans would not even consider him. I mean his success doesn't even rival Paisley be he did lay a very strong foundation for Paisley's success. 3 European Cups did Paisley win with a team containing Shankley's DNA. Well 4 if you consider Fagan's. My nomination is based very much on sentiment and what I would give to meet the man in person.


Added on June 16, 2009, 10:39 am
QUOTE(Makakeke @ Jun 16 2009, 10:20 AM)
Let's see, if we're taking number of trophies into consideration, Fergie has won United 11 domestic titles and 2 european cups. That might not rival some other managers like Barnebau who had more european glory but i think he shares the same podium as Ancelotti, Del Bosque with 2 UCL title under their belt. Domestic glory is pretty much justified. That alone is something to be glorified.

Loyalty comes into the picture. No doubt, managers like Guus, Scolari, Mourinho, Keegan are great managers but neither had the steel to last that long with a single club. Arsene Wenger is another example I could bring into the picture, look at how he stayed and transformed Arsenal. He stayed for more than 10 years now? How many managers can actually do that?

I believe the main factor that separates a great manager to a great coach is management itself. Fergie has shown us in the past and perhaps recently? (with the offload of Ronaldo) that no one is bigger than the club and no one is indispensable. He's not afraid of making choices, even hard ones that might affect the club's reputation and chances. He'd sold some of the best players in the world i.e Stam, Becks, RVN and still United is one of the best clubs in the world. That's a great manager. The game is not based on strategy alone, that can only bring you to a certain level, mentality and team spirit brings you further and Fergie inculcates it in the team. The club, fans, players all respect him, how many clubs can say that with their manager?

And not many managers develop homegrown players. Fergie probably is the virtuoso in this area. The bunch on kids that won us the title in 95/96, and even the current United youth squad, they're all perfect examples. That's already a problem that when Fergie retires, there ain't another manager that could fill that void, except for Wenger but we know where his loyalty stands.

I'd say why Fergie is the best manager of all time is because of his undying passion to the game, his willingness to evolve with time, and his policies that is not self-centred but universally loved.
*
It was always going to be subjective when you remove silverware and rightly so I believe.

My vote for "best manager of all time" would be Bill Shankly. I suppose a lot of it is down to sentiment but his contributions not only to the club but the city of Liverpool speaks for itself. Liverpool were in shambles at the time he took over. A second division side with facilities that resembled the slums of Brazil. He not only transformed us into one of the most feared sides in Europe, he changed the hearts and minds of the people. He made Liverpool "the people's club" and his connection with them was unrivaled. He was behind the all red kit, the bootroom, almost everything that the club stands for today. He had a really dry sense of humour and some mistook his confidence of arrogance. Was he arrogant? Well he would talk to anyone off the street about football. He would let strangers into his house. He would stop by for a kickabout with local kids on the way home. The stories go on and on. Even after he left the club, he bought a ticket and stood at the kop because it was were he said "he belonged". I've done some research and not many managers have as many stories as the Shanks. Not many have as many testimonials from journalists and common folk.

I can see why non-Liverpool fans would not even consider him. I mean his success doesn't even rival Paisley be he did lay a very strong foundation for Paisley's success. 3 European Cups did Paisley win with a team containing Shankley's DNA. Well 4 if you consider Fagan's. My nomination is based very much on sentiment and what I would give to meet the man in person.

This post has been edited by Duke Red: Jun 16 2009, 10:39 AM

36 Pages « < 31 32 33 34 35 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0436sec    0.64    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 08:32 AM