Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FX-60 Overclock On Air & Questions, Basic OC results - continuing

views
     
ktek
post May 19 2008, 02:57 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
your CPU speed is high (3.0GHz) but why the superPI result is so bad sweat.gif sweat.gif
when 3GHz usually people already break 30seconds for 1M test.
AMDAthlon
post May 19 2008, 03:04 PM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


I think its causes by the Ram jo..
ktek
post May 19 2008, 03:22 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 19 2008, 03:04 PM)
I think its causes by the Ram jo..
*

gtoforce, it's time to tweak RAM brows.gif
otherwise i rather to use stock 2.6GHz speed if no improvement.
SUSjoe_star
post May 19 2008, 07:13 PM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
@ktek
DDR ram la bro. But actually it can be optimized for sub 30 sec.

@TS
I'm refering to my experience with procs in general, in my experience they seem to fail at those intervals. Ive experience it with both intel and amd socket 939 and AM2
TSgtoforce
post May 20 2008, 01:31 AM

SPAM AND BECOME A SENIOR MEMBER
*******
Senior Member
2,967 posts

Joined: May 2006



QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 19 2008, 03:04 PM)
I think its causes by the Ram jo..
*
QUOTE(ktek @ May 19 2008, 03:22 PM)
gtoforce, it's time to tweak RAM brows.gif
otherwise i rather to use stock 2.6GHz speed if no improvement.
*
QUOTE(joe_star @ May 19 2008, 07:13 PM)
@ktek
DDR ram la bro. But actually it can be optimized for sub 30 sec.

@TS
I'm refering to my experience with procs in general, in my experience they seem to fail at those intervals. Ive experience it with both intel and amd socket 939 and AM2
*
i need advice on the timings dude
ddr1 mau OC i dunno the timings...
rite now its Attached Image


Added on May 20, 2008, 1:32 amim not sitting back at stock
im using 2.95 ghz cuz its the most stable currently
smile.gif

This post has been edited by gtoforce: May 20 2008, 01:32 AM
SUSjoe_star
post May 20 2008, 09:34 AM

Serving the Servants
******
Senior Member
1,810 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
For best benchmark results, take out 1 stick of ram and operate with dual channel. Hmm.....what divider are you using? I'm not sure about your mobo chipset but with nforce4 lastime the memory and cpu htt used to be linked, so oc-ing ram was similar to an intel system. Try to get the ram stable at around DDR400, and also use CL=2 and CR=1T. Dont be afraid to increase volage a lil, but not too much also la.
TSgtoforce
post May 20 2008, 03:23 PM

SPAM AND BECOME A SENIOR MEMBER
*******
Senior Member
2,967 posts

Joined: May 2006



QUOTE(joe_star @ May 20 2008, 09:34 AM)
For best benchmark results, take out 1 stick of ram and operate with dual channel. Hmm.....what divider are you using? I'm not sure about your mobo chipset but with nforce4 lastime the memory and cpu htt used to be linked, so oc-ing ram was similar to an intel system. Try to get the ram stable at around DDR400, and also use CL=2 and CR=1T. Dont be afraid to increase volage a lil, but not too much also la.
*
will try tonite
but how do i check the divider?
blush.gif
ktek
post May 20 2008, 08:52 PM

小喇叭
********
All Stars
13,189 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(joe_star @ May 19 2008, 07:13 PM)
@ktek
DDR ram la bro. But actually it can be optimized for sub 30 sec.
*

not just the RAM, i feel some other things gone wrong hmm.gif
the result is way too off from causing by RAM.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

this is the worst possible timing i purposely set except dual channel i lazy to take out RAMs
running 2.9GHz. DDR323 (1:2 divider) 3-4-4-10-2T

gto, divider table for RAM
[attachmentid=475587]
taken from DIY-street forum

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0194sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 03:10 AM