when 3GHz usually people already break 30seconds for 1M test.
FX-60 Overclock On Air & Questions, Basic OC results - continuing
FX-60 Overclock On Air & Questions, Basic OC results - continuing
|
|
May 19 2008, 02:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,189 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
your CPU speed is high (3.0GHz) but why the superPI result is so bad
when 3GHz usually people already break 30seconds for 1M test. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 03:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,221 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Deneb star |
I think its causes by the Ram jo..
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 03:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,189 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
|
May 19 2008, 07:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,810 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
@ktek
DDR ram la bro. But actually it can be optimized for sub 30 sec. @TS I'm refering to my experience with procs in general, in my experience they seem to fail at those intervals. Ive experience it with both intel and amd socket 939 and AM2 |
|
|
May 20 2008, 01:31 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,967 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(AMDAthlon @ May 19 2008, 03:04 PM) QUOTE(ktek @ May 19 2008, 03:22 PM) QUOTE(joe_star @ May 19 2008, 07:13 PM) @ktek i need advice on the timings dudeDDR ram la bro. But actually it can be optimized for sub 30 sec. @TS I'm refering to my experience with procs in general, in my experience they seem to fail at those intervals. Ive experience it with both intel and amd socket 939 and AM2 ddr1 mau OC i dunno the timings... rite now its Added on May 20, 2008, 1:32 amim not sitting back at stock im using 2.95 ghz cuz its the most stable currently This post has been edited by gtoforce: May 20 2008, 01:32 AM |
|
|
May 20 2008, 09:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,810 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
For best benchmark results, take out 1 stick of ram and operate with dual channel. Hmm.....what divider are you using? I'm not sure about your mobo chipset but with nforce4 lastime the memory and cpu htt used to be linked, so oc-ing ram was similar to an intel system. Try to get the ram stable at around DDR400, and also use CL=2 and CR=1T. Dont be afraid to increase volage a lil, but not too much also la.
|
|
|
May 20 2008, 03:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,967 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(joe_star @ May 20 2008, 09:34 AM) For best benchmark results, take out 1 stick of ram and operate with dual channel. Hmm.....what divider are you using? I'm not sure about your mobo chipset but with nforce4 lastime the memory and cpu htt used to be linked, so oc-ing ram was similar to an intel system. Try to get the ram stable at around DDR400, and also use CL=2 and CR=1T. Dont be afraid to increase volage a lil, but not too much also la. will try tonitebut how do i check the divider? |
|
|
May 20 2008, 08:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
13,189 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
QUOTE(joe_star @ May 19 2008, 07:13 PM) not just the RAM, i feel some other things gone wrong the result is way too off from causing by RAM. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « this is the worst possible timing i purposely set except dual channel i lazy to take out RAMs running 2.9GHz. DDR323 (1:2 divider) 3-4-4-10-2T gto, divider table for RAM [attachmentid=475587] taken from DIY-street forum |
| Change to: | 0.0194sec
0.44
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 03:10 AM |