With high ISO capability of camera now, I think those F4L lenses should already enough. 70-200 F4L is half the weight of F2.8L.
Photography Canon L Lens Thread, L-coholics Anonymous
Photography Canon L Lens Thread, L-coholics Anonymous
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,329 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Selangor |
With high ISO capability of camera now, I think those F4L lenses should already enough. 70-200 F4L is half the weight of F2.8L.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 03:49 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 22 2009, 03:40 PM) With high ISO capability of camera now, I think those F4L lenses should already enough. 70-200 F4L is half the weight of F2.8L. I dont care how heavy it is coz it's such a buuuuuuuuuuuutiful lens. The f4 simply cannot do what the f2.8 does. Dont forget the 70-200 f4L is not weather proof too. |
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 03:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,242 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: JAVABUS |
70-2004 f4 USM not weather sealed ka ?
L must weather sealed mah... haiyo |
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 03:53 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 04:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,214 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore | Malaysia |
honestly I find telephoto hard to use without IS... I used to own the 70-200 f/4 L on my ex 300D... darn, the handshake is so terrible.
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 04:11 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
118 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Iish. The f/2.8 IS is really expensive, but i REALLY dont feel like upgrading after getting the f/4 IS, and to also experience what Uncle ianho experienced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 04:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,214 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore | Malaysia |
i still very much prefer to touch and test any lens before I make my purchase.... getting from overseas is cheap but you'll cry if you got a lemon copy.
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 04:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,329 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Selangor |
QUOTE(ianho @ Nov 22 2009, 03:49 PM) I dont care how heavy it is coz it's such a buuuuuuuuuuuutiful lens. The f4 simply cannot do what the f2.8 does. Dont forget the 70-200 f4L is not weather proof too. oops, I mean the IS version.Added on November 22, 2009, 4:53 pm QUOTE(IMspiration @ Nov 22 2009, 04:11 PM) Iish. The f/2.8 IS is really expensive, but i REALLY dont feel like upgrading after getting the f/4 IS, and to also experience what Uncle ianho experienced. I have the heavy 70-200 F2.8 IS, every time I use that lens, I keep thinking what the F4IS version would feel like. argh... must control...This post has been edited by yushin: Nov 22 2009, 04:53 PM |
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 05:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
859 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
I've upgrade my tele lens from EF-S 55-250 IS to 70-200 f4 IS and recently 70-200 f2.8 IS. If u have the moolah, just take the 70-200 f2.8 IS. I love every bit of this lens. Quite regret didn't bought it at the first place because i lost money when upgrade from time to time. The only drawback was i wish it wight just like the f4 IS..
|
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 05:11 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
118 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(kapalterbang_737 @ Nov 22 2009, 05:07 PM) I've upgrade my tele lens from EF-S 55-250 IS to 70-200 f4 IS and recently 70-200 f2.8 IS. If u have the moolah, just take the 70-200 f2.8 IS. I love every bit of this lens. Quite regret didn't bought it at the first place because i lost money when upgrade from time to time. The only drawback was i wish it wight just like the f4 IS.. I think i really have to test it out before i buy that beast == Anyone's willing to lend it to me for a day? Argh, still the same question, anyone of you out there ever bought lenses online from the US, and shipped to your doorstep? |
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 06:59 PM
|
|
VIP
15,705 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Tg. Rambutan |
QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 22 2009, 04:47 PM) oops, I mean the IS version. Don't maaaaaaan. When u see the loss of bokeh u will know y u hafta carry the big mama. I don't miss my f4 the slightest bit. Added on November 22, 2009, 4:53 pm I have the heavy 70-200 F2.8 IS, every time I use that lens, I keep thinking what the F4IS version would feel like. argh... must control... QUOTE(IMspiration @ Nov 22 2009, 05:11 PM) I think i really have to test it out before i buy that beast == Anyone's willing to lend it to me for a day? I have but it was just cheap lenses for my Sony Alpha. I certainly won't b buying rm7-8k lenses online man. Though the US merchants r very reliable n do refunds n exchanges willingly, the postage is gonna kill u.Argh, still the same question, anyone of you out there ever bought lenses online from the US, and shipped to your doorstep? |
|
|
Nov 22 2009, 10:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
118 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(ianho @ Nov 22 2009, 06:59 PM) Don't maaaaaaan. When u see the loss of bokeh u will know y u hafta carry the big mama. I don't miss my f4 the slightest bit. Not being safe, or the cost? I have but it was just cheap lenses for my Sony Alpha. I certainly won't b buying rm7-8k lenses online man. Though the US merchants r very reliable n do refunds n exchanges willingly, the postage is gonna kill u. |
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 01:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,738 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin |
Uncle Ian, I thought that all L-lenses are weather-proofed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 07:54 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,214 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore | Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 07:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,738 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin |
@yrh0413:
Is the 70-200 F4L (Non-IS) weather sealed? |
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 07:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,601 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: WMKP |
non-is is not weather sealed
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 08:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,749 posts Joined: Dec 2005 From: Sydney, AU |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 09:18 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
118 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 10:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,214 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Singapore | Malaysia |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2009, 03:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,738 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin |
@teddie:
I see, thanks for clarifying. |
| Change to: | 0.0235sec
1.30
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 10:07 AM |