Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

42 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Canon L Lens Thread, L-coholics Anonymous

views
     
TSianho
post Oct 13 2009, 12:04 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(Vincent Pang @ Oct 12 2009, 05:41 PM)
i'm struggling 17-40 or tokina 11-16 f2.8

17-40 is not wide enough, but will be nice if i upgrade to FF

11-16 is gonna be useful if i get 7D sad.gif
*
U know u want the FF lar. Dont deprive urself. brows.gif



QUOTE(yrh0413 @ Oct 12 2009, 08:35 PM)
tongue.gif yeap gonna let go my 40D once I got hold of my 7D; but it might not be so soon.

1740L as compared with Tammy 1750; basically you are paying a premium for weather-seal, USM, and higher built quality. IQ wise, I would say the tammy performs as good as the 1740L at f/4 (or perhaps even better). smile.gif
*
I owned a Tamron 17-50 f2.8 before. IMO it's nowhere near the 17-40L. I don't notice any softness even wide open on my 5D2. I know it will be sharper when stopped down but I'm really happy with it at f4. Wait later I post up a full crop at 17mm n see. Just sorted out my internet so now can post pics again. Past 2 weeks no broadband damn charm. sad.gif

This post has been edited by ianho: Oct 13 2009, 12:06 AM
DecaPix
post Oct 13 2009, 08:50 AM

5 star monkey
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: PeeJay
you mean narrow band?
in malaysia we have broadband?
tongue.gif
bazlit
post Oct 13 2009, 03:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: Cybertron


I had the 70-200 F4 once but then I sold it because it was too big for the kind of work I usually do. Now I'm a proud owner of the 35L. I checked the manufacturing date on the lens and it was manufactured in Sept this year. Really new! biggrin.gif
PCHo
post Oct 13 2009, 03:49 PM

...Otherwise known as Kevin Ho...
******
Senior Member
1,246 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: JB


Pardon me, but is there a UWA "L" lens?
TSianho
post Oct 13 2009, 03:54 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(PCHo @ Oct 13 2009, 03:49 PM)
Pardon me, but is there a UWA "L" lens?
*
Got. 14mm I think. Need to go check my Canon Bible afterwards. laugh.gif

16-35 f2.8 n 17-40 f4 is also UWA mar. But for FF lor. brows.gif

This post has been edited by ianho: Oct 13 2009, 03:56 PM
PCHo
post Oct 13 2009, 03:59 PM

...Otherwise known as Kevin Ho...
******
Senior Member
1,246 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: JB


QUOTE(ianho @ Oct 13 2009, 03:54 PM)
Got. 14mm I think. Need to go check my Canon Bible afterwards. laugh.gif

16-35 f2.8 n 17-40 f4 is also UWA mar. But for FF lor.  brows.gif
*
hahaha....bro ian, I m not on FF la.
16 & 17 is too long for my 40D la.... sweat.gif
FF widest can go is 12mm?
TSianho
post Oct 13 2009, 04:04 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(PCHo @ Oct 13 2009, 03:59 PM)
hahaha....bro ian, I m not on FF la.
16 & 17 is too long for my 40D la.... sweat.gif
FF widest can go is 12mm?
*
It's a 14mm prime IINM. Need to check bible afterwards. Even fisheye is 15mm oni.
yrh0413
post Oct 13 2009, 05:05 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,214 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Singapore | Malaysia


yup, bro ian is right. The widest L is 14mm f/2.8 L

FF widest should be 12mm on the Sigma 12-24. You can go wider on Fisheye... google 8mm Peleng wink.gif
ae8za
post Oct 13 2009, 05:07 PM

Whoot WHOOT!
*****
Senior Member
724 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Jesselton, North Borneo


QUOTE(PCHo @ Oct 13 2009, 03:59 PM)
hahaha....bro ian, I m not on FF la.
16 & 17 is too long for my 40D la.... sweat.gif
FF widest can go is 12mm?
*
12mm if you go for Sigma 12-24mm for Canon FF body... smile.gif
Else for Canon L, it's the 14mm II. Tested the lense few times but I notice that my Canon 15mm Fisheye is slighly wider (because of the distortion)... wink.gif

p.s Aiyaa, yrh0413 beats me for the answer... sad.gif

This post has been edited by ae8za: Oct 13 2009, 05:08 PM
creap
post Oct 13 2009, 06:23 PM

I would like a piece of punch line
*******
Senior Member
3,306 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: VIET POW S.O.S


QUOTE(yrh0413 @ Oct 12 2009, 08:35 PM)
tongue.gif yeap gonna let go my 40D once I got hold of my 7D; but it might not be so soon.

1740L as compared with Tammy 1750; basically you are paying a premium for weather-seal, USM, and higher built quality. IQ wise, I would say the tammy performs as good as the 1740L at f/4 (or perhaps even better). smile.gif
*
After seeing the price for 7D, still think the same? lol

I guess if I'm less nit-picky, the tamron's IQ would be enough to satisfy me =/ IQ aside, L will never be the wrong choice. smile.gif
yrh0413
post Oct 13 2009, 08:12 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,214 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Singapore | Malaysia


smile.gif 7D was out since 2 weeks back in Singapore... quite a number of CS forumers got their hands on their 7D. Price is S$2.4k for body alone (RM5800).

Well, still waiting for proper reviews from DP tongue.gif
marcweizer
post Nov 20 2009, 03:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(yrh0413 @ Oct 13 2009, 08:12 PM)
smile.gif 7D was out since 2 weeks back in Singapore... quite a number of CS forumers got their hands on their 7D. Price is S$2.4k for body alone (RM5800).

Well, still waiting for proper reviews from DP tongue.gif
*
Good news is that DP reviewed 7D and has confirmed that it's one of the best camera ever produced.

Price is around RM5.6k for the body only...

Was hoping it was a FF... then again, if it is, Canon will be shooting themselves at the leg tongue.gif


lan76
post Nov 20 2009, 04:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
316 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: KL



If want a FF body, go for 5D Mark II but if want to shoot sport with 1.6 crop factor, 7D is the perfect choice compare to 1D Mark III ( 1D mark III however is much more better, prize also better tongue.gif)
IMspiration
post Nov 22 2009, 12:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
118 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


Iish, guys. My hands went gatal after reading through this whole thread. Gosh. doh.gif Which lense do you guys recommend, as my first L lens? I currently have 450D, kitlens, 50/1.8, 430EX II. I'll be shooting events, gatherings.. things like that. biggrin.gif

Kena poision tim icon_question.gif

This post has been edited by IMspiration: Nov 22 2009, 12:19 PM
TSianho
post Nov 22 2009, 01:05 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(IMspiration @ Nov 22 2009, 12:00 PM)
Iish, guys. My hands went gatal after reading through this whole thread. Gosh.  doh.gif  Which lense do you guys recommend, as my first L lens? I currently have 450D, kitlens, 50/1.8, 430EX II.  I'll be shooting events, gatherings.. things like that. biggrin.gif 

Kena poision tim  icon_question.gif
*
Most ppl buy 17-40 f4L or 70-200 f4L as their 1st L lens coz both r the cheapest.
yrh0413
post Nov 22 2009, 02:45 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,214 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Singapore | Malaysia


tongue.gif the newer 100mm f/2.8 macro L IS USM also quite cheap eh
TSianho
post Nov 22 2009, 02:48 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(yrh0413 @ Nov 22 2009, 02:45 PM)
tongue.gif the newer 100mm f/2.8 macro L IS USM also quite cheap eh
*
Oh ya. Forgot about that. But newcomers wont be looking for a prime or macro.
yrh0413
post Nov 22 2009, 02:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,214 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Singapore | Malaysia


well that's the cheapest f/2.8 and it comes with 4-stops IS! laugh.gif serious contender for a beginner's first L
IMspiration
post Nov 22 2009, 03:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
118 posts

Joined: Mar 2009


QUOTE(ianho @ Nov 22 2009, 01:05 PM)
Most ppl buy 17-40 f4L or 70-200 f4L as their 1st L lens coz both r the cheapest.
*
iish. but the 17-40 ain't enough for me, perhaps. 70-200 is a better choice, but is it worth it to get f/2.8L IS?
TSianho
post Nov 22 2009, 03:22 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(IMspiration @ Nov 22 2009, 03:12 PM)
iish. but the 17-40 ain't enough for me, perhaps. 70-200 is a better choice, but is it worth it to get f/2.8L IS?
*

Hehe, 70-200 f2.8L IS is the favorite lens in my bag. The 17-40 is the other favorite as it's a fantastic UWA for me.


42 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0293sec    1.19    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 11:36 PM