QUOTE
i think xbox and ps3 work almost same as pc, they got their own cell processor to process date fetch from data from the roms... just the cell processor are processing more thread then regular PC so i think probably tht makes the graphic processing smoother than regular PC.. while regular PC are using Graphic card to calculate the graphic data while CPU calc others such as physic and AI...
Xbox and Ps3 simpler OS which specific for gaming also make it faster then PC OS which consumes ram and also meant for office applications
Xbox and Ps3 simpler OS which specific for gaming also make it faster then PC OS which consumes ram and also meant for office applications
No the cell processor isn't more powerful, it's just that it's priorities lies elsewhere, where else a PC can run GP code and let the OS sort out shit and the processor handle itself, the Cell is harder to program for as it trades die space for pure FPU performance. Think of it as an idiot that can run 60kmph easily but won't stop if a car is heading his way. It requires more handholding, more optimization and certainly more programming time. No, even the PS3 has it's own dedicated GPU, which is a geforce 7900 Equivalent.
PROTIP : The PS3 looks good because it's games have low native resolutions and then are upscaled. And code is more streamlined on the developers part.
Some rendering is hardware limited in form, it's obvious that the 8800 series will beat the 7900 series in the PS3 in terms of qualitative rendering, no amount of fancy programming can push hardware limitations, although you can trick the end user or implement more costly forms of rendering at high perf hit levels.
If you must know, a 2k PC can beat a 2k PS3 soundly. The end.
Fun factor is still at debate, i've had alot of fun with a Wii and it has totally rubbish specs.
Jan 23 2008, 12:15 AM
Quote


0.0181sec
0.53
5 queries
GZIP Disabled