Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is spaying / neutering your pet cruel?, Please read the first post before voting

views
     
TSwon
post Jan 14 2008, 01:15 AM, updated 18y ago

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
Based on some recent post, it seems that a lot of the pet owners still think that spaying/ neutering their pet is a cruel thing to do.
Are they aware of the spaying / neutering procedure? hmm.gif What are the concerns?

Here are some information regarding spaying / neutering. Please go through this post (sorry for the long post) before voting and feel free to comment. notworthy.gif

QUOTE
What Do "Spay" and "Neuter" Really Mean?
Female dogs and cats are spayed by removing their reproductive organs, and male dogs and cats are neutered by removing their testicles.
In both cases the operation is performed while the pet is under anesthesia. Depending on your pet's age, size, and health, he or she will stay at your veterinarian's office for a few hours or a few days.
Depending upon the procedure, your pet may need stitches removed after a few days. Your veterinarian can fully explain spay and neuter procedures to you and discuss with you the best age at which to sterilize your pet.
QUOTE
Benefits of spaying / neutering:

Why is spaying / neutering good for your pets?   smile.gif
1) Spaying and neutering helps dogs and cats live longer, healthier lives.
2) Spaying and neutering can eliminate or reduce the incidence of a number of health problems that can be very difficult or expensive to treat.
3) Spaying eliminates the possibility of uterine or ovarian cancer and greatly reduces the incidence of breast cancer, particularly when your pet is spayed before her first estrous cycle.
4) Neutering eliminates testicular cancer and decreases the incidence of prostate disease.

Why is spaying / neutering good for you?   nod.gif
1) Spaying and neutering makes pets better, more affectionate companions.
2) Neutering dogs/cats makes them less likely to spray and mark territory.
3) Spaying a dog or cat eliminates her heat cycle. Estrus lasts an average of six to 12 days, often twice a year, in dogs and an average of six to seven days, three or more times a year, in cats. Females in heat can cry incessantly, show nervous behavior, and attract unwanted male animals.
4) Unsterilized animals often exhibit more behavior and temperament problems than do those who have been spayed or neutered.
5) Spaying and neutering can make pets less likely to bite.
6) Neutering makes pets less likely to roam the neighborhood, run away, or get into fights.

Why is spaying / neutering good for the community?   thumbup.gif
1) Communities spend millions of dollars to control unwanted animals.
2) Irresponsible breeding contributes to the problem of dog bites and attacks.
3) Animal shelters are overburdened with surplus animals.
4) Stray pets and homeless animals get into trash containers, defecate in public areas or on private lawns, and frighten or anger people who have no understanding of their misery or needs.
5) Some stray animals also scare away or kill birds and wildlife

source
QUOTE
Some Myths surrounding Spaying / Neutering:

I love my pet so much, I want another one just like her.   wub.gif
Chances are, your pet's offspring won't be just like their mother or father. Even breeders who follow generations of bloodlines can't guarantee they will get just what they want out of a particular litter. A pet owner's chances are even slimmer. In fact, it is possible that the puppies or kittens will inherit their parents' worst traits rather than the great ones you are trying to duplicate. Each animal is an individual with lovable quirks and habits of its own.

A female cat or dog should have a litter before she is spayed.   sweat.gif
The sooner you spay your female, the better her health will be in the future. The likelihood of developing mammary tumors or uterine infections increases the longer a female goes unspayed. In fact, a female spayed before sexual maturity (six to nine months of age) only has one-seventh the risk of developing mammary cancer, compared to an intact female.
Neutering reduces a dog's ability as a watchdog.
Don't confuse aggressiveness with protectiveness; a sterilized dog protects his/her home and family just as well as an unneutered dog, and many unwanted aggression problems can be avoided by early neutering.

My pet will become fat and lazy.   doh.gif
Lack of exercise and overfeeding make pets fat and lazy - not neutering. It is true that altered animals require fewer calories. There's an easy way to keep them fit and healthy: cut down on their meals and treats, provide toys to keep them busy, and make time for walks or playtime every day.

My children will not have the chance to witness "the miracle of birth."
Countless books and videos are available to teach your children about birth in a responsible manner, without endangering your family pet's health (did you know that your cat or dog may get sick and even die during pregnancy and birth? Also, it is not uncommon for one or several of the babies to die within the first few weeks after birth).

Even if children are able to see a pet give birth -- which is unlikely, since it usually occurs at night and in seclusion -- the lesson they will really learn is that animals can be created and discarded as it suits us. Instead, explain to your children that the real miracle is life and that preventing the birth of some pets can save the lives of others.

Instead of showing your children the "miracle of birth," why not foster a litter of kittens or puppies for a shelter or rescue group? You will make a great difference for orphaned animals, your kids will love it just as much, and you will be teaching them to treat animals responsibly.
It is not safe to spay a female before her first heat. Early spay or neuter is risky.
As long as a kitten or puppy is healthy, weighs more than two pounds, and is two months old, he or she can be neutered or spayed. Male rabbits can be neutered as soon as their testicles become visible (at 3 to 4 months of age). Female rabbits can be spayed at 4 to 5 months old. Veterinary medicine has made great strides in the last years and many veterinarians now practise perfectly safe early sterilization.

Neutering is cruel and painful to the pet.   shakehead.gif
Every surgery carries certain risks, but sterilization is the most common surgery performed on animals today. Spays and neuters are performed with the same general anesthesia used in human medicine, and pain medication is available for animals.

The surgery usually requires minimal hospitalization -- many pets can go home the same day. And with a minimal amount of home care, your pet will resume normal behavior in a couple of days. In fact, many males act perfectly normal the day after surgery so don't be surprised if your dog tries to play ball with you the morning after his neuter (do restrict your pet's activity for 7-14 days after surgery depending on your vet's recommendations).
Kittens and puppies are so adorable that it will be easy to find homes for them.
In six years, one female dog and her offspring can be the source of 67,000 puppies, and in seven years one cat can be the source of 420,000 kittens! But even if your pet does have "just one " litter, it won't be easy finding good homes for all of them. Every year hundreds of kittens and puppies die in shelters right here in San Diego County. Most of them are perfectly healthy and cute, but there simply aren't enough homes for them. It's not a question of age or cuteness... it's pure math.

We don't need to neuter males because they aren't the ones having the litters.
Every litter is sired by a male. A single male can impregnate many females in just one day! Also, neutering isn't just about preventing litters. Keep in mind that neutering your male animal before sexual maturity dramatically reduces diseases of the prostate and testicles. It also reduces aggression and territorial behaviors, making your male pet so much more pleasant to live with.

I don't want my male animal to feel like less of a male.   doh.gif
Pets don't have any concept of sexual identity or ego. Your dog, cat, or rabbit won't suffer any kind of emotional reaction or identity crisis when neutered.

My animal is a purebred so breeding her won't contribute to the problem.
A large number of animals killed at shelters and pounds are purebreds. Remember, pet overpopulation is a problem of numbers, not "what kinds" of pets.

It's too expensive to get my pet(s) spayed or neutered. moneyflies.gif
The cost of spay or neuter surgery is a one-time cost; and, if we do say so ourselves, it's a relatively small cost when compared to all the benefits. It certainly is a bargain compared to the cost of having a litter and ensuring the health of the mother and babies. Your pet's pregnancy and the time until the litter is weaned can add up to significant veterinary bills and food costs if complications develop (which is not uncommon). Then there's the heartache if things go wrong and you lose a baby or the mother

source

Spay or neuter surgery carries a one-time cost that is relatively small when one considers its benefits. It's a small price to pay for the health of your pet and the prevention of more unwanted animals. Hopefully the above post also helps to answer the question about spaying / neutering. smile.gif
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 02:35 AM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


Somehow same issues on my thread... http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/610993

I'll be the first to say nono to neuter...say "TakNak to Neuter!!!"

just imagine urself being neuter ok? urghhh...so cruel!
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 08:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I know its good for them but somehow, I just cannot bring myself to do it when I only had Casper. In the end, I got him a partner, Moonie and decided to take care of them for life.

I always think - your mom thinks it's good for you, send you to the chop board - how would you feel? Unfair la. I'm not letting my dog make the decision, I'm making the better decision for him as a good owner. If we talk about the amount of stray dogs on the road, then that's a different case.

In the end, I feel spaying and neutering is for SPCA, not for home owners. That's just my humble thought. Thanks for reading.
TSwon
post Jan 14 2008, 09:33 AM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 02:35 AM)
Somehow same issues on my thread... http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/610993

I'll be the first to say nono to neuter...say "TakNak to Neuter!!!"

just imagine urself being neuter ok? urghhh...so cruel!
*
Why do you think neutering/spaying is cruel? I am curious, care to share your opinion?
Do you think it is painful for the pet? Do you think your male animal will feel less of a male after he is neuter? Both question has been answered above. Animal is not like human, they do not have sexual urges - they do it as natural instinct only.

OT: A lot of people have vasectomy / tubal ligation surgery as a form of permanent birth control.


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 08:34 AM)
I know its good for them but somehow, I just cannot bring myself to do it when I only had Casper. In the end, I got him a partner, Moonie and decided to take care of them for life.

I always think - your mom thinks it's good for you, send you to the chop board - how would you feel? Unfair la. I'm not letting my dog make the decision, I'm making the better decision for him as a good owner. If we talk about the amount of stray dogs on the road, then that's a different case.

In the end, I feel spaying and neutering is for SPCA, not for home owners. That's just my humble thought. Thanks for reading.
*
Thanks for your input. smile.gif
Actually, I made the post to clear the misconception of spaying / neutering. (as per the myth part)
A lot of people keep repeating that it is painful, cruel, etc.... while they don't really read about it properly. The same information has been repeated in various thread as well.
However, to me - at the end, the decision whether to spay / neuter the animal is still up to the owner.
As long as the owner is a responsible owner and take care of the pet properly - it is good enough for me.
xecton
post Jan 14 2008, 09:42 AM

The Reverend
*****
Senior Member
734 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 08:34 AM)
I know its good for them but somehow, I just cannot bring myself to do it when I only had Casper. In the end, I got him a partner, Moonie and decided to take care of them for life.

I always think - your mom thinks it's good for you, send you to the chop board - how would you feel? Unfair la. I'm not letting my dog make the decision, I'm making the better decision for him as a good owner. If we talk about the amount of stray dogs on the road, then that's a different case.

In the end, I feel spaying and neutering is for SPCA, not for home owners. That's just my humble thought. Thanks for reading.
*
If the home owners do it, then SPCA wouldn't have to.

You cannot care for all of your pet's offsprings. Eventually you will need to give them away, and hopefully to good owners.
But you'll never know. Some of them might ended up as a stray. If they managed to survived, then they'll breed more. Who is to give a good home to them?
krynzpeaches
post Jan 14 2008, 09:59 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


NO, it is not cruel at all because I love my pet so much and want to be able to care for it until it's last breath, I spay/neuter my pets.

Taking into major concern on their health, it is good to have them spayed/neutered.

Also taking into account that where/who will be caring for the off springs until their last breath? That is always not a guarantee and unless I am sure I can take care of all of them, I'd prefer NOT to have any.

Pets do NOT know how to control breeding/mating thus every mating is a 99% success and will produce off springs. If they mate 2 a year, they will produce/give birth twice. And in their life time, how many times would that be? Do you think they do not endure the labour pain every time they give birth? Do you think that all of the off springs will survive? Now that is for a pet that mates only twice a year. What about those which mates more than twice?

If you choose not to spay/neuter them, can you watch your pets every move and ensure that they do not mate at all?

Please do NOT compare spaying/neutering your pets with humans. That is such a misconception. Humans can think, they have well functional brains and is able to opt for any type of contraception if they do not want any children (yet). Even a sane and healthy human being will not give birth every year, it is bad for the human body (ofcourse this applies to woman only rolleyes.gif ). Plus there is an option for human themselves to have vasectomy/tubal ligation surgery as a form of permanent birth control. A lot of married couple who is happy with the number of children they have will gladly opt for this.

Ohh and yes, like what won has said, pets/animals do NOT have sexual urges, they only mate because it's their natural instinct to do so.

Anyway, sorry if I strayed out of topic to explaining the above but I stand with spaying/neutering your pets is a good move wink.gif

notworthy.gif
KP
jaswwp
post Jan 14 2008, 10:03 AM

Life is but a dream ~
*******
Senior Member
3,782 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Cheras


I feel its ok for the owner to decide not to spay/neuter, but only if being responsible for the pets actions. A lot of pet owners allow their pets to mate freely then post up the offspring for urgent adoption "because my house no more space" and all sorts of similar reasons. In the end the animals end up on the road, sold to a petshop, in SPCA, or neglected in a cage the whole day. I think that is more cruel compared to neuter/spay. The babies will have suffer for an entire life.

I wont point out any names here but there have been so many pet owners on this forum that said after I breed I will not dump out or sell the offspring, I will keep all myself or find an excellent home for them. In the end you will see the pets on our adoption board or garage sales, sometimes the parents, sometimes the offspring. Then the owner will MIA from lyn indefinately.

This post has been edited by jaswwp: Jan 14 2008, 10:06 AM
pasarmalam
post Jan 14 2008, 10:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
276 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: OUG/MIDVALLEY


well i won't do it..let nature take its course.All my previous dogs have lived healthy lives without being spayed/neutered.
Its not the matter of sexual urges but its just not natural.This is wat MAN invented..So let it be if you can avoid it.

Only reason to do it if you have a male and a female living together.
and you don't want them to breed.But just spay the female.Leave the male.

Maybe we should get birth control pills for pets.At least let them shag tongue.gif


jaswwp
post Jan 14 2008, 10:16 AM

Life is but a dream ~
*******
Senior Member
3,782 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Cheras


Its not nature to have 2 animals of different gender stay together and "shag" as you put it. In the wild they mate then they go their seperate ways. Putting them together and letting the male harrass the female all day can be stressful for the female especially if the male is really high libido. I'd rather neuter the male and leave the female as she is rather than the other way round.
krynzpeaches
post Jan 14 2008, 10:28 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(pasarmalam @ Jan 14 2008, 10:13 AM)
well i won't do it..let nature take its course.All my previous dogs have lived healthy lives without being spayed/neutered.
Its not the matter of sexual urges but its just not natural.This is wat MAN invented..So let it be if you can avoid it.

Only reason to do it if you have a male and a female living together.
and you don't want them to breed.But just spay the female.Leave the male.

Maybe we should get birth control pills for pets.At least let them shag tongue.gif
*


Neutering males are easier and less complicated than spaying females thus the cost is always higher to spay.

Spaying needs a minor surgery, but neutering is much-much less.

Do you know that if you neuter/spay your pet they can still "shag" all they like?

Even if you have a vasectomy, you can still "shag" all you like.

Spaying/neutering is not removing the sexual organ itself, it just removes the part that produces the "thing" to create off springs.

doh.gif
KP


jaunty_niel
post Jan 14 2008, 10:35 AM

i love ribena.
*******
Senior Member
3,260 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


if its to save their lives, i would do it. i've already neutered my previos shihtzu, spayed my mom's rottie, and a mix breed.
sometimes, it really saves problems just by neutering/spaying the dog.
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 10:57 AM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


QUOTE(won @ Jan 14 2008, 10:33 AM)
Why do you think neutering/spaying is cruel? I am curious, care to share your opinion?
Do you think it is painful for the pet? Do you think your male animal will feel less of a male after he is neuter? Both question has been answered above. Animal is not like human, they do not have sexual urges - they do it as natural instinct only.

OT: A lot of people have vasectomy / tubal ligation surgery as a form of permanent birth control.
*
AS I mention, pls imagine ur next life as a dog and being neuter by ur master...how does it feel? huh? huh?

U say for their health sake which i tin is a pure rubbish...den y dun u neuter urself now? Den it will reduce the risk of AIDS, penyakit kelamin....and also no poor kids on street...lesser crime cases..like Nurin...tin again ok? Dun act like u r the only one flowing with warm blooded ok? vmad.gif
krynzpeaches
post Jan 14 2008, 11:00 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


I'm sorry QiQio, I need to understand your point of view.

How old are you?

Honestly.

KP


Added on January 14, 2008, 11:07 am
QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 10:57 AM)
U say for their health sake which i tin is a pure rubbish...den y dun u neuter urself now? Den it will reduce the risk of AIDS, penyakit kelamin....and also no poor kids on street...lesser crime cases..like Nurin...tin again ok? Dun act like u r the only one flowing with warm blooded ok?  vmad.gif
*


It is true that it is good for their health.

You can consult any vet/doctor if you want and see what they say if think you cannot trust us.

As I have mentioned earlier, even for human, it is not good to give birth every single year.

You got your facts wrong, if you do actually "neuter" a human (which is called vasectomy) it does not help to control AIDS/HIV because the virus remains in the fluid and a person who has under gone vasectomy can still produce discharges when having sex.

"Neutering" human (vasectomy) will only help curb unwanted/illigitimate children not help to curb sex offenders at all.

KP


This post has been edited by krynzpeaches: Jan 14 2008, 11:07 AM
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 11:28 AM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 14 2008, 12:00 PM)
I'm sorry QiQio, I need to understand your point of view.

How old are you?

Honestly.

KP


Added on January 14, 2008, 11:07 am

It is true that it is good for their health.

You can consult any vet/doctor if you want and see what they say if think you cannot trust us.

As I have mentioned earlier, even for human, it is not good to give birth every single year.

You got your facts wrong, if you do actually "neuter" a human (which is called vasectomy) it does not help to control AIDS/HIV because the virus remains in the fluid and a person who has under gone vasectomy can still produce discharges when having sex.

"Neutering" human (vasectomy) will only help curb unwanted/illigitimate children not help to curb sex offenders at all.

KP
*
IS there any concern my age with neuter issue?

I'm a vr gd fren for the vet at Setapak here...an indian guy not coz i dog always sick is beacuse we chat alot bout dogs...he always tell me dogs' history and some of his philosophy on dogs...when i talk bout neutering...he abit over react somehow by asking me: "Why dis kind of question ever come to ur mind?", "IS not i dun wan to earn ur money but dats not the wise choice if u love ur dog"...maybe he feels dat i treat dog as a fren rather than a pet...
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 11:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Basically, I feel that human should not play as God. I will always believe that its meant to be and let mother nature takes it course. This is why I am against spaying and neutering. I know not every owner is a good owner, not everyone can be responsible. Some are careless, some just dont have the time, others have different excuses.

Simply put, I believe that "Do not do what you dont want others to do unto you."

won,
I understand your point and I know many of us will have differing views about this topic of discussion. It's good that we have topics like this to keep the board alive and going.

Like you said, it's the owners decision and responsibility to take care of the pet. When I bought my dog, I made a vow to my girl (soon to be wife) that if I failed at taking care of them, it will only reflect how poorly I would be if I am a dad. I did that because she is a pet lover and I want to be good and right now, as an owner, I would dare say I am doing the right thing.

xecton,
The home owners dont have to do it. They just have to be responsible. I know we cannot care for all our pet's offsprings. There are bound to be 'accidents' sometimes and more puppies come along the way. How I see it is,
1. Give it to your relatives where you can often visit
2. Sell it to a new home - I believe if people fork out money from their pockets, they are bound to be more responsible. If you give it to them free, they are bound to be more careless.

If they surive, it is their life. Whether the next owner wants to spay, neuter or even put them to sleep is the sins the next owner have to bear.
crazymouse_yyh
post Jan 14 2008, 11:33 AM

www.suggiesathome .wordpress.com
Group Icon
Elite
12,047 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Setapak


QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 14 2008, 11:00 AM)
I'm sorry QiQio, I need to understand your point of view.

How old are you?

Honestly.

KP


Added on January 14, 2008, 11:07 am

It is true that it is good for their health.

You can consult any vet/doctor if you want and see what they say if think you cannot trust us.

As I have mentioned earlier, even for human, it is not good to give birth every single year.

You got your facts wrong, if you do actually "neuter" a human (which is called vasectomy) it does not help to control AIDS/HIV because the virus remains in the fluid and a person who has under gone vasectomy can still produce discharges when having sex.

"Neutering" human (vasectomy) will only help curb unwanted/illigitimate children not help to curb sex offenders at all.

KP
*
Hahah.... when I read that AIDS can be controlled, I was laughing already. If that really happens, wouldn't all every man and women who have sex freely would like to "neuter" themselves so they don't get affected during their sex parties? LOL LOL

Humans can think. Humans can do family planning..... Animals can't.....

It is TRUE that neutering can save LIVES!!!!!!

My dog was saved because he got neutered. The vet found cancerous tissue in his testicles..... so.... if I did not neuter him, means he will go through a painful life and die from cancer.

My female dog's temperament and health improved after spaying. No phantom pregnancies, no need to worry about uterus cancer, no need to worry about her dying young.

Feeding birth control pills to a dog is much worst. It can poison them to death.....

Many people here put human emotions, alright... fine, but it is your individual preference..... just don't put it as cruel and all. This is about population control. I find it more cruel to let your pet breed without control, making more offspring.... and when that happens, they become street animals, getting run over by cars, getting hurt by other animals, starve to death.....

SPCA do it to control the population. Pet Owners do it to control breeding if they have male and female dogs/cats... pet owners do it to control dominance and behaviour problem.
There is no cruelty in it. Never put human emotions and feelings with animals, they breed from instinct, not to feel good. Humans, dolphins, bonobos, they have sex for bonding, offspring and fun..... but dogs and cats do not feel this.... Yah, you say GOD gave them what they have to breed..... but then GOD never knew humans would take animals as pets. In the wild, cats run alone, when they wanna breed, they would call out for a male from a far..... for a dog, females stay in a pack with a dominant male..... and only the dominant male and dominant females breed..... other males and driven away while the less dominant females become babysitters. This is without any humans around. The animals breedings are controlled that way, GOD made them that way. But since we humans decided to keep them as pets.... they lose their pack instincts..... kept in a male and female pair, of course they would breed non-stop. To control this, spaying and nuetering works IF you do not have the responsibility of watching over them.

I neutered my gerbil because I don't want him to breed..... and also he got a problematic testicle... IS THAT CRUEL? I neutered my cat so he would not wander off into the streets to fight other male cats and spray urine around the house.... Is it cruel to save him from the pain of fighting other cats?

If you want to keep your animals intact.... then do it responsibly.... I do know some people here who watch their animals closely when their female goes on heat.... so a Great Big Pat on the back for you for doing a good job. To others, castrating your animal is never wrong..... it is never cruel..... if you think is cruel, then you must be responsible for your pet's offspring.... do not dump them out, do not send to SPCA, do not sell out. Promise your pets that you will be their forever home.
krynzpeaches
post Jan 14 2008, 11:35 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 11:28 AM)
IS there any concern my age with neuter issue?
*


YES, because I need to understand your point of view and your age will tell that.

KP
crazymouse_yyh
post Jan 14 2008, 11:37 AM

www.suggiesathome .wordpress.com
Group Icon
Elite
12,047 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Setapak


QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 11:28 AM)
IS there any concern my age with neuter issue?

I'm a vr gd fren for the vet at Setapak here...an indian guy not coz i dog always sick is beacuse we chat alot bout dogs...he always tell me dogs' history and some of his philosophy on dogs...when i talk bout neutering...he abit over react somehow by asking me: "Why dis kind of question ever come to ur mind?", "IS not i dun wan to earn ur money but dats not the wise choice if u love ur dog"...maybe he feels dat i treat dog as a fren rather than a pet...
*
What is not a wise choice? Neutering?

That vet has been treating my dogs for years, as young as I was 10..... he was the one who neutered my dog to save him from cancer..... he was the one who neutered my other dog for he said it could work for dominance behaviour..... he was the one who spayed my female dog because she was in a home with many male dogs.....
jaswwp
post Jan 14 2008, 11:43 AM

Life is but a dream ~
*******
Senior Member
3,782 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Cheras


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 11:32 AM)
Basically, I feel that human should not play as God. I will always believe that its meant to be and let mother nature takes it course. This is why I am against spaying and neutering. I know not every owner is a good owner, not everyone can be responsible. Some are careless, some just dont have the time, others have different excuses.

Simply put, I believe that "Do not do what you dont want others to do unto you."

won,
I understand your point and I know many of us will have differing views about this topic of discussion. It's good that we have topics like this to keep the board alive and going.

Like you said, it's the owners decision and responsibility to take care of the pet. When I bought my dog, I made a vow to my girl (soon to be wife) that if I failed at taking care of them, it will only reflect how poorly I would be if I am a dad. I did that because she is a pet lover and I want to be good and right now, as an owner, I would dare say I am doing the right thing.

xecton,
The home owners dont have to do it. They just have to be responsible. I know we cannot care for all our pet's offsprings. There are bound to be 'accidents' sometimes and more puppies come along the way. How I see it is,
1. Give it to your relatives where you can often visit
2. Sell it to a new home - I believe if people fork out money from their pockets, they are bound to be more responsible. If you give it to them free, they are bound to be more careless.

If they surive, it is their life. Whether the next owner wants to spay, neuter or even put them to sleep is the sins the next owner have to bear.
*
Since you have been around LYN forum for some time, you should have seen the cases that some owners bought the pure breed dogs with their own money yet were not responsible for them. Forking out money for pets does not mean they will be great owners.
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 11:50 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
If you guys dont mind, here are some of my views on what was posted on the first post. I know I might make some enemies from this post but please dont mind the language and this are just some very personal views, for fun. Dont be offended and sorry if you are.

For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for your pets?" section, here is my reply:
Removing reproductive organs, testicles and stiches = UNNECESSARY OUCH!

For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for you?" section, here it is:
Spaying and neutering may bring a lot of good for them like living longer, reduce health problems, more affectionate companions, less territorial, show nervous behaviour, attract unwanted male, behaviour and temperament problems, less likely to bite, get into fights. All these are natural and these are the distinct features about them. Every breed is different, do you modify them to be more submissive? Do you slice off your breast to avoid breast cancer? Why dont we chop off our legs and put on a mechanical one so we become indestructible like Robocop?

For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for the community?" section, here:
A lot of positive for the community does not mean I am about to slice off my poor kid's balls just because of the world. We really should not have that sacrifice one to save all mentality. All we have to do is be more responsible. I know everyone cannot be like that, I will let God deal with that.

FAQs
1. I love my pet so much, I want another just like her.
Buy one.

2. A female cat or dog should have a litter before she is spayed.
Up to individual.

3. My pet will become fat and lazy.
Yea, it might be and so will the owner.

4. My children will not have the chance to witness "the miracle of birth."
Now this is bullshit because why would anyone want their children to witness such a gory scene? They will have their chance when they deliver or when they watch their wife do.

5. Neutering is cruel and painful to the pet.
This I have to agree. Would you like to be put on the cutting board just cause your mom thinks "OK, let's stop our family generation tree."

6. We don't need to neuter males because they aren't the ones having the litters.
Oh man, come to the world of animals and we still have that preference of male is more superior than female just like the traditional Chinese mentality?

7. I don't want my male animal to feel like less of a male.
A "male" isnt determined by the balls.

8. My animal is a purebred so breeding her won't contribute to the problem.
Purebreed or not is alike. In China's one child policy, being richer than others does not mean you're allowed 10 kids.

9. It's too expensive to get my pet(s) spayed or neutered.
So is owning a pet for 15 years, give it up then.

Forgive me. notworthy.gif


This post has been edited by Pennywise: Jan 14 2008, 11:54 AM
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 11:53 AM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Yay...at last i able to read something nice here...i wan to be ur gf too...oppss...kidding lar...i got bf d..eehehhe

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


I said "REDUCE" not "CONTROL"...

Yup...u neuter it coz he got cancerous tissue in it rite? dat is fine...is like i having breast cancer and i hv to cut off my breast...is not i dun hv breast cancer and i hv to cut of my breast ok?

Well...so do u find the vet nice? his consultation fees is the cheapest i found so far...ehehe

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


I still dun see dat coming...but i'm old enuf to make my own decision...
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 11:56 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Argh!!! I wanted to click No! to Neutering / Spaying but it turns out I clicked on No! Spaying / Neutering your pet is not cruel!


QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 12:00 PM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 12:56 PM)
Argh!!! I wanted to click No! to Neutering / Spaying but it turns out I clicked on No! Spaying / Neutering your pet is not cruel!
*
Huh? dun get wat u mean thou... rclxub.gif
madmoz
post Jan 14 2008, 12:03 PM

New Member
*******
Senior Member
4,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Hahah penny you subconcious is telling you that neutering is good...
jaunty_niel
post Jan 14 2008, 12:05 PM

i love ribena.
*******
Senior Member
3,260 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


ok, lets take some examples. if all of you have been to any SPCAs before, then i guess you'll probably have a mindset that spaying/neutering is not cruel. many of you do it for the sake of your pet's health, which i think is reasonable. why are there SPCAs all over? because there're too much unwanted pets/animals and these kind people are there to help rehome them, to help them have a second chance.

stray dogs/cats out there, they breed rapidly. i think most of us seen cases like cars ran over these poor animals alive. to neuter/spay them, it can reduce the number of stray cats/dogs out there, reduce cases such as the area government giving out money rewards if they can catch stray dogs. i think sending them to death by euthanasia/tembak-tembak is worse than neutering/spaying them. nowadays, even pure breds are unwanted.

my family made a mistake by listening to the vet's advise to bring back my rott after it reaches 1 year old. my rott got pregnant at 8months old, and she had 5 puppies. we had to give away some of them as the area government only allow a corner lot house with 4dogs. we received letter warnings by the area government that if we dont reduce the amount of dogs in our house, they will have to "take action". luckily a few relatives/friends adopted them, if not, what can we do? send them to the SPCA and wait for them to die? or just dump them at any rubbish site for them to survive themselves?

owning a pet means you have responsibility to ensure that every choice you make is based on the benefits of the pet. it doesnt mean that if you own a hamster, then your responsibility is lighter because its just a small life. why breed your pets when you're unable to pay full responsibilities to all the babies? no time, cant afford, family problems, accidentally "mated"... these excuses all come to mind when they cant get rid of the "unwanted breeds". if you cant bear those responsibilities, dont breed your dog!

*p/s: i'm not pin-pointing anyone. just used to using "you" when writing stuffs. readers can always change the "youS" to "theyS".
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 12:11 PM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Well...accidentally mated do happened to my ham ham....all the stupid Pets Wonderland at Midvalley convinced me dat i'm having 2 male hammies...but end up is a male and a female and gv birth to a ton of little hammie...:headache:
dat is really unexpected one... whistling.gif
jaunty_niel
post Jan 14 2008, 12:15 PM

i love ribena.
*******
Senior Member
3,260 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


hmm.. dat nearly happened to me too. my bro wanted a pair of hammies, and the shop owner told me that he's giving me two males. but in the end we got 2 females = =

well, we humans are special and different from other animals because we're considered more intelligent. we have the power to change something, to protect the other animals [sounds bit familiar, i dunno where i heard this] i guess spaying/neutering is one of the steps that helps strays..
madmoz
post Jan 14 2008, 12:25 PM

New Member
*******
Senior Member
4,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


I have a male MS and a female MS living together, both intact. And the MS group already knows how much trouble (and money on pampers) that I go through every six months. I am thinking of spaying/neutering both for health reasons but the fact that i have to knock them temporarily with anesthetics puts me off.

Why?

Because of this...
Attached Image

Now this is CRUEL (ear cropping). When I first got my MS, a showbreeder adviced me to crop his ears, and I blindly/idiotically/gullibly did. Unlike spaying/neutering this is a totally unnecessary procedure akin to cosmetic surgery cry.gif I hate myself to this day for doing it.
And right after the operation, you could see my poor boy shivering, yet he won't respond when you call or pat him as he is still hasn't woken up. It is a heart wrenching sight, and after that regular vet visits are needed to clean to sutures & change the bandages cry.gif

If anything, always get a second opinion on everything - the showbreeder has her reasons and I don't blame her. I blame myself for not being knowledgeable enough, hence i repeatedly ask ppl not to impose human feelings/wants on their furkids.

Also, if your precious furkids were to 'suffer' an operation and you have to be 'cruel' once only in their lifetime, please let it be a neutering/spaying procedure.

This post has been edited by madmoz: Jan 14 2008, 12:38 PM
QiQio
post Jan 14 2008, 12:27 PM

.::Event Freak::.
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Kay El


Aiyaa...i dun wan to stay at this thread any longer...it somehw poison my mind...i stay firm with my tinkin..so sry guys...any offended here..pls 4gv me..i'm just a pet lover like u all dats all...diff ways of loving my best fren only..ok..tata! smile.gif
jtl
post Jan 14 2008, 12:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
788 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
Personally, I feel that if you are not breeding your dog/cat, then you should neuter/spay your dog/cat. However, if one believes that neutering/spaying is not the right thing to do, then that should be one's prerogative. All I hope is that one is aware of all the ramifications involved and be responsible enough to deal with those ramifications.

I think this threads like this is good as it allows for an issue to be debated, whether rightly or wrongly but it seems that some are not able to debate with intelligence and maturity. Yes, I do understand that everyone has their 2 cents worth (including me) but it would be nice to read threads that are informative and most of all, mature.

For example, I may not agree with Pennywise (sorry!) but I applaud the manner in which he has stated his take on the matter.

My point here in a round-about way though it may be, is please be rationale when putting your point across. It makes for more pleasant reading smile.gif
krynzpeaches
post Jan 14 2008, 03:02 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 11:50 AM)
For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for your pets?" section, here is my reply:
Removing reproductive organs, testicles and stiches = UNNECESSARY OUCH!

But it's only a once in a lifetime procedure. Would be more painful to deliver babies twice every year of your life I would say (ofcourse this applies to female while the happy male dog just shags)

For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for you?" section, here it is:
Spaying and neutering may bring a lot of good for them like living longer, reduce health problems, more affectionate companions, less territorial, show nervous behaviour, attract unwanted male, behaviour and temperament problems, less likely to bite, get into fights. All these are natural and these are the distinct features about them. Every breed is different, do you modify them to be more submissive? Do you slice off your breast to avoid breast cancer? Why dont we chop off our legs and put on a mechanical one so we become indestructible like Robocop?

Modify to become more submissive? Well ain't that bad for a having a more handsome little boy at home wink.gif

But if I do have breast cancer, I would chop off my breast!


For the "Why is spaying / neutering good for the community?" section, here:
A lot of positive for the community does not mean I am about to slice off my poor kid's balls just because of the world. We really should not have that sacrifice one to save all mentality. All we have to do is be more responsible. I know everyone cannot be like that, I will let God deal with that.

If one feels positively-positive (if there is such word) that later in the future he/she will not contribute to selling or giving off or dumping their pets off spring and contribute to the over population of unwanted pets, then fine, don't neuter.

FAQs

4. My children will not have the chance to witness "the miracle of birth."
Now this is bullshit because why would anyone want their children to witness such a gory scene? They will have their chance when they deliver or when they watch their wife do.

Agree.

5. Neutering is cruel and painful to the pet.
This I have to agree. Would you like to be put on the cutting board just cause your mom thinks "OK, let's stop our family generation tree."

Hey it happens to human too.

6. We don't need to neuter males because they aren't the ones having the litters.
Oh man, come to the world of animals and we still have that preference of male is more superior than female just like the traditional Chinese mentality?

Yeah, males are not the ones having the litter they're the ones having the fun and pissing/marking all over the place only tongue.gif (strictly referring to pets)

7. I don't want my male animal to feel like less of a male.
A "male" isnt determined by the balls.

True and bravo.

9. It's too expensive to get my pet(s) spayed or neutered.
So is owning a pet for 15 years, give it up then.

So true wink.gif

Forgive me. notworthy.gif

Forgive me too! tongue.gif notworthy.gif
*


Oh dear, the board won't let me post until I reply something here cuz quoted replies does not count laugh.gif

wink.gif
KP
aureliux
post Jan 14 2008, 05:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
529 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
Well, i think neutering your pet is not cruel.. in fact it might be cruel if you dont neuter them... I hav ferrets, in fact ferrets can die if you do not mate them when they are in heat, They female will die a slow death. That is my main motive to neuter my daughter. The male will have better temperment after neuter, and they will live longer, less prone to health problem. So i think if you are not a professional breeder and just wanna breed for the heck of it, then i label you as cruel. As you know animals risk their life during pregnancy and laboring, you are actually putting your lovely pet in danger everytime you breed them.
I do not breed dog so i m in no position to say anything. But as a normal human, i sometimes do pity stray dogs and cats, they are full of health problems, mange, infested wounds, out in the rain, cold, no food, famished... abused by other humans... Its so sad... I think the problem starts with why should i neuter my pet... Many ppl just wanna breed coz puppies is cute but wat happen when they grow up? will you continue to feed 8 dogs? walk them 1 by 1? Or just let them out by themselves? If they run wild, they will breed again... This is a never ending cycle. We are not the one who suffer, its them who suffer. You might hav a pure bred dog... but how many will you be able to keep? You might wanna sell them out after the gave birth, but wat if you cant sell and even if you manage to sell them all, you might not earn anything as the matter of fact, you might be loosing money. You will need vet fee, food, time to care, and all the hidden cost that you might not see right now. I know a freind who have alot of dogs, but they devote all their time for them. That means no long term vacation, no movies, no yam cha... If you are able to do like them then, i would agree with you. If you were to breed, pls plan for things to come. If you hav a child of your own, i dont think you just wanna bring them in to this worl right, you will need to think of university, their future, their health. Its the same of breeding your pet...
hamster9
post Jan 14 2008, 09:14 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(jaswwp @ Jan 14 2008, 10:16 AM)
Its not nature to have 2 animals of different gender stay together and "shag" as you put it. In the wild they mate then they go their seperate ways. Putting them together and letting the male harrass the female all day can be stressful for the female especially if the male is really high libido. I'd rather neuter the male and leave the female as she is rather than the other way round.
*
and allow other male dogs to intrude your property?

QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 14 2008, 10:28 AM)
Neutering males are easier and less complicated than spaying females thus the cost is always higher to spay.

Spaying needs a minor surgery, but neutering is much-much less.

Do you know that if you neuter/spay your pet they can still "shag" all they like?

Even if you have a vasectomy, you can still "shag" all you like.

Spaying/neutering is not removing the sexual organ itself, it just removes the part that produces the "thing" to create off springs.

doh.gif
KP
*
Neutered males who has not mate before do not know how to shag compared to neutered males who had already experienced it. Same goes as smelling females "on heat" urine

Vasectomy only ties up the Vas deferens tube of the human male anatomy. Which means they still have their testicles intact that plays a vital role in producing the hormone called testosterone. Testosterone is important in determining a male behaviour which includes their sex drive. Means it can human can still in your language "shag" because their sexual drive is still there as the hormones remains (literally)

In neutering, it involves removal of the testicles. Which means if you neutered the animal, they do not exhibit the characteristic of a male. Which means their size would be the same as their female counterparts as male hormones promotes the growth of their size and also head. wink.gif

QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 10:57 AM)
AS I mention, pls imagine ur next life as a dog and being neuter by ur master...how does it feel? huh? huh?

U say for their health sake which i tin is a pure rubbish...den y dun u neuter urself now? Den it will reduce the risk of AIDS, penyakit kelamin....and also no poor kids on street...lesser crime cases..like Nurin...tin again ok? Dun act like u r the only one flowing with warm blooded ok?  vmad.gif
*
Neutering yourself does not mean the reduction of AIDS or penyakit kelamin (STD) because it's via blood or bodily fluid contact to get it doh.gif

QUOTE(crazymouse_yyh @ Jan 14 2008, 11:37 AM)
What is not a wise choice? Neutering?

That vet has been treating my dogs for years, as young as I was 10..... he was the one who neutered my dog to save him from cancer..... he was the one who neutered my other dog for he said it could work for dominance behaviour..... he was the one who spayed my female dog because she was in a home with many male dogs.....
*
2 sides of the story. Yet I hope people in LYN Pets Wonderland do not get too overboard with matters. Especially information found in the internet. Ought to take it with a pinch of salt I'd say. In your case, yes...it does save lifes and that you have to do it because that's the only way out. The removal of infected organs.

I'd say, if one is responsible enough then it's fine by not neutering/spaying your animals. For the least it does bring out their gender characteristic. Else, if living in a neighbourhood of dogs and cats, I'd suggest to do so to avoid any problems later.

My word on Neutering and spaying...it's all created for the conveniences of mankind, not the animals (excluding the health part) be it for birth control, be it for ur male animals to stop scent marking, etc

This post has been edited by hamster9: Jan 14 2008, 09:16 PM
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 09:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
krynzpeaches,
Once in a life time is still painful and this kind of pain cannot be compared to the pain of birth-giving because watching their offsprings is the joy of life, humans and animals alike.

If not submissive = less handsome meh? Look ma-si-like-that... Sama sama saje. And no, touch wood, dont talk about yourself like that. Take "one", dont use "I" - if one have breast cancer, then she should chop off her breast.

POsitively-positive, you must be refering to me cause that's exactly how I feel.

hamster9,
It's all created for the conveniences of mankind --- All I have to say to this is hell yeah! I'm all with you!


Added on January 14, 2008, 9:36 pm
QUOTE(madmoz @ Jan 14 2008, 12:25 PM)
I have a male MS and a female MS living together, both intact. And the MS group already knows how much trouble (and money on pampers) that I go through every six months. I am thinking of spaying/neutering both for health reasons but the fact that i have to knock them temporarily with anesthetics puts me off.

Why?

Because of this...
Attached Image

Now this is CRUEL (ear cropping). When I first got my MS, a showbreeder adviced me to crop his ears, and I blindly/idiotically/gullibly did. Unlike spaying/neutering this is a totally unnecessary procedure akin to cosmetic surgery  cry.gif  I hate myself to this day for doing it.
And right after the operation, you could see my poor boy shivering, yet he won't respond when you call or pat him as he is still hasn't woken up. It is a heart wrenching sight, and after that regular vet visits are needed to clean to sutures & change the bandages cry.gif

If anything, always get a second opinion on everything - the showbreeder has her reasons and I don't blame her. I blame myself for not being knowledgeable enough, hence i repeatedly ask ppl not to impose human feelings/wants on their furkids.

Also, if your precious furkids were to 'suffer' an operation and you have to be 'cruel' once only in their lifetime, please let it be a neutering/spaying procedure.
*
For me, I have a low capacity for pain and guilt. Any cutting is cruel. I can understand what you feel now. I can feel the pain and I know you regret but let it go dude. Just treat him better from now on. Thanks for sharing.

This post has been edited by Pennywise: Jan 14 2008, 09:36 PM
TSwon
post Jan 14 2008, 10:50 PM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
Thank you everyone for their valuable feedback! notworthy.gif
The posts in this thread has been interesting. I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if you share out your side of the view as well, perhaps we might learn something and help others to look at the issue in another point of view. Do feel free to post your opinion and we may have a courteous debate on it.

For example - in the senario where you have a male and a female - which one will you spay/neuter? both?
From pasarmalam, he mention that he would spay the female and leave the male intact. Jaswwp would prefer to neuter the male so that the female will not be harassed and get stress out. I think this is pretty reasonable. Then, Hamster9 point out that by just neutering the male, it will still invite the other male to intrude on your property and that might not solve the problem, which is pretty true. I admit I didn't think of this until it was pointed out. blush.gif

Any owner who has the pet spayed / neuter care to share the experience of the process? How long is the surgery and does it take a long time for your pet to heal? Any complications? Thanks!

p/s: Pennywise, thanks for putting up your stand in this matter even you are outnumbered. tongue.gif I think your posts has made this thread very interesting!



Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 11:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
won,
I will take that as a compliment. Board should be like this to keep things alive. Funny jokes and personal views - freedom of speech and beliefs. Thanks a lot for listening.

Yes, I would like to know about such details as well - how long the surgery take, how long it takes to heal, what are the risk (infections, etc), etc.
Hunter_Mx
post Jan 14 2008, 11:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
100 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: KL


Oops Ter- use boyfriends ID to post, didnt realized he hadnt logged out will post with own ID below

This post has been edited by Hunter_Mx: Jan 14 2008, 11:44 PM
Cimredopyh
post Jan 14 2008, 11:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
385 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur



Theres a woman who lives on the same row as my family home who is amazingly kind enough to catch female stray cats, take them to the vet and pay out of her own pocket to have them spayed
why do i say 'kind' ?
well...because the life of a female stray is pretty much giving birth non stop the body getting weaker and weaker with each birth. Not to mention the poor worm ridden kittens who almost never survive. They keep getting sick, starving, getting run over by cars and if they manage to make it to adulthood only end up in the same situation as their parents.
I really look up to this lady, its hard to find people who care and actually DO something to make a difference. Talk is cheap.
Feeding strays is well and good, im not saying dont do it (i do it too) but unless you are willing to care for them full time, even i have to admit that the sad reality is that it changes..well...pretty much nothing

'It's all created for the conveniences of mankind'
Yes it probably was created for convinience. But to be fair you must realize that not every pet owner is doing this for their own selfish reasons. There are many very valid, very real reasons to do it for the health of the animal.

If you are choose not to have it done and can be 100% responsible for your animal and its offspring thats ok with me.
But to say that spaying/neutering is cruel, i think this is a rather one sided biased view of it, as in the example of the lady above and in so many situations that are easily overlooked, I have to say that spaying/neutering is the kind, resposible and humane thing to do.

Needless to say i voted for neutering/spaying. Both my cats (adopted from a litter abandoned behind my house ) have had it done
Pennywise
post Jan 14 2008, 11:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Cimredopyh @ Jan 14 2008, 11:45 PM)
Theres a woman who lives on the same row as my family home who is amazingly kind enough to catch female stray cats, take them to the vet and pay out of her own pocket to have them spayed
why do i say 'kind' ?
well...because the life of a female stray is pretty much giving birth non stop the body getting weaker and weaker with each birth. Not to mention the poor worm ridden kittens who almost never survive. They keep getting sick, starving, getting run over by cars and if they manage to make it to adulthood only end up in the same situation as their parents.
I really look up to this lady, its hard to find people who care and actually DO something to make a difference. Talk is cheap.
Feeding strays is well and good, im not saying dont do it (i do it too) but unless you are willing to care for them full time, even i have to admit that the sad reality is that it changes..well...pretty much nothing

'It's all created for the conveniences of mankind'
Yes it probably was created for convinience. But to be fair you must realize that not every pet owner is doing this for their own selfish reasons. There are many very valid, very real reasons to do it for the health of the animal.

If you are choose not to have it done and can be 100% responsible for your animal and its offspring thats ok with me.
But to say that spaying/neutering is cruel, i think this is a rather one sided biased view of it, as in the example of the lady above and in so many situations that are easily overlooked, I have to say that spaying/neutering is the kind, resposible and  humane thing to do.

Needless to say i voted for neutering/spaying. Both my cats (adopted from a litter abandoned behind my house ) have had it done
*
This is the best sounding post I have ever read and what the woman is doing is really something worthy of respect. How does she catch the cat? If you put it in a cycle like that, I can see the picture better.

Female stray cat ---> Birth ---> Worm ridden kittens ---> Sick / Starve / Run over by cars ---> Adulthood = Female stray cat = REPEAT. Even though I agree with this but I only see this as a point of view for strays and not properly home owned pets. If we were to house a pet, we were to care and be responsible for it for life.

Thanks for your input. This is really something. THanks!

Mr. Z
post Jan 15 2008, 12:08 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
601 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Boleh LannD~!


If u think that spaying or neutering is bad, think about not giving your male dog to do it when the female you own is on heat. Think of their frustration and anxiety knowing that its there, but he cant do it. Males often have this kind of problem when there is a female on heat nearby. Thats mental torture if you think about it.

Are you sure that you can watch after your dog 24/7, making sure that they dun mate? what if they actually do? Do you have the financial capabilities? space? time? for another litter of dogs? Yes, you may be able to take care of their first litter, imagine half a year later another accident occur, what are you going to do with the next litter? a dog have an average lifespan of 12 years, which mean they maybe pregnant around 18 to 20 times. What are you going to do for this 18 to 20 times?

You would probably think of selling it if accidents do occur, but what if you own two different dogs? what are you going to do with their offspring? and what if you cant sell them off? Have you consider that you might be contributing to the local mixed breed population? There is enough in spca and paws and throughout the streets.

Final word, its up to the owner whether to spay or not, but the please be responsible with the them especially if you own more than one dog.
Cimredopyh
post Jan 15 2008, 12:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
385 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 11:55 PM)
This is the best sounding post I have ever read and what the woman is doing is really something worthy of respect. How does she catch the cat? If you put it in a cycle like that, I can see the picture better.
*
In part i think the cats in the area are familiar with her as she puts food and water out for them daily. I know she uses a cat carrier to transport them but how exactly she catches them i do not know.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 11:55 PM)
Even though I agree with this but I only see this as a point of view for strays and not properly home owned pets. If we were to house a pet, we were to care and be responsible for it for life.
*
Strays are the direct result of irresponsible pet owners, in an ideal world everyone would be responsible, but we all know how that works out in reality >.>.
Every single one of those strays running the streets is because somewhere down the line a pet owner was irresponsible in some way or another

PS: Thanks Pennywise for sticking to your guns in a mature way, you can be sure people who do not see neutering/spaying as cruel will take what you have to say into serious consideration even though they may not agree with you



Pennywise
post Jan 15 2008, 10:16 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Dont worry about that catching-the-cat part because I'm just interested to know how a lady does it since cats are usually so agile. It's amazing, her skills and love for those pets.

Strays are a direct result - I cannot argue with that. A give birth to B which in turn give birth to C and D and E and C will probably give birth to C1, C2, C3,... so on.

I know what you mean and its hard to be idealistic. People here possibly think I'm just ignorant. I'm not so much of a pet person until New Year 2007 when I got Casper.

Dont worry, I will make sure that my dog isnt mated while she's on heat unless I really want a litter. Things will most likely stop at "B" for me. To live in an ideal world as expect people to be more responsible, is almost impossible.
krynzpeaches
post Jan 15 2008, 10:32 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 14 2008, 09:14 PM)
My word on Neutering and spaying...it's all created for the conveniences of mankind, not the animals (excluding the health part) be it for birth control, be it for ur male animals to stop scent marking, etc
*


Yes, it is for the convenience of mankind who loves their pet and knows their responsibility to keep one properly and safely until their end of time instead of a few dozens and not knowing what to do with it.

And also like what Cimredopyh has said too...

notworthy.gif

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 09:27 PM)
krynzpeaches,
Once in a life time is still painful and this kind of pain cannot be compared to the pain of birth-giving because watching their offsprings is the joy of life, humans and animals alike.

If not submissive = less handsome meh? Look ma-si-like-that... Sama sama saje. And no, touch wood, dont talk about yourself like that. Take "one", dont use "I" - if one have breast cancer, then she should chop off her breast.

POsitively-positive, you must be refering to me cause that's exactly how I feel.
*


The pain of giving birth, the agony of losing your body shape, the endless hours of nursing, the non-stop clingy off spring by your side could be washed away by watching the joy of life?

Ekkkkk...

Not less handsome at all but becomes more handsome I must say (this applies to some pets only I think tongue.gif)

I prefer, to use I, haha, easier methodology... tongue.gif

Which positively-positive you are referring too?

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 14 2008, 11:34 PM)
Yes, I would like to know about such details as well - how long the surgery take, how long it takes to heal, what are the risk (infections, etc), etc.
*


The surgery is very quick. Depending on the type of pet, it's more or less than half an hour.

Depending of the type of pet too, it will normally fully heal within a week.

There should be no infection if the area is not disturbed heavily or caused the stitch to re-opened what-so-ever.

QUOTE(Cimredopyh @ Jan 14 2008, 11:45 PM)
'It's all created for the conveniences of mankind'
Yes it probably was created for convinience. But to be fair you must realize that not every pet owner is doing this for their own selfish reasons. There are many very valid, very real reasons to do it for the health of the animal.

If you are choose not to have it done and can be 100% responsible for your animal and its offspring thats ok with me.
But to say that spaying/neutering is cruel, i think this is a rather one sided biased view of it, as in the example of the lady above and in so many situations that are easily overlooked, I have to say that spaying/neutering is the kind, resposible and  humane thing to do.

Needless to say i voted for neutering/spaying. Both my cats (adopted from a litter abandoned behind my house ) have had it done
*


Couldn't agree more wink.gif

biggrin.gif
KP

hamster9
post Jan 15 2008, 11:04 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(won @ Jan 14 2008, 10:50 PM)
Thank you everyone for their valuable feedback!  notworthy.gif
The posts in this thread has been interesting. I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if you share out your side of the view as well, perhaps we might learn something and help others to look at the issue in another point of view. Do feel free to post your opinion and we may have a courteous debate on it.

For example -  in the senario where you have a male and a female - which one will you spay/neuter? both?
From pasarmalam, he mention that he would spay the female and leave the male intact. Jaswwp would prefer to neuter the male so that the female will not be harassed and get stress out. I think this is pretty reasonable. Then, Hamster9 point out that by just neutering the male, it will still invite the other male to intrude on your property and that might not solve the problem, which is pretty true. I admit I didn't think of this until it was pointed out.  blush.gif

Any owner who has the pet spayed / neuter care to share the experience of the process? How long is the surgery and does it take a long time for your pet to heal? Any complications? Thanks!

p/s: Pennywise, thanks for putting up your stand in this matter even you are outnumbered.  tongue.gif  I think your posts has made this thread very interesting!
*
Surgery depends on animals. Both my male cats were neutered very young and the procedure takes about 4 hours. Then it's all ready to go home. But male dogs neutering are a big complicated and more care is needed. Same goes with female dogs. So far I don't have any female cats to comment about. laugh.gif

To heal depending on the care taken by the owner to the animal. Some within a week some months due to infections rclxub.gif

Pennywise was outnumbered as he couldn't express it well IMHO laugh.gif


QUOTE(Mr. Z @ Jan 15 2008, 12:08 AM)
If u think that spaying or neutering is bad, think about not giving your male dog to do it when the female you own is on heat. Think of their frustration and anxiety knowing that its there, but he cant do it. Males often have this kind of problem when there is a female on heat nearby. Thats mental torture if you think about it.


*
Like said, if you neutered the male dog from young when he doesn't know what a female on heat means, it wouldn't be torturing. Unless it neutering a male dog who is experienced sex before.

It's like a 3 years old kid who doesn't know what sex is all about (provided he is not exposed to those information). Neutering males would like stop all these and make him forever as innocent as a 3 year old kid wink.gif

QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 15 2008, 10:32 AM)
Yes, it is for the convenience of mankind who loves their pet and knows their responsibility to keep one properly and safely until their end of time instead of a few dozens and not knowing what to do with it.

And also like what Cimredopyh has said too...


*
well.. for the least I placed my vote as No Comment as I feel there's both side of the story.

But neutering and spraying is not as cruel as debarking and declawing nod.gif
krynzpeaches
post Jan 15 2008, 11:16 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 15 2008, 11:04 AM)
well.. for the least I placed my vote as No Comment as I feel there's both side of the story.

But neutering and spraying is not as cruel as debarking and declawing  nod.gif
*


Yup, true wink.gif

Okay, I would say it is up to the individual IF, only IF the individual is a responsible owner...

My male cat is due to be neutered end of the month.

Then all the pets I have is neutered wink.gif

smile.gif
KP



chibi_tenko
post Jan 15 2008, 11:25 AM

I see. I pinch. I squeeze
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Tropicalu Janguru


QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 10:57 AM)
AS I mention, pls imagine ur next life as a dog and being neuter by ur master...how does it feel? huh? huh?

U say for their health sake which i tin is a pure rubbish...den y dun u neuter urself now? Den it will reduce the risk of AIDS, penyakit kelamin....and also no poor kids on street...lesser crime cases..like Nurin...tin again ok? Dun act like u r the only one flowing with warm blooded ok?  vmad.gif
*
How can 'neutering' a human reduce the risk of AIDS or STD? shakehead.gif Vasectomy (for human) doesn't really lower a man's sexual desire. It's just that the man's sterile and can't impregnate a female after undergoing it. So, how does that contribute to 'lesser crime'?

Besides, it's your choice not to spay/neuter your pets, so don't go around pointing fingers at people with statements like : "Dun act like u r the only one flowing with warm blooded ok?"

What you do to your pet's offsprings are entirely up to you. Personally, I do not want to see my furkids' puppies being used by people to make money (by using them as breeding machines) or worse still, being abused by people who adopts them.

Animals are not the same as humans. They don't use sex for 'recreation'. If I'm reborn as a dog in my next life, I wouldn't know the difference whether my owner spayed me or not. Both of my furkids are spayed and both are perfectly healthy - I don't see any difference in their behaviour or them acting weird.


QUOTE(QiQio @ Jan 14 2008, 11:28 AM)
IS there any concern my age with neuter issue?

I'm a vr gd fren for the vet at Setapak here...an indian guy not coz i dog always sick is beacuse we chat alot bout dogs...he always tell me dogs' history and some of his philosophy on dogs...when i talk bout neutering...he abit over react somehow by asking me: "Why dis kind of question ever come to ur mind?", "IS not i dun wan to earn ur money but dats not the wise choice if u love ur dog"...maybe he feels dat i treat dog as a fren rather than a pet...
*
Are you talking about Dr.Ghosh? Funny that you say he reacted that way. I was talking to him last time and he encouraged me to spay my Chelsea if I'm not going to breed her. He explained in detail of the consequences of spaying and not spaying our pet - and I admit I asked him alot of the spay/neuter myth and he took the time to explain everything to me one by one. He never once said that 'if you love your pet, don't spay/neuter them'

BTW, I'm curious as to who that Indian vet that you're talking about. Care to introduce him?
rancid
post Jan 15 2008, 12:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


I actually adopted a stray female shih tzu about a year ago and without my knowledge she was in heat when I took her in. I have another 2 male dogs at home. After 2 months, 6 puppies were born, gave away 1 to a friend and kept all 5 pups with me till now. You know what, before you know it, she was on heat again after 6 months. So I asked myself, "Should I risk her in having another litter of puppies again or resort to spaying to stop the breeding permanently?" Obviously, I picked the latter. Yea, it may sound a lil cruel but I guess sometimes you need to be cruel to be kind. 2 days after the surgery, she runs and plays like a young puppy again and I'm so proud of her. rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by rancid: Jan 15 2008, 12:59 PM
madmoz
post Jan 15 2008, 01:03 PM

New Member
*******
Senior Member
4,250 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


A stray shih tzu? Well, that should tell that to qiqio as she has never seen a stray a.k.a. unwanted shih tzu before.
TSwon
post Jan 15 2008, 02:40 PM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
If the we are keeping the pets ourselves and are responsible owner, I guess we do have the option whether we want to spay/ neuter or keep them intact. smile.gif

One point to ponder however, just say in the senario like:
1) when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
2) we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption

Will you spay/ neuter the pets then? Do you still think that is is cruel and we should let mother nature take its course?

There is a possibilty that you may not find a good reponsible owner to take care of them. The owner might just let them be and unwanted litter happens. The new owner may just simply pass to other people, throw the puppies away and they become strays.

Worse still, there are some unscrupulous people who will lie to adopt your pet and then resell it to make money / treat it like a breeding machine. These cases really happens as we have read about them in other forum.

What will you do? unsure.gif

hamster9
post Jan 15 2008, 02:52 PM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(won @ Jan 15 2008, 02:40 PM)
If the we are keeping the pets ourselves and are responsible owner, I guess we do have the option whether we want to spay/ neuter or keep them intact.  smile.gif

One point to ponder however, just say in the senario like:
1) when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
2) we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption

Will you spay/ neuter the pets then? Do you still think that is is cruel and we should let mother nature take its course?

There is a possibilty that you may not find a good reponsible owner to take care of them. The owner might just let them be and unwanted litter happens. The new owner may just simply pass to other people, throw the puppies away and they become strays.

Worse still, there are some unscrupulous people who will lie to adopt your pet and then resell it to make money / treat it like a breeding machine. These cases really happens as we have read about them in other forum.

What will you do?  unsure.gif
*
Well..I have to applaud Junnie in the adoption of the chow chow she posted before the owner hands over the chow chow, the new owner would have to pay for spaying. notworthy.gif Too bad it has already landed in a family already when we called to confirm tongue.gif
krynzpeaches
post Jan 15 2008, 03:11 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(won @ Jan 15 2008, 02:40 PM)
If the we are keeping the pets ourselves and are responsible owner, I guess we do have the option whether we want to spay/ neuter or keep them intact.  smile.gif

One point to ponder however, just say in the senario like:
1) when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
2) we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption

Will you spay/ neuter the pets then? Do you still think that is is cruel and we should let mother nature take its course?

There is a possibilty that you may not find a good reponsible owner to take care of them. The owner might just let them be and unwanted litter happens. The new owner may just simply pass to other people, throw the puppies away and they become strays.

Worse still, there are some unscrupulous people who will lie to adopt your pet and then resell it to make money / treat it like a breeding machine. These cases really happens as we have read about them in other forum.

What will you do?  unsure.gif
*


In case 1, if we love our pet and wish for the best for them, I think it is better to have them spayed/neutered before giving them to a new home. It's true, we might not know what will happen if the new owner is not very responsible, or is some con man using your pet as a breeding machine. *shivers* I wouldn't want that to happen to my babies even if they are given away to people...

In case 2, I think it's best to spay/neuter the stray that you found (like the kind lady story wink.gif ) so that the stray cycle could stop some where... But if it's a lost pet you found... Then that I'm not sure...

smile.gif
KP
TSwon
post Jan 15 2008, 03:22 PM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 15 2008, 02:52 PM)
Well..I have to applaud Junnie in the adoption of the chow chow she posted before the owner hands over the chow chow, the new owner would have to pay for spaying.  notworthy.gif  Too bad it has already landed in a family already when we called to confirm tongue.gif
*
That's a good thing! (i mean about the requirement of spaying, not the latter - sorry you didn't get to adopt the chowchow tongue.gif)

Recently we saw a lot of pets being put out for adoption (in other forum as well), and when the advice were given to the owner to spay/neuter their pets first before passing it to the potential adoptee, the owner refuse to do so by giving reason like - "i love my pet, I am already depressed since i am giving it out for adoption, i don't want them to suffer further, spaying is such a cruel thing to do......" doh.gif

The advice is actually given by the people were concerned that the beloved pet might fall into wrong hands (backyard breeder) and suffer for the rest of their life (being cage 24 hr and becoming a nonstop breeding machine) if they were to remain intact. As least when it is spay / neuter, you have already filter out these unscrupulous people from the adoptee list. Doesn't that help to protect your pet? smile.gif

KP,

tongue.gif on the lost pet. It is a debatable issue i guess.
I mean if you pet is lost and when found it back, it has been spayed / neutered, will you get angry? vmad.gif
Some will. To me, I think I would be just grateful that I found back my furkids first, rather not finding it back and keep imaging it fall into the hands of the backyard breeder and suffer for the rest of its life. cry.gif
krynzpeaches
post Jan 15 2008, 04:41 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


I know I wouldn't be angry too, atleast you found your furkid safe and sound, and it being spayed/neuter already save you the cost to do so right?

tongue.gif
KP
Pennywise
post Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 15 2008, 04:41 PM)
I know I wouldn't be angry too, atleast you found your furkid safe and sound, and it being spayed/neuter already save you the cost to do so right?

tongue.gif
KP
*
That's IF you wanted to spay / neuter... If you wanted to get a next generation and you just came home with the other half of your furkid. You'd scream and kill the founder.

Anyway, here's my post to your replies above.
krynzpeaches,
Give birth! Lose your body shape! Endless hours of nursing! Clingy is good!! Then you watch them grow up and take care of you back (applies to humans), or be taken care off by the same responsible owner (applies for pets) - I think it's great!!

Got such thing as chop chop = more handsome wan meh? This I really do not know but finding a body organ missing, die die I'm all against it! I'm refering to myself being positively positive in being the ideal responsible owner but I know accidents might happen thats why if you read on the other thread, I'm taking precaution with Moonie now.

Seems like you experienced with this whole process thingy. By the way, I know you're pro for Sugar Gliders, did your neuter / spay yours (a pair)?


Added on January 15, 2008, 11:49 pm
QUOTE(won @ Jan 15 2008, 02:40 PM)
If the we are keeping the pets ourselves and are responsible owner, I guess we do have the option whether we want to spay/ neuter or keep them intact.  smile.gif

One point to ponder however, just say in the senario like:
1) when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
2) we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption

Will you spay/ neuter the pets then? Do you still think that is is cruel and we should let mother nature take its course?

There is a possibilty that you may not find a good reponsible owner to take care of them. The owner might just let them be and unwanted litter happens. The new owner may just simply pass to other people, throw the puppies away and they become strays.

Worse still, there are some unscrupulous people who will lie to adopt your pet and then resell it to make money / treat it like a breeding machine. These cases really happens as we have read about them in other forum.

What will you do?  unsure.gif
*
Ok, you just love to put up a good fight, eh? I like you... Hehehe... Let me answer this.

Scenario 1 - when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
- I would give them up for adoption as nature would want it - NO AGAIN TO NEUTER / SPAY! Why? Ok, if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it. I know I could have with the spaying and neutering thing but then I do not wish to play God. I see it as a sin, as minor as it could be. As light as it is compared to debark / declaw. I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid. I wont go deciding on other people's behalf - that's not right, I think. I know it probably sound selfish that I do not have the courage to bear the sin. It's nothing about guts but I'm all against taking mother nature and modify it into something else. I ain't Captain Planet but I love them too much to hurt them. Discipline / cane them, I think OK... Cut them, NO!

Scenario 2 - we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption
- Stray is not my problem go to hell. Kidding. If I found a stray, I'd run it over and save the world from another 'problem'. Kidding. The serious thing I'd do is put it up for adoption. Before handing over to the new owner, I will speak to them and tell them the available options out there for them to spay / neuter their furkids.

Bottomline: I will educate people that there is such an option to neuter / spay their kids and not contribute to the problem at-hand but for myself, I wont do it. Hahaha... I think suddenly some of you guys going to flame me for being DOUBLE STANDARDS! Hahaha... Lol!!

This post has been edited by Pennywise: Jan 15 2008, 11:50 PM
hamster9
post Jan 16 2008, 12:26 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM)
That's IF you wanted to spay / neuter... If you wanted to get a next generation and you just came home with the other half of your furkid. You'd scream and kill the founder.

Anyway, here's my post to your replies above.
krynzpeaches,
Give birth! Lose your body shape! Endless hours of nursing! Clingy is good!! Then you watch them grow up and take care of you back (applies to humans), or be taken care off by the same responsible owner (applies for pets) - I think it's great!!

Got such thing as chop chop = more handsome wan meh? This I really do not know but finding a body organ missing, die die I'm all against it! I'm refering to myself being positively positive in being the ideal responsible owner but I know accidents might happen thats why if you read on the other thread, I'm taking precaution with Moonie now.

Seems like you experienced with this whole process thingy. By the way, I know you're pro for Sugar Gliders, did your neuter / spay yours (a pair)?


Added on January 15, 2008, 11:49 pm
Ok, you just love to put up a good fight, eh? I like you... Hehehe... Let me answer this.

Scenario 1 - when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
- I would give them up for adoption as nature would want it - NO AGAIN TO NEUTER / SPAY! Why? Ok, if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it. I know I could have with the spaying and neutering thing but then I do not wish to play God. I see it as a sin, as minor as it could be. As light as it is compared to debark / declaw. I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid. I wont go deciding on other people's behalf - that's not right, I think. I know it probably sound selfish that I do not have the courage to bear the sin. It's nothing about guts but I'm all against taking mother nature and modify it into something else. I ain't Captain Planet but I love them too much to hurt them. Discipline / cane them, I think OK... Cut them, NO!

Scenario 2 - we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption
- Stray is not my problem go to hell. Kidding. If I found a stray, I'd run it over and save the world from another 'problem'. Kidding. The serious thing I'd do is put it up for adoption. Before handing over to the new owner, I will speak to them and tell them the available options out there for them to spay / neuter their furkids.

Bottomline: I will educate people that there is such an option to neuter / spay their kids and not contribute to the problem at-hand but for myself, I wont do it. Hahaha... I think suddenly some of you guys going to flame me for being DOUBLE STANDARDS! Hahaha... Lol!!
*
sweat.gif your answer really sweat.gif doh.gif

Anyway in Scenario 1,
Even if you give it up for adoption, how sure are you that the people you are giving is good or bad? Take example you have a very expensive MKA cert female shit tzu and something along the way happened that you have no choice to give it up. You would look for responsible owners right? But anybody can act they love dogs etc but which in fact in the background they have other intention in mind which is breeding.

Would you consider it to be cruel that they start breeding her non-stop just to get money out of it? Means every possible heat cycle she would be "raped" by a male dog to get offspring for sale. Means it's going to wear out her womb in say 3 years?

Or

Would you consider it to be cruel to suffer a one time operation which only last for weeks to heal and happy be someone's pet?

Your choice, 3 weeks of healing from operation or 3 years of labour pain?

Spaying for adoption is a must I'd say.

Also another applaud for junnie too that apart of the new owner bearing the cost of spaying or neutering, the new family will be given a probation of one month from the old owner who will check whether the dog is suitable with the new family or not. notworthy.gif (cough, was put in the waiting line in case something happens to the new family, that's why i know) whistling.gif



Pennywise
post Jan 16 2008, 12:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
I reply for the sake of replying saje. Dont take it too seriously. Just do what you think is right for you. For my conscience, neuter / spay is really not for me. Maybe later, I know the risk will be higher, so still considering - maybe wear baby diaper whenever on heat, for life.

Yes, what people do in the background, we do not know but like I said, that is the sin for him to carry, not me. I know this talk about sin and all is subjective as most probably do not see how God will play a part in this. Call me selfish but I really cannot bring myself to put my dog on a chopping board.

I know 3 weeks of healing from operation sounds so much more tempting from 3 years of labour pain. If I cannot take care of it anymore and give it up. If the new owner want to pretend in front of me and background turn my dog into a puppy factory - nasib la for the dog. Best we can do is give it to someone we know and can visit often.

After so many people against my idea, I think MAYBE spaying / neutering might be the way to go before giving it out. But the dogs will never forgive me for giving them that one last pain before pushing them away. I dont think I will ever be able to forgive myself also.

I have extremely high sensors for guilt so that is why I am extremely against shedding blood.
hamster9
post Jan 16 2008, 01:04 AM

CFP
*******
Senior Member
2,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: on da move with 3G technology



QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 12:59 AM)
I reply for the sake of replying saje. Dont take it too seriously. Just do what you think is right for you. For my conscience, neuter / spay is really not for me. Maybe later, I know the risk will be higher, so still considering - maybe wear baby diaper whenever on heat, for life.

Yes, what people do in the background, we do not know but like I said, that is the sin for him to carry, not me. I know this talk about sin and all is subjective as most probably do not see how God will play a part in this. Call me selfish but I really cannot bring myself to put my dog on a chopping board.

I know 3 weeks of healing from operation sounds so much more tempting from 3 years of labour pain. If I cannot take care of it anymore and give it up. If the new owner want to pretend in front of me and background turn my dog into a puppy factory - nasib la for the dog. Best we can do is give it to someone we know and can visit often.

After so many people against my idea, I think MAYBE spaying / neutering might be the way to go before giving it out. But the dogs will never forgive me for giving them that one last pain before pushing them away. I dont think I will ever be able to forgive myself also.

I have extremely high sensors for guilt so that is why I am extremely against shedding blood.
*
beranak pon shedding of blood gak laugh.gif

nasib la that dog? rclxub.gif haih..tak sakit hati ke? blink.gif dah tak sayang ke?

sin and God? Which part of the Bible/ Quran/ buddhist sutra/ hinduism sez so? blink.gif
TSwon
post Jan 16 2008, 01:26 AM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM)
That's IF you wanted to spay / neuter... If you wanted to get a next generation and you just came home with the other half of your furkid. You'd scream and kill the founder.


Added on January 15, 2008, 11:49 pm
Ok, you just love to put up a good fight, eh? I like you... Hehehe... Let me answer this.

Scenario 1 - when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
- I would give them up for adoption as nature would want it - NO AGAIN TO NEUTER / SPAY! Why? Ok, if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it. I know I could have with the spaying and neutering thing but then I do not wish to play God. I see it as a sin, as minor as it could be. As light as it is compared to debark / declaw. I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid. I wont go deciding on other people's behalf - that's not right, I think. I know it probably sound selfish that I do not have the courage to bear the sin. It's nothing about guts but I'm all against taking mother nature and modify it into something else. I ain't Captain Planet but I love them too much to hurt them. Discipline / cane them, I think OK... Cut them, NO!

Scenario 2 - we found stray / lost pets (and unable to fin its owner) and put them up for adoption
- Stray is not my problem go to hell. Kidding. If I found a stray, I'd run it over and save the world from another 'problem'. Kidding. The serious thing I'd do is put it up for adoption. Before handing over to the new owner, I will speak to them and tell them the available options out there for them to spay / neuter their furkids.

Bottomline: I will educate people that there is such an option to neuter / spay their kids and not contribute to the problem at-hand but for myself, I wont do it. Hahaha... I think suddenly some of you guys going to flame me for being DOUBLE STANDARDS! Hahaha... Lol!!
*
Well, I hope if your furkids is lost, it is not found by me then .......jk tongue.gif

I would say spaying / neutering is advisable if the founder really cannot locate the owner (after a lapse of time and effort spend) and he/she cannot keep the dog and have no choice but to put it out for adoption. At that point of time, I think the probability of ever finding the owner is slim and by not spaying / neutering it, it would just expose the lost dog to the risk of misuse. Imaging, once the furkids got into the hand of the puppy miller, do you think you will ever see them again? They might not even see daylight again - being stuck in a dark cramp cage and only be used for breeding. rclxub.gif

I respect your stand on senario 1, I do hope if the case really happen, you will thoroughly screen your potential adoptee before handing your westie over to them.

QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 16 2008, 12:26 AM)
sweat.gif  your answer really  sweat.gif  doh.gif

Anyway in Scenario 1,
Even if you give it up for adoption, how sure are you that the people you are giving is good or bad? Take example you have a very expensive MKA cert female shit tzu and something along the way happened that you have no choice to give it up. You would look for responsible owners right? But anybody can act they love dogs etc but which in fact in the background they have other intention in mind which is breeding.

Would you consider it to be cruel that they start breeding her non-stop just to get money out of it? Means every possible heat cycle she would be "raped" by a male dog to get offspring for sale. Means it's going to wear out her womb in say 3 years?

Or

Would you consider it to be cruel to suffer a one time operation which only last for weeks to heal and happy be someone's pet?

Your choice, 3 weeks of healing from operation or 3 years of labour pain?

Spaying for adoption is a must I'd say.

Also another applaud for junnie too that apart of the new owner bearing the cost of spaying or neutering, the new family will be given a probation of one month from the old owner who will check whether the dog is suitable with the new family or not.  notworthy.gif  (cough, was put in the waiting line in case something happens to the new family, that's why i know)  whistling.gif
*
Another point to add:
Some people think that by not handling over their pet MKA cert, it will discourage the people from breeding their furkids, hence there is no need to spay / neuter. Well, that's not the case. If you see the selling thread nowadays, a lot of puppy without MKA cert is sold and they are snapped up like hotcakes. Hence, unscrupulous breeder don't need the cert at all since the puppy can be easily sold without the MKA certs. dry.gif They can even market mix breed puppy that are born from simply mixing different breeds together.

Cimredopyh
post Jan 16 2008, 04:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
385 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM)
That's IF you wanted to spay / neuter... If you wanted to get a next generation and you just came home with the other half of your furkid. You'd scream and kill the founder.
*
You lost your pet, so pretty much it found itself living the life of a stray ( a purebreed with a collar and no way of tracing to any owner is a stray ) then by some amazing luck you find it in in the hands of someone who cares enough to spend money to do something they believe was best for an animal that isnt even theirs, even if you had intended to breed i doubt you would scream and yell to find a much loved pet in the hands of someone like that.
The only person who would scream and yell in such a situation, in my opinion, does not care for that pet as a companion, Thats someone who just cares about breeding
for anyone else the joy of finding them again would eclipse the disapointment of being unable to breed

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM)
Scenario 1 - when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
- I would give them up for adoption as nature would want it - NO AGAIN TO NEUTER / SPAY! Why? Ok, if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it. I know I could have with the spaying and neutering thing but then I do not wish to play God. I see it as a sin, as minor as it could be. As light as it is compared to debark / declaw. I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid. I wont go deciding on other people's behalf - that's not right, I think. I know it probably sound selfish that I do not have the courage to bear the sin. It's nothing about guts but I'm all against taking mother nature and modify it into something else. I ain't Captain Planet but I love them too much to hurt them. Discipline / cane them, I think OK... Cut them, NO!
*
No matter how i look at it if you give your pet to someone who is irresponsible or someone who takes advantage of your pets ability to reproduce, the 'blood' is still on your hands.

You knew there was a chance it could happen. You were the one who put them in that situation. You made the choices for your pet that resulted in that situation.
If you had done everything you could and still something bad happens, THEN only you can say that it was fate
Accidents happen, priorities and situations can change.
You cant controll or predict what happens in the hands of the new owner so you should do everything you can to make sure your pet stands the best chance at a happy, healthy rest of his/her life

If you didnt do something but knew maybe you should have, when something bad happens, sorry but you are the guilty one. Too easy to blame everything on God.


Not a flame, just my 2c. If i sound like im hot under the collar its because this was written from the heart. smile.gif

chibi_tenko
post Jan 16 2008, 07:43 AM

I see. I pinch. I squeeze
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Tropicalu Janguru


Some of you guys argue that spaying/neutering your pets is a human act and that it's not natural.

Breeding your pet and selling of their puppies/kittens/etc <-- Did it cross your mind that the very act of breeding your pet for profit is also a 'human act' rather than letting nature take its course?

Alot of things that we do for our pets are 'not' natural. We groom them, we cut their nails, we bathe them with flowery scented shampoo, feed them with nutritious kibbles - all these are 'not' natural. No?

If sending our pets to be spay/neutered is considered as sin, then we are also potentially committing sin by handing over our pet's pups/kittens to people who might torture/abuse them. It's really easy to blame fate/destiny or God but it's not 'easy' to blame oneself.

One cannot say, "it's their luck/fate/destiny" if the poor pups/kittens ended up with abusive family who chain/cage them 24/7. These can be prevented by NOT breeding your pet (you can opt to not spay/neuter) or let 'accidents' happen, make more effort and check the background of the people who wants to adopt the little darlings and etc etc.

It's unfair to the pups/kittens if we say it's their luck to end up with bad families. I usually don't go to pet shops because it's heart breaking to see puppies looking at you through the pen or cage. This, my friends, is the result of breeding for profit or 'accidents'.

Sure, some of you guys can say that you can't keep so many dogs/cats in the house after your pet gave birth, hence the selling/adoption of the pups/kittens that follow. Alot of first time owners look at these pups/kittens and see them as 'aaaawww so cute!' - alot of them are NOT prepared when their cute fluffy pup/kitten grows into adulthood.

I've seen many posters here that asks for advice when getting their first dog, with requests like : I want a small friendly dog. I want a cute cute dog. Dog that don't shed much, dog that don't bark much, dog that is easy to control, etc etc. What these people don't realise is that each dog is an individual - their temperament differs, and sometimes dogs that are supposed to shed a little might end up shedding alot.

Then those who breed puppies for sale will recommend their pups to them. Taken in by the cuteness, the new owner buys the pup. A year or so later, they find that they can't control the dog and gives it up for adoption or just chuck the dog away in some park. The dog breeds, and puppies are born and the cycle continues.

Personally, I would rather have my pets spayed/neutered than to give their puppies away to strangers. I do not want to worry if the foster family is treating them right or not.

This is just my 2 cents, so flame-throwers, don't flame over here ok? I apologise in advance if I've accidentally stepped on anyone's toes and paws.
Pennywise
post Jan 16 2008, 07:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Wah liao, I wake up only to find my post kena bang kuat kuat. You guys wait, I reply when I get to work later. Now rushing... Hahahaha...
chibi_tenko
post Jan 16 2008, 08:17 AM

I see. I pinch. I squeeze
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Tropicalu Janguru


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 07:53 AM)
Wah liao, I wake up only to find my post kena bang kuat kuat. You guys wait, I reply when I get to work later. Now rushing... Hahahaha...
*
Hahaha healthy debate ma.


Added on January 16, 2008, 8:55 am
QUOTE(won @ Jan 14 2008, 10:50 PM)
Thank you everyone for their valuable feedback!  notworthy.gif
The posts in this thread has been interesting. I believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. However, if you share out your side of the view as well, perhaps we might learn something and help others to look at the issue in another point of view. Do feel free to post your opinion and we may have a courteous debate on it.

For example -  in the senario where you have a male and a female - which one will you spay/neuter? both?
From pasarmalam, he mention that he would spay the female and leave the male intact. Jaswwp would prefer to neuter the male so that the female will not be harassed and get stress out. I think this is pretty reasonable. Then, Hamster9 point out that by just neutering the male, it will still invite the other male to intrude on your property and that might not solve the problem, which is pretty true. I admit I didn't think of this until it was pointed out.  blush.gif

Any owner who has the pet spayed / neuter care to share the experience of the process? How long is the surgery and does it take a long time for your pet to heal? Any complications? Thanks!

p/s: Pennywise, thanks for putting up your stand in this matter even you are outnumbered.  tongue.gif  I think your posts has made this thread very interesting!
*
Hahahaha missed your post earlier. Here's my reply :

Both Abby and Chelsea's been spayed and the surgery took, roughly, between 2-3 hours (if I'm not mistaken). In Abby's case, she's up and walking on the same day itself and didn't seem to be bothered by the stitches.

Chelsea, being the to-fu dog that she is, took about a day to start walking up and down. Same as Abby, she still have appetite to eat and beg for treats. Only thing is that we prevent them from getting too playful, just in case the stitches give way.

If I have both females and males, I'll spay and neuter both. My brother's GR's been neutered and I honestly don't see any difference in his temperament. He's still goofy, clumsy and very mischievious. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by chibi_tenko: Jan 16 2008, 08:55 AM
krynzpeaches
post Jan 16 2008, 10:37 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 15 2008, 11:42 PM)
krynzpeaches,
Give birth! Lose your body shape! Endless hours of nursing! Clingy is good!! Then you watch them grow up and take care of you back (applies to humans), or be taken care off by the same responsible owner (applies for pets) - I think it's great!!

Got such thing as chop chop = more handsome wan meh? This I really do not know but finding a body organ missing, die die I'm all against it! I'm refering to myself being positively positive in being the ideal responsible owner but I know accidents might happen thats why if you read on the other thread, I'm taking precaution with Moonie now.

Seems like you experienced with this whole process thingy. By the way, I know you're pro for Sugar Gliders, did your neuter / spay yours (a pair)?


Added on January 15, 2008, 11:49 pm
Ok, you just love to put up a good fight, eh? I like you... Hehehe... Let me answer this.

Scenario 1 - when the unfortunate happen - we are unable to take care of our pets anymore and have to give them up for adoption.
- I would give them up for adoption as nature would want it - NO AGAIN TO NEUTER / SPAY! Why? Ok, if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it. I know I could have with the spaying and neutering thing but then I do not wish to play God. I see it as a sin, as minor as it could be. As light as it is compared to debark / declaw. I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid. I wont go deciding on other people's behalf - that's not right, I think. I know it probably sound selfish that I do not have the courage to bear the sin. It's nothing about guts but I'm all against taking mother nature and modify it into something else. I ain't Captain Planet but I love them too much to hurt them. Discipline / cane them, I think OK... Cut them, NO!
*


With our fast moving generation/country, do you really-really think your off springs will take care of you as much as you have for them?

I've seen too much disappointment and sad stories to let that happen again.

Ohh, sooo you're the "positively-positive as an ideal responsible owner?" yawn.gif Not everyone is like YOU and you have to remember that.

Me experiencing the whole ordeal is a personal matter that I don't think is appropriate to discuss it here don't you think? But do you think I would talk about it if I don't?

I'm not a super pro about Sugar Gliders, but at this moment, I know everything I should and still learning about it.

YES, my beloved Igantius Sorvo Corromandel the Male Sugar Glider is NEUTERED. And he is the first Sugar Glider neutered by procedure in Malaysia (the other one was naturally and by accident tongue.gif)

As far as spaying for female gliders, there no such procedure unless necessary because of the presence of their "pouch". It is an extremely difficult and almost fatal procedure to delve into their pouch just to spay female gliders, so unless they have a womb infection, most vets would not recommend it (even in the USA).

-----

Wahhh, sounds so easy for you putting everything in the hands of GOD and let the lucky future owner to bear their own sins!

When you say, "if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it" does that mean if one is destined to have a horrible life, one should do nothing, sit on their a** and wait for the terrible to come???

One does not need to be religious to know that God makes plan for everything, but that does not mean we don't have to work things out.

I do not want to touch on this issue pulak, but don't go putting things lightly in Gods hand...

And "I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid..." Ermmm, wasn't the furkid yours before? As far as the sin part, that would be the new owner's responsibility, but if your prev furkid turned out to have a bad life in the hands of the owner, wouldn't you feel that stab of pain too? Or you just don't care anymore because the furkid "was" yours?

Never mind, I guess all these talks and discussion does not apply to you at all cuz you know sooo much that you are a responsible owner.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 12:59 AM)
After so many people against my idea, I think MAYBE spaying / neutering might be the way to go before giving it out. But the dogs will never forgive me for giving them that one last pain before pushing them away. I dont think I will ever be able to forgive myself also.

I have extremely high sensors for guilt so that is why I am extremely against shedding blood.
*


You don't even know what's in their mind to say that they won't forgive you for starters. Animal or not, in time they know things were done for the best and they don't keep vengeance...

If you are extremely high in sensor for guilt, I wonder how can you not feel guilty for allowing the things that you could've prevent to happen... (per say in the case above lah...)

QUOTE(chibi_tenko @ Jan 16 2008, 07:43 AM)
Some of you guys argue that spaying/neutering your pets is a human act and that it's not natural.

Breeding your pet and selling of their puppies/kittens/etc <-- Did it cross your mind that the very act of breeding your pet for profit is also a 'human act' rather than letting nature take its course?

Alot of things that we do for our pets are 'not' natural. We groom them, we cut their nails, we bathe them with flowery scented shampoo, feed them with nutritious kibbles - all these are 'not' natural. No?

If sending our pets to be spay/neutered is considered as sin, then we are also potentially committing sin by handing over our pet's pups/kittens to people who might torture/abuse them. It's really easy to blame fate/destiny or God but it's not 'easy' to blame oneself.

One cannot say, "it's their luck/fate/destiny" if the poor pups/kittens ended up with abusive family who chain/cage them 24/7. These can be prevented by NOT breeding your pet (you can opt to not spay/neuter) or let 'accidents' happen, make more effort and check the background of the people who wants to adopt the little darlings and etc etc.

It's unfair to the pups/kittens if we say it's their luck to end up with bad families. I usually don't go to pet shops because it's heart breaking to see puppies looking at you through the pen or cage. This, my friends, is the result of breeding for profit or 'accidents'.

Sure, some of you guys can say that you can't keep so many dogs/cats in the house after your pet gave birth, hence the selling/adoption of the pups/kittens that follow. Alot of first time owners look at these pups/kittens and see them as 'aaaawww so cute!' - alot of them are NOT prepared when their cute fluffy pup/kitten grows into adulthood.

I've seen many posters here that asks for advice when getting their first dog, with requests like : I want a small friendly dog. I want a cute cute dog. Dog that don't shed much, dog that don't bark much, dog that is easy to control, etc etc. What these people don't realise is that each dog is an individual - their temperament differs, and sometimes dogs that are supposed to shed a little might end up shedding alot.

Then those who breed puppies for sale will recommend their pups to them. Taken in by the cuteness, the new owner buys the pup. A year or so later, they find that they can't control the dog and gives it up for adoption or just chuck the dog away in some park. The dog breeds, and puppies are born and the cycle continues.

Personally, I would rather have my pets spayed/neutered than to give their puppies away to strangers. I do not want to worry if the foster family is treating them right or not.

This is just my 2 cents, so flame-throwers, don't flame over here ok? I apologise in advance if I've accidentally stepped on anyone's toes and paws. or tails...
*


I have to agree with most of the things you say...

All these heated discussion is just to make people see and understand that we should be responsible for the well-being of all animals not just our pets because we are on the top of the hierarchy and we must look out for the others.

Don't just think or feel that yourself is responsible enough, but think of those many-many unfortunates out there that came about because of our mankind's doing too.

I don't know, I think I've seen too much of those already that it breaks my heart from time to time...

I really hope that other forumers (besides all those debating here) actually do come in and read all this and take a piece of something useful with them...

*sighhh*

notworthy.gif
KP

Pennywise
post Jan 16 2008, 10:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 16 2008, 01:04 AM)
beranak pon shedding of blood gak  laugh.gif 

nasib la that dog?  rclxub.gif  haih..tak sakit hati ke? blink.gif  dah tak sayang ke? 

sin and God? Which part of the Bible/ Quran/ buddhist sutra/ hinduism sez so?  blink.gif
*
Hello... where can compare like that? It's different la weiii... You give birth and you get shot in Afghanistan is different. So its also different than being cut.

I think saying nasib la is too cruel la. Sayang sure got la but then you already cannot take care of it and give it up. What you dont see, wont hurt you. Dont bring yourself to go see also. See more, pain more. The very fact that it's no longer in my arms kills me, not to mention whatever the new owner does to it.

Of course, Bible / Quran / Kamasutra dont say that but the line to determine good and bad is always there wan ma. I just feel cutting furkid up is in the bad side. Not backside ah!

QUOTE(won @ Jan 16 2008, 01:26 AM)
Well, I hope if your furkids is lost, it is not found by me then .......jk  tongue.gif

I would say spaying / neutering is advisable if the founder really cannot locate the owner (after a lapse of time and effort spend) and he/she cannot keep the dog and have no choice but to put it out for adoption. At that point of time, I think the probability of ever finding the owner is slim and by not spaying / neutering it, it would just expose the lost dog to the risk of misuse. Imaging, once the furkids got into the hand of the puppy miller, do you think you will ever see them again? They might not even see daylight again - being stuck in a dark cramp cage and only be used for breeding. rclxub.gif

I respect your stand on senario 1, I do hope if the case really happen, you will thoroughly screen your potential adoptee before handing your westie over to them.
Another point to add:
Some people think that by not handling over their pet MKA cert, it will discourage the people from breeding their furkids, hence there is no need to spay / neuter. Well, that's not the case. If you see the selling thread nowadays, a lot of puppy without MKA cert is sold and they are snapped up like hotcakes. Hence, unscrupulous breeder don't need the cert at all since the puppy can be easily sold without the MKA certs. dry.gif They can even market mix breed puppy that are born from simply mixing different breeds together.
*
Wah liao eh... Sure my furkid wont get lost unless it's stolen. Every time I bring them out, I walk ten minutes, I will check their leash is tight or not, intact or not. I will check where collar hook is properly fixed or not. Paranoia kind of thing... So far, I tried letting them roam my gf's house compound which is EXTREMELY big like 5 badminton court size and they know how to come back to me when I called. I think in public / outside, will be different.

Its not about the time and money la. I purposely lose my dog, you neuter for me. Then I pretend find back and save on the cost of the operation? I also understand your views. There is a man who sold me Moonie, he is a family friend. I went over his house to pick up Moonie which he brought from Seremban (so I dunno what is in Seremban) but this man, I saw his kennel, right next to his house. All sorts of dogs inside that compound which is supposedly TNB land but he fenced it, opened a small gate connecting to his house and has a kennel inside. From outside, cannot be seen wan because of the kind of entangling grass he put on the fence. I lived in the next neighbourhood for ~25 years and I've never knew that it was a kennel - so when you said never seen daylight, I think I can imagine the scenario. But used for breeding - can I say breeding is better than extinction? What if one day no more Westie or GR or Shih Tzu? Hehehehe... Just another point of view.

Wow, good idea huh... Give away the pup without giving the MKA cert. True true, no cert still sell like hotcake but mostly these are not for breeding and selling cause I think most likely they will still be parked as home owner, home pets as without MKA cert, they hold less value (monetary terms) in the mind of those money making zombies. Therefore, I would believe they would not waste so much time mating and breeding them since they have no cert. I believe even though it may not be the case but this step, helps, definitely!

QUOTE(Cimredopyh @ Jan 16 2008, 04:40 AM)
You lost your pet, so pretty much it found itself living the life of a stray ( a purebreed with a collar and no way of tracing to any owner is a stray ) then by some amazing luck you find it in in the hands of someone who cares enough to spend money to do something they believe was best for an animal that isnt even theirs, even if you had intended to breed i doubt you would scream and yell to find a much loved pet in the hands of someone like that.
The only person who would scream and yell in such a situation, in my opinion, does not care for that pet as a companion, Thats someone who just cares about breeding
for anyone else the joy of finding them again would eclipse the disapointment of being unable to breed
No matter how i look at it if you give your pet to someone who is irresponsible or someone who takes advantage of your pets ability to reproduce, the 'blood' is still on your hands.

You knew there was a chance it could happen. You were the one who put them in that situation. You made the choices for your pet that resulted in that situation.
If you had done everything you could and still something bad happens, THEN only you can say that it was fate
Accidents happen, priorities and situations can change.
You cant controll or predict what happens in the hands of the new owner so you should do everything you can to make sure your pet stands the best chance at a happy, healthy rest of his/her life

If you didnt do something but  knew maybe you should have, when something bad happens, sorry but you are the guilty one. Too easy to blame everything on God.
Not a flame, just my 2c. If i sound like im hot under the collar its because this was written from the heart.  smile.gif
*
If its me and I dont believe it's best, I'd still send a flying kick over to the founder. Of course before that, I'd also punch myself in the face for losing it. That is human carelessness that can be avoided if we are more careful.

The blood would still be in my hand... Hmmm... Good point of argument but I've never thought of it. I think I can a..c..c..e..p..t.. that. But I think I will take more blood onto my hands at that time if I see the new owner being irresponsible and it would be the owner's blood! Argghh!!! You're turning me into rampage-mode!!

Dont worry, I didnt take it as flaming. Like I said before, I saje reply for fun only. I want to see what kind of arguments I have to put up with! Haha... This makes the board alive! Just to clarify I am not the type to blame on God or others but I will just let them bear the sin themselves. However, from the way you put it, I think it does affect me as I didnt do my best before the handover.

You sure can put up a good argument, lady. I like you!

QUOTE(chibi_tenko @ Jan 16 2008, 07:43 AM)
Some of you guys argue that spaying/neutering your pets is a human act and that it's not natural.

Breeding your pet and selling of their puppies/kittens/etc <-- Did it cross your mind that the very act of breeding your pet for profit is also a 'human act' rather than letting nature take its course?

Alot of things that we do for our pets are 'not' natural. We groom them, we cut their nails, we bathe them with flowery scented shampoo, feed them with nutritious kibbles - all these are 'not' natural. No?

If sending our pets to be spay/neutered is considered as sin, then we are also potentially committing sin by handing over our pet's pups/kittens to people who might torture/abuse them. It's really easy to blame fate/destiny or God but it's not 'easy' to blame oneself.

One cannot say, "it's their luck/fate/destiny" if the poor pups/kittens ended up with abusive family who chain/cage them 24/7. These can be prevented by NOT breeding your pet (you can opt to not spay/neuter) or let 'accidents' happen, make more effort and check the background of the people who wants to adopt the little darlings and etc etc.

It's unfair to the pups/kittens if we say it's their luck to end up with bad families. I usually don't go to pet shops because it's heart breaking to see puppies looking at you through the pen or cage. This, my friends, is the result of breeding for profit or 'accidents'.

Sure, some of you guys can say that you can't keep so many dogs/cats in the house after your pet gave birth, hence the selling/adoption of the pups/kittens that follow. Alot of first time owners look at these pups/kittens and see them as 'aaaawww so cute!' - alot of them are NOT prepared when their cute fluffy pup/kitten grows into adulthood.

I've seen many posters here that asks for advice when getting their first dog, with requests like : I want a small friendly dog. I want a cute cute dog. Dog that don't shed much, dog that don't bark much, dog that is easy to control, etc etc. What these people don't realise is that each dog is an individual - their temperament differs, and sometimes dogs that are supposed to shed a little might end up shedding alot.

Then those who breed puppies for sale will recommend their pups to them. Taken in by the cuteness, the new owner buys the pup. A year or so later, they find that they can't control the dog and gives it up for adoption or just chuck the dog away in some park. The dog breeds, and puppies are born and the cycle continues.

Personally, I would rather have my pets spayed/neutered than to give their puppies away to strangers. I do not want to worry if the foster family is treating them right or not.

This is just my 2 cents, so flame-throwers, don't flame over here ok? I apologise in advance if I've accidentally stepped on anyone's toes and paws.
*
Wow weee... Another great point! I guess if you put it that way, it does sound a bit cruel to sell the pups for money. It's like you give birth and your husband sell it for profit. When we think about it, it does seems cruel actually.

I agree that a lot of things we do for them is not natural - such as those you listed but that does not cause them pain and also if we really let NATURE takes it course. I doubt my poor Westie will survive. At most, they'd first be run over by cars as soon as they step out of my house. So, let me put it this way, by not spaying / neutering them I feel that we are giving him that last bit of nature about themselves. Get what I mean?

You have the same argument point as Cimredopyh. It is partly our fault for not doing enough for them. However, what if we spay and neuter them and then the new owner realize "Awww.. this damn thing dont even have its genitals! What the hell am I keeping and feeding it for when it cant brings me money!" and he / she kills it and cook stew with its meat? If we think of it like that, wouldnt that be more cruel? Or maybe NOT kill it but rather kick it out of the house to survive on its own in the wild wild city? Hahahaha...

Anyway, there wont be much of a flaming here because we are all friendly people, just looking at things from some very different perspectives. Thanks for your feedback!!
chibi_tenko
post Jan 16 2008, 11:18 AM

I see. I pinch. I squeeze
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Tropicalu Janguru


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 10:38 AM)
I agree that a lot of things we do for them is not natural - such as those you listed but that does not cause them pain and also if we really let NATURE takes it course. I doubt my poor Westie will survive. At most, they'd first be run over by cars as soon as they step out of my house. So, let me put it this way, by not spaying / neutering them I feel that we are giving him that last bit of nature about themselves. Get what I mean?

You have the same argument point as Cimredopyh. It is partly our fault for not doing enough for them. However, what if we spay and neuter them and then the new owner realize "Awww.. this damn thing dont even have its genitals! What the hell am I keeping and feeding it for when it cant brings me money!" and he / she kills it and cook stew with its meat? If we think of it like that, wouldnt that be more cruel? Or maybe NOT kill it but rather kick it out of the house to survive on its own in the wild wild city? Hahahaha...

Anyway, there wont be much of a flaming here because we are all friendly people, just looking at things from some very different perspectives. Thanks for your feedback!!
*
Hahahaha I understood what you meant bout letting them have what remaining 'natural' thing that they have. You see Pennywise - it's fine if the dog/cat have a responsible owner. Sadly, there's also a lot of irresponsible owners out there. Some people will complain whenever a female dog's in heat and 'mess up' the place. I find it really odd when people make their furkids wear dog pampers when its on heat.

As for not having genitals - laugh.gif Mana ada leh, spaying/neutering is not removal of genitals. laugh.gif The following sentence that follow about why keep and feed the pet if it brings the owner no money - these are not owners, they are breeders. These people are only concerned bout the money that the dog will bring to them, not because they love the dog.

Besides, if people adopts/buys a dog and discover that it's spayed/neutered, they can return the dog. As for killing the dog and cooking it for food because of its lack of reproductive ability, laugh.gif waah, your imagination really geng.
Pennywise
post Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 16 2008, 10:37 AM)
With our fast moving generation/country, do you really-really think your off springs will take care of you as much as you have for them?

I've seen too much disappointment and sad stories to let that happen again.

Ohh, sooo you're the "positively-positive as an ideal responsible owner?" yawn.gif Not everyone is like YOU and you have to remember that.

Me experiencing the whole ordeal is a personal matter that I don't think is appropriate to discuss it here don't you think? But do you think I would talk about it if I don't?

I'm not a super pro about Sugar Gliders, but at this moment, I know everything I should and still learning about it.

YES, my beloved Igantius Sorvo Corromandel the Male Sugar Glider is NEUTERED. And he is the first Sugar Glider neutered by procedure in Malaysia (the other one was naturally and by accident tongue.gif)

As far as spaying for female gliders, there no such procedure unless necessary because of the presence of their "pouch". It is an extremely difficult and almost fatal procedure to delve into their pouch just to spay female gliders, so unless they have a womb infection, most vets would not recommend it (even in the USA).

-----

Wahhh, sounds so easy for you putting everything in the hands of GOD and let the lucky future owner to bear their own sins!

When you say, "if God intended their life to be a horrible one, nobody can help it" does that mean if one is destined to have a horrible life, one should do nothing, sit on their a** and wait for the terrible to come???

One does not need to be religious to know that God makes plan for everything, but that does not mean we don't have to work things out.

I do not want to touch on this issue pulak, but don't go putting things lightly in Gods hand...

And "I will let the next owner carry the sin, give the owner a chance to choose what's best for their new furkid..." Ermmm, wasn't the furkid yours before? As far as the sin part, that would be the new owner's responsibility, but if your prev furkid turned out to have a bad life in the hands of the owner, wouldn't you feel that stab of pain too? Or you just don't care anymore because the furkid "was" yours?

Never mind, I guess all these talks and discussion does not apply to you at all cuz you know sooo much that you are a responsible owner.
You don't even know what's in their mind to say that they won't forgive you for starters. Animal or not, in time they know things were done for the best and they don't keep vengeance...

If you are extremely high in sensor for guilt, I wonder how can you not feel guilty for allowing the things that you could've prevent to happen... (per say in the case above lah...)
I have to agree with most of the things you say...

All these heated discussion is just to make people see and understand that we should be responsible for the well-being of all animals not just our pets because we are on the top of the hierarchy and we must look out for the others.

Don't just think or feel that yourself is responsible enough, but think of those many-many unfortunates out there that came about because of our mankind's doing too.

I don't know, I think I've seen too much of those already that it breaks my heart from time to time...

I really hope that other forumers (besides all those debating here) actually do come in and read all this and take a piece of something useful with them...

*sighhh*

notworthy.gif
KP
*
My God! Just when I finish with one post, here I have to reply another! Lol!!! Ok, let's see what's written.

You know, with the way you reply, I cant tell which is your post and which is my quoted ones. Hahahaha... Are you trying to confuse me in this debate? Hehe!!

I really really think I have the time to take care of their offsprings later, despite the fast moving country. Even if I work in NY, Tokyo or Singapore, I would have time. I make time! I know its difficult sometimes and require a lot of discipline. Sometimes, I dont have the time, so my sister stand-in for me, sometimes my maid but rarely cause she is my grandma's personal helper so we only ask her if its really necessary.

Dont be drag down by the disappointment and sad stories. It can affect you badly but dont let it get to you else you will forever be upset about it. I am aware that not everyone is going to be like me - thats why this debate is my point of view only, not speaking for others.

This part, I really dont understand what you're writing. If you dont mind, you can share with us. If it's a personal matter, treat it as I never asked. smile.gif "Me experiencing the whole ordeal is a personal matter that I don't think is appropriate to discuss it here don't you think? But do you think I would talk about it if I don't?"

Dont be humble about the sugar glider part. I do read and I can tell from what you've written there that you are good with them, damn good. Oh my, your sugar glider have a super-long name. Thank you for educating me about sugar gliders. We can neuter the male and your sugar glider is first in Malaysia - Malaysia Guiness Record Holder!! We cannot do that to the female because it's too risky.

If we take this into the debate, we look at it like a female sugar glider cannot be spayed. Would that not risk the chance of pregnancy if you no longer can take care of it and then it's given to a new owner? I mean, I know dogs can be easily spay / neuter. Sugar gliders can be neuter but not spayed (assuming it's too risky to even try, so we consider it's not do-able). But just because it's easily done on dogs, then we should do it to help with the overgrown size of mongrels and strays on the street? Can we really say that it is all because sugar gliders are caged pets?

This is my personal point of view on this debate. We, humans, would modify anything for our own convenience. From rocks to start fire, to sticks, to matches, lighter, and gas. Same goes for neuter / spay. If it's easily done for dogs, we do it to prevent them from being bred by puppy-millers, and contribute to the number of dogs put to sleep, run over, killed, badly treated. But just because its dangerous to do it to sugar gliders, it's OK to just neuter the male but would that not make the female still open to risk of contributing to the over-populated community of wild sugar gliders, etc?

Get my point? Counter me, I would really like to see what's in your mind so please share it with me on this.

Oh about the God part, I didnt mean to put this debate in his hands. I was just kidding about that part. I mean it make sense to me but maybe not to most of you so it's not a valid point in this argument. I was just saying it for the sake of saying it. Dont let it get to you. Its really difficult to see what you replied and what I wrote. So this is going to take some time.

Hang on.

You have the same argument point as the two before you. That the fact that it WAS my furkid before it was given away. You know, I think that if it is really our furkid, we should not give it up AT ALL. Let's not talk about the next generation because not everybody can take care of a sire + dam + a litter of 4. Even I might not be able to do it, but for as long as I live, I will keep Casper and Moonie with me, even if it means selling my PC and stop coming to Lowyat.net! Hahaha... Dont take it lightly because PC is my life and its important to me as anything else but for me to be willing to give it up, it must be really something. This shows that despite they are just DOGS, they are really important in my life. I will share with you my story later on why they are so bloody important and how did I turned so positively positive.

Please do not be offended by my post. I know it sounds as though I'm a stubborn mule but I am not. I just know damn well what I want and what I can do. It does not mean that all these talks and debate does not apply to me. Of course your views affect me and your passion to keep things going, deciding whats best for your furkid even though its different from what's on my mind earn yourself a great deal of respect from me.

Oh yes, I do have strong sense of guilt but I can also not see / look / know / acknowledge once it's out of my hands. That makes it sounds like I'm dangerous eh? My gf says I have double personality! One minute can be so kind, one minute can dont care at all. I dont know but its just the way I am.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by Pennywise: Jan 16 2008, 03:20 PM
TSwon
post Jan 16 2008, 11:53 AM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 10:38 AM)
Its not about the time and money la. I purposely lose my dog, you neuter for me. Then I pretend find back and save on the cost of the operation? I also understand your views. There is a man who sold me Moonie, he is a family friend. I went over his house to pick up Moonie which he brought from Seremban (so I dunno what is in Seremban) but this man, I saw his kennel, right next to his house. All sorts of dogs inside that compound which is supposedly TNB land but he fenced it, opened a small gate connecting to his house and has a kennel inside. From outside, cannot be seen wan because of the kind of entangling grass he put on the fence. I lived in the next neighbourhood for ~25 years and I've never knew that it was a kennel - so when you said never seen daylight, I think I can imagine the scenario. But used for breeding - can I say breeding is better than extinction? What if one day no more Westie or GR or Shih Tzu? Hehehehe... Just another point of view.

Wow, good idea huh... Give away the pup without giving the MKA cert. True true, no cert still sell like hotcake but mostly these are not for breeding and selling cause I think most likely they will still be parked as home owner, home pets as without MKA cert, they hold less value (monetary terms) in the mind of those money making zombies. Therefore, I would believe they would not waste so much time mating and breeding them since they have no cert. I believe even though it may not be the case but this step, helps, definitely!
If its me and I dont believe it's best, I'd still send a flying kick over to the founder. Of course before that, I'd also punch myself in the face for losing it. That is human carelessness that can be avoided if we are more careful.

*
sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif
You misunderstand my point.

Firstly, I am not suggesting that to save the cost of operation, you purposely lose your dog and then pretend to find it back once it is done. doh.gif
If you can find your dog that fast, I don't think it will be spayed / neutered yet. You don't just found a lost dog and bring it immediately for spaying / neutering operation right? You will try to look for its owner, ask around, paste flyers, etc. (unless those people who has the intention to keep the lost dogs for themselves but that's another story) That's because as a dog lover and owner, you will understand the other owner pain of losing their beloved furkids. However, sometimes we are unable to find back the owner no matter how hard we tried or we found out that the furkids have been abandoned by their own owner. Then the next best thing is to find it a new good home. To ensure the furkids do not fall into hands of unscrupulous people, the best solution is to spay / neuter it. If the new potential adoptee actually refused to adopt just because it is spayed / neutered, do you he/she actually truly care for the dog? Think again.

I also do not agree with the statement bold above.
let me show you some pictures of puppy miller dog condition:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


The photos are taken from this website : <<ban puppy mills>>.
I post some pictures here just to make an impact. There are more photos in the above website if you are interested. Now, do you still think life is better there?

Secondly, please don't take the "give away my purebreed dog without its MKA cert" as a good idea. rclxub.gif
I have personally seen non MKA cert puppies being sold at a high prices at pet shops, >RM1K per puppy and they are not rare breeds. Some are even mix breed. In fact, dunno why recently got trend of selling mix breed puppies for as high as RM800. Some are so mixed I don't even know what breed they are and they look so weird. doh.gif At the current economic condition ( recession and price hike), this still look desirable / profitable to many. Besides this, I would also say that "What if one day no more Westie or GR or Shih Tzu?" will be more likely from too many cross mixing of breed rather than nobody is breeding them until we can't even differentiate what dog is that .... dry.gif

krynzpeaches
post Jan 16 2008, 12:37 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM)
My God! Just when I finish with one post, here I have to reply another! Lol!!! Ok, let's see what's written.

You know, with the way you reply, I cant tell which is your post and which is my quoted ones. Hahahaha... Are you trying to confuse me in this debate? Hehe!!
*


OMG, I got work to do...

Anyway, if I split the answers would it be better?

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM)
I really really think I have the time to take care of their offsprings later, despite the fast moving country. Even if I work in NY, Tokyo or Singapore, I would have time. I make time! I know its difficult sometimes and require a lot of discipline. Sometimes, I dont have the time, so my sister stand-in for me, sometimes my maid but rarely cause she is my grandma's personal helper so we only ask her if its really necessary.
*


I was referring to the off springs (or your kids in this case) taking care of you, not the other way round.

A mother/parent can raise and take good care of 10 children, but it is not a guarantee that the 10 children will be able to do the same to her/them.

That is why I see that sometimes the pain of giving birth and losing a few percentage of your life is not that worthy...

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM)
This part, I really dont understand what you're writing. If you dont mind, you can share with us. If it's a personal matter, treat it as I never asked. smile.gif "Me experiencing the whole ordeal is a personal matter that I don't think is appropriate to discuss it here don't you think? But do you think I would talk about it if I don't?"
*


What I mean is should I be discussing how responsible I am in taking the proper birth control measures too? Or how I would consider under going the proper surgery once I have enough of my own kids?

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM)
Dont be humble about the sugar glider part. I do read and I can tell from what you've written there that you are good with them, damn good. Oh my, your sugar glider have a super-long name. Thank you for educating me about sugar gliders. We can neuter the male and your sugar glider is first in Malaysia - Malaysia Guiness Record Holder!! We cannot do that to the female because it's too risky.

If we take this into the debate, we look at it like a female sugar glider cannot be spayed. Would that not risk the chance of pregnancy if you no longer can take care of it and then it's given to a new owner? I mean, I know dogs can be easily spay / neuter. Sugar gliders can be neuter but not spayed (assuming it's too risky to even try, so we consider it's not do-able). But just because it's easily done on dogs, then we should do it to help with the overgrown size of mongrels and strays on the street? Can we really say that it is all because sugar gliders are caged pets?

This is my personal point of view on this debate. We, humans, would modify anything for our own convenience. From rocks to start fire, to sticks, to matches, lighter, and gas. Same goes for neuter / spay. If it's easily done for dogs, we do it to prevent them from being bred by puppy-millers, and contribute to the number of dogs put to sleep, run over, killed, badly treated. But just because its dangerous to do it to sugar gliders, it's OK to just neuter the male but would that not make the female still open to risk of contributing to the over-populated community of wild sugar gliders, etc?

Get my point? Counter me, I would really like to see what's in your mind so please share it with me on this.
*


Thank you, but learning is a continuous process and I still consider myself learning a lot about them.

He's Iggy for short wink.gif

Yes, not being able to spay a female glider does risk the chance for it to get pregnant if being placed with an active male in the future... BUT, the process of introducing successfully the previously paired female is a longer and tedious process.

Anyway, that is why I DO encourage suggie owners who are real in keeping them for long term to Neuter the males too... And why I intend to keep my suggies for as long as they live...

True enough, because gliders are caged pets unlike dogs/cats that can be left as strays on the streets.

Female gliders also do not go on heat and create noises or mess like dogs and cats do. But male gliders will mark and musk a lot if not neutered. And for those who does not understand this process, will complain and give up the male simply because they bald, turn yellowish and smell.

We don't have gliders in our wild. Gliders that are released in our wild is most likely not to survive at all to even create a wild glider population.

But, there's already too much, too many money making people breeding gliders unethically without thinking of the consequences and the future of the long-life spanned creatures, which leads me to encourage glider neutering.

If you have read, you may have came across us trying to solve this problem and fighting for the greater good of our poorly treated suggie families in the pet shops.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 11:26 AM)
You have the same argument point as the two before you. That the fact that it WAS my furkid before it was given away. You know, I think that if it is really our furkid, we should not give it up AT ALL. Let's not talk about the next generation because not everybody can take care of a sire + dam + a litter of 4. Even I might not be able to do it, but for as long as I live, I will keep Casper and Moonie with me, even if it means selling my PC and stop coming to Lowyat.net! Hahaha... Dont take it lightly because PC is my life and its important to me as anything else but for me to be willing to give it up, it must be really something. This shows that despite they are just DOGS, they are really important in my life. I will share with you my story later on why they are so bloody important and how did I turned so positively positive.

Please do not be offended by my post. I know it sounds as though I'm a stubborn mule but I am not. I just know damn well what I want and what I can do. It does not mean that all these talks and debate does not apply to me. Of course your views affect me and your passion to keep things going, deciding whats best for your furkid even though its different from what's on my mind earn yourself a great deal of respect from me.

Oh yes, I do have strong sense of guilt but I can also not see / look / know / acknowledge once it's out of my hands. That makes it sounds like I'm dangerous eh? My gf says I have double personality! One minute can be so kind, one minute can dont care at all. I dont know but its just the way I am.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Enough reason to cover why I would not put them to spay / neuter. Thanks for reading.
*


YES, for responsible owner/people, if you have furkid, you shouldn't give it away at all but must find all ways and means to keep them and make them happy.

I know I won't.

Who ever denies the goodness that a pet can bring? I understand your story and am not even surprised by it, because a good pet does make people come together.

I love cats, but am terribly allergic to them plus with suggies to care, I don't have time for one. But, I decided to give in and keep one when I saw how it makes my husband happy and actually more calmer wink.gif

But I will neuter my cat because I know it will not change his personality, only for his well-being and a measure to prevent him from pissing on my walls.

In your last word "Enough reason to cover why I would not put them to spay / neuter."makes it sound like spaying/neutering is a death sentence... shocking.gif

And for the record, I think you are as stubborn as mule and you have double personality! Haha laugh.gif

yawn.gif
KP

*oiii, I gotta work lar...*

This post has been edited by krynzpeaches: Jan 16 2008, 02:57 PM
mrkenjiro
post Jan 16 2008, 02:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
396 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Hi guys,

I read this topic with much interest because I own a 8 months old female golden retriever.
For weeks I am struggling within myself whether to spay my dog or not.

I got tonnes of questions running in my mind during these period such as:

Would I breed my dog?
I want to because I like to see her babies... but then again, for a person without any experience in breeding, this is not an easy task. The mother might suffer complication during delivery. And especially large breed, the offspring have a big chance to get Hip Dyspxia which a risk I am not willing to take it.

So, if I do not want to breed it, can't I just leave her as she is... heat comes and go. I just need to make sure no males are around(which should be quite easy since I only have one dog and my house are quite well walled). That stopped me from spaying her. But a few days later another question popped into my mind. Is there any long term effect on the dog if I did not mate her when she is in heat.
So then I did some research and found out that the pulp (equivalent to the human's discharge') tend to stay inside the uterus which can contribute to uterus cancer and all other kinds of tumor(Golden and Lab are not called Tumor Dog for no reason)


Spaying is about removing the productive organ from the body. And because of that the hormon discharge will be different --> this has effect on the temperant but most ppl will tell you that their dog have better temperant after spaying so I guess that is a good thing.

My dog due to have her first heat soon... i guess since she is already 8 months old. Prior to reading about spaying, I have never ever wanted to spay her because of obvious reason - why the surgery/pain when everything is so fine with her? But reading research and report on potential cancer especially for female dog changed my mind. I am doing this as a PREVENTIVE measure. I am not sure if she will get cancer in the future but it is a risk I am not willing to take. I rather see her pain now for a week than seeing her in pain for months (touch wood) in the future...

I love her and that is why I am spaying her...

aaronpang
post Jan 16 2008, 03:30 PM

Cat Exterminator
******
Senior Member
1,979 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
Personally I will avoid spaying or neutering my pet if I can help it... my dog is fully functional tongue.gif

I wan't my dog to be just the way he's born... and it's also the reason why I prefer males over females... periods can be messy and pregnancies can really complicate matters.
Pennywise
post Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(won @ Jan 16 2008, 11:53 AM)
sweat.gif  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
You misunderstand my point.

Firstly, I am not suggesting that to save the cost of operation, you purposely lose your dog and then pretend to find it back once it is done.  doh.gif
If you can find your dog that fast, I don't think it will be spayed / neutered yet. You don't just found a lost dog and bring it immediately for spaying / neutering operation right? You will try to look for its owner, ask around, paste flyers, etc. (unless those people who has the intention to keep the lost dogs for themselves but that's another story) That's because as a dog lover and owner, you will understand the other owner pain of losing their beloved furkids. However, sometimes we are unable to find back the owner no matter how hard we tried or we found out that the furkids have been abandoned by their own owner. Then the next best thing is to find it a new good home. To ensure the furkids do not fall into hands of unscrupulous people, the best solution is to spay / neuter it. If the new potential adoptee actually refused to adopt just because it is spayed / neutered, do you he/she actually truly care for the dog? Think again.

I also do not agree with the statement bold above.
let me show you some pictures of puppy miller dog condition:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


The photos are taken from this website : <<ban puppy mills>>.
I post some pictures here just to make an impact. There are more photos in the above website if you are interested. Now, do you still think life is better there?

Secondly, please don't take the "give away my purebreed dog without its MKA cert" as a good idea.  rclxub.gif
I have personally seen non MKA cert puppies being sold at a high prices at pet shops, >RM1K per puppy and they are not rare breeds. Some are even mix breed. In fact, dunno why recently got trend of selling mix breed puppies for as high as RM800. Some are so mixed I don't even know what breed they are and they look so weird. doh.gif  At the current economic condition ( recession and price hike), this still look desirable / profitable to many. Besides this, I would also say that  "What if one day no more Westie or GR or Shih Tzu?" will be more likely from too many cross mixing of breed rather than nobody is breeding them until we can't even differentiate what dog is that .... dry.gif
*
Oh man, this is so much fun! This must be the longest word-per-post thread ever. Everyone like write karangan only!!

I know you are not promoting it to save the cost of the operation la. I know! I am just saying for example. Sorry if the example wasnt appropriate.

You people really can put up a good argument!! Just for your information, the impact you tried to make, works on me. I can see that poor dog is now semi-white due to mange.

About puppies sold without MKA cert, I believe that makes a difference as small as it may be. I mean there are people out there who specifically look for those with certification so that if they feed them, breed them and sell them, its worth something. I'm not so sure on the market price as I have not survey in a while but I think non-MKA certified dogs are cheaper by RM1,000 is it?

Yea, I also noticed unbelieving amount of ID10TS making money by breeding mixed breed. I mean, what the hell is wrong with these people? I cant believe there's even market for this... What they trying to do next? Breed a dog and cat? A lady and a horse to get a Centaur? Wow weee... we are moving onto the Land of Narnia.


QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 16 2008, 12:37 PM)
OMG, I got work to do...

Anyway, if I split the answers would it be better?
I was referring to the off springs (or your kids in this case) taking care of you, not the other way round.

A mother/parent can raise and take good care of 10 children, but it is not a guarantee that the 10 children will be able to do the same to her/them.

That is why I see that sometimes the pain of giving birth and losing a few percentage of your life is not that worthy...
What I mean is should I be discussing how responsible I am in taking the proper birth control measures too? Or how I would consider under going the proper surgery once I have enough of my own kids?
Thank you, but learning is a continuous process and I still consider myself learning a lot about them.

He's Iggy for short wink.gif

Yes, not being able to spay a female glider does risk the chance for it to get pregnant if being placed with an active male in the future... BUT, the process of introducing successfully the previously paired female is a longer and tedious process.

Anyway, that is why I DO encourage suggie owners who are real in keeping them for long term to Neuter the males too... And why I intend to keep my suggies for as long as they live...

True enough, because gliders are caged pets unlike dogs/cats that can be left as strays on the streets.

Female gliders also do not go on heat and create noises or mess like dogs and cats do. But male gliders will mark and musk a lot if not neutered. And for those who does not understand this process, will complain and give up the male simply because they bald, turn yellowish and smell.

We don't have gliders in our wild. Gliders that are released in our wild is most likely not to survive at all to even create a wild glider population.

But, there's already too much, too many money making people breeding gliders unethically without thinking of the consequences and the future of the long-life spanned creatures, which leads me to encourage glider neutering.

If you have read, you may have came across us trying to solve this problem and fighting for the greater good of our poorly treated suggie families in the pet shops.
YES, for responsible owner/people, if you have furkid, you shouldn't give it away at all but must find all ways and means to keep them and make them happy.

I know I won't.

Who ever denies the goodness that a pet can bring? I understand your story and am not even surprised by it, because a good pet does make people come together.

I love cats, but am terribly allergic to them plus with suggies to care, I don't have time for one. But, I decided to give in and keep one when I saw how it makes my husband happy and actually more calmer wink.gif

But I will neuter my cat because I know it will not change his personality, only for his well-being and a measure to prevent him from pissing on my walls.

In your last word "Enough reason to cover why I would not put them to spay / neuter."makes it sound like spaying/neutering is a death sentence... shocking.gif

And for the record, I think you are as stubborn as mule and you have double personality! Haha laugh.gif

yawn.gif
KP

*oiii, I gotta work lar...*
*
Yes dear, splitting the answers would be great. I know we all got to work but it's so tempted to reply back here to see what others may write!! Woo hoo!!!

"A mother/parent can raise and take good care of 10 children, but it is not a guarantee that the 10 children will be able to do the same to her/them." <--- This is damn right!!

You mean after you give birth to a certain amount of children, would you wanna "ikat" (like spay / neuter) or you want to go on with birth control measures? Hmmm... humans would definitely go for "ikat" but then if its for me, if my wife wont want to, I wont force her. Since furkids cannot voice out saying "No, daddy, dont slice my balls!" I just cannot bring myself to JUST-DO-IT for them.

Iggy sounds like a name for lizards than to sugar gliders. But it's a nice name, only very long! Try having the elder in your family pronounce it! Hahahaha... I think your sugar glider will be very confused.

About the sugar glider example on the fact that we can neuter the male but not spay the female. I am talking about it being in the wild. If a male is neutered, the female cannot be spayed (too risky so we conclude as cannot), then that will somehow still contribute to the overpopulated of sugar gliders. Now I am no pro with sugar gliders. I had wanted them and the urge just kept coming back. My sister and gf is stopping me from getting a pair but I had really really want it. So occassionally I would go read up on them in the Sugar Glider thread.

You're the pro when it comes to sugar glider so its my privilege to be educated by you on some information you might share. I didnt know that female sugar gliders who has been paired with one male, takes a long and tedious process to be paired with another male. I believe what you're trying to tell me is that they are faithful to their other half?? Is it??

So neutering the male sugar glider will help with the baldness, turn yellowish and smell issue? Now that is a positive point which might be considered for you sugar gliders lover.

Oh, sugar gliders cannot survive here eh? OKOK... This is educating!! Are you married? How old are you and how does cat make your husband happier and calmer? Lastly, I am not stubborn and I dont have double personality!!

QUOTE(mrkenjiro @ Jan 16 2008, 02:25 PM)
Hi guys,

I read this topic with much interest because I own a 8 months old female golden retriever.
For weeks I am struggling within myself whether to spay my dog or not.

I got tonnes of questions running in my mind during these period such as:

Would I breed my dog?
I want to because I like to see her babies... but then again, for a person without any experience in breeding, this is not an easy task. The mother might suffer complication during delivery. And especially large breed, the offspring have a big chance to get Hip Dyspxia which a risk I am not willing to take it.

So, if I do not want to breed it, can't I just leave her as she is... heat comes and go. I just need to make sure no males are around(which should be quite easy since I only have one dog and my house are quite well walled). That stopped me from spaying her. But a few days later another question popped into my mind. Is there any long term effect on the dog if I did not mate her when she is in heat.
So then I did some research and found out that the pulp (equivalent to the human's discharge') tend to stay inside the uterus which can contribute to uterus cancer and all other kinds of tumor(Golden and Lab are not called Tumor Dog for no reason)
Spaying is about removing the productive organ from the body. And because of that the hormon discharge will be different --> this has effect on the temperant but most ppl will tell you that their dog have better temperant after spaying so I guess that is a good thing.

My dog due to have her first heat soon... i guess since she is already 8 months old. Prior to reading about spaying, I have never ever wanted to spay her because of obvious reason - why the surgery/pain when everything is so fine with her? But reading research and report on potential cancer especially for female dog changed my mind. I am doing this as a PREVENTIVE measure. I am not sure if she will get cancer in the future but it is a risk I am not willing to take. I rather see her pain now for a week than seeing her in pain for months (touch wood) in the future...

I love her and that is why I am spaying her...
*
You are all against me isnt it? Hehehe... Anyway, good choice! I can see you take this seriously with the research and the possible questions popping up in your head. I am glad you have the courage to take that step. Good for you. smile.gif


Added on January 16, 2008, 4:12 pmOK, after seriously considering what mrkenjiro wrote, I think maybe spaying and neutering can be a positive thing for our pets health concern.

Now a new question for everyone in here... I want to breed my dog but dont know when but it's not now, possibly. I cannot decide how many litter I want.

Since there so many things that is undecided now, I will not spay / neuter them. Will it be alright later if I suddenly decide to? I know the risk of operation will be there as it gets older.

Since I put up a good fight on my beliefs on saying TAKNAK to spaying / neutering. I hope you guys can put up a equally good fight to guide me down the right path.

Now this aint about double personality or double standards. This is just something that's been bothering me a while. It's not like I can neuter them now and put it back later...


This post has been edited by Pennywise: Jan 16 2008, 04:31 PM
krynzpeaches
post Jan 16 2008, 05:25 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
I know we all got to work but it's so tempted to reply back here to see what others may write!! Woo hoo!!!
*


Hell yeah, just look at how fast I'm replying tongue.gif

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
You mean after you give birth to a certain amount of children, would you wanna "ikat" (like spay / neuter) or you want to go on with birth control measures? Hmmm... humans would definitely go for "ikat" but then if its for me, if my wife wont want to, I wont force her. Since furkids cannot voice out saying "No, daddy, dont slice my balls!" I just cannot bring myself to JUST-DO-IT for them.
*


Yup, I'd definitely consider it rather than going for the everyday pills or quarterly jabs or yearly things replacement...

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
About the sugar glider example on the fact that we can neuter the male but not spay the female. I am talking about it being in the wild. If a male is neutered, the female cannot be spayed (too risky so we conclude as cannot), then that will somehow still contribute to the overpopulated of sugar gliders. Now I am no pro with sugar gliders. I had wanted them and the urge just kept coming back. My sister and gf is stopping me from getting a pair but I had really really want it. So occassionally I would go read up on them in the Sugar Glider thread.

You're the pro when it comes to sugar glider so its my privilege to be educated by you on some information you might share. I didnt know that female sugar gliders who has been paired with one male, takes a long and tedious process to be paired with another male. I believe what you're trying to tell me is that they are faithful to their other half?? Is it??
*


Err, don't really get the 1st part you're saying cuz I thot I've already explained it... tongue.gif

You're welcome anytime at the Sugar Glider's thread smile.gif

Yes, basically they're loyal and thrives on companionship, that is also why it is not advisable to keep a group of non-neutered pairs together in one cage, bad things can happen... They can be introduced to other males, but there's a procedure to follow lah smile.gif

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
So neutering the male sugar glider will help with the baldness, turn yellowish and smell issue? Now that is a positive point which might be considered for you sugar gliders lover.
*


Ohh, YES it does! No more balding, no more yellowish and no more smell issues!

That's why I said he is a handsomer boy now wink.gif Can't resist to kiss his lil' nose everytime I see him tongue.gif

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
Oh, sugar gliders cannot survive here eh? OKOK... This is educating!!
*


Yes, they can't, because we don't have their nature here and there are too many of their predators out there.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
Are you married? How old are you and how does cat make your husband happier and calmer?
*


I did say I have a husband right? tongue.gif

Well, he says the cat is smart and listens to him (cuz I don't laugh.gif ), very playful, keeps him entertained and I've seen times when he is frustrated or mad over his work/family issues that he keeps calm by stroking the cat (which when we didn't have a cat, he'll go mad at almost everything!) wink.gif Ohh and plus the fact that we don't have kids tongue.gif

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
Lastly, I am not stubborn and I dont have double personality!!
*


Hahaha, fine!

---

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
Now a new question for everyone in here... I want to breed my dog but dont know when but it's not now, possibly. I cannot decide how many litter I want.

Since there so many things that is undecided now, I will not spay / neuter them. Will it be alright later if I suddenly decide to? I know the risk of operation will be there as it gets older.

Since I put up a good fight on my beliefs on saying TAKNAK to spaying / neutering. I hope you guys can put up a equally good fight to guide me down the right path.

Now this aint about double personality or double standards. This is just something that's been bothering me a while. It's not like I can neuter them now and put it back later...

*


I think it should be alright, probably not too old I guess... But I am not an expert with dogs, so I shall give way for those who are better knowledge in it wink.gif

I'm sure they'd be more than willing to help/guide you the right measures smile.gif

biggrin.gif
KP

This post has been edited by krynzpeaches: Jan 16 2008, 05:26 PM
White Palace
post Jan 16 2008, 08:55 PM

Angel - Top Maltese 2006 @ Best Malaysian Bred In Show
*******
Senior Member
2,309 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur



This thread is interesting, read every single word, and for the sake of making this more debatable and perhaps lo0Onger! Or perhaps, it should be better said is to keep this thread alive and more people educated.

QUOTE(chibi_tenko @ Jan 16 2008, 11:18 AM)
As for not having genitals -  laugh.gif Mana ada leh, spaying/neutering is not removal of genitals.  laugh.gif The following sentence that follow about why keep and feed the pet if it brings the owner no money - these are not owners, they are breeders. These people are only concerned bout the money that the dog will bring to them, not because they love the dog.
*
Nope, not ALL breeders. I do put a price tag on my puppy for sale, and I do ask for a higher price compared to what is averagely asked, but i strongly believe that i'm not earning more money, or should I say my bank account had not exceed 1k if you believe me.

People might ask, wow you are selling maybe the most pet products in LYN yet you do not have cash in hand more than 1k? YES! Reason is eventhough i do put a price tag on my puppies, but at the same time i spend most or more than what I get. Providing them good food, good home, staying with them at home = not able to work outside even with a degree on hand.

Also, I do not put a price tag on them if money is needed to save their lifes. This is because, i love the dog.

But of corse, i know you are not pointing it to me, but just to point out that, not ALL breeders are bad. There are good ones, and it is really hard to be a good one.

QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 16 2008, 12:37 PM)
But, there's already too much, too many money making people breeding gliders unethically without thinking of the consequences and the future of the long-life spanned creatures, which leads me to encourage glider neutering.
*
Same in dog breeding. Too many unethical breeder and we can't stop them as long as there are buyers with mentality that price come first, ethicality later. And the fact that there are many, else how on earth these backyard breeders able to raise hundreds on dogs and still surviving?

My point is, we can't stop the unethical breeder and i dont believe people's mentality will change in my life time.

Hence, instead of discourage breeding, which means even people who cares will have no choice but to buy from these unethical breeders; i strongly believe in encourage responsible breedings. I personally thought that, If I find a person who is a sincere dog lover, who value a dog's life like his own, and one day if he appears and says "I intend to breed my dog", I believe most of the forumers will against the idea, and few will react kind of agressively, without even try to discuss more about responsible breeding. But if this person comes to me, and I realised that he is a much better candidate compared to those backyard breeders, I would say go ahead and I will guide you through it!

I dare to say that, I do agree with the request of some of my maltese buyers to breed their maltese, provided I known them for long, chat with them many many times, and they gain my trust & respect on ways they are treating their maltese.

QUOTE(mrkenjiro @ Jan 16 2008, 02:25 PM)
Hi guys,

I read this topic with much interest because I own a 8 months old female golden retriever.
For weeks I am struggling within myself whether to spay my dog or not.

I got tonnes of questions running in my mind during these period such as:

Would I breed my dog?
I want to because I like to see her babies... but then again, for a person without any experience in breeding, this is not an easy task. The mother might suffer complication during delivery. And especially large breed, the offspring have a big chance to get Hip Dyspxia which a risk I am not willing to take it.
*
To breed or not to breed, it really depends on what is your objective and goals.

Some breeders breed and strive for perfection. Some hoping to get the offsprings. Some don't give a damn about the quality, but they do it ethically. No matter what is your objective, the important part is, do it responsibly.

Like what you mentioned, this is not an easy task. There are risks involving the mother, their offsprings might inherits some genetic problems. Now, I see a person who is concern before deciding on breeding. If you dont mind, I would ask " Do you think that, a backyard breeder, or unethical ones, will borders?" If the mom gets into complication, and it requires a treatment cost a bomb, or at least cost more than what the breeder value the mother dog, do you think he will go for it? OR leave it to death? And averagely speaking, how many GR breeders on the market now, that you think, will stop breeding their GRs if their GRs have Hips problem, or they might not even border to find out?

And will the story change, will the scenario be different, if you are the breeder?

That's why, it really depends on what you want, when comes to breeding.

QUOTE(aaronpang @ Jan 16 2008, 03:30 PM)
Personally I will avoid spaying or neutering my pet if I can help it... my dog is fully functional tongue.gif

I wan't my dog to be just the way he's born... and it's also the reason why I prefer males over females... periods can be messy and pregnancies can really complicate matters.
*
I prefer females than males, becoz, females on heat 1 year twice, males do marking 1 day maybe 20 times.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 16 2008, 04:08 PM)
OK, after seriously considering what mrkenjiro wrote, I think maybe spaying and neutering can be a positive thing for our pets health concern.

Now a new question for everyone in here... I want to breed my dog but dont know when but it's not now, possibly. I cannot decide how many litter I want.

Since there so many things that is undecided now, I will not spay / neuter them. Will it be alright later if I suddenly decide to? I know the risk of operation will be there as it gets older.

Since I put up a good fight on my beliefs on saying TAKNAK to spaying / neutering. I hope you guys can put up a equally good fight to guide me down the right path.

Now this aint about double personality or double standards. This is just something that's been bothering me a while. It's not like I can neuter them now and put it back later...[/b]
*
I can't decide for you, but I have to say, I am confidence that if you are going into breeding, people will have a better choice of breeder if they were to look for a westie. You tell me, how many westie breeder out there that you think will care more for their westie than you? If you can count it, then you know what I mean.

YES, I understand that my discussion is MORE on breedings, but one couldnt deny that "neutering/spaying" is always argued alongside with "breedings". They are buddies! Dont seperate them PLEASE. Thread starter kindly amend the topic to, "neutering, spaying & breeding?" or anything alike? Then this thread will be even lo0Onger and MORE fun for Pennywise!
TSwon
post Jan 17 2008, 09:48 AM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(White Palace @ Jan 16 2008, 08:55 PM)
This thread is interesting, read every single word, and for the sake of making this more debatable and perhaps lo0Onger! Or perhaps, it should be better said is to keep this thread alive and more people educated.
Nope, not ALL breeders. I do put a price tag on my puppy for sale, and I do ask for a higher price compared to what is averagely asked, but i strongly believe that i'm not earning more money, or should I say my bank account had not exceed 1k if you believe me.

People might ask, wow you are selling maybe the most pet products in LYN yet you do not have cash in hand more than 1k? YES! Reason is eventhough i do put a price tag on my puppies, but at the same time i spend most or more than what I get. Providing them good food, good home, staying with them at home = not able to work outside even with a degree on hand.

Also, I do not put a price tag on them if money is needed to save their lifes. This is because, i love the dog.

But of corse, i know you are not pointing it to me, but just to point out that, not ALL breeders are bad. There are good ones, and it is really hard to be a good one. 
Same in dog breeding. Too many unethical breeder and we can't stop them as long as there are buyers with mentality that price come first, ethicality later. And the fact that there are many, else how on earth these backyard breeders able to raise hundreds on dogs and still surviving?

My point is, we can't stop the unethical breeder and i dont believe people's mentality will change in my life time.

Hence, instead of discourage breeding, which means even people who cares will have no choice but to buy from these unethical breeders; i strongly believe in encourage responsible breedings. I personally thought that, If I find a person who is a sincere dog lover, who value a dog's life like his own, and one day if he appears and says "I intend to breed my dog", I believe most of the forumers will against the idea, and few will react kind of agressively, without even try to discuss more about responsible breeding. But if this person comes to me, and I realised that he is a much better candidate compared to those backyard breeders, I would say go ahead and I will guide you through it!

I dare to say that, I do agree with the request of some of my maltese buyers to breed their maltese, provided I known them for long, chat with them many many times, and they gain my trust & respect on ways they are treating their maltese.
To breed or not to breed, it really depends on what is your objective and goals.

Some breeders breed and strive for perfection. Some hoping to get the offsprings. Some don't give a damn about the quality, but they do it ethically. No matter what is your objective, the important part is, do it responsibly.

Like what you mentioned, this is not an easy task. There are risks involving the mother, their offsprings might inherits some genetic problems. Now, I see a person who is concern before deciding on breeding. If you dont mind, I would ask " Do you think that, a backyard breeder, or unethical ones, will borders?" If the mom gets into complication, and it requires a treatment cost a bomb, or at least cost more than what the breeder value the mother dog, do you think he will go for it? OR leave it to death? And averagely speaking, how many GR breeders on the market now, that you think, will stop breeding their GRs if their GRs have Hips problem, or they might not even border to find out?

And will the story change, will the scenario be different, if you are the breeder?

That's why, it really depends on what you want, when comes to breeding. 
I prefer females than males, becoz, females on heat 1 year twice, males do marking 1 day maybe 20 times.
I can't decide for you, but I have to say, I am confidence that if you are going into breeding, people will have a better choice of breeder if they were to look for a westie. You tell me, how many westie breeder out there that you think will care more for their westie than you? If you can count it, then you know what I mean.

YES, I understand that my discussion is MORE on breedings, but one couldnt deny that "neutering/spaying" is always argued alongside with "breedings". They are buddies! Dont seperate them PLEASE. Thread starter kindly amend the topic to, "neutering, spaying & breeding?" or anything alike? Then this thread will be even lo0Onger and MORE fun for Pennywise!
*
Hi Whitepalace,

Thanks for your feedback! I am glad you enjoy reading this thread. smile.gif

I have some feedback to your comments but I am kind of busy today and will post it later. About the tittle of the thread, currently that's my poll question and I am still thinking how to change it to include breeding issue too rclxub.gif If anyone has idea let me know and i will gladly change it later. Meanwhile, do feel free to post your comments and opinion. I notice that a number of people answered yes to the poll but at the moment only Pennywise is putting his opinion out to share (even though he accidentally click on the no tongue.gif ).

Pennywise
post Jan 17 2008, 03:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
My God, look at the scroll bar for this window. Because we wrote so much, now the page looks so long!!

Anyway, Yang, I admit I dont know any good Westie breeder out there. However, I think Junnie87 is one? I've seen her sell Westie a couple of times now.
Mr. Z
post Jan 17 2008, 05:52 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
601 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Boleh LannD~!


QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 15 2008, 11:04 AM)
Like said, if you neutered the male dog from young when he doesn't know what a female on heat means, it wouldn't be torturing. Unless it neutering a male dog who is experienced sex before.

It's like a 3 years old kid who doesn't know what sex is all about (provided he is not exposed to those information). Neutering males would like stop all these and make him forever as innocent as a 3 year old kid wink.gif
well.. for the least I placed my vote as No Comment as I feel there's both side of the story.

But neutering and spraying is not as cruel as debarking and declawing  nod.gif
*
Thats what i m trying to say. If u think it is cruel to neuter, its even crueler to not let the dog have sex even though they want to. Male dog will be a nuisance and go frustrated when a female is on heat nearby. So i think its best to neuter it if you can.

Pennywise, i dont have time to read all your replies, but from what i see, you are putting everything on god's will. I think that is very wrong. Time is different now and then. You have the power to prevent something from happening. If you have done everything you could to prevent something, and it still happens, then you can say it is god's will. If you had not done anything, please put the blame on yourself for lending a hand in making that thing happen.

Its as though a student who had not studied and fail saying that it is god's will that he fail today and suffer. I understand all of us have emotions and some really cant bear to neuter our pets. But i believe that is your ego saying. If you dun intend on breeding your pets, then just neuter them. Everything will still be functional except for reproductions. If you debark your dog, thats a different story, that i would say weigh a different sin on them.

This post has been edited by Mr. Z: Jan 17 2008, 05:57 PM
Pennywise
post Jan 17 2008, 10:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Mr. Z @ Jan 17 2008, 05:52 PM)
Thats what i m trying to say. If u think it is cruel to neuter, its even crueler to not let the dog have sex even though they want to. Male dog will be a nuisance and go frustrated when a female is on heat nearby. So i think its best to neuter it if you can.

Pennywise, i dont have time to read all your replies, but from what i see, you are putting everything on god's will. I think that is very wrong. Time is different now and then. You have the power to prevent something from happening. If you have done everything you could to prevent something, and it still happens, then you can say it is god's will. If you had not done anything, please put the blame on yourself for lending a hand in making that thing happen.

Its as though a student who had not studied and fail saying that it is god's will that he fail today and suffer. I understand all of us have emotions and some really cant bear to neuter our pets. But i believe that is your ego saying. If you dun intend on breeding your pets, then just neuter them. Everything will still be functional except for reproductions. If you debark your dog, thats a different story, that i would say weigh a different sin on them.
*
Hahaha... I cant help it if that's the impression I gave out but indeed I was trying to escape in that direction. However, dont take my post seriously. I got tons of replies from others on how we play a part and if we dont do them, the blood is also in our hands. Hahaha... Just some point of argument with the rest, for fun. You should read them, it's nice to watch us bicker once in a while!
TSwon
post Jan 18 2008, 10:24 AM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(White Palace @ Jan 16 2008, 08:55 PM)
But of corse, i know you are not pointing it to me, but just to point out that, not ALL breeders are bad. There are good ones, and it is really hard to be a good one. 

This one I agreed. nod.gif

QUOTE
Same in dog breeding. Too many unethical breeder and we can't stop them as long as there are buyers with mentality that price come first, ethicality later. And the fact that there are many, else how on earth these backyard breeders able to raise hundreds on dogs and still surviving?

My point is, we can't stop the unethical breeder and i dont believe people's mentality will change in my life time.

Probably the people mentality wouldn't change in a lifetime, but we should still try and educate as many as possible. Sometimes, people are ignorant because they lack the knowledge and information. Hopefully, when more are aware of the issue, it would help to change the mentality a little. smile.gif

QUOTE
Hence, instead of discourage breeding, which means even people who cares will have no choice but to buy from these unethical breeders; i strongly believe in encourage responsible breedings. I personally thought that, If I find a person who is a sincere dog lover, who value a dog's life like his own, and one day if he appears and says "I intend to breed my dog", I believe most of the forumers will against the idea, and few will react kind of agressively, without even try to discuss more about responsible breeding. But if this person comes to me, and I realised that he is a much better candidate compared to those backyard breeders, I would say go ahead and I will guide you through it!

I dare to say that, I do agree with the request of some of my maltese buyers to breed their maltese, provided I known them for long, chat with them many many times, and they gain my trust & respect on ways they are treating their maltese.
To breed or not to breed, it really depends on what is your objective and goals.

Some breeders breed and strive for perfection. Some hoping to get the offsprings. Some don't give a damn about the quality, but they do it ethically. No matter what is your objective, the important part is, do it responsibly.

Like what you mentioned, this is not an easy task. There are risks involving the mother, their offsprings might inherits some genetic problems. Now, I see a person who is concern before deciding on breeding. If you dont mind, I would ask " Do you think that, a backyard breeder, or unethical ones, will borders?" If the mom gets into complication, and it requires a treatment cost a bomb, or at least cost more than what the breeder value the mother dog, do you think he will go for it? OR leave it to death? And averagely speaking, how many GR breeders on the market now, that you think, will stop breeding their GRs if their GRs have Hips problem, or they might not even border to find out?
*
I am not against breeding dog. It is good that a person does research and approach experienced breeder to learn more before breeding their dogs.

However, i disagree a bit on the bold part above.
There are a lot of reason people breed:
- I want to make $$!
- I want another dog just like mine
- Every female dog should have a litter
- My dog is registered and it would be a waste not to breed it
- my kids should see the wonder of birth and life dry.gif
- I want to improve the breed

A lot of breeder (not all) now fall into the first one unfortunately.
IMO, a person should only breed when he/she feels that he/she is improving the breed of the dog, not just to get the offsprings. The person should also not breed the dog especially he/she knows that the dog has hereditary problems. Proper research must be done before any breeding.

What is your defination of breeding responsibly? Let discuss. smile.gif

Yes, unfortunately, lots of the GRs currently has hip problems due to their breeder just want to make $$ and does not care about the quality. The owners who purchased these puppies suffered - those who loves their puppies enough end up spending lots of $$ for medical bills while the unfortunate ones are abandoned when the owner found out about the problem.

QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 17 2008, 03:31 PM)
My God, look at the scroll bar for this window. Because we wrote so much, now the page looks so long!!

Anyway, Yang, I admit I dont know any good Westie breeder out there. However, I think Junnie87 is one? I've seen her sell Westie a couple of times now.
*
Erm, I thought Junnie87 is a dog agent? unsure.gif
Pennywise
post Jan 18 2008, 11:45 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(won @ Jan 18 2008, 10:24 AM)
Erm, I thought Junnie87 is a dog agent?  unsure.gif
*
Whatever she is, I just know she has Westies for sale and I also believe she is very ethical with her work.

zeist
post Jan 18 2008, 02:45 PM

Mivec 1800cc
********
All Stars
15,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Heights



No wonder the other day I went to this pet shop, the cardboard stated there Maltese selling at RM1.8K but 100% looked like Westie sial. ohmy.gif
Pennywise
post Jan 18 2008, 02:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(zeist @ Jan 18 2008, 02:45 PM)
No wonder the other day I went to this pet shop, the cardboard stated there Maltese selling at RM1.8K but 100% looked like Westie sial.  ohmy.gif
*
Which pet shop are you talking about, zeist? She had I think 4 puppies for sale last month or so.
zeist
post Jan 18 2008, 03:35 PM

Mivec 1800cc
********
All Stars
15,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Heights



QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 18 2008, 02:59 PM)
Which pet shop are you talking about, zeist? She had I think 4 puppies for sale last month or so.
*
Pet Family, Bukit Tinggi. There the staff are all hopeless fellas, all curi tulang chit chatting.
Pennywise
post Jan 18 2008, 11:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Did she sell them to PEt Family? There's one malay or sabahan guy in PEt Family, Bkt Tinggi who is OK and quite helpful. Very nice guy. WHen I bought dog food, he even helped me carry to the car despite the fact that I'm much bigger than he is.
White Palace
post Jan 20 2008, 03:05 AM

Angel - Top Maltese 2006 @ Best Malaysian Bred In Show
*******
Senior Member
2,309 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(won @ Jan 18 2008, 10:24 AM)
What is your defination of breeding responsibly? Let discuss.  smile.gif

*
Of corse, if we were to make it as perfect as what AKC or MKA says, then we MUST only breed to improve the standard, that should be the only aim.

But thing is, by picking the best male and mate with the best female, it doesnt mean that the best offspring will magically appear. Angel had achieve good results in dog show, but both of her parents are non show dog.

My point is, though we should strive to improve the breed standard, but we can't deny that only very few out of many will stand out as show quality, most will be pet quality. And if we were to depend on these limited amount of show quality pairs to breed, then most of the people still will have to get their puppies from millers.

Beside the purpose of breeding mentioned above, which is improving the standard, there is another purpose of breeding I am willing to accept or even encourage. Particularly for our very own country. As we know, most of the puppies bred at our country are from millers. We are not at a stage to even talk about improving the standard of breeding as most millers are not even providing the very basic need for their breeding programmes. Dogs are caged up 24 hours a day, stay away from human, no love, living in a filthy, unhealthy environment, just to name a few.

I would say that, though the long term goal should be breeding to improve the standard, but the very next step we should do first is, to REPLACE these unethical breeders. I would say if there is a dog owner, who cares for the dog a lot, who always provide the best for the dog, allow the dog freedom and provide the dog with a healthy environment. If he / she intends to breed, although their pets are not of show quality, I would say, WHY NOT?

At the very least, they are much more responsible compared to those unethical breeders. Then, only then, when we see most of the breeders are ethical enough, i only dare say that we should try to influence them to strive to improve the quality.

Replacing unethical breeders as the purpose of breeding might not be "perfectly responsible" but to me it is "acceptable" due to the seriousness of massive supply of puppies from unethical breeders in Malaysia. Getting a non show quality dog from a dog lover who breeds his/her dog will be much better from getting a show quality dog from a miller, isn't it? Don't be surprised, how some of the breeders who breeds to improve the quality are equally cruel as unethical millers.

This post has been edited by White Palace: Jan 20 2008, 03:11 AM
wish-bone
post Jan 20 2008, 12:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


just imagine our parent spay us so we wont go out straying or flirting and risk of getting aids.
cruel ? or not ??
xecton
post Jan 20 2008, 02:31 PM

The Reverend
*****
Senior Member
734 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Penang


QUOTE(wish-bone @ Jan 20 2008, 12:16 PM)
just imagine our parent spay us so we wont go out straying or flirting and risk of getting aids.
cruel ? or not ??
*
You are equating a human and a dog, two distinct beings with very very different mental capacities.

Perhaps we should think of it this way, that it is a bit on the cruel side to neuter/spay your pets but it is a necessery evil that we do so that our society can function smoothly (stray animals are always a hazard to us, road accidents, diseases, etc).

By neutaring/spaying them, we also remove from them a few potential health hazards and also the mating urge that most of us will not let them engaged to.

It is childish to not acknowledge all these issues that affect both us and our pets while standing on a misguided moral high ground.

Because ultimately, we know that all these breeds of pets that we have are actually animal monstrosities that we human selectively breed out.
They are not natural, and because of our tempering, they are now susceptible to various health problems that is specific to their breeds.

If neutering/spaying is cruel and we should not do it, then we should not have all these different breeds of a same animals in the first place. Let them breed amongst themselves without our interference.
Heck, we should not keep pets at home at all. We should let them run wild and true to their nature.
ristikol
post Jan 20 2008, 02:43 PM

\~*Grand Belial's Key*~/
******
Senior Member
1,049 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: from cradle to enslave and hell



no comment tongue.gif
wish-bone
post Jan 20 2008, 02:52 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


wahh... i just say try to imagine... sigh... ppl around are just so grumpy nowadays

any how if wanan spay just go ahead
just dun forget to go bayar zakat for them then.

Pennywise
post Jan 20 2008, 11:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Just want to check with you guys how many of you have renewed the dog license from your town council?

I see 2008 got new ruling. The MPK (I'm from Klang), wants these items are License Application Requirement:
1. Photocopy of owner's I.C.
2. Photo of dog(s)
3. Photo of house external (how big is your house determine how many dogs you can keep.)
4. Photocopy of vaccination card
5. Application form.

I was told that if your house is bigger that 3,000 square feet only you're allowed to keep more than one dog, else one is the max.

While we were at it at the vet clinic today, I heard some other stories as well. Scary stories.

There are basically two parties catching dogs these days. First one is the local council. Once they catches your dog, they will put it in the dogpound and you can retrieve it back within 24hrs. The second one is Indonesians who catches your dog to sell for a high-price or kill it IMMEDIATELY and claim the bounty from our local council.

Then one lady who was there with us said that the week before Christmas, she went to a restaurant to eat. She saw a girl walking a Yorkshire / Silky Terrier and an Indonesian came up to her, saw her dog without MPK tag and took it away immediately. There was a squabble and argument but it ended with the Indonesian taking the dog and the young girl was helpless. They WOULD take immediately, dont give a damn because they know there's high price for that dog.

So without a master and leash on our dogs, when we bring them out, they can be subjected to being taken away from us on the spot, is it? What's the ruling about these? Anyone who knows more, can clarify and educate us on this system?

Appreciate if anyone can share.
krynzpeaches
post Jan 21 2008, 09:55 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(wish-bone @ Jan 20 2008, 12:16 PM)
just imagine our parent spay us so we wont go out straying or flirting and risk of getting aids.
cruel ? or not ??
*


We have clearly discussed about how you should not equate humans and pets as well as putting human emotions in pets in the prev-prev pages...

Have you not read them before posting up your comments?

Plus spaying humans will not prevent humans from going out to flirt or get Aids...

Geeeee doh.gif

KP

TSwon
post Jan 21 2008, 12:03 PM

shushu & kero
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
QUOTE(wish-bone @ Jan 20 2008, 12:16 PM)
just imagine our parent spay us so we wont go out straying or flirting and risk of getting aids.
cruel ? or not ??
*
QUOTE(krynzpeaches @ Jan 21 2008, 09:55 AM)
We have clearly discussed about how you should not equate humans and pets as well as putting human emotions in pets in the prev-prev pages...

Have you not read them before posting up your comments?

Plus spaying humans will not prevent humans from going out to flirt or get Aids...

Geeeee doh.gif

KP
*
I guess a lot of the pet owners equate human and pets as one of the reason of spaying / neutering is cruel.
Human and pets are different. Human can use rational and exercise control while for pet it is just part of their natural instinct. We have been repeating this over and over again but it doesn't seem to get the message accross that well. sad.gif

Many has seen this video posted by Nairud in guidelines for owning a pet thread but I think it would be appropriate to post it here again to get the message accross. Perhaps seeing it visually might be better than all the text that has been typed. doh.gif

QUOTE(nairud @ Aug 9 2007, 03:44 PM)
This would be the best way to get the message across to all pet owners

*
krynzpeaches
post Jan 21 2008, 12:32 PM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


Hey, that remind me of another video ad I saw...

Lemme dig it out and see if I can link it here too...

I think that one work way better...

smile.gif
KP
Jamien
post Jan 23 2008, 01:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,647 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


I think spaying or neutering is not cruel, it's actually being kind. Some thing like a blessing in disguise. yes, your pets may lose its ability to reproduce, but it will lengthen the time you can have your pet by your side. plus it will be healthier with less health and temperament problems. So why not?

The reason why we have pets is we enjoy keeping and having their company, having them with us. We don't need to breed them. And our streets are overun with stray cats and dogs. Already too many... Why contribute more to the overpopulation problem? We don' need more pure breed dogs. Mongrels or local breeds are fine too, so why not adopt a stray rather than breeding your pure breed? Adopting a stray would lessen the stray population and prevent overpopulation of breeding if you neuter. two birds with one stone.

Pets are our companions, not our birthing machines.So neuter and spaying is good.
White Palace
post Jan 23 2008, 07:13 PM

Angel - Top Maltese 2006 @ Best Malaysian Bred In Show
*******
Senior Member
2,309 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur



No doubt, adopting a stray is very nobel and should be encouraged. But sadly, there are too many, too too many dog owners out there that pick up a cute stray puppy, and when the puppy grown up so no longer cute, or the size or the temperament are not what they look for, they just dump it back to the street since they do not pay for it. This really makes stray population a never ends cycle.

I am at a position that mixed breed and purebreeds are equally lovable and yes, we might not NEED a purebreed, but it is good to have purebreeds around, isnt it? Certain people who look for a guard dog, at least they know getting a doberman will be a good choice. Those who wants a companion who stays indoor, perhaps a poodle will be a good choice.

Responsible ownership and responsible breeding is the upmost important factor if we were to talk about reducing stray population. It has nothing to do with purebreed or non purebreed. As long as the owner is irresponsible, what dog goes to it hands, he/she will just dump it to street when they face problems. Chance are higher if they do not pay for it, like what can we see around our neighbourhood. Sadly, lots of people who thought that their mongrels are not gonna get caught / stolen, they just let them roam free. Then, they mate, they deliver, then takes no responsibility to rehome the puppies, then here it goes, more strays!

Of corse, there are owners who adopted strays and view them as their precious kids, thing is, sadly, most of the people are not like that, else there wont be strays already.

If we can't educate and change people's perception, then even if we ban purebreed breedings, the stray population still wont reduce. Unless we totally ban pet ownership then, which is not we want to see. So i guess, people should really change their perception and start educating each others, purebreeds or non purebreeds really not that relevant. Humans are the culprit.

This post has been edited by White Palace: Jan 23 2008, 07:24 PM
chibi_tenko
post Jan 23 2008, 08:20 PM

I see. I pinch. I squeeze
******
Senior Member
1,250 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Tropicalu Janguru


QUOTE(White Palace @ Jan 23 2008, 07:13 PM)
No doubt, adopting a stray is very nobel and should be encouraged. But sadly, there are too many, too too many dog owners out there that pick up a cute stray puppy, and when the puppy grown up so no longer cute, or the size or the temperament are not what they look for, they just dump it back to the street since they do not pay for it. This really makes stray population a never ends cycle.

I am at a position that mixed breed and purebreeds are equally lovable and yes, we might not NEED a purebreed, but it is good to have purebreeds around, isnt it? Certain people who look for a guard dog, at least they know getting a doberman will be a good choice. Those who wants a companion who stays indoor, perhaps a poodle will be a good choice.

Responsible ownership and responsible breeding is the upmost important factor if we were to talk about reducing stray population. It has nothing to do with purebreed or non purebreed. As long as the owner is irresponsible, what dog goes to it hands, he/she will just dump it to street when they face problems. Chance are higher if they do not pay for it, like what can we see around our neighbourhood. Sadly, lots of people who thought that their mongrels are not gonna get caught / stolen, they just let them roam free. Then, they mate, they deliver, then takes no responsibility to rehome the puppies, then here it goes, more strays!

Of corse, there are owners who adopted strays and view them as their precious kids, thing is, sadly, most of the people are not like that, else there wont be strays already.

If we can't educate and change people's perception, then even if we ban purebreed breedings, the stray population still wont reduce. Unless we totally ban pet ownership then, which is not we want to see. So i guess, people should really change their perception and start educating each others, purebreeds or non purebreeds really not that relevant. Humans are the culprit.
*
Agreed.

What I cannot tolerate are people like the lazogirlz who suddenly decided to get rid of her puppies by trading for a male dog so she can breed her dogs. It is irresponsible people like her who simply breeds her dogs so 'I can either sell or give to frens'. These type of never never and don't give a damn about the welfare of their dogs and their litters. doh.gif Somemore have the cheek to defend and justify what she did. Sheesh.

OT : Yang hor, how's Maya lui? wub.gif
Jamien
post Jan 23 2008, 11:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,647 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


I don't mean we don't NEED purebreeds lar. Just that we shouldn't put emphasis on JUST purebreed dogs. The life of a stray mixed local breed dog is no less than a purebreed's ma. They are equal. That's what I'm trying to say. I heard of cases where people throw out their adopted stray dogs because their purebreed dogs are giving birth or buying another purebreed dog. Very saddenning...

One must be responsible for what he/she breeds soo there are less strays la. Animals deserve our love, no matter what their breed or species are.

We aim for more understanding and responsible owners, not less owners, so banning is not the way lor.
Mr. Z
post Jan 24 2008, 01:05 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
601 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Boleh LannD~!


QUOTE(White Palace @ Jan 23 2008, 07:13 PM)
No doubt, adopting a stray is very nobel and should be encouraged. But sadly, there are too many, too too many dog owners out there that pick up a cute stray puppy, and when the puppy grown up so no longer cute, or the size or the temperament are not what they look for, they just dump it back to the street since they do not pay for it. This really makes stray population a never ends cycle.

I am at a position that mixed breed and purebreeds are equally lovable and yes, we might not NEED a purebreed, but it is good to have purebreeds around, isnt it? Certain people who look for a guard dog, at least they know getting a doberman will be a good choice. Those who wants a companion who stays indoor, perhaps a poodle will be a good choice.

Responsible ownership and responsible breeding is the upmost important factor if we were to talk about reducing stray population. It has nothing to do with purebreed or non purebreed. As long as the owner is irresponsible, what dog goes to it hands, he/she will just dump it to street when they face problems. Chance are higher if they do not pay for it, like what can we see around our neighbourhood. Sadly, lots of people who thought that their mongrels are not gonna get caught / stolen, they just let them roam free. Then, they mate, they deliver, then takes no responsibility to rehome the puppies, then here it goes, more strays!

Of corse, there are owners who adopted strays and view them as their precious kids, thing is, sadly, most of the people are not like that, else there wont be strays already.

If we can't educate and change people's perception, then even if we ban purebreed breedings, the stray population still wont reduce. Unless we totally ban pet ownership then, which is not we want to see. So i guess, people should really change their perception and start educating each others, purebreeds or non purebreeds really not that relevant. Humans are the culprit.
*
agreed nod.gif
I think the main emphasis here is to educate the pet's owner here, and with proper encouragement, i think we can reduce strays in the long run.
I felt that this is the main issue which is still not paid much attention to in our country. I think that seminars or promotion should be held in conjunction with dogs or cats show to promote awareness among owners who are still at the dark concerning importance of spaying and neutering.


White Palace
post Jan 24 2008, 01:09 AM

Angel - Top Maltese 2006 @ Best Malaysian Bred In Show
*******
Senior Member
2,309 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Kepong, Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(chibi_tenko @ Jan 23 2008, 08:20 PM)
Agreed.

What I cannot tolerate are people like the lazogirlz who suddenly decided to get rid of her puppies by trading for a male dog so she can breed her dogs. It is irresponsible people like her who simply breeds her dogs so 'I can either sell or give to frens'. These type of never never and don't give a damn about the welfare of their dogs and their litters.  doh.gif Somemore have the cheek to defend and justify what she did. Sheesh.

OT : Yang hor, how's Maya lui?  wub.gif
*
Maya, now big girl already lor, super manja one!

About that gal... I think, i'm really speechless liao.

After say she must give up her mix breed coz no space for a cage, yet want to replace it with a male shih tzu so she can breed. Now, want to get a monkey somemore.
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/592567

QUOTE(Jamien @ Jan 23 2008, 11:17 PM)
I don't mean we don't NEED purebreeds lar. Just that we shouldn't put emphasis on JUST purebreed dogs. The life of a stray mixed local breed dog is no less than a purebreed's ma. They are equal. That's what I'm trying to say. I heard of cases where people throw out their adopted stray dogs because their purebreed dogs are giving birth or buying another purebreed dog. Very saddenning...

One must be responsible for what he/she breeds soo there are less strays la. Animals deserve our love, no matter what their breed or species are. 

We aim for more understanding and responsible owners, not less owners, so banning is not the way lor.
*
I guess you mistaken my meaning, i'm not trying to say you mean that, i'm sure you view purebreeds and non purebreeds equally, so do I.

But if a owner throw out a stray to bring in a purebreed, then that's what i'm trying to tell, that's 101% owner's fault. Nothing to do with purebreed or not. This type of people, should be educated, but if they refuse to accept that dogs life should be respected, they aren'y qualified to own a dog at all. I dont see why we should have one more such dog owner.

I totally agree with you, we should be responsible if we were to breed and it is equally responsible if we were to own.

If we were to talk about stray issue, then most are mix breeds as if a purebreed run lose, probably people will grab it already. Especially many irresponsible owners who pick up puppy on the street, they want a male one coz they thought it wont get pregnant so can let it run lose, but ends up? Their males mated with other females. Equally guilty. They do not get a dog from a breeder, and these people are the major contributor of strays.

But if we were to talk about breeding itself, then of corse, even if we are breeding purebreeds, we have to be responsible and respect animal's life.


Added on January 24, 2008, 1:12 am
QUOTE(Mr. Z @ Jan 24 2008, 01:05 AM)
agreed  nod.gif
I think the main emphasis here is to educate the pet's owner here, and with proper encouragement, i think we can reduce strays in the long run.
I felt that this is the main issue which is still not paid much attention to in our country. I think that seminars or promotion should be held in conjunction with dogs or cats show to promote awareness among owners who are still at the dark concerning importance of spaying and neutering.
*
Very true. As we can see many forumers who enter here intially, dont really have complete knowledge, and luckily, most willing to share and accept other's kind advices. But few, despites many encourages, advices, even harsh words, they just refuce to even filter other's words properly. That's saddening, but i'm glad that most of the forumers here, or should i say pet lovers here, are so much more open minded and willing to share with open mind.

This post has been edited by White Palace: Jan 24 2008, 01:54 AM
krynzpeaches
post Jan 24 2008, 10:27 AM

* k * a * P * i * s * h * ? *
*******
Senior Member
2,047 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Ampang, UK Side ;)


QUOTE(White Palace @ Jan 24 2008, 01:09 AM)
After say she must give up her mix breed coz no space for a cage, yet want to replace it with a male shih tzu so she can breed. Now, want to get a monkey somemore.
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/592567
*


OMG! shocking.gif shocking.gif shocking.gif

I thot I was the only one baffled by this...

I have been refraining myself to give her a piece of my mind cuz I know nothing good will come out of my mouth, so I just keep quiet...

But I just can't believe my eyes too! shakehead.gif

doh.gif
KP

zeist
post Jan 24 2008, 01:46 PM

Mivec 1800cc
********
All Stars
15,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Heights



QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 18 2008, 11:24 PM)
Did she sell them to PEt Family? There's one malay or sabahan guy in PEt Family, Bkt Tinggi who is OK and quite helpful. Very nice guy. WHen I bought dog food, he even helped me carry to the car despite the fact that I'm much bigger than he is.
*
Dude, which pet shop or vet provide good services in Klang area? Wanna look for a place to bring my pup for jabs and deworm. rolleyes.gif

So far I know one in Taman Chi Liung, own by an indian boss, is a certified Doctor (20 years experience). And another is Pet Family, but I need to think twice when I plan to bring my pup for jabs there. The rest I have no clue.
Pennywise
post Jan 24 2008, 10:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(zeist @ Jan 24 2008, 01:46 PM)
Dude, which pet shop or vet provide good services in Klang area? Wanna look for a place to bring my pup for jabs and deworm.  rolleyes.gif

So far I know one in Taman Chi Liung, own by an indian boss, is a certified Doctor (20 years experience). And another is Pet Family, but I need to think twice when I plan to bring my pup for jabs there. The rest I have no clue.
*
zeist, you from Klang meh? I live near Tmn Chi Liung wor but not aware if got vet here. There is Dr Thomas vet at Tmn Gembira, old clinic and many years experience vet. My cousin's dog goes there. I go to Dr. Lian at Jln Meru, opposite the main wet market. ihawk98 also bring his Westies there for jabs and deworm. However he had one bad experience there so dont know if he will go again. For me, I'm ok with Dr LIan.
zeist
post Jan 25 2008, 08:45 AM

Mivec 1800cc
********
All Stars
15,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Heights



QUOTE(Pennywise @ Jan 24 2008, 10:24 PM)
zeist, you from Klang meh? I live near Tmn Chi Liung wor but not aware if got vet here. There is Dr Thomas vet at Tmn Gembira, old clinic and many years experience vet. My cousin's dog goes there. I go to Dr. Lian at Jln Meru, opposite the main wet market. ihawk98 also bring his Westies there for jabs and deworm. However he had one bad experience there so dont know if he will go again. For me, I'm ok with Dr LIan.
*
Wah Lau Eh, pah sang lang lare. You live near Taman Chi Liung ah? My old house is in Taman Chi Liung. laugh.gif tongue.gif Now staying in Bukit Tinggi 2. smile.gif

Which part of Happy Garden? Near...?

The one in Chi Liung is quite convenient for me, the boss lives at the same row of houses as me last time (my old house is still there, can't sell then rent). I always see him walking to his shop, close distance only. His shop is located at just opposite of Public Bank, you should be able to find a vet there.

The indian boss is a friendly person.

Weh, when my Silky is big enough, let my Silky play with your Westie ok. rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by zeist: Jan 25 2008, 08:48 AM
Pennywise
post Jan 25 2008, 02:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,796 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(zeist @ Jan 25 2008, 08:45 AM)
Wah Lau Eh, pah sang lang lare. You live near Taman Chi Liung ah? My old house is in Taman Chi Liung.  laugh.gif  tongue.gif  Now staying in Bukit Tinggi 2.  smile.gif

Which part of Happy Garden? Near...?

The one in Chi Liung is quite convenient for me, the boss lives at the same row of houses as me last time (my old house is still there, can't sell then rent). I always see him walking to his shop, close distance only. His shop is located at just opposite of Public Bank, you should be able to find a vet there.

The indian boss is a friendly person.

Weh, when my Silky is big enough, let my Silky play with your Westie ok.  rolleyes.gif
*
Oh I see... I didnt know you're from Klang. Not aware Chi Liung got vet also. Tmn Gembira... If from Teluk Pulai, you know the shortcut to Tmn Gembira, you will pass by only 1 row of shop, Dr. Thomas is there.

Silky? Play together? Why not? Usually I will walk around the Chi Liung padang with my Westies in the evening.
Amanda85
post Jan 26 2008, 01:29 AM

Scuderia Ferrari
*******
Senior Member
2,232 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Petaling Jaya


i choose to spay my dog, because i had bad experience of male dogs lining up my front gate whenever my female is on heat....n that's situation is unbearable...
Miko_Chan
post Jan 26 2008, 02:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
221 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


If its me... I'd rather neuter them even though it might be abit cruel rather than risking their health and they might get uterus problems later and they can live longer with me... biggrin.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0977sec    0.45    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 10:30 PM