QUOTE(hamster9 @ Jan 16 2008, 01:04 AM)
beranak pon shedding of blood gak
nasib la that dog?

haih..tak sakit hati ke?

dah tak sayang ke?
sin and God? Which part of the Bible/ Quran/ buddhist sutra/ hinduism sez so?

Hello... where can compare like that? It's different la weiii... You give birth and you get shot in Afghanistan is different. So its also different than being cut.
I think saying nasib la is too cruel la. Sayang sure got la but then you already cannot take care of it and give it up. What you dont see, wont hurt you. Dont bring yourself to go see also. See more, pain more. The very fact that it's no longer in my arms kills me, not to mention whatever the new owner does to it.
Of course, Bible / Quran / Kamasutra dont say that but the line to determine good and bad is always there wan ma. I just feel cutting furkid up is in the bad side. Not backside ah!
QUOTE(won @ Jan 16 2008, 01:26 AM)
Well, I hope if your furkids is lost, it is not found by me then .......jk
I would say spaying / neutering is advisable if the founder really cannot locate the owner (after a lapse of time and effort spend) and he/she cannot keep the dog and have no choice but to put it out for adoption. At that point of time, I think the probability of ever finding the owner is slim and by not spaying / neutering it, it would just expose the lost dog to the risk of misuse. Imaging, once the furkids got into the hand of the puppy miller, do you think you will ever see them again? They might not even see daylight again - being stuck in a dark cramp cage and only be used for breeding.
I respect your stand on senario 1, I do hope if the case really happen, you will thoroughly screen your potential adoptee before handing your westie over to them.
Another point to add:
Some people think that by not handling over their pet MKA cert, it will discourage the people from breeding their furkids, hence there is no need to spay / neuter. Well, that's not the case. If you see the selling thread nowadays, a lot of puppy without MKA cert is sold and they are snapped up like hotcakes. Hence, unscrupulous breeder don't need the cert at all since the puppy can be easily sold without the MKA certs.

They can even market mix breed puppy that are born from simply mixing different breeds together.
Wah liao eh... Sure my furkid wont get lost unless it's stolen. Every time I bring them out, I walk ten minutes, I will check their leash is tight or not, intact or not. I will check where collar hook is properly fixed or not. Paranoia kind of thing... So far, I tried letting them roam my gf's house compound which is EXTREMELY big like 5 badminton court size and they know how to come back to me when I called. I think in public / outside, will be different.
Its not about the time and money la. I purposely lose my dog, you neuter for me. Then I pretend find back and save on the cost of the operation? I also understand your views. There is a man who sold me Moonie, he is a family friend. I went over his house to pick up Moonie which he brought from Seremban (so I dunno what is in Seremban) but this man, I saw his kennel, right next to his house. All sorts of dogs inside that compound which is supposedly TNB land but he fenced it, opened a small gate connecting to his house and has a kennel inside. From outside, cannot be seen wan because of the kind of entangling grass he put on the fence. I lived in the next neighbourhood for ~25 years and I've never knew that it was a kennel - so when you said never seen daylight, I think I can imagine the scenario. But used for breeding - can I say breeding is better than extinction? What if one day no more Westie or GR or Shih Tzu? Hehehehe... Just another point of view.
Wow, good idea huh... Give away the pup without giving the MKA cert. True true, no cert still sell like hotcake but mostly these are not for breeding and selling cause I think most likely they will still be parked as home owner, home pets as without MKA cert, they hold less value (monetary terms) in the mind of those money making zombies. Therefore, I would believe they would not waste so much time mating and breeding them since they have no cert. I believe even though it may not be the case but this step, helps, definitely!
QUOTE(Cimredopyh @ Jan 16 2008, 04:40 AM)
You
lost your pet, so pretty much it found itself living the life of a stray ( a purebreed with a collar and no way of tracing to any owner is a stray ) then by some amazing luck you find it in in the hands of someone who cares enough to spend money to do something they believe was
best for an animal that isnt even theirs, even if you had intended to breed i doubt you would scream and yell to find a much loved pet in the hands of someone like that.
The only person who would scream and yell in such a situation, in my opinion, does not care for that pet as a companion, Thats someone who just cares about breeding
for anyone else the joy of finding them again would eclipse the disapointment of being unable to breed
No matter how i look at it if
you give your pet to someone who is irresponsible or someone who takes advantage of your pets ability to reproduce, the 'blood' is still on your hands.
You knew there was a chance it could happen. You were the one who put them in that situation. You made the choices for your pet that resulted in that situation.
If you had done everything you could and still something bad happens, THEN only you can say that it was fate
Accidents happen, priorities and situations can change.
You cant controll or predict what happens in the hands of the new owner so you should do everything you can to make sure your pet stands the best chance at a happy, healthy rest of his/her life
If you didnt do something but knew maybe you should have, when something bad happens, sorry but you are the guilty one. Too easy to blame everything on God.
Not a flame, just my 2c. If i sound like im hot under the collar its because this was written from the heart.

If its me and I dont believe it's best, I'd still send a flying kick over to the founder. Of course before that, I'd also punch myself in the face for losing it. That is human carelessness that can be avoided if we are more careful.
The blood would still be in my hand... Hmmm... Good point of argument but I've never thought of it. I think I can a..c..c..e..p..t.. that. But I think I will take more blood onto my hands at that time if I see the new owner being irresponsible and it would be the owner's blood! Argghh!!! You're turning me into rampage-mode!!
Dont worry, I didnt take it as flaming. Like I said before, I saje reply for fun only. I want to see what kind of arguments I have to put up with! Haha... This makes the board alive! Just to clarify I am not the type to blame on God or others but I will just let them bear the sin themselves. However, from the way you put it, I think it does affect me as I didnt do my best before the handover.
You sure can put up a good argument, lady. I like you!
QUOTE(chibi_tenko @ Jan 16 2008, 07:43 AM)
Some of you guys argue that spaying/neutering your pets is a human act and that it's not natural.
Breeding your pet and selling of their puppies/kittens/etc <-- Did it cross your mind that the very act of breeding your pet for profit is also a 'human act' rather than letting nature take its course?
Alot of things that we do for our pets are 'not' natural. We groom them, we cut their nails, we bathe them with flowery scented shampoo, feed them with nutritious kibbles - all these are 'not' natural. No?
If sending our pets to be spay/neutered is considered as sin, then we are also potentially committing sin by handing over our pet's pups/kittens to people who might torture/abuse them. It's really easy to blame fate/destiny or God but it's not 'easy' to blame oneself.
One cannot say, "it's their luck/fate/destiny" if the poor pups/kittens ended up with abusive family who chain/cage them 24/7. These can be prevented by NOT breeding your pet (you can opt to not spay/neuter) or let 'accidents' happen, make more effort and check the background of the people who wants to adopt the little darlings and etc etc.
It's unfair to the pups/kittens if we say it's their luck to end up with bad families. I usually don't go to pet shops because it's heart breaking to see puppies looking at you through the pen or cage. This, my friends, is the result of breeding for profit or 'accidents'.
Sure, some of you guys can say that you can't keep so many dogs/cats in the house after your pet gave birth, hence the selling/adoption of the pups/kittens that follow. Alot of first time owners look at these pups/kittens and see them as 'aaaawww so cute!' - alot of them are NOT prepared when their cute fluffy pup/kitten grows into adulthood.
I've seen many posters here that asks for advice when getting their first dog, with requests like : I want a small friendly dog. I want a cute cute dog. Dog that don't shed much, dog that don't bark much, dog that is easy to control, etc etc. What these people don't realise is that each dog is an individual - their temperament differs, and sometimes dogs that are supposed to shed a little might end up shedding alot.
Then those who breed puppies for sale will recommend their pups to them. Taken in by the cuteness, the new owner buys the pup. A year or so later, they find that they can't control the dog and gives it up for adoption or just chuck the dog away in some park. The dog breeds, and puppies are born and the cycle continues.
Personally, I would rather have my pets spayed/neutered than to give their puppies away to strangers. I do not want to worry if the foster family is treating them right or not.
This is just my 2 cents, so flame-throwers, don't flame over here ok? I apologise in advance if I've accidentally stepped on anyone's toes and paws.
Wow weee... Another great point! I guess if you put it that way, it does sound a bit cruel to sell the pups for money. It's like you give birth and your husband sell it for profit. When we think about it, it does seems cruel actually.
I agree that a lot of things we do for them is not natural - such as those you listed but that does not cause them pain and also if we really let NATURE takes it course. I doubt my poor Westie will survive. At most, they'd first be run over by cars as soon as they step out of my house. So, let me put it this way, by not spaying / neutering them I feel that we are giving him that last bit of nature about themselves. Get what I mean?
You have the same argument point as
Cimredopyh. It is partly our fault for not doing enough for them. However, what if we spay and neuter them and then the new owner realize "Awww.. this damn thing dont even have its genitals! What the hell am I keeping and feeding it for when it cant brings me money!" and he / she kills it and cook stew with its meat? If we think of it like that, wouldnt that be more cruel? Or maybe NOT kill it but rather kick it out of the house to survive on its own in the wild wild city? Hahahaha...
Anyway, there wont be much of a flaming here because we are all friendly people, just looking at things from some very different perspectives. Thanks for your feedback!!