Owh my, with stock vcore u got that speed ? IMPRESSIVE =D.

-even 2.2 still like that..highest i try 2.7 only...
-ya both situation..
-that my fren monitor..not hp la...use SONY T2 fren...@@
-but at my memset i use 2T

so how??

bro ciku's F3 is even better than mine
1.296v 32M stable at 3.4GHz

haha...I think cpu-z read low Vcore.. I already set 1.5V at my bios,but cpu-z only show 1.296V. Try to get 3.45Ghz but super pi 32M fail

wooooooo wooooooooo finally i got 770 already....fixing soon

Well,congrats.
Hope you will share the experience.
I am getting after you all satisfied with it.(like TA690G)

woot, another phenom.
Can u try to break 230fsb...lol. I'm really eager to see how many 9500+ can actually break that.

I think the guy u are referring to is going to sell out his phenom.I saw his thread WTS.

B2...em..no bug ka?

---

Added on January 15, 2008, 10:53 pmi`m not lying to you

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=297837


This post has been edited by User_Xp: Jan 15 2008, 10:54 PM

New upload for a newbie here, finally found the stable clock here after so many tries ..core voltage at 1.35V..using stock cooler..any suggestion?


Attached thumbnail(s)

1.3++v with stock cooler??
Dude, i think u need to get a good cooler 1st.

Well,nice speed @ 2.8Ghz.


This post has been edited by ocz: Jan 16 2008, 12:11 AM

Thank you Bro, actually i am saving money for a better cooler ..lol

Well,i hope some of the sifu's here will quide you more thru in this OCing thingy.
Just keep on track.

About the cooler,better get the xigmatek as is good.

my ex-4000+ @ 2825mhz using stock cooler, but forgot to take SS of ram
my ram is mushkin value @ 403mhz btw~



Attached thumbnail(s)

set ram 2T in bios... memset is just a tool to test the right and good timing for ram in windows.... and it cause system hang as well....
i always do mem tweak in bios... never use memtest also...
find the best cpu best speed u can get 1st....
memory let it as lower as it can support.... and ram vdimm make it 2.2 or 2.3 if u wanna go over 3ghz...
even my ram is running at it speed 667mhz when my cpu achieve 3.4 i still need pump vdimm to 2.3... else system won't boot up... and not stable...

torture cpu ... and cpu will torture your ram... =) that's why crusial is the choice of a lot overclocker here....
we have build in memory controller... and not intel... have memory controller on board...

which if why, if you guys ever notice, Rams on amd will not overclock as well as rams on Intel setup. Also bro, just to let you know, indeed crucial rams are good overclockers, but they are also known to have a short lifespan and a huge number of RMAs.

Which means Crucial cant last long?

well... it depends on how u guys use it as well. As we all know, most of crucial performance rams are packed with D9GMH which is the favourite amongs overclockers. Knowing that, people tend to push them alot therefore resulting in problems.

As we all know, overclocking risk is shortening the lifespan of your hardwares, in this case, the lifespan of the crucials are shortened much faster than the others.

For me i not really agree crucial is short lifespan RAM.Is because the quantity of ppl using crucial is alot and the chanced of RMA is sure become higher.What we shld take account is percentage.Like the failing optical drive disccusion in hardware session.We can see samsung is highest vote because it is the most ppl using.And why other brand is so less ?Doesnt it meant it is a good drive?yet it is not.perhaps yes.It just really rare ppl using it and hard to see ppl sell those brand.

no bro, im comparing based on ratio. Then what do u think of value rams? i believe 70-80% of computers in the world are using them, thats alot dont you think? yet, ive seen more crucial RMAs than value rams.

Well, its just my humble opinion from running a computer shop =) i dont sell crucials because this is what i heard from my contacts.

---

Added on January 16, 2008, 2:30 amAnd also another comparison would be Harddives, just a rough estimation, i sell 3 brands in my shop, WD, Seagate and Hitachi. nearly 60% of my customer buys hitachi because they are cheap and Seagate only takes approx 15% of the pie while WD eats the remaining 25%. But the weird thing is, ive never encouter any RMA with hitachi, while for seagate, there's at least 1-3 pcs a month even with the low sales rate.

This post has been edited by AoiNatsume: Jan 16 2008, 02:31 AM