Ha Ha Ha, examiner cannot conduct any class for his paper but only can give Seminar.

Ya, I agree with u, lecturers only are just guessing what the examiner want. So sometimes the examiner will come out one or two not hot topic in the exam.

But based on their experience, they can tell u the technique to earn each marks from the exam. A good experience and responsibity lecturer will teach u step by step to answer exam question. They will tell u how to answer when see difference type of question.

Based on their experience and seminar from examiner, they will know the favourite topic from examiner. And beside make u understand for each topic, they also will tell u what is the important KEY WORD in answer question.

Nowaday also, the lecturer do a lot work for student. A lot of lecturer do their own study notes for student. With the good study notes, u no need to study text book by hard. Some of the lecturer even develop their own answer for the past year question for student.

So even the lecturer can't help u 100% for the exam, but with all this thing, he/she already help u a lot. And you must remember, a lot of student fail exam not because of lecturer not good, but is because of themself not done so good during the exam.

ACCA is difference from Degree course. If u want to complete it within a short period, my advise is u better go to attend the class. Even with the lecturer, there was no gurantee pass, but without lecturer, you will feel that more difficult to pass.

Actually, we can't said the prof paper is more difficult or more easy. Just for new syllabus, ACCA put more theory into practical. They want the student know more on application than study theory by hard.

I can give u a example also, my friend go to do P6 last sitting. B4 he actually enter for exam, he feel that problem is not much to handle this paper cos he get 48 marks in June 07. And also his lecturer Chow Chee Yan told student P6 cut down a lot of specialise industries, so sholud be easier than old 3.2. That day after he go for exam, he was very disappointed cos the question very practical until he don't know how to advise. But look like the question so hard, I really don't understand how can Chow Chee Yan go to tell student P6 should be easier than old 3.2?

As you can see from the Pilot paper and Dec 07 PYQ, the question was very practical as compare to old syllabus. Even you are very strong in theory, not means that you can do very well in P1 and P3, cos study theory and answer question is difference story. And also for those strong in calculation, not means that they can done well in P2, cos consol part for P2 can be very confuse until they do a lot of mistake in the qusetion.

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 15 2008, 10:09 AM

Which paper? 2.6/F8 or 3.1/P7?

But as I told u b4, 2.6/F8 passing rate very low. A lot of student feel that done well during the exam, but when result out fail!

Hope you can pass in 1 sitting lah!

If FOC, then go lah! But if charge u, better done waste your money.

I went to 3.2 examiner seminar b4, what he try to tell u was how to answer the exam question and some exam technique. But all this thing, Kwai Fatt already told us during his normal class.

The examiner won't tell u the KEY TOPIC cos he need u to study the whole syllabus.

Ya, MCO lecturer good but very expensive. Their tuition fees can't accepatable in KL area. 3 core paper school fees, RM1000++ per subject.

P6 - Chow Chee Yan(RM990) tuition fees more expensive than Choong Kwai Fatt (RM920), but his study material less than Kwai Fatt. Some more Chow Chee Yan won't teach u the whole syllabus for P6.

MCO really makan orang. If I got better choice, I won't go for any paper in MCO.

Actually I'm not sure about Chow Chee Yan teaching method, cos I never attend his class b4. I'm only attend Kwai Fatt class.

I got friend attend both Kwai Fatt and Chow Chee Yan class b4. Based on his comment, he said Kwai Fatt is better on teaching the basic concept, exam technique and some experience in practice. Normally, Kwai Fatt can finish the syllabus on time, but due to too many study material from him, so some student feel that very hard to finish study it.

On the other hand, Chow Chee Yan is teaching more detail than Kwai Fatt for each topic. His explaination was more detail than Kwai Fatt. But you got the risk when attend his class, cos he only teaching the IMPORTANT TOPIC for exam due to the time was limit. He skip a lot of small topic. So it is very riskly, cos 3.2/P6 examiner always like to come out some topic where it is not so hot in the exam.

On summary, Kwai Fatt method was more on Practice + Exam Technique, Chow Chee Yan method was more focus to Exam.

If I'm him/her, then I'll ask back Chow Chee Yan as follow:

Can you paid back now, if I don't want to attend your class anymore?


This Chow Chee Yan already expensive, somemore sombong than Kwai Fatt. He don't have responsibility to student if ask question like that.

But MCO is like that, always look at the money first.

I think P6 student better email to Kwai Fatt, ask him come back to teach IRC for June. Don't give chance to Chow Chee Yan open 2nd class.

Ya lo, but if more student email to him, I think he will be back to teach.

If only 1 student, he will not be back. You should ask any of ur P6 friend email oso. Email is FOC mah!

I got the experience that he said stop teaching for June 2006, but finally a lot of student email to him, then he come back to teach 3.2. Then I pass this paper in that sitting oso.

Congratulation.

You email him lo, kwaifatt@yahoo.com. Ask ur P6 friend email oso, more student, then he will be back!

congras........

look like a lot of student pass P1 - P3, but me............go back home only watch lah!

How, pass all paper with 50?

---

Added on February 18, 2008, 5:05 pmNow still in office, dun want to be sad until can't work.

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 18 2008, 05:05 PM

He still got options papers to go!

I expected to pass P1, but fail.

I expected to fail P3, but pass.

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 18 2008, 10:45 PM

I remember Kwai Fatt told me when new syllabus coming, the 1st and 2nd sitting should be more easier. See so many student pass P1 - P3 today, may be what Kwai Fatt said is correct oso!

Then I think Mr Chow Chee Yan oso paid u a lot lo!

I'm not said Chow Chee Yan not good, but the fees quiet expensive until Makan Orang. RM420, study material less than Kwai Fatt and no tea break. And I know that he only cover the important topic even during normal class.

I dun think broken language is a problem cos exam not test ur language, the most important was understanding.

Last thing, u make a BIG MISKTAKE. Cooly already graduate since 2004. So, how Kwai Fatt paid her?

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 18 2008, 11:52 PM

Can I asking u very simple question:-

1) What is the purpose u go for class? To understand lecturer speaking or listen he/she speak with wonderful language? If u want the wonderful language, u better go to find Mat Salleh lecturer. Their language sure very good.

2) I agree my language was not good as you, but I can communicate to my boss very well. You think your boss interest to listen how good ur language ah? As long as you speak something, make it simple and understand, he will be accept. Or may be you think with wonderful language, your promotion chance will higher mah?

3) Do you know that Kwai Fatt earnings was more than your BIG 4 partner? Do you know that his earning more than your other lecturers oso? But your lecturer and BIG 4 boss language better than him wo!

One more last thing, please dun simply assume "lecturer paid student money for advertising". I can tell u, if Kwai Fatt come back to teach P6, sure his class will full even without Cooly and me to recommend him. His student sure will more than Chow Chee Yan.

Anyway I would like to say sorry to you oso, cos wrongly assume Chow Chee Yan paid u for advertising.

His post already自相矛盾!

He keep on to comment about Kwai Fatt broken language, but how come he will said his favourite lecturer can be Andrew Pang? All the Andrew student oso know how good are Andrew's English (I'm a both Andrew and Kwai Fatt student)! If like that, Andrew as a ACCA lecturer for so many year should go to correct his english lo!

But if Andrew read his post, I think Andrew will very sad.

For me, I will recommend any lecturer if he/she is good even I'm not his/her fans. Even I don't like MCO, but I oso recommend Sheila, Haneef and Chow Kim Tai to student.

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 19 2008, 10:16 AM

May be she think go to work, ACCA + BIG 4 + Wonderful English, then promotion and increment will be higher.

Some more she think Kwai Fatt need this type of advertisment to get student. Ha Ha, very funny! I think may be she already fall love to Chow Chee Yan.

P1 - Philip Woo (KSA), Sheila (Mc Orange)

P2 - Keith Farmer (KSA), Joe Fang (KSA), Haneef (Mc Orange), Ms Menon (Sunway)

P3 - Parmindar (KSA)

P4 - Daniel Ho (FTMS), Andrew Pang (KSA)

---

Added on February 19, 2008, 2:03 pmYa, for same module paper, you can have max 4 paper in any order. You can take P1 and P3 w/o P2.

This post has been edited by carlosandy: Feb 19 2008, 02:03 PM