QUOTE(wU LiaO auditoR @ Jun 24 2008, 12:31 AM)
LOl, dear my fren...
after i read all the thing write bout the P1 lecturer..
may i giv some opinion??
first,dear carlosandy.. wat r u giving yr opinion...
is correct de...
but wat i konw is...
i feel like...
Jackson_Miller also giving his opinion....
why u get mad of he/she??
right??
differ lecturer got their own style...
all depend on the student...
depend on the student whether they accpet the style or the way teach by each lecturer...
right??
from my last experience for P1,
actualy i'm ACCA grad...
P1 is not an audit paper..
is a management paper...
but half of it cover by Corp Govern,tis is normally cover by last time 2.6 or 3.1..
it is correct...
i agree too...
but den got alot part not related to audit..
so wat i'm thinking is...
not audit lecturer onli gd in teaching P1...
can u giv a chance to other lecturer who can prove themself to teach P1?
for eg, chin ann (Kolej bandar) , parmindar (KSA)?
both of them r gud...
i attend their class b4...
i found tat their style quite suit for me...
i'm comfortable wif them...
so i'm thinking they r gud too...
right??
dun angry dude....
Ya, you are right. Difference lecturer got their own style
I also didn't mentioned P1 is audit paper, but just said the lecturer with audit background more suitable for teaching this paper b'cos of CG, Risk Mgmt, Internal Control where it was cover in 2.6 and 3.1 last time. (Remember Chin Ann oso got audit background)
Then, he come out the point said that P1 actually mgmt paper.
I dun said I'm not agree but just part of it disagree by me and said the most famous lecturer are Philip Woo and Sheila where they oso got audit background. At the same time, I said if he FEEL 3.5 LECTURER SUITABLE FOR P1, THEN JUST GO AHEAD and DO NOT WASTE TIME TO ARGUE THIS SMALL THING ANYMORE.
The question was he still want to argue his opinion until today and some more PM me said I'm wrong and said its a student mindset problem in malaysia. That's why I BAN he PM me anymore. At my reply message to him, I said again "IF HE FEEL 3.5 LECTURER SUITABLE FOR P1, THEN JUST GO AHEAD and DO NOT WASTE TIME TO ARGUE THIS SMALL THING ANYMORE."
But the question was he still want to argue. And I said different ppl got different opinion, his opinion right not means other ppl opinion wrong, he can't PAKSA other ppl accept his own opinion. He still not happy and reply with a lot of thing, want me accept his opinion.
Some more ppl ask him recommend lecturer, but he reply and ask ppl go to email to examiner and read his post. My friend, ppl only ask him recommend lecturer but not asking him how to study, why he want to ask ppl waste time to do this thing? (Remember all the class start next week)
At most of my reply, I oso mentioned "IF HE FEEL 3.5 LECTURER SUITABLE FOR P1, THEN JUST GO AHEAD and DO NOT WASTE TIME TO ARGUE THIS SMALL THING ANYMORE."
I'm very boring to due with this type of ppl cos he keep on to point out same question (Mgmt lecturer suitable for P1) and PAKSA ppl accept his view.
EVERY PPL GOT THEIR OWN OPINION, YOU ARE RIGHT BUT NOT MEANS THAT OTHER PPL WILL WRONG. WHY HE KEEP ON TO WANT ME ACCEPT HIS OPINION. I DON'T WANT TO POST WAR WITH HIM, BUT JUST HE POINT OUT TOO MANY RUBBISH THING, for eg said Philip Woo misconduct etc......WASTE PEOPLE TIME.
This post has been edited by carlosandy: Jun 24 2008, 04:46 AM