I used to like Intel graphics for different reason. When i was young, era 2010s, i used to play lot's games on INtel IGP.
Despite being not known for gaming, being just igp and smhow playable fps(that time lepas 30-40fps, 800x600, hoooray la, jnji no lag haha), the graphics still didn't look too terrible.
SO, i do trust their software optimization and support a lot.
If u experienced both sides(igp n Dgpu), should be amazed what that lil igp can do for wat it was.
That's why i didn't like AMD when their software optimization usED to suck, for being gaming oriented.
BUt, this time, personally, i don't like that 190 watt, especially Rm1000 gpu often sold with crappy coolers nowdays, not based on tdp.
Sapphire rx 570(138w), for exmple have way heftier cooler thn rtx 3050(130w, but some don't hv heat pipe, or maybe just 1) released on later years.
190w vs 115w of 4060. That's higher by 60%, though performance difference isn't even close to 60% and present with issues also, lepas beli, it's gamble.
Rmmber, this is a newly released gpu, not like comparing slightly faster old gen 3070(220w) with 4060 ti(170w).
Only slightly cheaper kot.
For budget users, that tdp matters.
Anything close 200, gonna need more than basic ventilation, so, for people using budget level PSU(higher load + more hot air from gpu inside casing), casing(better vents + air flow path) and fans(more, or bigger or louder), spends more, and end up spending same like Rtx 4060, but with more dust maintenance,,
or, be fine with running comparatively higheer temperature.
But we live hot country, and people should have device last as long as they can. Soo,, temperature it is.
Again, if mere 20-w to 40 watt pun ok la. but, 70watts, hmm.
even RTX 4070 is only 200 watt.
Mehh, it's just being over hyped i feel.
Marketing nowdays is to appear like saviour.