QUOTE(hpcp @ Feb 2 2013, 11:03 PM)
Why the inconsistency? Was this done intentionally?
http://bursastocktalk.blogspot.com/2013/02...scheme-why.htmlIn the Country Heights Grower Scheme prospectus dated 8 June 2012, they include the financial statement of the management company, which showed the company has been profitable since 2007 (see page 38 of the prospectus)
However, when it comes to the proposed voluntary termination of the scheme, Gua Musang plantation account, which is less impressive was used instead.
Why the inconsistency? One is to attract investors and the other is for the termination the scheme. But for the same scheme, why different accounts were used? Good if Tan Sri can explain this to the growers.
GOOD JOB, HPCP
After almost sold all his plots and left with just 8 plots and announced want to close shop.
If rich taikoon like him only got 8 plots left, sure got something wrong one.
WOI, Tan SRI LKY...I know you are reading in this forum. WHY IS THE ACCOUNT IS SO MUCH DIFFERENT????? you do COOKing?
Please Speak UP, what is your clear intention when you initially start this "INVEST IN CERTAINTY" or "MONEY DROP FROM THE SKY" scheme. Please explain to all the disgruntled GROWERS ASAP.
Only left a few days more is CNY and we have to postpone "balik kampung" just to attend your closing shop meeting. You got "heart" or not?
Make sure you pay our hard-earned money ASAP and not in 2 years time. Pay with your pocket money 1st and you wait for 2 years, not we the Growers wait for 2 years.