Biostar TA690G came out with a new bios again dated as at 13/10/2007.

http://www.lejabeach.com/Biostar/TA690G/



This post has been edited by beast921: Nov 1 2007, 04:00 PM

thx for sharing, so far try 913 only

To answer your question..Just get the TA690g..its a superb overclock mobo....

560 A2 not a bad choice either. which gc are you planning on using? nvidia goes to 560 A2, ati goes to TA690G. i'm not sure it is related or not, but some of my friends having problem on using ati card on nforce board

p/s: it's been a long time since my last visit this thread, and now v3 already? congrats nice 1st post too

wao! aim agena 9600 , 2.4ghz , wish outperform than Q6600 2.4GHz

how about Phenom X4 score on Crysis demo benchmark? is it true?

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=13854108

because if it is, Phenom X4 is not that good compared to QX i hope AMD can rise again, with some reasonable price too

for those people using X2 4000+(brisbane) i wonder how much vcore did u guys pump to achieve 2.9ghz~3.0ghz?

I hantam 2.65Vdimm to my Micron 800 512Mx2 @1200MHz+ with 40mm fans blowing on top...
tested >48hrs, so far so good...still alive
But for 7/24 dunno how long it can last

My DDR2 with Vdimm >2.4V didn't feel any diff


My 3800+ F3 update :
previously only able to boot up XP and passed PI 32M @ max 3.5GHz,
after some burn-in now it is able to boot from XP@3.55GHz@1.625Vcore and passed PI 32M


I am using WC for both test (no iced water )

Full load Temp@62C, 42C idling Temp.

This post has been edited by ongbs: Nov 2 2007, 05:06 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)

Good result bro........
I will test mine after get 10th......

only recom if got good cooler if set Vcore >1.5V, stock cooler i believe can't boot to XP @3.5G, at 1.6Vcore, temp increase is terrible!

unless your proc is dxxn good that can boot to 3.5G <1.5Vcore

This post has been edited by ongbs: Nov 2 2007, 07:21 AM

Suggestion from CV6149.



Yes. It really got difference. After change to this setting, I feel that the application runs more responsively.
But no difference in Folding

Thanks bro

-pWs-



This post has been edited by -pWs-: Nov 2 2007, 09:58 AM

The news is true.
So i can conclude that the price will be lower than intel

But IIANM, Crysis only utilises dual core. If it utilises quad core, hard to say then as Barcelona/Phenom scale quite well in quad

-pWs-

Last time I pump my 4000+ VCORE +0.75 to get 3.0Ghz. with R69AM828 bios, but for R69AM913 bios even I pump in +0.87, it wont post or load to window. (using CoolerMaster GeminII) with 2 X 12CM Vizo fan.

10th, u will get tomorow.. waiting for bro CV result

bro,

u mean the ram timing?

HT Link.
Last time i always keep under 1000MHz.

-pWs-

but the CPU-Z shown 1200+MHz wor???

Yea...I never make it over 1000MHz.
But I feel pc more responsive after oc over 1000MHz.

Really thanks for CV6149's suggestion.

-pWs-

ic...then i understood liau...
i thought u said keep below 1000HTT better

btw, new F3 update coming soon...tweaking memory now
actually @3.5GHz DDR~1200MHz SPI 32M tested 3 times already today.

now testing 3.56GHz HTT 1424MHz, DDR2~1200MHz SPI 32M .....

This post has been edited by ongbs: Nov 2 2007, 01:49 PM

bro, what's the max pi 1M stable ram speed that you can achieve?
HT link, higher always better...don't stick to 1000, not fun at all

This post has been edited by dblooi: Nov 2 2007, 01:50 PM