QUOTE(BC3232 @ Aug 29 2022, 11:48 AM)
I apologize that I use the wrong wording. Let's be clear this is a Pyramid scheme.
As far as I concern, many of us have proof from many reputable sources, that scams are working in a similar method. This is not enough? Really need to wait until it bursts?
Besides personal reviews / claiming it's legit, what other information that the other side provide?
There are very few posts that involve emotion and cursing others, and I really doubt that they are genuine account.
Every investment has its own risk, but please don't compare an investment with a scam. A scam is a scam, regardless. A scam cannot turn into an investment.
No worries. But was wondering how can a source be claimed "reputable"? As far as I concern, many of us have proof from many reputable sources, that scams are working in a similar method. This is not enough? Really need to wait until it bursts?
Besides personal reviews / claiming it's legit, what other information that the other side provide?
There are very few posts that involve emotion and cursing others, and I really doubt that they are genuine account.
Every investment has its own risk, but please don't compare an investment with a scam. A scam is a scam, regardless. A scam cannot turn into an investment.
Is it that the source is a 3rd party reviewer who reviews the broker in a bias way? (Be it reviewing in good or bad perspective)
Or is it sources such as 'LowYat Forums' where critics make about 70% of the comments most of the time?
Cause TFXI supporters might say there are 'reputable sources' that gave good comments on TFXI. But ofcourse nonetheless will be brushed off by critics saying its a "FAKE Review from FAKE source".
So its really a subjective matter to assume.
I personally have read 200++ (nearly 300) pages of LowYat Forums from the Dr.FX's post and I can see how the comments will always turn out to be.
Aug 29 2022, 11:31 PM

Quote





0.0206sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled