QUOTE(ianho @ Sep 26 2007, 02:34 AM)
There's nothing wrong with Forsa. They are all reference boards after all. I've been using a Forsa since the 8800GTX 1st appeared last year until now. It can OC like hell too.
ok dude..
i am going to compile a test
3dmark06 extended test
but this is the requirement
cpu must be c2d running at 333x9
ram at 667 CL5 2T
mobo only 975x/P965/P35/650/680 ( reason their 16x performance around the same)
OS: Windows Xp
and posting should have an ati tool articFact scan running for atleast 15 mins.
there should be two post. one stock , one driver/bios flash overclock...
y am i doing this... cause.. to show u all the difference in brands, OC difference in real world, ATI vs Nvidia pros and cons...
Will be setting up in a bit...
So the posting must constitute
2 CPUZ - CPU and MEm
Ati tools
Riva Tuner Hardware Monitoring - Proof of shader/Core/Mem Speed and temps
Ati Tools Running Artifact Scan 15 mins min without any error.
3dmark details on Feature Test.
so up for the challenge guys to stop bickering on different card manufacturers and ppl swearing all brands are same etc and ati card better than nvidia etc
The test will be
Fill Rate Test - Single/Multi
Vertex Shader - Single/Complex
Pixel Shader Test
Particle (SM3)
Perlin Noise (SM3)
Running some 3dmark in a minute...
So what say u??? want to prove me wrong..... also this would help ppl in their buying decisions... and u will see how come some so called OC card doesnt perform and the brand.
Will compile this with all the data i get from neoseeker since they do this for all the cards.
Will start the thread in a bit..
PS anybody knows where i can download a universal score keeper.
cant find it anymore.
This post has been edited by cstkl1: Sep 26 2007, 03:43 AM