QUOTE(temrage @ Nov 23 2025, 10:22 PM)
care to report for ipv6?nvm looks fixed.

This post has been edited by zerorating: Nov 27 2025, 12:04 AM
Unifi Connection Issue to International Server, Occured usually at night 9-11pm
|
|
Nov 24 2025, 04:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1781
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2025, 11:02 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
289 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(QuantumEdge @ Nov 24 2025, 11:13 AM) Probably because of the profit margin and overall increase in bandwidth How about routing to China sites and international routing?Since they lowered the broadband price, you can see the overall quality drops like bombs in the middle east No more fibre wall box, more low quality devices etc At the same time all the packages increased in speed means more bandwidth is required Lower price, higher bandwidth requirements, lower profit per customer From the standpoint of a business that has monopolised the market since 1960s, I understand From the standpoint of a user, I cant accept this Just switch to another telco if you are able to do so I tossed my Unifi to failover after subbing to Allo, no more CF congestion, getting 6ms instead of 150ms+, latency to other websites seems to be 50% lower as well Why pay an ISP that refused to fix known issues |
|
|
Nov 25 2025, 03:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1783
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,595 posts Joined: Jan 2016 |
|
|
|
Nov 27 2025, 09:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
407 posts Joined: Oct 2016 |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2025, 02:15 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1785
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
QUOTE(Snoopycute98 @ Nov 27 2025, 09:38 PM) unless you are enterprise user, your ticket will get discarded by the first line or technical support. your best bet is report a case, being informed that the ticket is closed and you create a report via cfm telling that your case is closed without a solution.of course they best way to reach them is you personally know them, someone like anime4000 for example. |
|
|
Nov 30 2025, 01:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1786
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2025, 09:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1787
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Nov 30 2025, 01:36 PM) Its just the ip range you using no issue, TM doesn't fixed it at all, still the same routing path given. then complain for your IP range.Its been ages since this issue started, and no solution has been reached by either side mine always connected to the same IP subnet. so it may remain fixed. i think the problem that we had is more on fiber pair being down or the link auto-negotiated with slower link speed, not much on route problem. ![]() This post has been edited by zerorating: Nov 30 2025, 09:45 PM |
|
|
Dec 1 2025, 10:54 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1788
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL |
QUOTE(zerorating @ Nov 30 2025, 09:38 PM) then complain for your IP range. The issue is not day 1, been complaining for years the feedback always the same copy and paste script. And also because TM ingress using on HE.net for Cloudflare, so you know what i mean. Once TM or He.net do traffic sharping for their incoming traffic it will exploded (high latency or keep loss packet) especially on night time.mine always connected to the same IP subnet. so it may remain fixed. i think the problem that we had is more on fiber pair being down or the link auto-negotiated with slower link speed, not much on route problem. ![]() I dont know why both parties not willingness to do PNI, since most of website are using Cloudflare. |
|
|
Dec 1 2025, 11:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Dec 1 2025, 10:54 PM) The issue is not day 1, been complaining for years the feedback always the same copy and paste script. And also because TM ingress using on HE.net for Cloudflare, so you know what i mean. Once TM or He.net do traffic sharping for their incoming traffic it will exploded (high latency or keep loss packet) especially on night time. TM dont use hurricane electric hops here for local cloudflare pop. yeah i agree that many websites are not locally cache here.I dont know why both parties not willingness to do PNI, since most of website are using Cloudflare. also if you realized TM dont rely much on hurricane electric links either. they moved to the like of telstra or tata. for singapore cloudflare resource, they can use equinix public peering instead. |
|
|
Dec 1 2025, 11:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL |
QUOTE(zerorating @ Dec 1 2025, 11:01 PM) TM dont use hurricane electric hops here for local cloudflare pop. yeah i agree that many websites are not locally cache here. Cloudflare KUL and SG are using HE.net, i already checked their ingress to TM.also if you realized TM dont rely much on hurricane electric links either. they moved to the like of telstra or tata. for singapore cloudflare resource, they can use equinix public peering instead. As far i know TM already dropped Telstra peering long ago. Anyway the best is using PNI rather then using any IX or upstream because always having limitation on the traffic. |
|
|
Dec 1 2025, 11:56 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1791
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Dec 1 2025, 11:52 PM) Cloudflare KUL and SG are using HE.net, i already checked their ingress to TM. not true for egress.As far i know TM already dropped Telstra peering long ago. Anyway the best is using PNI rather then using any IX or upstream because always having limitation on the traffic. Target Name: lowyat.net IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4a59 Date/Time: 12/1/2025 11:45:39 PM - 12/1/2025 11:55:39 PM Hop Sent PL% Min Max Avg Host Name / [IP] 1 3 0 1.10 4.67 3.24 2001:e68:542c:87x::1 [2001:e68:542c:87x::1] 2 2 0 5.61 7.68 6.65 2001:e68:402c:8001::71 [2001:e68:402c:8001::71] 3 2 0 10.93 13.08 12.01 2001:e68::b:22 [2001:e68::b:22] 4 2 50 21.45 21.45 21.45 2403:e800:e804:c::1 [2403:e800:e804:c::1] 5 2 0 15.51 17.44 16.48 2403:e800:57f:2::2 [2403:e800:57f:2::2] 6 2 0 16.39 27.15 21.77 2400:cb00:741:3:: [2400:cb00:741:3::] 7 2 0 14.14 17.77 15.95 lowyat.net [2606:4700:20::ac43:4a59] no point on using Hurricane electric for servers located in menara aims, KL. TM have private peering with cloudflare anyway. myix can be used as a fallback. This post has been edited by zerorating: Dec 1 2025, 11:59 PM |
|
|
Dec 2 2025, 12:22 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1792
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,350 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: HEAVEN & HELL |
QUOTE(zerorating @ Dec 1 2025, 11:56 PM) not true for egress. how about IPv4 for Telstra, i tried providers that using single Telstra none of them can route their ingress for Telstra back to TM.Target Name: lowyat.net IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4a59 Date/Time: 12/1/2025 11:45:39 PM - 12/1/2025 11:55:39 PM Hop Sent PL% Min Max Avg Host Name / [IP] 1 3 0 1.10 4.67 3.24 2001:e68:542c:87x::1 [2001:e68:542c:87x::1] 2 2 0 5.61 7.68 6.65 2001:e68:402c:8001::71 [2001:e68:402c:8001::71] 3 2 0 10.93 13.08 12.01 2001:e68::b:22 [2001:e68::b:22] 4 2 50 21.45 21.45 21.45 2403:e800:e804:c::1 [2403:e800:e804:c::1] 5 2 0 15.51 17.44 16.48 2403:e800:57f:2::2 [2403:e800:57f:2::2] 6 2 0 16.39 27.15 21.77 2400:cb00:741:3:: [2400:cb00:741:3::] 7 2 0 14.14 17.77 15.95 lowyat.net [2606:4700:20::ac43:4a59] no point on using Hurricane electric for servers located in menara aims, KL. TM have private peering with cloudflare anyway. myix can be used as a fallback. Yes, they do have PNI with Cloudflare but is only Egress traffic to Cloudflare which is useless(main issue we had on is ingress traffic itself). FYI, Cloudflare MYIX sometime is congested during night time ( i did test with local provider which using MYIX to cloudflare) |
|
|
Dec 2 2025, 12:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
975 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Lokap Polis |
QUOTE(heLL_bOy @ Dec 2 2025, 12:22 AM) how about IPv4 for Telstra, i tried providers that using single Telstra none of them can route their ingress for Telstra back to TM. connection via ipv4 to cloudflare singapore uses equinix public peering, not sure what between TM and equinix as icmp forwarding is disable on those appliance, but there is possibility of TM own node. myix are no longer being prioritized when TM left and right making private peering with other organization locally.Yes, they do have PNI with Cloudflare but is only Egress traffic to Cloudflare which is useless(main issue we had on is ingress traffic itself). FYI, Cloudflare MYIX sometime is congested during night time ( i did test with local provider which using MYIX to cloudflare) if you have private peering with someone, it is most likely that private link will be prioritized first both way even-though utilization were high. ipv6 seems to work great for cf-ray-kl and cf-ray-sg at the moment. why you want to bother with ipv4 anyway? anyway hurricane electric link(ipv4) is crap at the moment, long time already they havent fix their circuit. though ipv6 seems to be fine. ![]() looking on telstra looking glass, yeah ipv4 is messed up. but sg to kl pop is fine, and KL pop can reach TM's IP. so someone need to fix their internal routing table. it is most likely your provider are the one need to talk with their ISP, telstra to fix it. This post has been edited by zerorating: Dec 2 2025, 01:10 AM |
|
|
Dec 2 2025, 08:20 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#1794
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,595 posts Joined: Jan 2016 |
QUOTE(zerorating @ Dec 2 2025, 12:55 AM) connection via ipv4 to cloudflare singapore uses equinix public peering, not sure what between TM and equinix as icmp forwarding is disable on those appliance, but there is possibility of TM own node. myix are no longer being prioritized when TM left and right making private peering with other organization locally. if you have private peering with someone, it is most likely that private link will be prioritized first both way even-though utilization were high. ipv6 seems to work great for cf-ray-kl and cf-ray-sg at the moment. why you want to bother with ipv4 anyway? anyway hurricane electric link(ipv4) is crap at the moment, long time already they havent fix their circuit. though ipv6 seems to be fine. ![]() looking on telstra looking glass, yeah ipv4 is messed up. but sg to kl pop is fine, and KL pop can reach TM's IP. so someone need to fix their internal routing table. it is most likely your provider are the one need to talk with their ISP, telstra to fix it. ![]() I also noticed high PL recently, been like this for a while now However, last night even Allo feels a bit off |
| Change to: | 0.0156sec
0.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 03:57 PM |