Found an old screenshot of mine comparing the 2

no wonder la , i play Wang Zhe Rong Yao always at night the ping suddenly from 70+ become 150-200++ , unable to play , morning before work no problem , only at night time , anyway to solve this problem?

Yesterday and right now connection to my commercial VPN (Mullvad) to SG unusable after 9:00pm (yesterday lasted until 1am, today dunno). Currently using JP server.

At this rate, maybe I should try my luck switching to Maxis Fiber. A bit of a shame because I upgraded to Unifi500 through promotion a few years ago. Maxis charges $219 (before sst) for same speed plan, though according to the website got 65" TV included o_O. I don't need a TV or mesh rubbish. >_>

Yesterday and right now connection to commercial VPN (Mullvad) SG servers practically unusable after 9:00pm (yesterday lasted until 1am, today dunno). Currently using JP server.

At this rate, maybe I should try my luck switching to Maxis Fiber. A bit of a shame because I upgraded to Unifi500 through promotion a few years ago. Maxis charges $219 (before sst) for same speed plan, though according to the website got 65" TV included o_O. I don't need a TV or mesh rubbish. >_>

me too will be switching to maxis once finished contract. this is going overboard now.

isn't maxis unifi sharing with TM unifi ?

isn't maxis unifi sharing with TM unifi ?

maxis only using tm infrastructure for last-mile connectivity to provide service to users.
the bandwidth after local exchange center will go through maxis own network.

isn't maxis unifi sharing with TM unifi ?

Yup, talk about PCCW HK few pages ago, it is always a trouble for people using Tencent software(QQ/WeChat) as it is going via PCCW HK to Tencent HK server.
Worst is during MCO 1.0, where the whole world stay at home and overloading PCCW.

Lucky they open and move oversea users to SG server before MCO 3.0 happen, what's left are the image server still going via PCCW HK.

PS: Packet loss happen at internal route of PCCW HK, I google about normal PCCW HK ISP users, wow, so many complain...
PS2: So now can confirm the overload also because TM sending people to PCCW HK then back to SG, another problem solved for me.
---
For CloudFlare, yes, 2 possible routes to SG, I used WARP+FAST(speedtest) for testing, they always got 2 conditions, worst(1 Mbps) or good(30+ Mbps).
90% it is good routing la.
---
UniFi gonna getting worst, as long as Streamyx user coming to UniFi, and International route still not improving on time.

Unlike other country which connect to local CDN server that nearby them, within country, and greatly reducing international traffic with caching, we are going to other country asking for data, but TM just like, never mind la.

As far as I know, it is because opening server at Malaysia not cheap, so they going to other country like SG and HK, and well.
Payback coming back to TM now, National Fiberisation, free speed upgrade from 10M-100M to 30M-800M, and TNB allo joining the market.

PS3: Just correct me if I am wrong la.

Bukti hari ini untuk kenyataan saudara diatas.



Incapsula melalui PCCW HK menggunakan Unifi.

Check out fastly CDN's ping chart after 6pm today
http://0edb293e6fa4.ap.ngrok.io/smokeping/?target=CDN.CDN-1

On a sidenote, after reporting to TM and their CS called to explain with a bunch of BS. Talked to me about best effort, dynamic IP and how the routing situation can be fixed by resetting, changing the IP prefix and saying there's nothing much they can do for traffic that left the country?
Not being well versed with networking terms, it's so hard to explain to them what needs to be done. And very likely the CS can't do much at their level and they're not willing to escalate the issue.

Hi any host I can test to proof packet lose?

Strangely, based on comments that I read on their unofficial page, all of their staff/contractor/agent didn’t encounter this kind of problem at all. They still bs’ing the user about this matter. It make me wonder, is that they have a different kind of routing/premium routing/sla due to their status as staff ?