Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
Lampuajaib
post Aug 15 2021, 01:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Aug 15 2021, 01:18 AM)
Let me try and sort out your oxymoronic reply. You are insecure about SG and Indo. Hence you pit Sg versus Indo (nevermind the fact that Sg and Indo are close friends and partners; closer than Msia-SG).

You are not an expert but you r clear minded that Sgs defence relies on advanced hardware (not that there is anything wrong with that or any othet country which upgrades its hardware!).

Oh yeah..you still dont get what kiasu means. What does it mean?
*
Hahahaha....what ever you need to tell yourself
Lampuajaib
post Aug 16 2021, 05:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 16 2021, 10:53 AM)
Malaysia priority until 2030 should not be with the army. So money should not be wasted on expensive medium tanks.

Even Singapore, which has mostly prioritized its army in the past, is putting more money into its navy in the near future, with new submarines, new large frigates, new flat top.
*
C'mon alex23....
Gempita and Harimau MT are both have Turkish DNA.
Beside the shape, the turret, wheel and price......let's say both are equal.

The last but not least is transfer of tech MY and ID can get and how both can use the knowledge in the future.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 16 2021, 05:57 PM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 17 2021, 09:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 17 2021, 12:19 AM)
both are equal armor protection-wise.

but...

one is a "tank" and will be operated as a tank and will be a magnet for every MBT, ATGM and cannon fire within 1km of the Harimau.

one has a slow 6-8 rounds per minute firing speed, while the other has 60 rounds per minute firing rate, with ATGM ripple fire of up to 4 missiles at one go.
*
Well Alex....no hardware can be used for everything and win in every situation. That is why there are so many variants were designed.

I suggest you learn the purpose/main idea why a hardware was initially designed. There are APC, IFV/AFV, Medium tank, MBT and there are so many rifle and pistol with different caliber exist. For navy there many classes of ship and for AF there are so many types of plane This is the way that we can discuss with logic not just measuring who has the bigger dick or comparing an apple to orange which lead to nowhere in discussion. Not to mention how different hardwares must be operated in the field like a pack of wolf to achieve effectiveness.

ID already start design a new IFV variant using 30mm canon turret on their Harimau MT platform. So when MY will developed Gempita with 105mm cannon? This discussion for me is more interesting. Do MY has a need for 105mm cannon?







Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 07:25 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 17 2021, 10:48 AM)
So can you enlighten me from your understanding, what is the purpose/main idea why the Harimau/Kaplan MT is designed. What is it supposed to do?
*
Watch this..



Medium tank is not designed to face MBT so as IFV is not designed to face medium tank.
Although IFV or medium tank is equipt with ATGM, I would consider it for "emergency" if situation is unavoidable.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 18 2021, 08:11 AM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 07:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Aug 17 2021, 06:19 PM)
depends on the gun, but certainly not with the low-velocity 105mm cockeril gun on the harimau
even on their manufacturer site said its only to deal with light to medium armored vehicle
also most 105mm gun is not designed to deal with mbt's

harimau is not even a real tank to begin with, its an ifv with a large gun
it offers neither the firepower or protection of a real medium tank
*
Fact check

Harimau uses the newest cockerill 105mm turret 3105 which is a high pressure type. I found it this type of turret is gteat. It has elevation -10 to 42 degree which can be used for direct or indirect fire and it can throw ATGM falarick.
Harimau/Kaplan MT is initially designed for medium tank and later developed to IFV.
SG bionix and SK K21 who were designed initially as IFV.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 18 2021, 07:41 AM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 11:05 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 18 2021, 10:36 AM)
If it is just made for fire support and killing APC and IFV, why do you need a 105mm gun??

It looks like a tank, and believe me, the generals will use it like a tank. And the enemy will mark it out as the number 1 target on the battlefield, as it looks like a tank.

As for fire support, malaysian soldiers now have plenty of RPG-7 and to add new lightweight Carl Gustavs to not needing a fire support vehicle with 105mm gun. Which is why we have retired all our 90mm fire support vehicles (SIBMAS, Commando and Scorpion)
IFV not designed to face medium tank????

The Gempita with 30mm cannon and Ingwe missiles is made to kill IFVs and Medium tanks.

Gempita 30mm cannon can easily penetrate the Harimau tall and large side armor, and with a firing speed of 60 rounds per minute, will easily saturate any APS systems installed.
*
Alex....
True...gempita with 30mm can penetrate harimau standard skin with no add-on armour attached. But like I said IFV is not designed to be a tank killer. No need to insist using it more than what it is designed for. The Ingwe is for emergency situation. We wont put any gempita on emergency situation.

You only focus on strenght of 30mm cannon and 105mm weakness...in reality it is not easy to find a situation to support that.
You forget about 105mm strength. This 105mm ammo has both longer range and firepower. An ammo of 105mm enough already to blow gempita up. How to get closer without detected is another different story', isnt it?

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 18 2021, 11:08 AM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 03:00 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 18 2021, 02:40 PM)
Actually Gempita with 30m can penetrate a Harimau with add-on armor. Add on armor for Harimau is rated up to 25mm cannon fire only. Harimau does not have armor protection of a tank, so the Harimau is a fair game for Gempita.

Harimau 105mm has a 10km indirect range (ie lobbing shells on a ballistic arc for long range fire support, not to kill other IFV or tanks), the Gempita GI30 has a 4km direct fire range. Both weapons of Harimau and Gempita can easily kill each other, it depends on how quick the crew acquire and shoot at the target.

The 105mm strength is the ability to penetrate tanks. With that is a sure bet of the user actually using the Harimau against real tanks.
ST Kinetics/SAIC was not selected for the US Army MPF Program, BAE and General Dynamics got to move on to the evaluation phase.
*
Ok...Alex
I wont argue on what somebody belief.
I just want to point' out that no hardwares can do everything and win in every situation.

Even a man with portable ATGM can destroy an MBT. What do I know.....

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 18 2021, 03:12 PM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 05:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 18 2021, 04:09 PM)
Looks like PT Lundin (North Sea Boats) is preparing to launch Indonesian Navy new Klewang Class Trimaran Fast Attack Missile Craft KRI Golok-688.


*
How ready this time?
Lampuajaib
post Aug 18 2021, 07:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 18 2021, 05:33 PM)
I mean....how ready this ship compare to last one?
Guarantee no more fire this time?
Lampuajaib
post Aug 19 2021, 07:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Aug 18 2021, 07:24 PM)
For light infantry?


*
Hmmmm....
I almost forgot even he US also start the MPF project acquring 105mm tank.
Bionix and K21 also adopted 105mm cannon.

Maybe TDM should consider it.
105mm cannon can be put on gempita.

Lampuajaib
post Aug 19 2021, 08:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 19 2021, 07:59 AM)
The Boxer is also adopting the Cockerill 3105 turret.

user posted image
Read more: https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-det...se-c3105-turret
*
This turret is on demand now....
It offers new great features.
Lampuajaib
post Aug 21 2021, 03:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Aug 19 2021, 06:16 PM)
If not mistaken jaguar ebrc, like griffon & Ceaser are all build on the same Renault truck platforms.

Renault truck are a fully own subsidary of Volvo trucks. Both Volvo & Renault do have assembly plant here.

The turret are build by thales, nexter & bae, thales if not mistaken partner with Sapura to network the army, nexter already license the assembly of their 105mm canon here locally. While bae are partner of deftech. The  40mm CTA turret can also be use for marine vehicle namely utilized by RMN & MMEA as a quasi CIWS & cannon. The turret can also be use by AF as part of their GBAD.

So it's relatively reliable, easy to fix, cheap, pretty adequate firepower, easy to connect as part of a networking, CNA be deployed at scale, made by companies with strong local present & connection, and can be locally assemble.

I think it ticks a lot of right boxes.
*
Jaguar ebrc 6x6 can fill TDM requirement for UN mission.
Lampuajaib
post Aug 21 2021, 03:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 20 2021, 10:17 PM)
Serial Production Kaplan MT - IDEF 2021. Credit to FNSS.

user posted image

user posted image

https://www.fnss.com.tr/en/kaplan-mt-only-t...platform-design
*
Look prettier than bionix....
Lampuajaib
post Aug 21 2021, 03:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 21 2021, 01:34 PM)
Launching of Indonesian Navy new Fast Attack Missile Craft Trimaran KRI Golok-688. Credit to Berita Jatim.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

https://beritajatim.com/foto/kasal-launchin...ran-banyuwangi/
*
ID has done their homework hope no fire alarm this time.
It is BNS turn when will launch the LCS?
Lampuajaib
post Aug 22 2021, 09:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Aug 21 2021, 05:53 PM)
A bit overkills. We are not hunting tanks or shooting plane or anything there

The jaguar 'little sister' the griffon should be enough.

Hopefully the griffon is considered as the condor replacement.
100x better than that lipan bara.
*
Griffin rather looks like MRAP than APC. No problem really but I like APC better than MRAP for UN mission.
Maybe TDM can ask a modified jaguar with smaller weapon and troop space
Lampuajaib
post Aug 27 2021, 09:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 27 2021, 07:49 PM)
Congratulations to indonesia on the OPVs.

I dont really understand the meaning of the launch. There will be 2 different types of OPV being officiated at the same steel cutting ceremony?

Why 2 different types being build simultaneously at the same shipyard?

Also if I am Indonesia, I would put all OPVs under the Indonesian Coast Guard, not the navy.
*
Maybe there are 2 different size of OPV or different spesification.

Lampuajaib
post Aug 28 2021, 11:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
This OPV design reminds me of Lekiu or nakhoda ragam.

Lampuajaib
post Aug 30 2021, 10:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Aug 29 2021, 09:18 PM)
PT PAL Indonesia received fresh funds from Jokowi to complete submarine production hangar facilty and to increase production capacity.

user posted image
Indonesian Navy KRI Alugoro during Joint Section Process at PT PAL Submarine Production Facility
Read more: https://pal.co.id/2021/08/publikasi/news-be...cal-production/
*
If there is no big plan on building locally in big number there is no need to build facility for building up to 4 subs and 2 midget sub simultaneously
Lampuajaib
post Aug 30 2021, 10:33 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 30 2021, 09:21 AM)
I cannot say about other countries in SEA and their military dreams, but for Malaysia, we don't plan or we don't need military expeditionary capabilities.

Why should we? Our military is first and foremost is our tool to defend our country. That is defending our sea and soil from others, fighting on our own land and sea. Fighting the abu sayaf on sabah soil, fighting the communists, even fighting to our last man for the defence of singapore against the japanese in WW2. There is no need to gear up our military to fight on other people's land and sea expeditionarily like US forces. For example US navy "LCS" means fighting in other people's littoral thousands of miles from home.

Too much Holywood, too much Afghanistan, too much i want to be US Military.

And you lost track of reality and lose track of what is the main reason for your countries military.
*
True....MY is not an expeditionary force. ATM is not built to achieve expeditionary capabilities.
IMO, only ID can but limited.TNI has many support equipments for airlift and sealift. TNI has experiences moving personnel and equipment in long distance.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Aug 30 2021, 10:34 AM
Lampuajaib
post Aug 30 2021, 10:43 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Aug 30 2021, 10:21 AM)
>
Now i am confused

user posted image

which statement is true?
>
*
Let's check how much they spend to build them and compare to LMS....

9 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1166sec    0.92    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 04:34 PM