Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
Lampuajaib
post Aug 30 2021, 11:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Aug 30 2021, 12:29 PM)
Having expeditionary capabilities is not about transporting equipment by land and sea. It is about sustained power projection over vast distances and the ability to up the ante with full scale military strikes. That requires a whole gamut of land, air and sea equipment and capabilities encompassing strike, sensor integration, time on target kill box assignments,  large real time surveillanve, etc. Most importantly is the financial resilience to back such endeavours which can cost hundreds of millions of USD or billions. Australia which had a significant but smaller deployment (relative to the US) in Afghanistan spent over $USD 10 billion at least over a couple of years. The US spent over $USD 2 trillion. Sgs Operation Flying Eagle 2 help Indonesia after the Asian Tsunami costs over USD $1 billion then and this was a humanitarian operation lasting for a month or so.
*
Whatever you want to tell yourself lah kiasu...
SG is the superpower in this regiion....
Lampuajaib
post Sep 6 2021, 09:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 6 2021, 09:03 PM)
A400M, starstreak, md530g and lipanbara we can just buy them without any complicated procedures, so why can't we do the same with FA-50?
*
Need politician support, complicated or not pikir belakang
Lampuajaib
post Sep 7 2021, 09:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 7 2021, 07:22 AM)
Thought a Korean news mentioned TUDM wanted a BVR capable LCA & the FA50 aren't capable of it?

Personally doubt anyone else can offer a better deal then m346.
Since it's capable of BVR out of the box with 7 or something jet being free.
*
Nope...
LCA is not MRCA. It is not designed to engage in air to air combat. It has only limited capability in air to air or aiir to ground combat.

I don't know if TUDM want LCA with BVR capability....that is too much to ask and too much to hope for any LCA can do what MRCA can.

Even if they can make a BVR capable LCA. The question is will it worth to buy that?

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 7 2021, 09:33 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 8 2021, 10:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 8 2021, 08:03 AM)
HAL claimed they had signed a MOU with MMTC. MMTC will buy palm oil from Malaysia for LCA Tejas barter trade for RMAF LCA Project.

MMTC to buy Palm Oil for LCA Tejas barter deal with Malaysia: HAL
*
While those 2 guys arguing about everything but no one considered palm oil barter is the game changer...hahaha

It is not about the platform but about who can accept palm oil....good luck RMAF.
It will be Tejas mk1, isnt it? At least it uses the same engine as the hornet
Lampuajaib
post Sep 9 2021, 05:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 8 2021, 11:40 PM)
From the study.

It is concluded that

M346 only has 50% of the capability of a real fighter like Typhoon

FA-50 90%

Gripen 95%

Interesting there is only 5% difference in capability between FA-50 and gripen while the cost of gripen is double of the FA-50

user posted image
*
Comparing M346 AJT to FA-50 is not apple to apple
It should be conparing M346FA to FA-50

Btw, 90% is about air policing not combat capability.
Do you want to say FA-50 only 10% less capability than F-35 too?
Read carefully lah....

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 9 2021, 05:51 PM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 10 2021, 07:20 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 9 2021, 11:40 PM)
FA-50 Block 20 is in development, will have BVR capability, along with targeting pods and probe for air to air refueling.

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/def...50-golden-eagle

https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/20...e-for-kai-fa-50
*
Is it worth to buy it?
Why not buy the real MRCA?
What ever the Korea do to upgrade the FA-50, it will be limited to its structure.
What about payload, range, top speed, angle of attack, RCS, service ceiling, climb rate, etc ..etc ...etc ..

Why Korea need to develop KFX if their plan to upgrade FA-50 is so great?

If TUDM need a platform for LIFT and air policing that is great let's buy FA-50. No need to spend more money.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 10 2021, 07:27 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 10 2021, 07:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(KLthinker91 @ Sep 10 2021, 07:25 AM)
define "the real MRCA". KFX?

You're asking why Korea need twin-engine less-observable medium fighter if their plan to upgrade single-engine light fighter is so great... um, maybe because they want 2 different planes for 2 different roles?
*
Do you even know what MRCA definition is?
The word combat should get you into something

Like you said, then the existing FA-50 wont fit the need with all the upgrade plan they have

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 10 2021, 07:32 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 10 2021, 08:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 10 2021, 07:55 AM)
user posted image
Lockheed Martin C-130J-30 Super Hercules
Read more: https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pac...-from-lockheed/
*
Many unaware the important of airlift and sealift.
Logistics is the key to win a war.
ID with her vast teritory has the reason to build up this capability.
Lampuajaib
post Sep 11 2021, 06:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 11 2021, 03:42 PM)
Not bad...
2035 is a good time to buy 5 gen fighter. The jet will be more matured.
Let's focus on LCA and LIFT at the moment.
Lampuajaib
post Sep 13 2021, 07:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 13 2021, 05:33 AM)
A half OPV half Corvette like the RSN LMV doesn't really sounds all that bad.

Basically just a vehicle to carry those MICA around to shoot stuff flying on the EEZ with the added benefits of using it as PV & mines countermeasures or such.

Thought it does sound like a restructuring of 15 2 5 program since putting weapon on ship they wish to retired in 5 years doesn't sound like a bright ideas. Would probably worth it if they intend to use it for another 15 years.

Since words on the street the rebooted LMS is pretty much the size and capabilities of the Kedah class. Seems like a merging of both the 18 OPV & 18 LMS into a single program would take place.
NSM probably better be put on a truck kot? Since truck are a lot faster than a ship and pan Borneo is a thing.
*
I like better the new ID OPV than SG LMV...the price also can be cheaper...and No to another batch of LMS


This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 13 2021, 07:19 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 13 2021, 07:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 13 2021, 02:55 PM)
More of a similar concept to LMV. In which it prioritize air defense. Not really about getting those Saab designs LMV.

LMV prioritize air defence but lack of attack capability while ID OPV the other way around.

QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 13 2021, 02:55 PM)
ID vast territories + being an archipelago + underdeveloped land transportation network means they need more ASuW Corvette/fast attack boat. As for us,it's probably cheaper,faster, easier to just shoot those ASuW missiles from land.

Both have the same need only different in number.

QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 13 2021, 02:55 PM)
Personally have no problem if RMN want to adopt RSN strategy. It make guessing what they going to do next easier. If they are apeing it, i can confidently say the next RMN ship after rebooted LMS is a Multi Role Combat Ship & MMEA going to get the OPV

Not until the LCS is solved, except for MRSS

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 13 2021, 08:34 PM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 15 2021, 09:29 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 15 2021, 07:25 AM)
Source reported that Indonesian Navy is to sign contract for 2 units Fast Attack Missile Boats 68 meter from Turkey. Budget already been approved by the MoF and waiting execution from the MoD. The source also repoterd the FAMB is likely the GMFPB 67 from TAIS Shipyard.

user posted image

https://www.taisshipyards.com/en/gmfpb-guid...-patrol-boat-67
*
ID seems collecting many FAC(M).
Asymmetric warfare against Giant China?
Lampuajaib
post Sep 15 2021, 09:31 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 15 2021, 08:01 AM)
The best many years ago.....
Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 07:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Sep 17 2021, 12:23 AM)
At 325 ton it's basically the same size as bagan datuk isn't it?

There's nothing wrong with buying this Damen as the 2nd batch of NGPC since MMEA still need 8 of it. There's also nothing wrong with MMEA working beside Navy LCS nor nothing wrong with MMEA having military grade weapon.

So case close. Let's move on.
*
It is not about the task....RMN and MMEA can join and do the same job in peace time..MMEA also can have a ship as big as RMN. The differents are the weapon system istalled in it and how bad situation MMEA can tackle?

Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 08:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 17 2021, 07:55 AM)
Kejap lagi budak kiasu tu merasa.tertekan lah...hahaha
Hari itu kan kata kabar ID mana boleh percaya sangat...

FREMM and Arrowhead.....gandengan berbisa.

Like I said before sooner or later ID will become China of the region.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 17 2021, 08:08 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 08:57 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 17 2021, 08:47 AM)
congratulations to Indonesia

those are very good frigates.

Still waiting to see the plan on how PT PAL would build 6 FREMM and 2 Arrowhead 140 all at the same time.
This also should be a big wake-up call for Malaysia not to procrastinate and just get the Gowinds completed whatever it costs. And a wake-up call for the leadership of TLDM to stop planning for corvettes, OPVs or RLMS.
*
The LCS fiasco is not about the money....if there is a political will the problem will be solved immediately. How to solve it is the problem. Who is going to take the blaming game later?

LCS already made RMN stucked watching others building their muscle.
What mindef and all ATM branches need to do first is revisited all their plan 4nextg, cap 55, and 15 to 5. Those plans are already dead before started to answer future security situation.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 17 2021, 08:59 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 09:16 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Sep 17 2021, 09:09 AM)
A question to ponder.

Is the blaming game much more important than the survival of Malaysia as a country?

Can you politicians and military leaders sleep at night knowing that we don't have anything close to those FREMMs and Arrowhead 140s?
*
If you see any stateperson instead of just politician then you can have the answer.

Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 11:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(junkyman @ Sep 17 2021, 09:36 AM)
Indonesia lately so aggressive in modernizing their military equipment even under the Pandemic time !!!!! Whereas Our Country - Aggressive in Political !!!!!
*
Even Aus already joined to build nuclear powered subs with UK and US. The total cost is $90billion.

ID reaction in defence building is still normal....it is MY who act unnormal

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 17 2021, 11:55 AM
Lampuajaib
post Sep 17 2021, 12:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(James831 @ Sep 17 2021, 12:01 PM)
why does indonesia go for so many variant of Frigate ?
Italy FREMM , Danish Iver Huitfeldt and now British Arrowhead 140 ?
*
It is the system installed not the platform that make so many variants.
Lampuajaib
post Sep 18 2021, 09:11 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(jwst1313 @ Sep 18 2021, 08:32 AM)
The Formidable Class of Singapore 3200 tons is actually smaller version of French La Fayette class 6000 tons also built by Naval Group (same company that built and design Gowind Maharaja lela)

Even Singapore ST Marine Engineering, they are very advanced in building vessel, never dare not  take all change design vessel all built all in Singapore.

Instead they  built one in Naval Group France and 5 in ST Marine Engineering. Why do that? Let your local engineers learn on the site.

Note only buy blue print only cannot  built warship. If can do that better buy mercedes, bmw and F35 blue print and make here. Not that easy. Blue print is not eveeything.

The 1st vessel RSS Formidable was comissioned in 2007. The after that every year, 2 vessels.

Formidable class are more potent stealth ship

1) use Thales Herakles Pesa Radar (stronger)
2) Have 32 Aster 15 + Aster 30 Vls for air defence
3) Harpoon
4) Anti submarine torpedoe
5) Heli
6) Ciws
There is no 6000 ton La fayette frigate.
Formidable class is 115m long ship. It is a shorter variant than the original 125m La fayete class.
Aster 15 only installed on it while the aster 30 is used as land based air defense.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Sep 18 2021, 09:12 AM

9 Pages « < 4 5 6 7 8 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1148sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 08:20 PM