i don't think we would get the t50.
Simply because if we wanted too we would had purchased it already.
Not to mention it's our tradition to not buy what our neighbors buy.
Since all our neighbors had bought it so obviously we won't buy it.

Personally i think they all bought the T50 simply because its basically a mini f16.unlike all our immediate neighbor, we don't have any f16 around.
But T7 is basically a mini hornet, same avionics,same engine and such.
sizable USAF deal make it way cheaper than t50.its 27 mil a piece inclusive of simulator.
T7 is also a very big plane, more JF-17/Gripen in size then to a pure LIFT.so plenty of space to put stuff in. It would be compatible with all our weapons something t50 couldn't do.
Boeing & sabb both has awac that can be included in the deals. LM & KAI has no awac to offer.
Not to mention Saab are open towards the prospect of local assembly. A very easy way to commit the gov to buy plenty of something and to spurned off a new industry.
So there's you go. The only candidates that ticks all the box's for LCA requirement is T7. Except right now it's still a paper plane. Even if they managed to roll it out of assembly it's still an incomplete and immature platforms. But eventually compared to the rest, it has the brightest future with the best ultilities.
Not to mention by having a Saab factory locally and churned out t7 for 15 years. By 2035 it can churn out the tempest pulak.
It is still in prototype stage. The USAF already booked for 350 units.