Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
darth5zaft
post Jun 20 2021, 10:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 20 2021, 08:43 PM)
^ Reports online indicate that these are not contracts per se but Letters of Intents! This is because the funding has not been resolved.

It is the same thing again and again. You hear grandiose announcements (usually from military commentators or vendors eager to have any good news) about Indonesia buying something but nothing is really bought and built e.g. the contract to buy/build the KFX. The Ivers has been in the news for years - you do not take years to decide on a variant design when the baseline design is ready.

At the end of the day, Indonesia does not have the funding to buy or maintain these equipment. Hence, the scramble for foreign loans.

I will be happy to be proven wrong. But at this point of time, there is just announcements; like the rest.

Im calling their (the vendors and reports) bluff - as in there is no way forward unless there is money.

Let me know when construction actually starts. Because I do not think it will be anytime soon i.e. even if it happens, it will be years later and stretched over many more years.

Meanwhile, the Indonesian armed forces is as it has always been.

Forumners should know by now how Indonesia operates.
*
ID is a democracy not a dictatorship one party state. So their plans just like with other democracy are fluids. One didn't care what their citizens think and thus can have long term acquisition schedule,

To say they can't afford it isn't true. They can afford it without increasing defense spending by just modernizing aka downsizing the size of their military personnel. PLA had downsize their army decades ago while US marine corps are doing it now.

Though having said that, all of their recent announcement seems to directed for domestic consumption rather than as a response to a changing security threats. If anything these whole announcement are just Probowo starting his 2024 presidential campaigns.

Scrambling for foreign loans particularly in foreign notes is pretty dangerous due to the instability of rupiah. The Rafale & fremm would likely involved local assembly which would shoot Probowo popularity (and wealth) through the roofs

Highly unlikely to get approval by MOF who herself might throw her hat into the presidential contest ring. Nor she would likely agree to increase defense spending at the cost of infrastructure development.

So next step for Probowo would likely to rallies up the public opinion to pressure MOF to do what he wants.



Mai189
post Jun 20 2021, 10:47 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Jun 20 2021, 10:37 PM)
ID is a democracy not a dictatorship one party state. So their plans just like with other democracy are fluids. One didn't care what their citizens think and thus can have long term acquisition schedule,

To say they can't afford it isn't true. They can afford it without increasing defense spending by just modernizing aka downsizing the size of their military personnel. PLA had downsize their army decades ago while US marine corps are doing it now.

Though having said that, all of their recent announcement seems to directed for domestic consumption rather than as a response to a changing security threats.  If anything these whole announcement are just Probowo starting his 2024 presidential campaigns.

Scrambling for foreign loans particularly in foreign notes is pretty dangerous due to the instability of rupiah. The Rafale & fremm would likely involved local assembly which would shoot Probowo popularity (and wealth) through the roofs

Highly unlikely to get approval by MOF who herself might throw her hat into the presidential contest ring. Nor she would likely agree to increase defense spending at the cost of infrastructure development.

So next step for Probowo would likely to rallies up the public opinion to pressure MOF to do what he wants.
*
It is not about whether a country dabbles with democrazy. It is about having too many cooks dabbling with the soup with limited financial means and a myriad of economic and societal goals in the middle of a raging pandemic.

darth5zaft
post Jun 20 2021, 11:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 20 2021, 10:47 PM)
It is not about whether a country dabbles with democrazy. It is about having too many cooks dabbling with the soup with limited financial means and a myriad of economic and societal goals in the middle of a raging pandemic.
*
Lol. That's what the angmoh called balance of power.
It's a good thing according to Angmoh.
A lot of people give their live so that others can enjoyed it.
Of course in our case balance of power, just like independence & democracy it's is handed to us on a silver plater.

We live in the 21st century, we have no need for a God King to decide & told us what best for us. We decided it ourselves.

Infact in a way particularly in public transportation, creating e commerce unicorn, local entrepreneurship,.risk taking and so on, ID are far ahead and are more efficient then a God emperor dictatorship can ever hope to achieve. All God emperor are good at is stealing others unicorn & big companies by throwing dedak since a dictatorship would never allowed a space for such a thing to grow organically.


Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 08:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 20 2021, 09:00 PM)

Video by Lockheed. Strange that Lockheed removed it - usually they dont!

user posted image
Video still image - note the Himars registration number - not US Marine Corps vehicle.

user posted image
SG HIMARS - see the registration number.

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/produc...ke-missile.html

Note: The PRSM with its multi mode targeting sensors can hit both static and moving targets up to distances of >500+km. It can be used both against land and sea targets. An extended range version can hit targets as far as 1000+km. It is built to work with 5th gen combat jets like F35s, 4.5 gen combat jets like F15SA, F15SG, F16Vs, etc. or other sensors. At >500+km, the missile may even reach Southern Thailand....Also, this is an improvement over Sg's Blue Spear missile with max range of 400km.

The current GMLRS rockets in used by current users has been successfully tested at a max range of 92km:

https://www.army-technology.com/news/news69339-html/

GMLRS-ER which is intended to replace the GMLRS rockets from 2022 onwards has a range of 150km. Current users are expected to replace their store of GMRLS rockets with this version later in the decade onwards.
*
So many posting advanced weapon system'.
What contribution SG can give to promote peace in SCS?
ID and Vietnam voice is heard louder.
Useless equipment just for show off and parade in SG hand.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Jun 21 2021, 08:26 AM
Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 08:22 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 20 2021, 10:47 PM)
It is not about whether a country dabbles with democrazy. It is about having too many cooks dabbling with the soup with limited financial means and a myriad of economic and societal goals in the middle of a raging pandemic.
*
All pandemic and tension in SCS are China's present to the world.
Whatever and whoever ID before doesnt matter. Asean facing SCS issue. China assertive claiming whole SCS is asean problem and the world.
ID already prove can modernize their defence sector, hope they can grow stronger and faster.
Whose voice do you think can be heard to unite Asean? Next in line are Viet and Thai.
SG can ah?....lol

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Jun 21 2021, 08:25 AM
Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 09:32 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 08:22 AM)
All pandemic and tension in SCS are China's present to the world.
Whatever and whoever ID before doesnt matter. Asean facing SCS issue. China assertive claiming whole SCS is asean problem and the world.
ID already prove can modernize their defence sector, hope they can grow stronger and faster.
Whose voice do you think can be heard to unite Asean? Next in line are Viet and Thai.
SG can ah?....lol
*
What are you rambling abt and you R living on another planet. If i have the time id provide a more elaborate reply. Suffice it to say, Asean isnt united on China. Not all countries have territorial disputes with china. And no, Asean welcomes a responsibly acting China as guess what Chinas the largest investor in many Asean countries e.g Msia.
Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 09:35 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Jun 20 2021, 11:24 PM)
Lol. That's what the angmoh called balance of power.
It's a good thing according to Angmoh.
A lot of people give their live so that others can enjoyed it.
Of course in our case balance of power, just like independence & democracy it's is handed to us on a silver plater.

We live in the 21st century, we have no need for a God King to decide & told us what best for us. We decided it ourselves.

Infact in a way particularly in public transportation, creating e commerce unicorn, local entrepreneurship,.risk taking and so on, ID are far ahead and are more efficient then a God emperor dictatorship can ever hope to achieve. All God emperor are good at is stealing others unicorn & big companies by throwing dedak since a dictatorship would never allowed a space for such a thing to grow organically.
*
Errrr. Ok. Noted..
Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 09:39 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 21 2021, 09:32 AM)
What are you rambling abt and you R living on another planet. If i have the time id provide a more elaborate reply. Suffice it to say, Asean isnt united on China. Not all countries have territorial disputes with china. And no, Asean welcomes a responsibly acting China as guess what Chinas the largest investor in many Asean countries e.g  Msia.
*
Yes...wumao supporter detected.
Do you think there is SCS problem if China has any resposible act?
Claiming whole SCS based on history?....lol

MY can claim SG too based on China logic....You support o not?

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Jun 21 2021, 09:48 AM
Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 09:42 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 09:39 AM)
Yes...wumao supporter detected.
*
/facepalm. Dont forget 2 ditch Chinese moneh in Msia.
Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 09:43 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 20 2021, 09:00 PM)

Video by Lockheed. Strange that Lockheed removed it - usually they dont!

user posted image
Video still image - note the Himars registration number - not US Marine Corps vehicle.

user posted image
SG HIMARS - see the registration number.

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/produc...ke-missile.html

Note: The PRSM with its multi mode targeting sensors can hit both static and moving targets up to distances of >500+km. It can be used both against land and sea targets. An extended range version can hit targets as far as 1000+km. It is built to work with 5th gen combat jets like F35s, 4.5 gen combat jets like F15SA, F15SG, F16Vs, etc. or other sensors. At >500+km, the missile may even reach Southern Thailand....Also, this is an improvement over Sg's Blue Spear missile with max range of 400km.

The current GMLRS rockets in used by current users has been successfully tested at a max range of 92km:

https://www.army-technology.com/news/news69339-html/

GMLRS-ER which is intended to replace the GMLRS rockets from 2022 onwards has a range of 150km. Current users are expected to replace their store of GMRLS rockets with this version later in the decade onwards.
*
Good read:

https://breakingdefense.com/2020/06/army-te...unt-ships-sams/
Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 09:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 21 2021, 09:42 AM)
/facepalm. Dont forget 2 ditch Chinese moneh in Msia.
*
Business and security are 2 sides of a coin.
Lol
How much money the world has lost by China's export covid? The number is hiking as we speak.

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Jun 21 2021, 09:54 AM
Alto31 P
post Jun 21 2021, 10:39 AM

New Member
*
Probation
0 posts

Joined: Feb 2021
PUBLISHED: 20 JUNE 2021
LAST UPDATED: 20 JUNE 2021

Indonesia TNI AU A330MRTT 640

Indonesia to buy tanker aircraft

High on the wish-list of the Tentara Nasional Indonesia - Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU, Indonesian Air Force) has been the acquisition of tanker aircraft.

Recently, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was granted permission to assign a budget of USD 700 million for such an acquisition. Top candidate is the Airbus A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT).

As far as Scramble Magazine knows, no contract has been signed yet. So it is still very early in the process, same as with the Dassault Rafale deal that was revealed recently.

Read more:
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/indon...tanker-aircraft
Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 11:06 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 09:51 AM)
Business and security are 2 sides of a coin.
Lol
How much money the world has lost by China's export covid? The number is hiking as we speak.
*
No it isnt. They have you by your throats.
darth5zaft
post Jun 21 2021, 02:07 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Mai189 @ Jun 21 2021, 11:06 AM)
No it isnt. They have you by your throats.
*
Don't oversell the chinese too much

As of now militarily they aren't that capable to threaten even Vietnam or pinoy by the neck what more us. If they could stop us drilling gas they would, the reason they didn't is because they couldn't.

Economic wise, they are a middle class export oriented country same as us, a relationship with them aren't as fruitful nor help us with our middle income traps (since they themselves are in it as well) as a relationship with rich consumption base economy of the west.
Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 02:15 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Jun 21 2021, 02:07 PM)
Don't oversell the chinese too much

As of now militarily they aren't that capable to threaten even Vietnam or pinoy by the neck what more us. If they could stop us drilling gas they would, the reason they didn't is because they couldn't.

Economic wise, they are a middle class export oriented country same as us, a relationship with them aren't as fruitful nor help us with our middle income traps (since they themselves are in it as well) as a relationship with rich consumption base economy of the west.
*
So many wumao here....
China=world
No China the world is suffering...lol

darth5zaft
post Jun 21 2021, 03:55 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 08:22 AM)
All pandemic and tension in SCS are China's present to the world.
Whatever and whoever ID before doesnt matter. Asean facing SCS issue. China assertive claiming whole SCS is asean problem and the world.
ID already prove can modernize their defence sector, hope they can grow stronger and faster.
Whose voice do you think can be heard to unite Asean? Next in line are Viet and Thai.
SG can ah?....lol
*
Don't undersell the sinkie too much, they are the biggest spenders on defense in asean, their military are highly mobile design for forward deployment, they can provide credible supplies lines and backups & unlike ID they seem more eager to take on the chinese.


ID can't be the shield between us & PRC simply because they don't want to. At least for now. They are public support for ID to be involved but like SK their gov doesn't seem to be very committed to it.

It does seem a lot of ASEAN countries got help probably from US to harmonize their defense spending to be competent individually but also compliment one another. Unlike MY & Pinoy that seem more or less stick to plans, ID seem trying hard to not do it.

Minimal essential force 2024 won't be achieved, there's no way they can get 150 jet & 150 surface combatants by 2024, they haven't increase defense spending nor reduce the size of the gurella style army
Infact the Rafale & fremm shows they going to do the same thing with leopard & apache. A feel good weapons but in minimal numbers to satisfied the locals voters rather than to create a credible expeditionary force.

ID try really hard to be neutral. They wanted to buy times, They try hard to not be too threatening to the chinese. But at the same time under pressure by neibors & citizens to counter the chinese. Maybe they change the stand by 2030 when their economy is among the 10th largest in the world with defense spending 300% then sinkie. But for now someone else has to man the fort. MY alone can't man the fort without SG assistance. SG had the tools, MY is trying to acquire the tools. ID ain't buying any tools for now.




darth5zaft
post Jun 21 2021, 04:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 02:15 PM)
So many wumao here....
China=world
No China the world is suffering...lol
*
Technically speaking ID/MY & SG are the one with hands on Chinese throats.

A simple blockage in the Singapore/malacca/makassar & sunda straits would bring chinese to their knees unable to acquire oil for war efforts, gas for electricity & factory nor even food to keep their citizens filled.


Lampuajaib
post Jun 21 2021, 05:29 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Jun 21 2021, 03:55 PM)
Don't undersell the sinkie too much, they are the biggest spenders on defense in asean, their military are highly mobile design for forward deployment, they can provide credible supplies lines and backups & unlike ID they seem more eager to take on the chinese.
ID can't be the shield between us & PRC simply because they don't want to. At least for now. They are public support for ID to be involved but like SK their gov doesn't seem to be very committed to it.

It does seem a lot of ASEAN countries got help probably from US to harmonize their defense spending to be competent individually but also compliment one another. Unlike MY & Pinoy that seem more or less stick to plans, ID seem trying hard to not do it.

Minimal essential force 2024 won't be achieved, there's no way they can get 150 jet & 150 surface combatants by 2024, they haven't increase defense spending nor reduce the size of the gurella style army
Infact the Rafale & fremm shows they going to do the same thing with leopard & apache. A feel good weapons but in minimal numbers to satisfied the locals voters rather than to create a credible expeditionary force.

ID try really hard to be neutral. They wanted to buy times, They try hard to not be too threatening to the chinese. But at the same time  under pressure by neibors & citizens to counter the chinese. Maybe they change the stand by 2030 when their economy is among the 10th largest in the world with defense spending 300% then sinkie. But for now someone else has to man the fort. MY alone can't man the fort without SG assistance. SG had the tools, MY is trying to acquire the tools. ID ain't buying any tools for now.
*
What the hell....
MY cant man the fort?

Mai189
post Jun 21 2021, 05:52 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Jun 21 2021, 02:07 PM)
Don't oversell the chinese too much

As of now militarily they aren't that capable to threaten even Vietnam or pinoy by the neck what more us. If they could stop us drilling gas they would, the reason they didn't is because they couldn't.

Economic wise, they are a middle class export oriented country same as us, a relationship with them aren't as fruitful nor help us with our middle income traps (since they themselves are in it as well) as a relationship with rich consumption base economy of the west.
*
What do you mean they do not threaten the Vietnamese or Pinoys? Theyve been sinking boats, even coast guard vessels from both countries. They can put a coast guard vessel in msian waters and you can do squat.

They are Msias largest investor now. Many of the engineering companies doing large scale projects are chinese. Msias economy will be in trouble if they leave. They can also stop the flow of Sinovac 2 you.

Laughable that you can put China and Msia in the same basket. Ones a world power. The other ones struggling to be relevant on the world stage.

This post has been edited by Mai189: Jun 21 2021, 05:58 PM
darth5zaft
post Jun 21 2021, 06:34 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Jun 21 2021, 05:29 PM)
What the hell....
MY cant man the fort?
*
What do you think.

Currently we have No AEW&C, no submarines detection capable MPA, no anti ship shore based missiles, no GBAD, ASW Frigates are on shore, no self propelled howatzer, no anti air gun, no mines laying ship, no sub hunting heli also on our own.

But we do have friends, they can provide the things we lack for now but ID like India doesn't have Allies, doesn't want to be in any alliance,want to berdiri atas kaki sendiri and thus they ain't going strong anytime soon.



123 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 09:04 PM