Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
123 Pages « < 83 84 85 86 87 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Military Thread V28

views
     
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 10:35 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 6 2021, 10:26 AM)
Want them to succeed?

Do like Korea. Buy local even if it is not cost effective.

Like just buy 100+ new Surion even if need to retire still perfectly operational Blackhawks.

Want deftech to survive? Buy Gempita 8x8 second batch.

Want SMEO to survive? Buy ammo from SMEO periodically, and sell old ammo overseas.

Want BNS to survive? Continue the Gowind project.
*
Like Proton?
No thanks.
TechSuper
post Oct 6 2021, 10:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2015


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Oct 6 2021, 10:35 AM)
Like Proton?
No thanks.
*
local shipbuilders can do the same job at a much cheaper price, and has more extensive experience.
they wanted to prop up bns, MMHE lost most of the skill needed building warships.
even hong leong lurssen tutup kedai. because of preferential treatment to bns.
back in 2016 or 2017 they declared profit, just because one of their law team found discrepancies in contract wording. not because of they are making real profit.
it's just to show the team in MoD who drew up the contracts are sh*t!
darth5zaft
post Oct 6 2021, 10:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(TechSuper @ Oct 6 2021, 10:45 AM)
local shipbuilders can do the same job at a much cheaper price, and has more extensive experience.
they wanted to prop up bns, MMHE lost most of the skill needed building warships.
even hong leong lurssen tutup kedai. because of preferential treatment to bns.
back in 2016 or 2017 they declared profit, just because one of their law team found discrepancies in contract wording. not because of they are making real profit.
it's just to show the team in MoD who drew up the contracts are sh*t!
*
It's not shit. It's them being force to do stuff by politicians things they didn't want to do. The moment said politicians are out of sight they reverted back, then another politicians force them back.

Like you already give an example for in aerospace industry. Self sufficiency create mediocrity. Not to mention having something like deftech & BNS for the military is
1) a total waste of their money, gempita is double the cost of other IFV
2) really detrimental towards national security. Having self sufficiency create a situation where politicians think it's ok to ditch MY traditional security providers, have a very independent foreign policy like sucking up to DaGe.

SG is very successful because they draw up their minister from the civil service. There's no such thing as political interference in SG planning, policy & acquisition. There's no such thing as politicians in SG just birokrat.
alexz23
post Oct 6 2021, 11:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Oct 6 2021, 10:45 AM)
local shipbuilders can do the same job at a much cheaper price, and has more extensive experience.
they wanted to prop up bns, MMHE lost most of the skill needed building warships.
even hong leong lurssen tutup kedai. because of preferential treatment to bns.
back in 2016 or 2017 they declared profit, just because one of their law team found discrepancies in contract wording. not because of they are making real profit.
it's just to show the team in MoD who drew up the contracts are sh*t!
*
Our local shipbuilding plan is bad.

we need
1. long term plan.

2. proper watertight contract with no mid way changes.

3. involvement of multiple shipyards, not just BNS.


PT PAL is an example where local shipbuilding was done right.

Even then, hard decisions was made even if it is not publicly mentioned.

For example in 2019-2021 they have planned empty slots for the build of SSV for Philippines and MRSS for Malaysia. But the orders did not materialize.

Indonesian government, rather than leave PT PAL idle, at last minute paid for 2 LPD to be designated as hospital ships. That is what it takes to have ingenious local shipbuilding capability.
Lampuajaib
post Oct 6 2021, 11:02 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
0 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 6 2021, 10:34 AM)
So compare PTDI to Embraer?

Brazil Embraer is many times more successful than PTDI.

Business jets (Phenom, Praetor), passenger jets (E-Jet), trainer (super tucano) all very popular all over the world.

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
*
Yes ..PT Di can be compared to Embraer, why not?
PT Di is smaller than Embraer....certainly nothing to discuss.

Your problem is if you compare PT DI to CTRM or UMW...No company in MY can design and make plane.

Even PT DI can build the whole body of EC725, they can not make them fly.....where do you think MY aero tech level? They waiting repeat order and can make if they are given parts spesification and dimension.
Maybe the raising Vietnam can replace us later as subcon because can make cheaper parts. Why not? All tech to make parts belong to the parent company.
Even if MY can still make those parts where want to sell?

This post has been edited by Lampuajaib: Oct 6 2021, 11:13 AM
TechSuper
post Oct 6 2021, 11:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2015


QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Oct 6 2021, 10:58 AM)
It's not shit. It's them being force to do stuff by politicians things they didn't want to do. The moment said politicians are out of sight they reverted back, then another politicians force them back.

Like you already give an example for in aerospace industry. Self sufficiency create mediocrity. Not to mention having something like deftech & BNS for the military is
1) a total waste of their money, gempita is double the cost of other IFV
2) really detrimental towards national security. Having self sufficiency create a situation where politicians think it's ok to ditch MY traditional security providers, have a very independent foreign policy like sucking up to DaGe.

SG is very successful because they draw up their minister from the civil service. There's no such thing as political interference in SG planning, policy & acquisition. There's no such thing as politicians in SG just birokrat.
*
politaik in malaysia tamak. everything also want to line their pocket.
junkyman
post Oct 6 2021, 11:05 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


With All Politikus and SONGLAP here, all those plans and talks are but - NATO / Empty talks only !!!!!!!!!!
azriel
post Oct 6 2021, 11:17 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012

HangPC2
post Oct 6 2021, 11:25 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا



BAE Systems Warton Aerodrome (Factory)



user posted image

user posted image




This post has been edited by HangPC2: Oct 6 2021, 11:26 AM
darth5zaft
post Oct 6 2021, 11:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Oct 6 2021, 08:51 AM)
As we all know ID orientation is know how and self sufficient. Boramae and KFX is 2 side of a coin. Buying rafale will open ID access to new tech in fighter jet weapon system, because US will not give any ToT. Although recently US give ID a capability MLU to upgrade their old F16 A/B locally but that will not help ID much.
*
Self sufficiency does create a mediocrity situation.

Look at SK. Their KFX & surion is basically a rebadged of stuff from the 70s being procure at way higher cost than this gen stuff like F35 & EC725.

TOT to acquired final assembly tech comes at the cost of far more profitable components contract trade off. Which lead to a situation where MY aerospace industry is 1000% higher than ID.


QUOTE(Lampuajaib @ Oct 6 2021, 10:08 AM)
And you still failed to understand when comparing ID and MY Aero indusrtry.
Even Honda uses subcon to build parts. Subcon can work if there is order from the parent company, all spesification and dimension parts are given. Even the parent company can set how much gain you can have if not they can find other to build for them.
Even Boeing and Airbus have subcon. Not all part are made by Boeing/airbus

Why you try so hard to compare? You must compare apple to apple then we can talk.
You can compare Boeing and Airbus or Embraer, Fokker, CASA and PT DI.

Sad thing is most major MY defence industries are failing.
Defrech, SMEO, BNS, are failling
*
Well for every $1 of Chinese export to US. $0.60 is components made in US send to china to do a final assembly point. Then resend back to US

China can banggalah make end product like Xiaomi or geely. But Chinese profit margin are tiny . US being the manufacturer of components & IP owner get high profit margin instead.

Major MY defense contractors are failing because they fail to provide value to our military other than sucking them dry and charge high price for a mediocre product.

TNI acquisition of EC725 is really interesting. Rather then stupidly build a custom heli plant for low yield production that increase the cost substantially. Just build the components domestically & send it to be assembled in France.
HangPC2
post Oct 6 2021, 11:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا



Chengdu J-10C



user posted image





darth5zaft
post Oct 6 2021, 11:29 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(TechSuper @ Oct 6 2021, 11:03 AM)
politaik in malaysia tamak. everything also want to line their pocket.
*
QUOTE(junkyman @ Oct 6 2021, 11:05 AM)
With All Politikus and SONGLAP here, all those plans and talks are but - NATO / Empty talks only !!!!!!!!!!
*
It was the rakyat own fault really.

Keep voting the same guy into office, for sure that what they would do.
HangPC2
post Oct 6 2021, 11:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: LANGKASUKA مليسيا



Baykar MIUS (Muharip Insansiz Ucak Sistemi)



user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image






azriel
post Oct 6 2021, 11:50 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Looks like Jokowi recently to follow Prabowo's master plan for Indonesia defense as an investment.

QUOTE
President Jokowi Calls for a Shift in Indonesia's Defense Policy

Antara - 05 October 2021 14:56 WIB

Jakarta: Indonesian President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) called for a shift in Indonesia's defense policy during the celebration of the 76th anniversary of the Indonesian Defense Forces (TNI) that took place at the courtyard of the Merdeka Palace in Jakarta on Tuesday.

"I asserted once more that we need to shift away from the defense spending policy to defense investment policy," President Jokowi said at the TNI anniversary celebration which was livened up with a show of a so called "Trimatra flight" from eight helicopters owned by the Indonesian army, navy, and air force. 

The participating choppers, including three AH-64 E Apache attack helicopters, carried the Red-and-White flag and TNI flag. 

President Jokowi emphasized the need for a long-term, systematic, consistent, and sustainable policy. Jokowi also advocated for continuous adoption and innovation of the latest technology.

In addition, he encouraged the nation to become more active within the consortium of the global defense industry, uphold the spirit of independence, and strengthen the domestic industry in order to a realize a more resilient Indonesia.


Read more: https://m.medcom.id/english/national/Wb74Pg...-defense-policy

Prabowo plan from a January article:

QUOTE
Prabowo Considers Defense System as Investment

Translator: Non Koresponden
Editor: Laila Afifa
24 January 2020 08:57 WIB

TEMPO.CO, Jakarta - Defense Minister Prabowo Subianto asserts that it is important for his ministry to conduct modernization and investment in the national defense. He is grateful since many parties have now understood and agreed upon this paradigm. 

"Alhamdulillah, state leaders and policymakers at the national level have now understood well on the importance of modernization of the military and investment in the defense; that the defense is an investment," he said at a press conference after the Annual Leadership Meeting (Rapim) at the Ministry of Defense office in Central Jakarta, Thursday, January 23, 2020. 

The Defense Minister viewed that a strong defense would guarantee a peaceful situation and it would create a good economy, inviting investors to invest in Indonesia.

"We need a safe and stable country. Therefore, we need a strong defense to maintain the integrity of our territory and our sovereignty," he said. 

The Minister is ready to fulfill the order from President Joko Widodo who asserts the sovereignty of Indonesia is undisputed. Thus, the Ministry of Defense is ready to support the National Armed Forces (TNI) in executing the task and that they will also be supported by other components including the universal defense system, said Prabowo.


https://en.tempo.co/read/1298981/prabowo-co...m-as-investment

This post has been edited by azriel: Oct 6 2021, 11:52 AM
darth5zaft
post Oct 6 2021, 11:52 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


QUOTE(alexz23 @ Oct 6 2021, 11:02 AM)
Our local shipbuilding plan is bad.

we need
1. long term plan.

2. proper watertight contract with no mid way changes.

3. involvement of multiple shipyards, not just BNS.
PT PAL is an example where local shipbuilding was done right.

Even then, hard decisions was made even if it is not publicly mentioned.

For example in 2019-2021 they have planned empty slots for the build of SSV for Philippines and MRSS for Malaysia. But the orders did not materialize.

Indonesian government, rather than leave PT PAL idle, at last minute paid for 2 LPD to be designated as hospital ships. That is what it takes to have ingenious local shipbuilding capability.
*
Unfortunately, you are getting our priorities wrong in our shipyards strategy.

We are not far off place like china or Korea that need to work hard to survive. They either build ship or they won't be in the maritime sector at all.We live in the middle of trade routes. Most shipyards in MY, Batam & SG specialized in refit, refurbishment & renovations because that's where the money is. PT PAL is far enough away from major trading route that buildings ship is the only way for them to ensure their survival.


Look at RSN acquisition, they are not really learning to design ship from scratch. They want to learn how to retrofitted. The LMV is basically a heavily modified Visby, the JMMV look like a flat top Damen enforcer while their MRCV look like a modification of their current LPD

ST engineering unlike deftech & BNS are not a dick that suck their military dry. They do provide value added service to RSN. The LMV is somewhere in the middle between Visby & arafura. It's give RSN an advantage compared to other off the shelf ship. Does a slightly bigger gowind but weapon are similar & custom weapon on pars give ATM any advantage? Nope! It's just money down the drain.

While BNS is pulling, i want to learn this, this & this and i can build this ,this & this for you. Now give me money RMN then buy my piece of shit that you don't want. ST engineering learn this or that to advance their commercial ship building while BNS doesn't really have any kinds of commercial customers.


TechSuper
post Oct 6 2021, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Jun 2015


QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Oct 6 2021, 11:52 AM)
Unfortunately, you are getting our priorities wrong in our shipyards strategy.

We are not far off place like china or Korea that need to work hard to survive. They either build ship or they won't be in the maritime sector at all.We live in the middle of trade routes. Most shipyards in MY, Batam & SG specialized in refit, refurbishment & renovations because that's where the  money is. PT PAL is far enough away from major trading route that buildings ship is the only way for them to ensure their survival.
Look at RSN acquisition, they are not really learning to design ship from scratch. They want to learn how to retrofitted. The LMV is basically a heavily modified Visby, the JMMV look like a flat top Damen enforcer while their MRCV look like a modification of their current LPD

ST engineering unlike deftech & BNS are not a dick that suck their military dry. They do provide value added service to RSN. The LMV is somewhere in the middle between Visby & arafura. It's give RSN an advantage compared to other off the shelf ship. Does a slightly bigger gowind but weapon are similar & custom weapon on pars give ATM any advantage? Nope! It's just money down the drain.

While BNS is pulling, i want to learn this, this & this and i can build this ,this & this for you. Now give me money RMN then buy my piece of shit that you don't want. ST engineering learn this or that to advance their commercial ship building while BNS doesn't really have any kinds of commercial customers.
*
BNS suck money dry, ST make money
atreyuangel
post Oct 6 2021, 02:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
406 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3°50'**.**"N - 103°16'**.**"E



QUOTE(junkyman @ Oct 6 2021, 11:05 AM)
With All Politikus and SONGLAP here, all those plans and talks are but - NATO / Empty talks only !!!!!!!!!!
*
plans and talks are made by the ATM

execution bukan laugh.gif
junkyman
post Oct 6 2021, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Jul 2012


QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 6 2021, 02:47 PM)
plans and talks are made by the ATM

execution bukan  laugh.gif
*
true when all songlap type ministers in charge !!!!!
Jaq_Ishmael P
post Oct 6 2021, 06:51 PM

New Member
*
Probation
0 posts

Joined: Sep 2019


MKM's precision strike sortie with PASKAU's GFAC team guidance during Ex Ababil 2021



user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image
azriel
post Oct 6 2021, 06:54 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
JS Kumano - Mogami Class Frigate. Such a beautiful ship.



123 Pages « < 83 84 85 86 87 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0282sec    0.28    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 07:08 AM