QUOTE(eq8all @ Feb 1 2008, 05:04 PM)
Not a Fender pro (far from it really...) here but I had my fair share. Can't really say about those bone or brass nuts.
Ps got some added mids growl (at least that's how I can describe it), I happen to own an old Yamaha ERB 300II PJ for years and had played both Fender and Squire Js and Ps. Thing is when it comes to tonal choices, I personally think that a J can easily cover that aspect over a P. Of course I can't say this out loud for everyone. Tried a J with hotter (I forgot which; Basslines or DiMarzio) pup set, it can give a P a good run but that still means that you should consider a pup transplant. The easiest method maybe is to notch up some more mids, level the lows and kill off the highs at EQs (choose your way; preamp or amp w/e works). Won't simulate a P exactly for sure but hey almost there is better than nowhere.
IMO these days, Squires are generally fine wherever MIx they'd come from. I'd just worry about the woods and assembly quality.
My 2 centslah. Let's wait for other low end gurus like bassraptor or bassix bros' posts. Should be interesting.
I kinda did something opposite, to some degree. I hate how the strings all have different volumes because of the pickup's natural conditioning, and i can't fit an active into my bass (not that i want one tho). What i tried to do was balance out all the string volume with my EQ. Heres the story lol:
Mine came with a single P in mid position, so I started with an advantage. P already has a darker sound with more midrange and bass than a J, and it was parked in the middle, so I got an equal natural balance from the strings

so my EQ is now a
/ line.
Just me, but I liked the idea of balancing string volumes so there wont be an awkward change in volume as i string skip and jump all over the place.
I was actually wondering what would happen if you had a P at bridge and a J at neck, since that would be a natural balancing of string tonality and pickup attributes. Anyone has a bass with that setup?