I worked there for 2 months about 10 years ago. HR called me to offer me the jobs 1-2 days after the interview. I accepted the jobs and request for offer letter before tender resignation. She said ok and my offer will be ready in few days. So I drive up to Ipoh to pick up the letter on following week. I am surprise to learn that they only provide me with simple 1 page letter (but didn't think too much) and will only provide another official letter when I report to work. Anyway, I accepted the job because I am desperate situation.
So, I resign from company in KL and move up to Ipoh. HR required me to sign Letter of appointment on the first day with the term that shock me. But I am in situation where I resigned from company in KL, move to Ipoh and rent the house. So I have no choice but to sign the letter. I didn't work with the son and daughter. I remember the second man in the company at that time was Reuben Poh, a relative from wife side. (BP stand for Beh & Poh). I didn't clash with anyone, but I saw myself all the horribly thing that people mentioned in this forum. I left the company after 2 months and they threaten to sue me to compensate them 6 months’ salary because of clause 7 on the letter of appointment.
It was 10 years ago but I still feel obligate to expose them so other didn't fall into the trap. So I upload the offer letter and letter of appointment that they require all employee to sign.
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9JFA.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9JFA.md.jpg </a>
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9XB6.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9XB6.md.jpg </a>
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9yGq.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9yGq.md.jpg </a>
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9OCI.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2022/08/26/Bs9OCI.md.jpg </a>

1. The contract is not bond.
2. The contract obviously bersifat berat sebelah and doesn’t justify the need to compensate 6 months’ salary.
3. Probationers 24 hours termination notice is acceptable, it needs a lengthier explanation, otherwise need to give ample period time.
4. The contract did not let legal dept to go through and approve the content?
5. Even the contract has been more than 10 years, anyone can go file complaint and notify JTK or any relevant of MOHR regarding this (if the company still practice the same)

1. The contract is not bond.
2. The contract obviously bersifat berat sebelah and doesn’t justify the need to compensate 6 months’ salary.
3. Probationers 24 hours termination notice is acceptable, it needs a lengthier explanation, otherwise need to give ample period time.
4. The contract did not let legal dept to go through and approve the content?
5. Even the contract has been more than 10 years, anyone can go file complaint and notify JTK or any relevant of MOHR regarding this (if the company still practice the same)

Biar betik Clause 7 ... legal ke clause ni?

Fuck bp healthcare boikot them
But I seriously lul at this dato. Kong the dump

Dafug he treat all employee like this and I’m suprise still got suckers working there. Sohei meh?

This turning into another lim kok wing story

In healthcare business but died so young. So rich and yet so bully employees. Got Dato title so he think won't die at young age ah?

This fella the son just passed away recently right?

Clause 7 is just criminal. Easily can go to court and win big. But need to spend time and money which most people don't have.

According to latest USA standard, any monetary labour bond is deem slavery
Kekwa

lmao what do u mean contract is not bond? pls explain

if u accept and sign, it’s legally binding

Confirm can't fly lo this clause. Sendiri syok sendiri de clause.

if u accept and sign, it’s legally binding

if u accept and sign, it’s legally binding

if u accept and sign, it’s legally binding

regardless its the same intention. which is to bind you because they invested in you.
so im quite surprised that people seem to look at it like a rare pokemon
although whether legally enforceable or not im not sure. because its quite unfair, you train someone so that he can do the job better. plus, what kind of training costs 1 year of an employee's pay? if its that expensive then the employee pay should be high pay not pay someone 2k but ask him to attend a 24k course , doesnt make sense. 

unless he really kns , quit immediately upon completing the training, e.g company sponsor external paper but you cabut after getting it using company money. on the other hand, actually your company already benefitted a bit because when you are studying for external papr you can apply the knowledge to your work already.

any HR or lawyer got experience dealing with the above?

BS

Malaysia company usually no proper & professional HR.....many boss think they are the master of everything

you watch too many movie liao....

if he is a bad paymaster, a proper invoice also he can skip payment....what do you think about this piece of LO?

I dare him to bring this to court

it is not if the letter is not draft according to the law....very weak or no much binding power

Thank god I never took up their offer.

I heard this Dato got mistresses.... most his office ladies..... Is it true? Any staff here who know?
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2021/10/29/BVl4F5.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2021/10/29/BVl4F5.md.jpg </a>
<a href='https://pictr.com/images/2021/10/29/BVln8V.md.jpg' target='_blank'>https://pictr.com/images/2021/10/29/BVln8V.md.jpg </a>

if u accept and sign, it’s legally binding

No I don't serve them directly. But their factories are my companys customers. You hear stories from ppl who work there about their big bosses attitude. And some of it you can also tell when they squeeze you when It comes to negotiating supply contract. But masuk interview it's always value our suppliers, staff first all that shit

Seems legit
Someone declared false positive from bp

Counter check with another lab it is negative