Holy fucking retarded idiot.

YOUTUBE ONLY PROVIDE THE PLATFORM BETWEEN TWO LEGAL TEAMS TO FIGHT OVER THIS DISPUTE.
Youtube literally made it the same as REAL WORLD when they transition from community based website to a more corporate video website.
Where the fuck have you been all this time?

When TS filed for a strike, he essentially representing himself in a legal battle against this youtuber over a copy right claim.
The reason why YouTube automatically took the video down is to protect themselves. They are liable as long as they let the video under legal dispute goes up on their website.

This youtuber then need to file a counter notification against TS legal team, essentially presenting their argument against TS himself.
Two things gonna happen, TS retract their claim and YouTube automatically restore the vid when he does that.
Or TS refuse to do so, and if this happen the youtuber legal team can take this to a court.
Both side then argue their case in front of a judge.

TS can also argue on the basis of DMCA copyright infringement claim. DMCA circumvents fair use argument..

No matter which argument you try to use, the law is firmly on TS side here.

Yes, I actually do own any fan art that depict my creation, or a likeness to said creation (depend on how big of a cunt I am).

Does this make it clear?

that guy look like another smelly fat-fuck

his room must be stink AF

geli

Done lipoting, hope the best for TS.. 

#kitajagakita

You do know there are movie review channels and reaction channels on Youtube that operates the same way right under fair use right?

Youtuber generally avoid copyrighted materials because of the hassle fighting a mega corporation legal team that can drag them to court and keep dragging the case endlessly.

You do know there are movie review channels and reaction channels on Youtube that operates the same way right under fair use right?

Youtuber generally avoid copyrighted materials because of the hassle fighting a mega corporation legal team that can drag them to court and keep dragging the case endlessly.

Genuine question. By "comment on it", do you mean people make reference to the artwork and critique it or something like that? Cos from what I watched in the video, the guy claims his editor put it in and he wasn't aware of it.

ok this cb is a male version karen. sendiri use copyright material without permission and blame youtube.. stupid idiot.

seriously like this also can reach 21 pages 

Again TS did not risk destroying the YouTuber career, it’s the YouTuber who did that to himself for not taking control and accounts for the content he posted. Learn to take some self responsibility instead of blaming others for one’s own screwups.

the artist can make parody art under fair use, but fair use does not allow the artist to claim a strike on someone that makes a comment on it in his own work, because fair use protects the commentator as well.

that's just how it works 

Typical snowflake sjw who thinks the world owes youtubers a living. Just like any other jobs if it’s your source of income it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to take care of your own fucking ricebowl. That includes not doing anything that could risk people striking your video.

You did something wrong then it’s you need to face the consequences not cry like a baby when things go south and play victim saying this person should have contacted me first instead of reporting me. Heck, u must be a beta cuck, if someone breaks into your house you also invite him to have coffee first and ask him to leave nicely right? Coz reporting him to the cops would ruin his livelihood.
Learn to look at the root cause of things not at people’s reactions. You sound like a bitch who did something wrong then when people retaliate seek sympathy by saying that was too harsh. Boo hoo, the world is a harsh place.

I guess based on your logic if someone tried to rape a girl and only manage to put it the tip of his dick then it’s not rape coz there’s no full on penetration huh? It’s just 2 seconds of the dick on the outer layers of the vagina, so let’s just let it go.
Oi cibai, when you run a YouTube channel you’re responsible for the content and anything your member of staff do.

Again TS did not risk destroying the YouTuber career, it’s the YouTuber who did that to himself for not taking control and accounts for the content he posted. Learn to take some self responsibility instead of blaming others for one’s own screwups.
Giving leeway is a courtesy not a right. Again no one owes youtubers a living.

Heck, based on this mentality you must be a najib supporter, he makes a living by songlapping, people should give him the chance to return the money he songlap instead of reporting him and putting him on trial. Now his whole livelihood is ruined. TOPKEK!
Again, perhaps it’s time you youtubers stop being whiny snowflakes and learn to be responsible for your own actions.

Copyright claim between TS and TheQuartering does not falls under DMCA, just because you can make the claim does not means it can be applied.

Also false DMCA claim is an offense under US law.

hm, if that's true, then it still can be considered "reporting" (i.e. adding pictures to illustrate what is being talked about). but i dunno, i'm not expert in this 

fair enough, the owner does own the art, and others can use the art as part of a commentary.

i thought for manual copyright strike, youtube would at least go through the claims manually before giving you a strike?
well Cr1tikal also did mentioned how hard it is to get in touch with an actual human from Youtube side of things (including Markiplier had problems trying to contact them so you have to rely on raising as much racket as possible)

yup.. that copyright protection falls firmly under DMCA restrictions. TS can use the DMCA to fight any lawsuit on fair use of his material and win.

Mat Salleh would be stupid to take this to court. He will lose for sure.

What he SHOULD do now is to remove TS artwork and re-create the video. Problem solved..

1) he didn't apply it.. YOUTUBE automatically did.

2) Yes, yes he can use DMCA. He is the original author of his material. He has every right on how and where it can be used.

dude you could have contacted him first instead of going for a strike straight
apparently, Youtube system is pretty terrible and they have very little leeway with strikes
if you watch his video, he says that he doesn't blame you but rather Youtube's system

personally I don't like his content, too sensationalized, dramatic

1) he didn't apply it.. YOUTUBE automatically did.

2) Yes, yes he can use DMCA. He is the original author of his material. He has every right on how and where it can be used.

If TS had PMed him to remove the image and straight away copyright strike him then can la. Now got that strike on the account, that's the problem.
TS said he copyright strike the video , not Youtube auto.