oh wait this ended up in serious k  oh well i suppose i have to answer with some seriousness
judicial review dont work this way 
you will need evidence to prove that you indeed went up to genting, see s. 101, 102 and 103 of Evidence Act

timid need to show, through evidence, imho, mainly 2 things, 1. there is Texas hold'em poker tables in genting (notwithstanding; (1) the possibility that there are only "Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker games" in genting based on the information made available on genting's official website, (2) that the court may take judicial notice on the fact that Texas hold'em Poker and Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker in 2 distinct game as they are general knowledge on arts and history [i think gambling is an art and part of human history] and (3) therefore both party having made a fundamental mistake as to the fact, i.e. the definition of "texas hold'em poker", the agreement/contract is void s.21 of the Contracts Act) and 2. timid's allegation that he had went up to genting, etc on evidence

all that said, agreement by way of wager like this is void and unenforceable under s.31 of the Contracts Act anyway

while it is true that one may sue based on a promise which forms an oral agreement between parties, hence promissory estoppel, you must still show that you have suffered losses due to the promise as it is one of the key element to mount a suit based on promissory estoppel and the basic principle of evidence still need to be fulfilled
if anything I can only imagine the losses timid would have suffered is his travel expenses up to genting, which he need to prove in evidence, perhaps in form of his gps travel logs/toll payments/hotel expenses if he overnight there/etc
uamcy is known to be lamtin dupe, he loves to quote random legal principle online that he read somewhere and apply it to his favourable/preferred outcome

edit: hanging sentence

lol... are you LamTin.????

Did you manage to provide proof that you went up to Genting?

Toll Receipts? TouchnGo/RFID/PayDirect receipt? Genting Parking receipt? Grab Receipt?

If you did went up, you should've had those receipts/proof on hand; else your statement shall be invalid.
EDIT: Tagging LamTin.

kiddo, of course, my argument is based on the assumption that timidandslow can provide all the evidence. You just entered the bar 1-2 years already so cocky huh and graduated from a low tier university.

Your law firm Darryl & Loh paid you to name-calling and playing Kopitiam during office hours?

kiddo, of course, my argument is based on the assumption that timidandslow can provide all the evidence. You just entered the bar 1-2 years already so cocky huh and graduated from a low tier university.

Your law firm Darryl & Loh paid you to name-calling and playing Kopitiam during office hours?

We'll start from the beginning how this happened ok?
You wanna show hand with me in poker no? I told ya...you can't coz there is no hold em there , but since you insisted it's there go ahead prove it....you wanna play a show hand with me pulak and say you are right

Go read this:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_hold_%27em

In b4 change TnC lagi.....Damm I need search the post

To be straight....how this happened is this idiot wanna show hand with me
Let the pic tell the story


cc:2feidei hksgmydavez89larrypizzaguy@

from ts statement, the bets deal only just to prove  "texas hold em poker" exist in genting casino only, and ts did approve it exist in genting casino and the other party should honor the bet. so how come how  "texas hold em poker" being play and how ts getting the prove include in the bet? maybe ts not stated the bet deals in fully here?

counselor, please proceed to present your evidence of:

1    accepted the terms of the agreement;
2    detailed all of the essential terms in the agreement;
3    exchanged promises;
4    the capacity to consent; and
5    an intention to form legal relations.

dismissed till next hearing.

kiddo, of course, my argument is based on the assumption that timidandslow can provide all the evidence. You just entered the bar 1-2 years already so cocky huh and graduated from a low tier university.

Your law firm Darryl & Loh paid you to name-calling and playing Kopitiam during office hours?

No, I do not have any concrete evidence to say you are lamtin dupe, you are absolutely right, what I have is as much as you have that I'm a lawyer that work in Darryl & Loh and Darryl & Loh is a real law firm 

also how "uamcy" would have known what is my profession?

Sorry, I don't work in a law firm, as I have repeatedly told lamtin. (a dupe of lamtin that have ceased to be online) before, so I can't check for you what "my firm" charge for a tort case, perhaps this is more helpful than asking me - https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/list/find/l...rsonal-injuries

I have to keep my reply serious, this is serious /k

Lol, you don't understand me. I don't go for a losing battle. I won't take my future clients for a ride.

When I've said something, it means I can prove it.

So you really want me to prove that you are an associate from Darryl & Loh?

oh wait this ended up in serious k  oh well i suppose i have to answer with some seriousness
judicial review dont work this way 
you will need evidence to prove that you indeed went up to genting, see s. 101, 102 and 103 of Evidence Act

timid need to show, through evidence, imho, mainly 2 things, 1. there is Texas hold'em poker tables in genting (notwithstanding; (1) the possibility that there are only "Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker games" in genting based on the information made available on genting's official website, (2) that the court may take judicial notice on the fact that Texas hold'em Poker and Progressive Texas Hold'em Poker in 2 distinct game as they are general knowledge on arts and history [i think gambling is an art and part of human history] and (3) therefore both party having made a fundamental mistake as to the fact, i.e. the definition of "texas hold'em poker", the agreement/contract is void s.21 of the Contracts Act) and 2. timid's allegation that he had went up to genting, etc on evidence

all that said, agreement by way of wager like this is void and unenforceable under s.31 of the Contracts Act anyway

while it is true that one may sue based on a promise which forms an oral agreement between parties, hence promissory estoppel, you must still show that you have suffered losses due to the promise as it is one of the key element to mount a suit based on promissory estoppel and the basic principle of evidence still need to be fulfilled
if anything I can only imagine the losses timid would have suffered is his travel expenses up to genting, which he need to prove in evidence, perhaps in form of his gps travel logs/toll payments/hotel expenses if he overnight there/etc
uamcy is known to be lamtin dupe, he loves to quote random legal principle online that he read somewhere and apply it to his favourable/preferred outcome

edit: hanging sentence

i think the 1st point is to show that there is a firm called Darryl & Loh?

O wise one,  what is your view on recent turn of events.

1. previously destiny has denied me payment on the basis that the table in genting is not"player vs player" texas hold em

2. now he has given the payment to another party in this thread, for rendering the exact same services that i was originally contracted to provide.

https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/4882895

3. is this mala fide on the part of destiny? do i have just cause to claim damages?

I thought you have already acknowledged that Darryl & Loh is a legit law firm?

So how? You really want me to prove it with evidence only you won't be lying that you are not an associate from Darryl & Loh?

sorry I'm confused, have I ever said Darryl & Loh is a legit law firm? please remind me, I couldn't have claim Darryl & Loh exist when they don't, could you kindly point to me where I have said so?

This one. Just a simple search will do.

So how? You really want me to prove it with evidence only you won't be lying that you are not an associate from Darryl & Loh?

This one. Just a simple search will do.

So how? You really want me to prove it with evidence only you won't be lying that you are not an associate from Darryl & Loh?

Raja, Darryl & Loh

vs

Darryl & Loh
Yup, lamtin all right...

Thanks for clearing out that I don't work there. I also found "Tung Tze Tzing" at the law firm website. I'm kaemon, not Tung Tze Tzing.

Also, lets not screw around here, its serious /k and its not even your thread.

Who trolling first by claiming I am lamtin without evidence? If you did nothing wrong, why are you afraid to even admit your real name? Where is your integrity?

Do you know who else frequently uses these words?

LamTin.

Conlan79firm, TS is LamTin. dupe replying!

---

Btw, TS you still couldn't prove to us with traveling receipts that you drove up to Genting.

Pictures can be fakes, and for all we know, you could've took the photo from other Resort World Genting / Took the photo at a different time / Download from the internet / Photo from 3rd Party.

---

Like I said, go up, take pic with your username, time stamp and the texas sign board to settle this case.

I'm one of them, but definitely not the 1st in this thread 

likewise you can't prove who kaemon is irl, whatever you say is merely hearsay saje, perhaps i got no integrity, but why do you even care someone online got integrity or not 

ex-public uni law grad here, now working in one of the mentioned law firm by one of the /k

in my place, we generally prefer foreign grads. however we do have local grad from public uni working as lawyers (lets forget about pupillage, anyone with half a brain can get into anywhere for pupillage) besides UUM right now, i myself came from a what i would call the real lower spectrum of local uni in malaysia XD most of the lawyers (also pupils) are from overseas and UOL external